Homefront Preview

Duty bound.

It was all going so well until they tried to explain it. We've just been privy to a little bit of hitherto mysterious shooter Homefront, which features absurdly lavish environments and some retina-bothering firebombing effects. Its very much broken world looks as it does because North Korea invaded America in 2027...

OK, that's a little bit implausible and awfully indelicate as subject matters go - but then so's Russian separatists starting a war by pinning a ghastly terrorist act on a single American. Oh, military shooters - you've read far too many Tom Clancy books. Fine, give me a gun, let's start defending the homeland.

Later, after the shooting's done, a man who we have previously been told is known for security reasons only as 'Tae' walks onto the stage. The THQ presenter duly addresses him by his full name of Tae Kim. It's downhill from there for poor Tae, a former CIA operative and military advisor who's been hired to help craft the politics of Homefront's back-story. He's here today to explain why and how North Korea would invade America.

To start with, there's some plausibility - no-one expected Hitler, America's burning money at the moment, North Koreans are taught to hate the US, the two country's GDP might start to equalise. But the jig's up when he predicts a viral outbreak killing millions of Americans in 2021. Oh, Tae. Tae, Tae, Tae. You just had to go sci-fi, didn't you?

'Homefront' Screenshot 1

See that netting above the trees? They think that's going to hide them. It's really not going to.

It is very much best not to know the how and why in a situation as silly as Homefront's. Too much reason spoils its fictional pudding. Just concentrate on what you can do in that situation. Coming from Kaos Studios, the creators of underwhelming Battlefield-like Frontlines: Fuel of War, many had expected Homefront to be more of the same - rival armies fighting for territory, with a rudimentary string of bot-occupied multiplayer maps masquerading as a single-player campaign.

This, though, is from what's being referred to as 'The New THQ'. Quality not quantity, every game a blockbuster: this is the plan. Homefront is, quite clearly, THQ hoping to have its own Call of Duty. There's as much to separate the two as there is to liken them, but in its sheen, in its bombast, in its patriotism and in its shooting lots of dudes, it's absolutely doing that latter-day videogame blockbuster thing.

What we're shown doesn't give a complete picture of how the game will play, but it's definitely a tightly scripted, high-production-value forward stomp, rather than anything free-roaming or capture-point based. There will be drivable tanks and helicopters, one of the developers hints later, but for the most part it's ultra-glossy run 'n' gun.

'Homefront' Screenshot 2

That's robo-tankette the Goliath on the left. Apparently you shouldn't get used to having access to high-tech gear, though.

If you'd like a couple more comparisons, try THQ's own horror-shooter Metro 2033 and Valve's Half-Life 2. It's the latter that looms largest, with Homefront working hard to build a world of refugees in an invaded land. The environments tell the story at least as much as do the (interactive) cut-scenes - the junk and leftovers from which America's few free survivors have built irrigation and accommodation, the solar panels, the generator hooked up to an exercise bike, the strange juxtaposition of a colourful table football table inside a ruined hallway, the DIY armour worn by the resistance, the goats being milked in the back garden...

Make no mistake: American has fallen. There isn't a standing army, and there aren't any major population centres outside of Korean-guarded refugees camps. There's just these guys, this tiny handful of people making do - they have their lives, but not a lot else. "It's not quite the future we had in mind," says their kindly middle-aged (but buff) leader Boone, "but at least we're free. We've built ourselves a safe haven."

These sort of scenes act as both pace-breakers from the intense action, and as a reason to fight. In the first camp we see, children play and farmers farm: it's tranquil and it's honest. These are good people.

It can't stay that way, of course. While we're not shown the fall of this idyllic enclave in the demo, concept art on the walls shows the harrowing sight of a playground filled with tiny corpses. So, hopefully we're never shown the fall of this idyllic enclave. But it shows what you're fighting for, and what you're fighting against.

Well, sort of. Kaos endures several questions about what kind of insight we'd get into the thinking of the Korean soldiers, but it seems that will be thin on the ground - the enemy is the enemy, after all. If a guy is trying to kill you, you probably won't bother asking him how he feels about it.

There's no avoiding the fact that documenting a potential conflict-in-waiting is very sensitive ground, but there will be some sympathy for Homefront's elected devil. Not just in the form of the sole (Seoul?) Korean chap, an engineer called Hopper, who's on the US side, either.

In the lengthy, brutal and fiery combat section we're shown, the Americans manage to lay their hands on some heavy ordinance. Bring the rain, as they say. As white phosphorus lays burning waste to the car park of a discount lumber warehouse, Alyx Vance-y resistance fighter Rhianna stares in horror at the screaming, writhing, melting Koreans below. "Those are people... put them out of their misery!"

You don't have to do anything, and in fact another, rather angrier resistance fighter opines that they deserve to suffer. Perhaps you'll use your sniper rifle to mercy-kill the burning men below. Perhaps you won't.

'Homefront' Screenshot 3

Disco! Inferno! If only ever party was a white phosphorous party.

As you're deliberating, another barrage of white phosphorous appears on the night horizon. Seems to be heading a little far, this one... Oh. Oh no. Before you know it, your nice little sniper nest is just so many matchsticks, you're lying in a heap on the concrete ground, and the entire world's on fire. That was a resistance missile - but the resistance aren't trained soldiers. They're just the guys fighting back, making do with whatever resources and whatever training might happen to be around. Accidents are going to happen.

Fortunately, they've got a Goliath to hand this time - a remote-controlled armoured truck capable of locking-on to multiple targets and letting loose a volley of rockets at once. It can also run people over, with a horrific noise that's apparently based upon a recording of a dog chewing a bone.

The fight is big, noisy, chaotic and cinematic. Homefront unquestionably wins the war of production values, though the developers admit there is work to be done on the character models and animations ahead of the mooted February 2011 launch.

'Homefront' Screenshot 4

If Call of Duty can do carparks, so can we! Carparks with helicopters!

It's very much THQ punching at a whole new weight, and that's before they've talked about multiplayer. We won't hear about that until August, but attention is drawn to the fact that this is a team whose heritage largely lies in multiplayer FPS - they started out as Battlefield modders. Apparently we should expect a very cool and unique new feature in multiplayer, so start your guessing now. Something playing with the concept of invasion, perhaps?

Speaking of which, don't play Homefront's single-player expecting to win the war, drive Korea out of America then go all Jack Bauer Kim Jong-Um, the even madder son of North Korea's current crazy despot, Kim Jong-Il. THQ and Kaos make no bones about this being a franchise - your character (a chap named Jacobs) will sort out his own story, but the wider story of America is yet to be told.

Usefully, Korea's earlier irradiation of the Mississippi, apparently to deter a counter-attack from the East Coast, has created a divided America. You'll cross that poison river and see New York in a future game, no doubt. For this first chapter, though, confirmed locations include Colorado and a climactic showdown on San Francisco's Golden Gate Bridge. The concept art suggests high-ex splendour from that particular set-piece.

Homefront, then. An epic story of future war, timeless heroism and a lot of bullets. You'll almost certainly want to play it. But whatever you do, don't try to explain it.

Homefront is due out for PC, PS3 and Xbox 360 in February 2011.

Comments (35) Latest comment 1 year ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Fab4 #1 2 years ago

    "Apparently we should expect a very cool and unique new feature in multiplayer, so start your guessing now. "


    Decent match-making?
  • Sunyavadin #2 2 years ago

    I still play Frontlines a fair bit, shame the ranked servers are always empty so nobody can pick up the online achievements.
    Hope this turns out equally fun but I can't help but find the premise rather shaky. North Korea can't invade SOUTH Korea, let alone the US. Frontlines' peak oil scenario WORKED. Particularly as were seeing a lot of the Frontlines backstory happening already.
  • AphoticCosmos #3 2 years ago

    At least it's not the Russians.

    Frontlines was kind of nifty, I enjoyed the drones and sniper weaponry, but I just wish it had been a bit more polished so that it had some longevity rather than being the one-hit-wonder that so many non-Halo and non-COD games are. Maybe it can be good?
  • Acrid #4 2 years ago

    @Sunyavadin

    It could be worse, it could be the French invading America
  • MerricK #5 2 years ago

    looks decent. but will most likely be shit. these things just are. :(
  • frostcircus #6 2 years ago

    The burning/mercy setpiece was already used in CoD:WaW (complete with NPCs spelling out the Moral Dilemma for you). They're really not doing the best job of separating themselves from that franchise.

    It appears to share the same helicopter fetish too, judging from the screenshots.
    Edited by 1 at 11/06/10 @ 09:20
  • Anthony_UK #7 2 years ago

    Frontlines with increased production values and proper dedicated server support?

    Yes Please!
  • metalangel #8 2 years ago

    Frontlines was and is a more faithful successor to the Battlefield series than Bad Company 2! Too complicated for screaming elmos to understand, though, so it gets called "underwhelming". Hope this will be just as good in multiplayer but frankly the ludicrous scenario and robot trucks makes me think otherwise.
  • berryl227 #9 2 years ago

    oh.... thing is this maybe a small gem but im just so world weary of shooters at the moment!

    I bought resistance 1 when i got my PS3 and having come from PS2 gaming was totally blown away. Next up was modern warfare and again wow it did everything so well. over the last 2 years its just felt like a non ending realse schedule of shooters some good ( MW2) some not so good (AVP) and i have sunk too much time into bad company 2 online. Even the mighty uncharted 2 is a shooter at heart i guess im longing for a change of gaming scene!

  • Kenshin001 #10 2 years ago

    Really. Isolated, impoverished North Korea is the best they can do? Can't help but think the whole time I was playing this I'd be thinking how stupid it is.
  • Madder-Max #11 2 years ago

    "I still play Frontlines a fair bit, shame the ranked servers are always empty so nobody can pick up the online achievements"

    Whats your gamertag? Im on their loads 'eg maddermax'

    Oh and the reviewer has never played Frontlines multiplayer. Sure as hell aint underwhelming.
  • Ptarmigandalf #12 2 years ago

    I thought the plot of MW/MW2 was idiotic, but this takes 'daft' to the stratosphere, and then ignites the second stage.
  • Siberian_Khatru #13 2 years ago

    I could write something about how most DPRKoreans' idea of heroism is managing to successfully defect to Mongolia with your family, not invading the US, but what's the point, even the dimmest of FPS players should understand how implausible the scenario is. Wonder if the devs are at least a little bit bothered about hate/fearmongering effects of such games.
  • Nuada #14 2 years ago

    Am I alone in thinking the US deserved to get nuked in MW2? I mean it was a sanctioned US agent who wandered around that airport murdering all those innocent Russians (and taking great pleasure in it).
  • cianchristopher #15 2 years ago

  • metalangel #16 2 years ago

    I am also up for playing Frontlines again if it'll help you get that elusive achievement. I might even have a friend to bring to the party who needs it too (provided he hasn't traded it in) so drop me a PM on here and we'll arrange something! Plus it'll be nice to play Solar Farm and Oil Fields again...
  • sneetch #17 2 years ago

    @Kenshin001
    Really. Isolated, impoverished North Korea is the best they can do? Can't help but think the whole time I was playing this I'd be thinking how stupid it is.

    Yeah and apparently they pick the one year that the European Union, Japan and everyone else are incredibly busy to invade too. Oh man, we'd love to help you out but we're swamped! What crappy luck! What the hell is South Korea and Japan doing while the North Korean legions are off invading a truly massive nation?

    Unless they were all magically virused too. Dun dun DUNNNN!
  • Chazmeister #18 2 years ago

    Surely the US would have just nuked North Korea as soon as it started it's invasion?
  • makariel #19 2 years ago

    Since I'm usually only playing singleplayer in FPS I think I can easily skip this one. It was hard for me playing through the stupidity of modern warfare 2's storyline. NK invading the US and apparently everybody else simply watching just... no.
    No.
  • humble #20 2 years ago

  • metalangel #21 2 years ago

    Even if the entire North Korean military faced off against the entire US military, they'd be outnumbered (unless you count all reserves which wouldn't counter the other disadvantages against the DPRK). And that's before you take into account they'd be having to do an airborne/amphibious invasion. And the US has superior equipment and training as well as the defensive advantage. AND widespead gun ownership which means occupation forces would face armed resistance from the general population. And still more besides. Plague or not, it's preposterous that they'd establish a beachhead never mind subjugate the entire country.
  • coolbritannia #22 2 years ago

    Looks good, sounds good, has real baddies as the baddies, I'm happy. Unless it drops after Reach, in which case it won't get a look in.
  • glaeken #23 2 years ago

    A viral outbreak killing millions is the Sci/Fi part of the story? I guess history is not a strong point for the writer.
  • Kain201 #24 2 years ago

    When North Korea invades a country, they do it with style.
  • metalangel #25 2 years ago

    @chimneyleaf: "War, war never changes..."
  • Bluetooth #26 2 years ago

    Maybe we'll get an extensive prequel, you know the part where they manage to feed their population on something a bit more weighty than race and beans, so they can actually get the energy to fight a war against a superpower.

    That prequel will take ages to finish.
  • VicViper #27 2 years ago

    Having just seen the back story trailer they open with the news about the sinking of the south Korean ship by a north Korean torpedo, which sends the tasteless meter right of the scale, to get their story going.


  • BrokenSymmetry #28 2 years ago

    Frontlines was underwhelming? For me it was one of the big surprises of the last few years. Multiplayer was great (50-player matches!), and even the single-player was surprisingly good, with all its gadgets and multiple approaches to complete goals.
  • Farzlepot #29 2 years ago

    Bah, all shooting games are insensitive and implausible. At least these guys are being imaginative. Very imaginative. Absurdly imaginative. Imaginative beyond all reason. Imaginative to the point of clinical insanity.

    But still, imaginative!

    This game might actually be fun. You never know, the whole daft story line might be played out a little tongue-in-cheek.
  • kongzi #30 2 years ago

    Choosing Korea is weak.. choosing China would make more sense, but would alienate the chinese gaming market so they'd miss sales there. North Koreans don't buy games..

    And really can developers do nothing else but choose between russians and koreans, near or far future. The game industry needs a creative kick in the ass.
  • JustCommunication #31 2 years ago

    Guys, you know it's not *just* North Korea, right?

    If you look at the trailer that's out, North Korea first unites with South Korea, then it invades Japan and does what they did during WW2 and takes over a lot of the pacific nations, and THEN invades the US, which is in a weakened state at the time.

    The Korean Federation or something I think it was called, so no it's not North Korea Invading the US, but some bigger Empire. Assuming then that the US is weakened/crippled by an oil crisis or whatever thay plague was, do you really think Europe would get involved on their own? Apart form the UK Europe doesn't even want to be involved now, let alone 30 years down the line.

    I think there has been far wilder plots, but seriously, do your homework before you start slating something.
  • Pike #32 2 years ago

    Are you saying that South Korea, a rich prosperous west friendly democracy suddenly becomes an militaristic expansionist power after uniting with their dirt poor northern neighbour, for no reason?

    Mmmkay. That sure sounds more plausible.
  • hookh #33 2 years ago

    As a former Ranked #7 FFOW (Frontlines) on the 360, I have been looking forward to hear news about this title for about a year. I will use the singleplayer campaign as a multiplayer warmup - so its not important for me wether the story is plausible. It all comes down to the gameplay: Are you free to move around all of the map? Will buildings break under fire (like BC2)?

    FFOW is (still - by far!) the best shooter with controllable vehicles, large maps with up to 50 players online (Thats far better than BF:BC2, witch have lousy helicopters, and COD:MW2 witch is even worse - thats is only run'n gun).

    I hope that Homefront will bring more stable online (ranked) servers than FFOW did. And the gamemode "forntline" from FFOW will hopefully appear in homefront too

  • pinochet_cz #34 2 years ago

    Count me in..lets invade america...we have 15 Grippen ultrasonics now..if we join with hungary we can do it. Or ..someone can write a game script about it :-D
  • Oh-Bollox #35 1 year ago

    Christ, how about some Americans defend America for a change? I'm tired of doing it.