Guild Wars
Guilding the lily.
Three years and three months ago (to the day, at time of writing), Guild Wars proved itself a real charmer. Good looks, flexibility and an eagerness to please helped it to find favour with an unusually broad spectrum of players, with hugely disparate experience with MMOs. The complete absence of a subscription fee seemed baffling at the time, but combined with the accessibility of Guild Wars' interface and structure, it opened up the genre to a new category of casual players, while beguiling the more experienced by dispensing with a swathe of genre conventions that suddenly seemed embarrassingly outdated.
Since then, the Guild Wars universe has been fleshed out with two new campaigns and one expansion pack, and some five million of these boxes have been sold at that one-time GBP 20 purchase price. Guild Wars' strengths have proven enduring, and the game still enjoys a huge player community. It's still well-presented, obscenely beautiful on the right equipment, and nonetheless runs well on pretty much any PC purchased since 2005. But last year's Eye of the North was the last planned expansion before the sequel arrives sometime late in 2009; now that the Guild Wars trilogy is complete, has it lived up to its promise?
It's worth explaining how the trilogy functions nowadays, and how its constituent parts fit together - because it really is confusing for returning players. Each of the three Guild Wars campaigns (Prophecies, Factions and Nightfall, from oldest to youngest) is a standalone, extremely lengthy role-playing campaign, taking place on a concurrent timeline. In this sense they are distinct games, with distinct features.

Prophecies: lonely.
Prophecies, the original, is the simplest; Factions beefs up the guild system, introducing guild alliances, better guild halls and better inter-guild competitive options; Nightfall introduces fully-customisable NPCs into the storyline. They all share the same one, madly gorgeous race (humans) and the same six character classes, although Factions and Nightfall also have two exclusive classes each to play around with.
Owning just one of the Guild Wars campaigns is no disadvantage; purchasing another campaign simply offers up a few hundred hours of new story on a new continent. Characters can be transferred between worlds if you fancy a Nightfall set of armour for your original Prophecies elementalist, or would rather take a powerful character into a new campaign storyline than start a new one from scratch.
Skills - the thousand-odd spells, special attacks and techniques with which Guild Wars players really customise their characters - are transferable between all three. Owning all of them is only advisable in the player-versus-player portion of the game, where hardcore Guild Wars players fight for guild honour and occasional cash prizes with intricate combinations of skills and equipment from all three games.

Factions: fighty.
Eye of the North, meanwhile, is essentially a pack of extra skills and quests across all of the three continents, designed for experienced players as a sort of Guild Wars 2 teaser. It introduces the sequel's new races into the storyline and converts your Guild Wars achievements into trophies that will carry over as rare items, pets and equipment in Guild Wars 2. It's not really worth bothering with unless you're a devoted player gearing up for the sequel; the storytelling and quest design of the three main campaigns are much better.
Sadly it's rather difficult to find any company at all for the Prophecies story quests these days - everyone completed them all three years ago - but Nightfall and Factions still seem to be getting a decent enough influx of new players experimenting their way through the introductory quests.
Now is as good a time to jump into Guild Wars as any - it is unique among MMOs, and there are more things than ever to like about it. The freedom and flexibility that it gives its players - in stark contrast to subscription-based games, which often give you far less control over your character despite charging you for the privilege of having one - is enduringly fantastic.
The only fixed thing about a Guild Wars character is their class and appearance; secondary classes, skills and attribute points can be switched around at will, making it impossible to make a decision that has an irrevocable, negative impact on your game. It is easier to experiment with different equipment and techniques than in any other game I've ever played - you can completely change your playing style just by redistributing your Warrior's swordsmanship points and making him a strong, say, necromancer instead - which perhaps explains why so many people are still playing Guild Wars years after they reached the level cap with their first character.
Guild Wars' extremely low level cap (20) has proven to be a stroke of design genius. Because it doesn't take very long to build up a top-level character, a lack of new players is barely even a problem for the community - the game is balanced towards characters with customised equipment and skills, rather than a buffed-up level. As it always has, Guild Wars rewards you for experimenting actively with your character rather than simply pouring endless hours into the number next to its name; for switching around stats and skills intelligently rather than slaughtering rats for hours on end. It's a welcoming system for new players, and it also means that you can come back to the game after years and still have a top-tier character, rather than finding yourself left way behind the curve.
This is the perfect way for a non-subscription MMO to work. Subscribers would be irked to see new players build up top-level characters so quickly, but in Guild Wars players come and go all the time. You can pour in as many hours as you like for that GBP 20 price tag, over as great a timespan as you please. Consequently there's little elitism in the community - long-term players don't have that slightly bitter sense of entitlement that develops when you've been shelling out USD 15 a month for years on end.

Nightfall: lovely.
The instancing system has also proved prescient, ensuring that it is still possible for players to enjoy every single part of the game that they paid for back in 2005, even if there's no longer anyone else around to join in on a quest. Only town areas are communal - the wilderness outside is generated for your party, and your party alone. In the absence of other real people, you can always adventure with computer-controlled henchmen or, even better, Nightfall's fully-customisable Heroes. It can be played as a single-player RPG, with the storytelling and set-pieces to match, and all the benefits of an MMO's community and constant developer support standing by if and when you feel like joining in with guilds and PVP.
Throughout the past three years, ArenaNet has shown that it cares about what Guild Wars players want: every new GW campaign has brought changes that dedicated players have asked for. The PVP element of the game is now ridiculously rich and complex, encompassing every imaginable tournament variation, and a boisterous and competitive community of guilds, constantly forming alliances to unseat each other. Spectating at these battles is awesome, even if you never plan to take part. In PVP, Guild Wars turns into a strategy game - it's fascinating just to watch how people play classes and skills off against one another, making full use of the game's 56 possible character combinations and limitless skill arrangements.
These are all things that people appreciate about Guild Wars. The things that people really love about it - the ludicrously beautiful characters, the Asian and Grecian influences on the art style and landscapes, the grand-scale theatrical storytelling that occasionally verges on the affected - are more subjective. It's these things that turn Guild Wars from a great-value-for-money diversion into a passion. It is theoretically possible to find it bland that every single male and female player in the game looks like a gorgeous Olympian demigod, or to find the outdoor environments, sumptuous as they are, a little lacking in imagination, but for most people the game's aesthetics are a main attraction.

Eye of the North: going south.
The downside of Guild Wars' extreme flexibility is a lack of depth. It's combat-obsessed - all you'll ever do in Guild Wars is kill things, albeit in intricate, enjoyable ways - and the very things that make it playable as a single adventurer with henchmen can make it a bit boring for support-class characters. It's not a game that it's worth devoting hours of your life to every single night for years. It's more something to dip in and out of, to revisit once or twice a month, to play obsessively during a week off.
Any of the three campaigns offers a great story, but it's not a virtual life that you feel compelled to come back to. It's excellent, but in MMO terms, it's short-term. It's also not got universal appeal, despite its accessibility - because of it, actually. Instanced questing and flexibility are empowering and refreshing for those who take to Guild Wars, but lonely and lacking in subtlety for those who don't.
Still, even taking that into account, you've got a good few hundred hours of entertainment for GBP 20 if you buy any one campaign, so it feels cheap and irrelevant to accuse the game of being shallow. Undeniably, Guild Wars as it currently stands offers preposterous value for money and is a brilliant example of how a successful a non-subscription MMO can be. It takes its own route rather than aping other games' successes, and over the past three years it has developed into a well-rounded, popular and unique experience for anyone seeking the companionable adventuring, grand storytelling and character role-playing of an MMO without the monthly price-tag, pretentious top-level players, or obligatory grinding that usually go with them.
8 / 10
You may also like...
-
Happy Action Theater Review
-
ModNation Racers: Road Trip Review
-
Call of Duty: Black Ops has best game ending ever, says Guinness World Records
-
Sony confirms PS Vita 1st Party digital only game prices
-
Mass Effect 3 Demo: The First 20 Minutes
-
Why Devs Owe You Nothing
-
Tim Schafer: publishers aren't evil
-
Halo 4 Master Chief action figure flaunts new suit design
-
DICE working on multiple Battlefield 3 fixes
-
EGTV: Eurogamer playtests PlayStation Vita
-
Face-Off: Final Fantasy 13-2
-
App of the Day: Monkey Bump
-
Apple begins Foxconn factories inspections
-
Sony's $50m Vita marketing campaign targets PS3 owners
-
UK Top 40: Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning beats Darkness 2
-
Fallout: New Vegas dev asks fans what game they would like it to Kickstart
-
Retrospective: Star Wars Episode I Racer
-
Digital Foundry: PS3 Skyrim Lag Fixed?
-
Metal Gear Solid 3D demo on eShop this week
-
Activision: games are relationships, "brands in people's lives"
-
Metal Gear Solid 5 expected between April 2013 and May 2014
-
Making FIFA Street in the FIFA engine's image
-
FIFA Street footage pits France vs. Germany
-
Ridge Racer Unbounded delayed by four weeks
-
Gotham City Impostors Review









Comments (22) Latest comment 4 years ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I went back to WoW and never looked back.
Worst thing to me was that you can't jump off something in that game at all. Every little stone is a barricade and you have to run around it. Totally destroyed that game for me.
Also all the damn PVP spam (Team X did something) in the cities sucked.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I do prefer the origional though more than Factions and Nightfall. Out of the 3 I think Factions is the poorest, I do really like Nightfall though.
Only downside is actually getting into teams for some of the missions. Even when in a crowded area it can still be difficult and mainly they want healers. Another downside is the amount of people about in all 3 campaigns, it is gradually dwindling. So far I have done a fair bit of Eye of the North with just Henchman. Must admit loving it though as I really like that type of setting.
Another thing is though lately I have been playing LOTRO so GW has been just sitting on my hard disc unused. I do go back to it in short bursts though, its really good to just do a few quests casually and slay some stuff.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
fantastic for casual players (a tip for new buyers - start the campaigns "backwards", so you can rely on the heroes (customizable AI companions from GW: Nightfall) through the other two campaigns)
great pvp system (although ANet could've done more to preserve the game's e-sport appeal over the years).
highly recommended!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Guild Wars is a great 'back burner' game, you can dip in and out when the mood takes you without having to worry about subs. Pretty much done all I want to now though, I look forward to the sequel.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Saying that, it's not a fulltime mmo. PVE is the poor relation and gets boring, pvp is great but requires a lot of organisation to make achieve anything significant.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I don't know why people complain about the lack of jump or swim (some of my RL friends use that same feeble excuse to why they don't like the games). TBh i'd rather take a game that is stable, fun, lag-free, has a huge population and as mentioned before has strong storylines, huge lands to explore and amazing looking graphics.
Also dipping in and out without any wasted subs doesn't leave a bitter taste in your mouth and doesn't leave any resentment like some of the paid for games do. And the time i spend with the game(s) has all been fun, unlike other games where i feel like i've been forced to play just to justify that i've paid a month to play for it.
Really looking forward to GW2! Wonder when we'll start to see some screenshots?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Damn well worth my money. Hope GW2 will suck me back in.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Pvp is awesome though, there is so much freedom how to play it and to test your builds versus other players. It is best comparable I think to the Magic: The Gathering cardgame. You can have lots of skills, but only 8 of them can be taken with you. So you have to choose 8 that combine really well.
I've played WoW for several weeks and after that I really missed the jumping ability in GW as well and the Auction House and the interesting races. I hope they'll take the best bits of WoW and put them in GW 2, but even now GW 1 is the best online game for me by a huge margin
Comment below viewing threshold Show
What, you gotta choose between those or a jump feature? I really doubt they take an equal amount of resources to develop...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'm a long time MMO player so maybe I was too spoilt by the features in subscription MMOs to enjoy it.
Each to their own I guess.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I've never played WoW or any other MMO for that matter, and it's never occurred to me at any point that a jump button would add anything whatsoever to the game.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'd certainly say Guild Wars has the best PvP I've played, it's the only one I've tried more than once. Being able to jump straight in helps.
Comment below viewing threshold Show