Hirai wants PS3 to beat PS2
Reckons sales could top 140 million.
Following the announcement that PlayStation 2 sales have now topped 140 million, King of Sony Kaz Hirai has said he's keen to see PS3 do even better.
"It's not fun for me replicating the PS2 numbers. I've seen that movie already," he told the Financial Times.
"I want to try to see if we can exceed the PS2 numbers after nine years, otherwise why are we in this business?"
As announced at E3 last week, it's taken PS2 nine years to hit the 140 million mark. PSone hasn't done too badly either, with 102 million consoles shifted since 1994.
It was also at E3 that Microsoft's Don Mattrick declared he'll do all he can to ensure Xbox 360 beats PS3. Contenders, ready!
You may also like...
-
Happy Action Theater Review
-
Motorola Xoom 2 Tablet Reviews
-
ModNation Racers: Road Trip Review
-
Sony confirms PS Vita 1st Party digital only game prices
-
Call of Duty: Black Ops has best game ending ever, says Guinness World Records
-
Sony explains PlayStation Vita game price strategy
-
Mass Effect 3 Demo: The First 20 Minutes
-
Why Devs Owe You Nothing
-
DICE working on multiple Battlefield 3 fixes
-
3DS Ambassador Super Mario Bros. game updated
-
EGTV: Eurogamer playtests PlayStation Vita
-
Rockstar mulling LA Noire 2 development
-
Halo 4 Master Chief action figure flaunts new suit design
-
The Witcher 2: Enhanced Edition Xbox 360 trailer
-
Mojang: no plans for Minecraft on Vita
-
Tim Schafer: publishers aren't evil
-
Apple begins Foxconn factories inspections
-
App of the Day: Monkey Bump
-
Face-Off: Final Fantasy 13-2
-
Digital Foundry: PS3 Skyrim Lag Fixed?
-
Who Killed Rare?
-
Fallout: New Vegas dev asks fans what game they would like it to Kickstart
-
UK Top 40: Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning beats Darkness 2
-
Sony's $50m Vita marketing campaign targets PS3 owners
-
Retrospective: Star Wars Episode I Racer









Comments (80) Latest comment 4 years ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The way things are going it may happen but it's not really important is it. Main thing is to keep the good flow of games coming and improve on what they already have.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Still not quite there Sony and of course you actually do have competition this gen for both hardcore gamers and casual markets, but if Sony listen to the criticism aimed at them and do something about it they might sell as many as PS1/2. Those two you HAD to own if you cared about games and so far PS3 hasn't got that HAVE to own status IMHO
My advice to him is look at what games made those consoles so great and must own consoles (especially PS1) and start to release some truly must have games on PS3. LBP, Killzone, R2, MS2 won't do it......
Comment below viewing threshold Show
That being said, I reckon PR people sshould shut up sometimes, giving figures like this when the ps3 is laggging behind (at least the wii) so much just makes them look bad. The PS3 isn't selling as well as the PS3 was, the cheap blu-ray player isn't as much of a draw as the cheap dvd-player was. The shovelware is all going to the wii, so the game sections for PS3 are smaller in stores and it gets less exposure.
Quite simply, compare last time to this time and I say cut their losses and preach the kind of things that could possibly happen..
Comment below viewing threshold Show
erm, you do know what PR stands for, right?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
IMHO those games don't have what it takes to make PS3 must have. Just my opinion.....
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Of course Sony want the PS3 to beat the PS2 in sales. Heck Microsoft and Nintendo also want their consoles to beat the PS2 in sales. If I had a console I would hardly go to the bank for money and promise NOT to try to beat the PS2 in sales now would I.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Look I'm not gonna get into which game is good or not row. All I'm saying IMO is that sequels to mediocre games such as MS, KZ, RFOM won't shift consoles. LBP seems very niche right now. Of course I've yet to play it and will reserve judgment but I am in the "I don't get it" group on that one.
For me PS3 is concentrating on it's older brothers later life. Buzz, Singstar, Killzone GoW all late PS2. Personally I think they should be looking further back for inspiration this gen to make PS3 a must have console.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Well IMO does actually mean "in my opinion" so yes you are right As I said I'm not getting into a good game/bad game row I except people are different. List all the score and reviews and sale figures you want but FOR ME these franchises do absolutely nothing, and I'm not alone.
I'm merely stating these franchises are not enough to make PS3 must have and sales figures prove I've got just a little bit of a point.......
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Having said that, I almost agree with you farticusmaximus. The main difference being that I have a PS3 and I like having a PS3.
140 million unit sold in 10 years? It's not impossible by any means, even likely in my opinion.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
2. Xbox 180 came out when PS2 had already 40 million units on the market.
3. Microsoft is not Sega.
4. Just MGS as an "IP established" exclusive.
5. Blu-Ray is not the DVD.
6. PS3 didn't bring 4D gaming (no shit?) as PS2 brought 3D gaming.
...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
i am in no way anti Sony but because you are defending the indefensible, that makes me a fan boy?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Hint: No, it doesn't.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Happy now, or will you "utterly fail to grasp the most simple of things"?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Come on, I didn't say that and you know it, you nigwit.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Yeah - there's far better things to berate Sony for!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
What you so cross about blokes?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Sony killed my parents, so I had to become a internet vigilante against them, much like Batman
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I think the 360 and PS3 both need something to take them to the next level and I don't think a price cut or any of the games either have shown are that something. I think this is probably a good thing and will make for a better next round. Sony have made mistakes with console design the last two times, but this time they have paid a price because of the strength of the competition - that should be the impetus to do better next time.
I've got all three consoles and I'm happy that each of them provides me with something worthwhile. If I could only have one it would be the 360 though.
Having said that if it wasn't Hirai's goal to better the PS2 numbers then he shouldn't be in the job should he? It would be more news worthy if he accepted he wasn't.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
not even mgs4 managed to drive up ps3 sales even tho it had a "multicultural" cast and was designed to appeal to "everyone"... so i spell doom for sony
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Are you trying to pass off assumption as fact?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
It's clear you have issues and reality management clearly being one of them. Pointlessly spewing forth sweeping and wildly inaccurate statements about something doesn't make them true.
Here's a fact for you: The PS3 is a great games machine. It's also a great media hub and HD movie player and that's why it costs a bit more. Some of us don't mind paying a bit extra to get all the features it offers.
Why is criticising the PS3 and the people who like it so important to you? Go away and play with your 360 or have a wank or something. Anything you like, just calm down.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
There's no fanboyism about it. I'm 33, a family man, a gadget buff and a film/game/music enthusiast. I've also owned just about every console and computer since the start of the industry including most Playstation consoles...except an Xbox.
I was completely ambivalent about Sony when the PS1 came out. It was a better system than the Saturn even though a prefered Sega's own titles.
When the DC came out it was an awesome games system. This is when things started to go wrong. Sony started bullshitting like you wouldn't believe about what their system could do. People fell for it. Either that or the wanted a DVD player! When the console was released it was utter lies and the PS2 was no better at games than the DC. The DC, a great games machine, died. It died, not like the Saturn, against a superior games machine but against Sony lies and DVD!
So what happens this time around? Sony start the bullshit all over again! And I see the same people who fell for it are falling for it again OR buying a cheap Blu-Ray player this time. FFS, that is not the gaming industry that has supplied my hobby since I was 5! No one before or since lied about their machines the way Sony do and no one used the allure of a subsidised film player to inflate the numbers of games consoles sold.
Honestly the parallels between the DC/PS2 & 360/PS3 are startling. 1 Console with great games and no next gen disc format being released early. 1 console being haled as a supercomputer with next gen films undercutting the stand-alone players.
I'm not saying that people don't have valid reasons to buy either of the 3 consoles but in my experience the reasons I hear for people buying the PS3 make my blood boil... (as a gamer.)
Yet another friend said to me at a party last night that he'd bought a PS3. When I called him a cunt =] and said the Xbox was cheaper with more games he simply said "I don't give a fuck about games...I wanted a blu-ray player and the PS3 was the cheapest one"
THAT says it all.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
farticus
One who farts in a spartan manner. One who farts frequently and shows a cavalier attitude about it. A coneseur of rectal wind.
after ripping a huge fart, Simon exclaimed " I AM FARTICUS"
maximus
A product used for penis enlargement.
source
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I though that was most blokes.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The point is no company is innocent. They all have their failings so what's the point in getting into a huff about it. Just get the product that best suits your tastes, without getting all political about it. It's a commercial business, not politics.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Nearly always getting products last that also cost more. DS3, PS3 etc.
I dont hate Sony just feel slighted by them to be honest.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
You've missed the point entirely.
Well done.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Now you could say it's not a problem as long as you've got your own machine but when you've seen these tactics kill of support for perfectly good consoles then it is a problem. Especially if I own the fucking thing.
Sony do this in the console arena. Citing MS in other areas is not for this discussion and is something I may well agree with you on if we had that discussion.
That's exactly the reason I feel attach rates are important along with total sales. What appears to happen is you inflate your use rbase by selling to people that only want the ancillary item. Publishers then look at this huge user base and think.."you know we need to makes games for this machine instead"
To be fair it doesn't seem to be a problem this time round as games tend to NEED to be multiformat but it was a problem in the past and I still don't agree with the tactic.
It also works the other way round with PS3. They managed to convince lots of people/company's that BD players were in more homes than HD-DVD even though some of those people bought a games machine not a film player.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I checked myself as well, I am in there too
look up PS3 (loads of definitions, although... I consider some of them less attractive than other's) and owner. I like the owner part. fits.
edit: typo
Comment below viewing threshold Show
You're obviously angry because I couldn't really understand half of what you were saying there.
I would reply but I'm not sure what I'd be replying to.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Can I just say I love Persona, FF Series, GTA Vice City, Ico, SotC, GoW, GoW2 on my PS2.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
At this point I cut my loses and move on.
I do the same thing with religious people.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
That's the smartest thing you posted on the whole thread... shame it's in an inappropriate context.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
What's you PSN ID?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Whenever I speak to 'real' people about buying Sony consoles (2&3) they either state something other than games or tell me how much more powerful the system is/will be compared to the competition.
That is a statement of FACT and as a gamer I don't like it.
Is that OK?
I would like it if a console, ANY console, that was deserved of lasting ten years and selling XXX millions of consoles got there on merits that I think are worthy - mostly gaming value.
The PS1 did, the PS2 didn't and the PS3 hasn't.
Edited: Just because it annoys blig
Comment below viewing threshold Show
PS1 -> DC -> PS2 -> GC -> 360
How does that fit in with being a DC owner and upgrading to 'MS Consoles'. I mean seriously WTF.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Not only that, but Sony has MUCH better contenders this time around. Say what you will about the 360 and its sales, but the facts are that it's almost 3 years old and hasn't had more than $50 taken off the price in the US. Once ITS magic number hits $200, who knows what'll happen - especially with the common perception that the 360 still has the most and best games.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Pot = Kettle = Black
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
PS3lol
Comment below viewing threshold Show
1) I apologise if I didn't write a full dossier as to why the DC failed and instead pointed out the facet that was relevant to the discussion.
2) We have no idea what the full evolutionary power of both systems would be as only one survived. Your statement that the PS2 is vastly superior just cannot be proven. I based my statement on the games available at the time on both systems.
3) I mentioned the DC as part of a larger point I was making and I'm now been drawn into a debate I have no interest in at the moment. ????
4) As for what I call my mates. I'm from the East End of London and that's just what we're like. They don't take any offence from it and neither do I. I'm a right charmer I am. And yes, his criteria for buying the games console IS THE WHOLE FUCKING POINT OF MY POST.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
you speak the truth i salute you good sir!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Damn man, I own a PS3 and it's a decent bit of kit but the levels you are going to trying to defend it against the evil people who dare to defy Sony dogma is a sure sign of fanboyitis, a serious condition if you don't vary your console "loyalties".
Chill out dude it's only peoples preference, face it there are people out there who don't like what Sony has done so far with PS3. Besides your own ramblings are nothing but opinion just as much as ours......
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Sony'll continue to lose money, and regardless, the 360 is going to continue to receive massive strong game support until the next gen because it SELLS GAMES. Great looking, fast loading, smooth games with a great controller and a great online community to play amongst.
It's up to Sony what happens next, and it's already fucked it all up so far, and is playing catchup.
Your move, Sony...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
(but then again, in here, anyone who defends Sony, regardless of how well, is dubbed a Fanboy).
@blig_merk
And, of course, you NEVER talk bullshit to justify your choice, right?
Hey, you're all facts even if they are made up ones
And you're wrong. Anyone who defends Sony is not dubbed a fanboy but YOU ARE.
What a maroon!
Rash' - Calling blig_merk a Sony extremist is not labelling. Reread your own posts to see what labelling means.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
" I apologise if I didn't write a full dossier as to why the DC failed and instead pointed out the facet that was relevant to the discussion. "
That sounds like the words used by the people who read the Bible solely as a means to cherry-pick bigotry.
"I apologise if I didn't use the whole of Leviticus in my argument and instead pointed out the facet that was relevant to my prejudices"
You have your devil, your martyr and your messiah. There'is no arguing with that kind of mentality.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
It must be kind of frustrating when you know you have the, objectively best console, and everyone else is wrong.
I suppose its how the Jehovahs witnesses must feel about their religion.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
LOL @ Rodney. Made me chuckle.
Comment below viewing threshold Show