Blizzard on the future
Is a cold wind gonna come and blow us all away?
Downstairs there's a massed crowd of Blizzard acolytes. Upstairs, it's different. Quieter. With more tea.
Behind elderly security guards is the press room. It's here over the weekend Eurogamer gets the chance to chat extensively with some of the higher members of the Blizzard hierarchy. We talk about what it feels like to stand in front of a huge crowd, who are here just because of your games, and to speak to them. We ask how you keep a straight face while someone has just said, "I play a Rogue, and you said that my damage rate would drop by three-per cent - and for me, it's nearer six per cent". And we asked them and anyone where we could get more tapes for our dictaphone, as we chatted so much we ran out.
None of which is here. Here we talk to Blizzard about the future. It's currently on top of the world, with a breakthrough massively-multiplayer game under its already powerful belt, with a string of nine number-one games-of-the-year hits behind it and probably the ability to lay golden eggs. Where is it going next? Because wherever it decides that is, it's sure that the industry will follow.
Obviously, the question everyone wants to know is about its next game. And it's equally obvious that the developer is not going to talk about it until it's good and ready. However, avoiding specifics, it is certainly happy to talk about generalities. For example, with three developed universes under its belt - Diablo, Warcraft and Starcraft - is it interested in creating another? "We do want to expand and create additional universes... but at the same time, we want to support our current universes," answers Mike Morhaime, Blizzard's President, "Generally that happens is that we have ideas for the next game, and think about what would be the best setting for the game. If we have a universe which fits the game, our first instinct would be to use that. But if we have a new universe which would be a better fit, we would go with that".

"Want to Party?" "I thought you'd never ask" "Oh, my heart's a flutter"
It's worth noting that a new franchise doesn't necessarily imply an entirely new genre. When approaching its updated nethack game, it had already created a perfectly serviceable fantasy world in the shape of Warcraft. There was no need to conceive of a new one for Diablo - except that it served the game better. There are lots of different sorts of fantasy worlds, after all. So is it possible that a new theoretical franchise wouldn't be a complete change of genre? "Absolutely. If we do, it's going to be what speaks to us," Paul Sams, senior VP of business development argues, "And we're a fantasy and science-fiction based company, and it's those types of offerings which speak to us. I absolutely envision it happening. I would envisage us bringing it off in a way which hasn't necessarily been shown before, but in a way that's accessible. We've introduced a variety of things in our current games. If you look at the races in Warcraft, and some of them have similarities to other fantasy stuff and some are entirely new. And you'll see that in the new stuff we bring out, but we try to keep that accessible. If we were ever to make a new franchise, we'd work hard to include a lot of the things people are accustomed to - whether it's science-fiction or fantasy - and things they're comfortable with, but also weave in new cool and fresh stuff which make it very Blizzard-esque".
The next-generation consoles are also looming on the company's plans. What excites Blizzard about it?
"Well - it's substantially better technology," Mike answers, "There's a lot of limitations on what we can do. We spend a lot of time working and iterating and trying to make it look good. With next-gen graphics hardware and the power of the system, there's a lot more we can do visually. There's a lot more you can do from a processing standpoint, in terms of game-logic. And of course connectivity, as what you can do from a multiplayer standpoint is going to be better to. We're going to have to look at how those things will translate"

A day-night cycle. Yesterday (At night).
However, there are still plenty of reasons why it's planning on supporting the PC. "First of all, everyone has one. That's really good," Mike grins. "It's a continuingly evolving platform, which is also good from a gamer's standpoint. The business model is great, as we don't have to pay fees to Microsoft or Sony. Piracy is an issue, but it's not an issue for World of Warcraft. It is an issue for our other boxed games, and we're always looking at other ways to minimalise piracy, but it's certainly not an issue enough to make us consider not developing for the platform"
Obviously with the 4.5 million and counting subscribers, World of Warcraft features prominently in Blizzard's plans, for the foreseeable future. "We've seen with previous MMOs that they've had a very long lifespan, and while at some point they start powering down in terms of subscribers, they're still a viable business for a very long time," notes WoW's lead designer Tom Chilton, "It could be a year from now. It could be five years from now. Your guess is as good as mine." In terms of the areas Blizzard wants to push in its continuing development, Tom's got a host of desires, outside of the context of the Burning Crusade expansion. "We still have a lot of work to do on the PvP honour system so it incentivises team-play rather than individual play," Tom notes, "We want to not necessarily reward people for time-investment instead of skill. In terms of ongoing material, we want to provide more content for players who aren't necessarily getting into the raid game, and make the raid game more attractive to people who aren't currently raiding. We feel as if there's a lot of value in terms of how heavily-scripted the encounters are. It's very fun once you overcome the barriers to entry."

These sort of structures full of monsters on main maps are called mini-dungeons. Apparently.
With Blizzcon a seeming success, thoughts would turn to other possibilities. A Blizzcon Europe, however, would seem to be relatively unlikely - at least in a form similar to the Blizzcon event itself.
"The challenge is we have several hundred developers which are working in the Irvine office, 20 minutes from here," Senior vice-president Frank Pearce explains, "Part of what makes this experience enjoyable for the community is the ability to interact with all these employees, and it's difficult to host an event like this remotely and bring the same experience to the community there."
And looking to the far future? Blizzard has existed for fifteen years already. What would the next - say - ten bring them? "One of the things I'd like to see is to expand and broaden the player base further, so gaming becomes more mainstream, so that more people outside of the core audience are familiar with our gaming world," Mike states, before turning onto something. "I would love for us to release feature-length films in each of the worlds. I think that the universes are rich and strong enough to support that kind of thing, and it'd enhance the connection that players have with the game. I think World of Warcraft has opened a lot of doors for us, being so popular and having such a large community. And I hope that we'll able to see something happen in the next five years."
Eurogamer agrees, with the obvious proviso: no Uwe Boll's World of Warcraft, thankyouverymuch.
You may also like...
-
ModNation Racers: Road Trip Review
-
Happy Action Theater Review
-
Sony confirms PS Vita 1st Party digital only game prices
-
Call of Duty: Black Ops has best game ending ever, says Guinness World Records
-
Mass Effect 3 Demo: The First 20 Minutes
-
Why Devs Owe You Nothing
-
Motorola Xoom 2 Tablet Reviews
-
DICE working on multiple Battlefield 3 fixes
-
EGTV: Eurogamer playtests PlayStation Vita
-
Sony explains PlayStation Vita game price strategy
-
Halo 4 Master Chief action figure flaunts new suit design
-
Tim Schafer: publishers aren't evil
-
Apple begins Foxconn factories inspections
-
3DS Ambassador Super Mario Bros. game updated
-
App of the Day: Monkey Bump
-
Face-Off: Final Fantasy 13-2
-
Fallout: New Vegas dev asks fans what game they would like it to Kickstart
-
Digital Foundry: PS3 Skyrim Lag Fixed?
-
UK Top 40: Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning beats Darkness 2
-
Activision: games are relationships, "brands in people's lives"
-
Sony's $50m Vita marketing campaign targets PS3 owners
-
Retrospective: Star Wars Episode I Racer
-
Metal Gear Solid 5 expected between April 2013 and May 2014
-
Metal Gear Solid 3D demo on eShop this week
-
Gotham City Impostors Review









Comments (23) Latest comment 6 years ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
/fears the worst.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
What can be next? I am betting on World of Starcraft in 2-3 years. The next logical thing for Blizzard and what a great idea it would be! 3 sides instead of 2, some amazing Battlegrounds and possible space travel/combat.
/hopes that the next game wont be another crappy mmo, but a good rocksolid singleplayer game with good mp elements.
You can argue that WoW *is* a good singleplayer game until 60. It actually has everything Diablo has and most quests can be considered solo-able (except for the instances and elite quests). I think a fair amount of players are coming from the "single-player" side, having enjoyed Warcraft and Diablo.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
There are a full bunch of pictures linked from Blizzard's homepage of the event, you should really check out some people's costumes!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
World of Warcraft didn't sell so much simply because people knew their Warcraft (the masses don't), a lot of it had to do with the very easily graspable fantasy elements common to most bulk fantasy.
Then again, I think *I'd* enjoy World Of Stracraft over Warcraft.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Noooooooooooooo!
Starcraft 2 or Diablo 3, pretty please!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Pretty please?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Still you can get the original and best one for the GBA. A next gen RnR 3 would be awsome, but lets face it, it'll never happen.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Guild Wars is free (once you have purchased the game) and makes me want to ask the question, why the monthly payments for WoW?
robbing b*st*rds imo
Comment below viewing threshold Show
You're mad. And frankly, it's astoundingly good value for money since this is the only game I've played (or wanted to play) for months and months. It's actually saved me money
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Guild Wars is free (once you have purchased the game) and makes me want to ask the question, why the monthly payments for WoW?
robbing b*st*rds imo
How many times have you seen a party bigger than 5 people do something in GW? Oh, never? Because you can only get together in a few selected zones that are restricted to finding a party and trading, while the real game is multiplayer, not massively multiplayer?
Exactly. The servers GW needs cost a tiny fraction from what the WoW servers cost.
Well, you did ask.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
If only, I'm sick to death of the endless stream of orc bashing MMOs. EVE and Anarchy Online are really the only options for sci-fi fans who don't want to suckle the teet of Mr. Lucas.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
And what's wrong about playing Warhammer and looking forward to the next Blizzard RTS?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Now Blizzard will have some hard time trying to make Starcraft2 be such success like first game was. Didn't they say marines were made after space marines from warhammer universe? And zergs seem to have some relationships withs nyds.
Anyway, if next title won't be Starcraft, bye, guys - my money are with Relic!
Comment below viewing threshold Show