Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Call of Duty 2 Interview

PC Xbox 360 Interview by John Walker

28 September, 2005

After the recent announcement of a release date for the Xbox 360, it's a pleasure to report that we've had our sticky mitts on one already, and even better, played a selection of levels from the forthcoming PC/360 release, Call of Duty 2.

Anyone who played the previous version of the WWII first-person shooter will need to know nothing more than that it's being developed once again by the same team, and it's following the same formula of multiple chapters playing soldiers from different countries. Short of some inexplicable mass-hysteria at Infinity Ward, and the levels we played being removed and replaced with, who knows, photographs of the developers on the toilet, it appears fairly safe to get your hopes up. Those who did not pick up the PC's Call of Duty, or perhaps were unfortunate enough to have only seen Spark's disappointing console ‘port', will want a bit more convincing. Thank goodness we're here.

We had the good sense to talk to Infinity Ward's president, Grant Collier, and ask him how the development progress has been, and whether being one of the first to develop for a next gen console is a smooth ride.

Eurogamer: Call of Duty was obviously an enormous success, and still stands out as one of the most evocative and engaging first-person shooters we've seen. We've noticed that you've done away with health packs, but what aspects of the original have you maintained?

Grant Collier: The cinematic intensity. The large-scale infantry battles, having a hundred a side. The multiple storylines. Different perspectives. Oh, and a really great multiplayer game. We spent a lot of time on CoD1, making sure we had a real streamlined and robust multiplayer. I've played 64-player games of multiplayer CoD, which is amazing. So we wanted to make sure we had that streamlined and rich experience - we wanted to keep that type of clean net code that would support clan gaming for those who want to play competitively.

Eurogamer: So with all that in place, what's changed?

Grant Collier: Some big changes from CoD1 to CoD 2 came from the feedback from consumers. We asked, and they said they didn't necessarily like the style we did for the British campaign - it was solo or with a small squad - and they really liked the Russians and they really liked the Americans. But with the Brits, they felt like they'd already played that game before - they'd already played the one man, Rambo, going through the war single-handedly. Now the British campaign is heavy infantry fighting, and not special ops any more.

'Call of Duty 2' Screenshot dday

Eurogamer: And there are some tactical changes too, right?

Grant Collier: Yeah, we also got together with our military adviser, Hank, and asked him what was missing from CoD1. He said that first off, it's too quiet out there. The guns are blazing, and the planes are flying overhead, but in a battlefield, once the first shot is fired, there's a lot of chatter. We've created a context-sensitive battle-chatter system. They can see their friends and foes, and they're going to call that information out to their allies. "I'm out of ammo." "I'm wounded." "Back me up." The enemies will do the same, relaying information about where you are. The other thing he said was missing was portable concealment, part of warfare for several hundred years.

Eurogamer: Portable concealment?

Grant Collier: Portable Concealment is basically smoke. We've created our own proprietary system, no longer using the Quake 3 system, that will allow us to have smoke grenades which are used throughout the game, changing the tactics you use. When explosions go off, it's not just a puff of smoke that appears and is then gone. There will be a brilliant explosion, and then smoke billowing, and smouldering. Adding smoke has so dramatically changed the way the game plays. You'll be having a fire-fight, when suddenly a soldier will throw shit-loads of smoke grenades at you, and all these guys come rushing through the smoke and rifle-butt you down. Heh, melee is very lethal in the game.

Eurogamer: You mentioned that you're no longer using the same engine. What made you decide to create something yourselves?

Grant Collier: When we started designing CoD2, we tasked the designers with taking the experience to the next level. They came back to us saying, "We're going to do non-linear gameplay." We said, "Hey, great idea," and set out to see how we could make the game, and realised that we couldn't use any of the stuff that we'd used before. It was worthless. Before, we always knew where the player was going to be, and there were never going to be any enemies behind you. You followed a little path, and maybe it was a great ride, but the AI always knew where you were, would always point their gun in a certain direction, and certainly didn't need to be as smart as they are now.

'Call of Duty 2' Screenshot tankback

Eurogamer: They seemed a lot cleverer. We were quite thrown when they started playing tricks on us.

Grant Collier: Now they have vision cones and hearing ranges - they're very autonomous. They have extensive knowledge of what can be used as cover, what the level layout is - they need to know everything about the level when they're moving around. When you're attacking the Germans, and they're pressed, they'll fall back and retreat. Then they'll try to set up ambushes. When they move around to flank you, if they come across other friendlies they'll tag them and bring them with. Once they find you, they'll relay that information to their fellow soldiers. If you speak German, you'll hear them say, "They're over here, let's flank them."

Eurogamer: So that explains the non-linearity within the levels, giving the opponents the capability to cope with your improvising, but what about the missions' non-linearity. How does that work?

Grant Collier: You start in 1941 with the Russians, defending Moscow from the Germans. You can move through a story-driven path all the way through the Russian missions, or, as you hit 1942 you unlock the British infantry campaign in North Africa, then in 1943 you open up the British tank commander campaign in N Africa. Then 1944 starts off with the Americans on D-Day. You can jump back and forth through these campaigns, as long as you unlock them chronologically.

Eurogamer: Something that probably most stood out to us when we played CoD1 was the astonishing emotional honesty. Killing people hurt, and when it stopped hurting, noticing that hurt worse. You seem to actually give a shit about the subject matter - where does that come from?

Grant Collier: We spent a lot of time talking with veterans. From day one, we always wanted to be extremely respectful of what those people went through, the sacrifices they made. It totally shaped the Western world. We've always wanted to talk to the veterans and bring them and, and we have a lot of pride in what we do. We've never once had a veteran tell us that he was ashamed of the fact that we were making this game. That's a real honour. It's been a real honour to tell their story, and to do it in a tasteful fashion.

'Call of Duty 2' Screenshot splash

Eurogamer: Obviously it's been exciting to see CoD2 running on 360. It looked pretty awesome, something that can't have been that easy to achieve on brand new tech.

Grant Collier: The 360 - it's like this whole new era of gaming. This probably would have been a PC-only title if Microsoft hadn't come to Activision and asked Infinity Ward to do an exclusive for the 360. That was a real honour - we've had a great relationship with them. They've been able to help us out tremendously. But multiple threading - that has been a really challenging thing. I don't want to blow any smoke your way, but it has been challenging.

Eurogamer: So how on earth do you go about meeting that challenge, especially with the pressure of being a launch title?

Grant Collier: At IW, we try to tackle the riskiest, most difficult things first. We allocate a certain amount f time in the beginning, and that's when we start beating on that shit, and if it's not working at the end of that time, then we know we're just not going to deal with it and move on. But when we do get it working, we have the entire development period to tweak it and make it better. And the multi-threading stuff, now we have it working, we're running at 60fps on the 360, which is very nice.

Eurogamer: Do you think there's an audience out there equipped to take full advantage of the 360's framerate and hi-def output?

Grant Collier: Well, I have a real pimped out home entertainment system. I've got a 60 inch plasma screen, and surround sound, and gigantic sub woofer, and it's begging for 5.1 games, and for hi-definition games. The games look so much better than everything else that I'm used to. It really is next generation.

Call of Duty 2 is coming to the PC and Xbox 360 in mid November via Activision; not to be confused with Call of Duty 2: Big Red One for PS2 and Xbox, that we recently previewed.

Advertisement

Are you excited about Call of Duty 2 on PC/Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-33 of 33 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Yazoo
28/09/05 @ 10:21
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Grant Collier: Well, I have a real pimped out home entertainment system. I've got a 60 inch plasma screen, and surround sound, and gigantic sub woofer, and it's begging for 5.1 games, and for hi-definition games

Nooo, he asked if the "audience" has that, way to end on a big-cheese boast ;) Did he pull away down Palm Beach in a Ferrari after he said that? heh
statix101
28/09/05 @ 10:26
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Just tried this on my Pc...and my 9800pro nearly had a heart attack...jerk'o'vision....
So the choice is new gfx card at £300 or an X360.....hmmmm
octo
28/09/05 @ 10:27
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm HD ready and looking forward to this immensely.

statix101
28/09/05 @ 10:29
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"we're running at 60fps on the 360, which is very nice."

Take note, other lazy ass developers....it can be done.
Yossarian
28/09/05 @ 10:32
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
sounds good, although military shooters have never really been my thing.
trevd72
28/09/05 @ 10:37
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Do you think there's an audience out there equipped to take full advantage of the 360's framerate and hi-def output? "

his response was basically "not really, but sod them cos i have loads of dosh. piracy hitting developers is a myth you see. I will get to play it on a top set up so who cares. its my game anyway"
Yazoo
28/09/05 @ 10:38
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yossarian; if in doubt try the original Call of Duty on the PC, which was awesome. Hopefully a console/pc simultaneous release won't take the distinctly PC and user friendly edge off the new game
Ceatlan
28/09/05 @ 10:53
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
statix101 'Take note, other lazy ass developers....it can be done.'

statix, this almost certainly is not the case in 99% of cases. Its more down to marketing/sales/finance demanding that games be released at a certain date and not allowing time to spit and polish a product. And no matter what YOU think, getting a game to run at 60FPS instead of 30FPS will always be considered a spit and polish optimisation done right at the very end, and never be considered a reason to delay a release by anybody whose job revolves around money.

Unfortunately very few developers are able to take the 'we'll release it when its done' attitude, in fact most are forced to release games when they personally know full well that they stink in several areas. Its rather insulting to call somebody lazy in an industry when most people work stupidly long hours.

Ceatlan
TILT
28/09/05 @ 10:54
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I wonder if this article will also be construed to be, in some way, anti-xbox360-ish. And further, if it will convince the "EG are anti-xbox Sony lackeys" crowd to make up their fanboy minds. Oh well... sounds like a fun game.
bootsy_NL_30
28/09/05 @ 11:00
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
man EG are so anti xbox...whats your problem guys I mean come on!

there, happy? :P

maybe there could be a Ninty revolution version of this ...Mario and Luigi's adventure in Normandy ....just imagine how many pokemon sprites you could have on screen at one time and zap them with your remote just by randomly waving your tv remote (sorry revolution controller) all over the screen ...

ok I'm just stirring up discontent,someone has to start an arguement in this forum!
chappers
28/09/05 @ 11:03
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
statix101, i'm surprised it didn't run very well on your 9800pro, i've got a FX5700 and the game seemed fine at 1024x768.
statix101
28/09/05 @ 11:12
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"statix101, i'm surprised it didn't run very well on your 9800pro, i've got a FX5700 and the game seemed fine at 1024x768"

I was doing a like for like comparison to COD1 with all settings set max, 4xAA and 16xAF...just so i could see how much more demanding COD2 would be...

even with eveything set to minimum, no AA or AF,800x600, i was only getting 20-30fps.....and it looked shit..:))
Darren
28/09/05 @ 11:45
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The PC demo is awesome both in its gameplay and visuals which are a noticeable leap over the previous game in terms of detail and animation. Only the disappointingly non-interactive levels (why can't I shoot and break a vase or box?) let it down slightly as does the poor water effects, which are lacking in refraction/reflection effects.

I'm definitenly buying this game for the Xbox 360. It runs fine on my PC at 1280x1024, maximum settings but somehow the thought of playing it on a 26" HDTV with DD5.1 surround sound and at a solid 60fps makes the console version far more appealing. Oh and did I mention how excellent it's bound to be on Xbox Live with it's standard headset for voice communication...?
kangarootoo
28/09/05 @ 11:54
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Ceatlan

Outstanding post. Saved me a load of grumpy typing there.
Talha
28/09/05 @ 11:54
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh Darren, are you saying that this game makes more sense when you just have to buy the frigging game and not spend a fortune on upgrading your machine, and - gulp! - even DARING to suggest that it will be a BETTER experience? Oooh, you have just committed a blasphemy.

Now tremble in horror as some 7800 GTX wielding sicko tells you off for preferring a console to that haloed machine, the PC, and another one tells you off to sod off if you can't afford PC gaming.
kangarootoo
28/09/05 @ 12:38
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
:) Well said.
Dire
28/09/05 @ 12:43
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
not everybody has a HDTV though :/ won't that make it a bit unfair on xbox live multiplayer as the HDTV people will have a advantage of being able to see more of the battlefield?

Hardly a level playing field.
MoFo
28/09/05 @ 12:59
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I get this odd feeling playing this demo which i cant really explain. It feels "clunky". Something about the movement or maybe the collision just feels odd. My best comparison would be to RTCW. That game movement felt smooth, collision with scenery around you felt nice. Where as CoD2 it just doesnt quite feel right. Dont get me wrong, I think what they've done from playing the demo is pretty fantastic but this does leave a nagging issue in my mind as I run around the levels.

Anyone else get this or am I just being really fussy?
kangarootoo
28/09/05 @ 13:00
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I guess the same issue applies to PC gaming already. Not sure how much of an impact that has on things there. Although turning down detail levels to increase fps is common, I'm not how many people turn down detail so they can increase res and get a clearer view of distant objects. Can anyone fill in the blanks here?
Dire
28/09/05 @ 13:29
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
fluffy we don't even know if the demo has been optimised yet :S
tengu
28/09/05 @ 14:29
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
No, it's this gen's Dreamcast. A '.5' if you will :)
frankie33
28/09/05 @ 14:30
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"BUT IS IT REALLY NEXT GEN ?!"

Yes, are you stupid you can't have two Xbox's in the same generation.
w00t
28/09/05 @ 14:33
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I like the sound of this... Could be very good. The AI sounds intriguing.
UncleLou
28/09/05 @ 17:02
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh Darren, are you saying that this game makes more sense when you just have to buy the frigging game and not spend a fortune on upgrading your machine, and - gulp! - even DARING to suggest that it will be a BETTER experience? Oooh, you have just committed a blasphemy.

Now tremble in horror as some 7800 GTX wielding sicko tells you off for preferring a console to that haloed machine, the PC, and another one tells you off to sod off if you can't afford PC gaming.


Heh, usually I always see console gamers touting how it's a much better and more comfortable experience (just because they own no decent chairs).

Anyway, playing it on my PC which I already have and which runs the demo perfectly fine is a lot cheaper than buying an Xbox 360. Not to mention that the game will be cheaper, too. ;)

/couldn't resist
Pablo2k5
28/09/05 @ 17:50
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
LeDilettante "but makes you look gay"

Playing games on a console makes you look 12 years old, PCs are for grown ups ;)
UncleLou
28/09/05 @ 18:10
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
but makes you look gay ;-D

Oh, I don't mind looking gay for a superior gaming experience. :D
stoopidgreg
28/09/05 @ 19:08
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
so much for games not reaching 60fps on the 360...
alpha-0ne
28/09/05 @ 19:45
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
my hdtv is waiting 60fps and 60 players online !!
Seifer
28/09/05 @ 23:06
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
" No, it's this gen's Dreamcast. A '.5' if you will :)"

I wish that were true , I mean DoA still looks better on the DC then it does on PS2 :)
beep
28/09/05 @ 23:56
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If the 360 can run this game at a solid 60fps, I will eat my own shit. I suspect developer hype is striking again.

/looking forward to eating own shite now :)
Talha
29/09/05 @ 05:13
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
UncleLou - you had me on that one. Somehow it slipped my mind that this will ship on X360, not XBox180!

As for being a console gamer, I am just a gamer, both console and PC (I own a half-decent one). And I wish it was a matter of comfortable chairs - it is more a matter of expensive hardware. I don't mind being called 12 year old if it means actiually making a living on a salary and feeding the family, the other exclusive option being keeping my PC updated.

By the way, I have been a co-moaner with Fluffy on the rip-off upgrade cycle, and that, more than anything else, attracts me towards buying an X360 and a PS3. Even if I buy both, it will still be cheaper than trying to run games on my PC within the next two years. Needless to say, I will be able to play much more games as well!
Artemus
29/09/05 @ 15:56
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I wouldn't be suprised if the 360 could run it at 60 FPS. Based on the demo, it hardly seems demanding even on my two year old PC. It looks nowhere near as good as the screens suggested, and yes that is with all the settings turned up. Although hopefully the game was toned down due to demo size limitations.
HarryB
03/10/05 @ 22:04
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
the game only had medium settings available so you havent seen the maximum textures or models yet ;)

Comments: 1-33 of 33 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery