Grand Theft Auto: Vice City Stories Review

Party like it's 2002.

Version tested: PlayStation 2

It'd be very easy to saddle up on my gigantic building-straddling horse and fire rockets down at Rockstar for the bloodless cash-in exercise that is Grand Theft Auto: Vice City Stories. Five and a half years (and five games) down the line, and barely a technical improvement worth a damn. This is a game that's not only showing its age, but begging for loose change.

It's also quite reasonable to take a more forgiving view of the return of an old friend. This is, after all, a reworking of one of our all-time favourite games, released at a tempting price. Sure, it unapologetically recycles the Vice City environments, but spruces it up with 59 new missions, a fresh storyline to work through, new characters to meet, and includes probably the finest soundtrack ever to grace a videogame. What's not to like?

I guess the answer to that is simple: Rockstar has been stubbornly resistant to change. Back in 2001 and 2002 when free-roaming sandbox games were revolutionary, we could forgive slightly dodgy combat, an unhelpful camera system and downright annoying inability to checkpoint progress or autosave after a successful mission. The rest of the game was so breathtakingly fresh and ambitious compared to what was out there that such issues were somewhat glossed over.

Competition time

'Grand Theft Auto: Vice City Stories' Screenshot 1

But in early 2007, Rockstar has some serious competition to contend with, and even some of the lesser contenders have managed to fix all of the problems we've just mentioned. Take your pick: The Godfather, Saints Row, Mercenaries, Scarface, Crackdown. They might not have the personality of the GTA games, but they all do the gameplay basics far better now, and going back to The Way Things Were is a horribly jarring experience.

Although it's fair to say that playing Vice City Stories on a PS2 is a slightly more pleasurable experience than on the PSP, the controls still feel hobbled in many of the areas that matter. The on-foot controls feel disappointingly out of touch with what we'd expect from a modern videogame, with an unforgivably rubbish auto aim system that routinely gets you into trouble. If it's not merrily targeting innocents whenever you hit R1, it's yanking the camera behind you to follow someone entirely irrelevant to what's going on. Taking manual aim might be the solution, if it weren't such a complete faff to do so. Name another game that makes you auto target with R1 first and then requires you to click down L3? It's beyond horrible. And worse still, even when you do manage to activate manual aim, the glacial pace at which the reticule moves across the screen renders it completely redundant when four Cholo goons are charging at you with bats. All Rockstar had to do was implement a standard two stick manual aiming system by default, with R1 for lock on like everyone else and the whole game improves in an instant.

'Grand Theft Auto: Vice City Stories' Screenshot 2

Also, exactly how hard can it be to checkpoint progress mid-mission, or auto save after finishing one, or let you simply retry a failed mission? To force the player to laboriously waste ages driving back to a safe house to save a game is bad enough. But to make players go through the same bits of a mission over and over (and often over and over and over and over) again when all you need to do is that final annoyingly tough bit is just a bloody minded, thoughtless game design choice in 2007. We've come to expect games to checkpoint since well before even GTA III came out, so for Rockstar to expect us to put up with it these days is asking a lot. It's like this generation's equivalent of the one-hit-kill, and there's no place for it in such a high profile game.

Faces of Wart

And so, if your love of GTA knows no bounds and you can still tolerate such fundamental issues, then you'd still expect the pros to outweigh the cons. We came to this really expecting to love it, warts and all, but didn't quite appreciate how many of the little things would annoy me. Yet, even when you force yourself to grind your way through the missions, it's hard not feel disappointed at the general dip in quality on show in most other areas of the game. Not only do many (most?) of the missions lack flair, but the characters and storyline woven into the action feels uninspired compared with previous GTAs. In the past, GTA could charm us into submission with the kind of top notch voice work and razor sharp writing that, frankly, embarrassed other games by comparison. Vice City Stories, though, feels like a bad cover version, full of grotesque caricatures with grudges that make little sense for you to get involved with. If they were funny, it would help, but they're mainly just objectionable idiots with annoying accents and bad lines.

'Grand Theft Auto: Vice City Stories' Screenshot 3

GTA stories are hardly known for their plausibility, but Vic Vance's spiral into a life of criminal activities, gratuitous violence and wanton destruction feels like a petty join-the-dots exercise to get you to kill an awful lot of people for the sake of it. Kicking off in an army barrack on the western edge of the two islands, you're drawn into running errands for money that soon get you kicked out. From there, the kind of missions on offer just descend into GTA cliché: mass murdering rampages and tiresome fetch quests simply because some disfunctional low-life said so.

One mission midway through just summed up the pointlessness of it all for me: a woman tells you that she has employed some heavies to bump off a welfare officer - so you're basically tasked with bumping them off to solve the problem. Hey, how about just telling them that it's all been a terrible mistake and not to bother? There's no real sense of purpose for furthering your criminal career because it inevitably results in more of these idiots coming out of the woodwork to give you more cut and paste missions.

Empirical

Vice City Stories tries to make things more expansive (and therefore more interesting) by introducing a new Empire building element to the gameplay - but compared to other games that have tried it (namely The Godfather) it feels little more than something bolted on that doesn't really add anything more than random battles. Once you've progressed about a quarter of the way into the main missions, you'll notice various businesses appear on the map which you can choose to take over, such as loan sharks, brothels and protection rackets. By simply destroying a car parked out the front, you'll kick off a short-lived battle with various gang members, which then allows you to go inside, kill the remainder of the gang, bust up the furniture and buy the business. At that point you can set up a small, medium or big time business of your choice and watch the money roll in.

If you fancy, you can also partake in some side missions to 'enhance your reputation', but these involve little more than chasing around destroying delivery vans or basic fetch quests. Nothing you haven't done a gazillion times over the past five years, put it that way. In a way, empire building becomes a bit of an irritation in itself, because taking over other gang's businesses will eventually result in them attacking you - meaning you have to engage in wave upon wave of control-deficient combat to protect your turf. As we've already pointed out, that's hardly the best way to spend your time with GTA.

'Grand Theft Auto: Vice City Stories' Screenshot 4

As ever, there are countless other optional side quests that, on paper at least, make Vice City Stories an incredibly good value for money offering. But as nice as it is to be able to dip into vigilante missions, taxi missions, races, rampages and all the others, the incentives to do so are fairly minimal compared to the effort required to clear all of them. Still, if you're the ultimate completist and enjoy mindlessly grinding through dozens of near-identical side portions, you'll be very well serviced. Me? I just wish they'd focus more on making the main dish more exciting than reheating the leftovers yet again.

Avert your eyes

Another unavoidable point to make about Vice City Stories is just how visually impoverished it looks these days. It might look just fine running on the lovely PSP display, but the same cannot be said for how it looks on modern, pin-sharp big screen TVs. Now, a game designed for the PSP was never going to dazzle us on the PS2, but it's quite painful to endure if you've been spending time with next generation games for the past year or so. Vice City was hardly pushing the technical limits of the PS2 back in 2002, so to observe the same game engine more than four years later in a barely modified state is a little depressing. We all know just what the PS2 is capable of, but VCS is a throwback to a time when juddery frame rates, limited animation and dreadfully blocky textured environments were acceptable. If you really haven't had your fill of GTA, do yourself a favour and keep it well away from a big screen high definition TV. We can't be held responsible for the damage that might occur to your mind's eye. Did Vice City really look this bad. Apparently so.

'Grand Theft Auto: Vice City Stories' Screenshot 5

Possibly the one thing that you can't fault Vice City Stories for is the soundtrack. Even in the darkest moments during the game, you can always rely on the radio stations to pull out one absolute corker after another. While Vice City was a masterful exercise in 80s nostalgia, somehow VCS goes far, far further into the deepest recesses of our minds, pulling out not only the big hitters of the time (Relax, Blue Monday, Love Action, It's My Life, Heart of Glass, Wouldn't It Be Good, Sexual Healing), but some real cult classics (Penthouse and Pavement, A Forest, Quiet Life). With over 100 songs in there, it's an incredible journey for anyone who grew up at that time. Far more than the gameplay itself, the radio stations provided the kind of hook that kept us going even when things were getting frustrating. As ever, the chat interludes prove that when it comes to gaming audio, Rockstar is still utterly peerless. It's almost worth buying the game for the radio stations alone, they're that good.

'Grand Theft Auto: Vice City Stories' Screenshot 6

Of course, one of the nicest things about the PSP original was the inclusion of six player multiplayer. Stripped of that novelty, the PS2 port leaves you with an underwhelming and often frustrating solo experience to justify the purchase. You could argue the toss about the game still offering an immense playground to dip in and out of as you see fit, and that's a fair point. But unlike previous GTAs, you've no longer got the novelty of exploration. Sure, some things have been changed and tweaked, but you're fundamentally running and driving around a place that most fans will have already played to death.

Put in context, there's no doubt that Vice City Stories is the weakest in the series to date: Vice City was never the most exciting and varied environment to explore the first time around; simply throwing dozens of uninspired missions at us and an unexciting empire building element into the pot doesn't make up for that. It might be cheap, and it might have more content than Liberty City Stories, and it has gaming audio to die for, but, on balance, Rockstar has milked the flaccid teat of its cash cow to the limit. There are occasional flashes of genius buried under the mountain of samey content in here, but for the most part, Vice City Stories is the kind of release that can only please the shareholders. GTA fans deserve more than this. Luckily, there's not long to wait for a real sequel to banish the memories of this opportunistic filler offering.

6 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (41) Latest comment 5 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • #1 5 years ago

    Kristan wrote:

    Also, exactly how hard can it be to checkpoint progress mid-mission, or auto save after finishing one, or let you simply retry a failed mission? To force the player to laboriously waste ages driving back to a safe house to save a game is bad enough. But to make players go through the same bits of a mission over and over (and often over and over and over and over) again when all you need to do is that final annoyingly tough bit is just a bloody minded, thoughtless game design choice in 2007.

    This is why I just can't be bothered, I really can't :(
  • dirigiblebill #2 5 years ago

    My God, a GTA 6/10? It's the promised end, I tell you.

    '..and brother shall slay brother, and the seas shall become as blood..."
  • richardiox #3 5 years ago

  • UncleLou #4 5 years ago

    +1 to Kristan and Mapster.


    By far the biggest problem I have with the GTA games, and the reason why I didn't finish a single one. Inexcusable, really.
  • Killerbee #5 5 years ago

    I bought LCS on the PS2 and I'm still yet to play it... I just got a bit tired of the whole GTA formula after the slog that was San Andreas. I'll probably do it one day when all my other PS2 games are sitting on the "finished" pile...

    Sure, I'll probably still be foaming at the mouth when GTA IV arrives, but I was already thinking of giving this a miss and this review has pretty much confirmed that.
  • Mildew #6 5 years ago

    You could argue the point that the amount of savepoints, etc. in games nowadays has made us less tolerant to games that are simply more difficult to get through. A lot of games back in the old days didn't even give you the opportunity to save your progress - it was a case of playing through from start to finish in one sitting. Plus there's the current fad with auto-recharging energy bars.

    Still I know how bloody annoying some of the missions in GTA can be :o)
  • IAmBatman #7 5 years ago

    > exactly how hard can it be to checkpoint progress mid-mission

    But lots of the missions do have checkpoints?
  • caligari #8 5 years ago

    I think I'll buy it when it's available for about a tenner - if only to park up the car and listen to the radio stations.
  • krudster #9 5 years ago

    Not one single mission that I got thoroughly stuck on had a checkpoint.
  • captainrentboy #10 5 years ago

    After the joys of Crackdown, Rockstar have got a right cheek releasing this poop!
    The new GTA really will have to be something special, as after all the building scaling, SUV jumping, and obsessive orb finding fun I've had with Crackdown, going back to playing a sandbox game where the main selling points are things like bashing in hookers with baseball bats, and lots of fantastic unnecesary swearing, is going to be tough.
  • RobertFoster #11 5 years ago

    Oh dear. I can buy it online for €20...should I wait until it drops further? :o
  • Killerbee #12 5 years ago

    The checkpointing / saving thing is inexcusable these days. San Andreas is the only game I've played recently (outside of the F5 / F9 fest of the PC FPS) that actually had me quitting the game and reloading my last save whenever I died, got arrested or failed a mission. I wasn't cheating or worrying about stats - it was just too much of a chore to have to trudge to the Ammu-nation to restock on weapons and armour; then trudge back to the mission start, and THEN get back to the point in the mission where I died.

    I think the (actually pretty good) "Trip Skip" idea appeared all of about once in the entire game. Why didn't they use that idea more? Plus they should have kept the Taxi that (in the original Vice City at least) picked you up from the hospital / police station and took you back to the starting point of the mission you failed, BUT added in an option for the taxi to stop off at an ammu-nation en-route.

    Surely, SURELY these things wouldn't have been too hard to do?
  • krudster #13 5 years ago

    The Taxi idea is still in VCS, but it's next to useless, because you lose all your weapons and ammo (not to mention armour, which is usually the most essential item of the lot). Yes, you can buy them back, but not for $2000. Sod that, I'd rather re-load a save game, like you say.
    Edited by 1 at 09/03/07 @ 12:05
  • IAmBatman #14 5 years ago

    So in the review you say the money is useless, but then you won't spend $2000 in game to save you a bit of hassle fannying around reloading?
  • krudster #15 5 years ago

    The $2000 doesn't buy you your armour back (a massively important thing to have for many missions), plus, for a large chunk of the game, you might not even have that much money to spare. So, yes, it is pretty useless.
  • spongebob #16 5 years ago

    Vice City was never the most exciting and varied environment to explore the first time around;

    This is not true, at all. Vice City was a great game when it came out originally on PS2 and it was mostly because of the environment.
  • krudster #17 5 years ago

    Compared to GTA III it was a massive step down - a flat, basic environment that was nowhere near as intricately designed and interesting as the multi-tiered landscape in III.
  • NewbieZilla #18 5 years ago

    Oh, man, this game sounds awesome.






    Lol, did I get you? :D
  • trevd72 #19 5 years ago

    i have yet to play LCS past the first 5 missions cos it was just too familiar. What i am about to say will not be very popular - i loves saints row. Now if they can add the elements from SR that allow you to actually play the game rather than driving and driving and quiting then loading so as not to lose the weapons (why lose the weapons if it forces you to reload, what is the point.) and driving again then perhaps finish the mission.

    the structure needs a overhaul.
  • nickthegun #20 5 years ago

    VCS isnt a patch on LCS. The characters are worse, the story is worse, the map is worse, the side missions are worse.......

    LCS was pretty enjoyable, but VCS was exactly the same game in slightly more garish clothes. Its was an absolute chore to finish, something that I did because im so bloody minded.
    Edited by 1 at 09/03/07 @ 12:38
  • Overlush #21 5 years ago

    Roll on San Andreas Stories, eh?
  • jonsaan #22 5 years ago

    Finally, an honest review of of a GTA game that ditches the rose coloured specs and points out the glaring, gamebreaking flaws.
  • Clive_Dunn #23 5 years ago

    I've bought every GTA game since GTA2, and must have played them for about 2 hours in total across however many games that's been.

    Firstly I don't know what people see in them ( apart from the soundtrack in Vice City ), a below average driving Sim with an even more below average shooter bit tacked on. I don't like the controls and ( as already mentioned ) hate the save game system.

    Secondly, I don't know why I buy them either - I guess it's something to do with the media saying that each one is "the best game evahhhhh" every time it comes out.

    Perhaps the bubble has finally burst, as it does for every game eventually.
  • Madder-Max #24 5 years ago

    Dont care. Still getting it later on. LCS was basically marketed as a filler and so is this and Scarface is the ONLY serious competition so far.

    £14 squid in Tesco. Hopefully it wont make my PS2 judder to a halt....
    Edited by 1 at 09/03/07 @ 13:01
  • Skeletor #25 5 years ago

    6...hehe, seems like Scarface finally claimed back its territory. Nice one, Tony.
    http://ww w.eurogamer.net/article.php?art...
  • [maven] #26 5 years ago

    I love the 4 votes this game got from users (2 x 1 + 2 x 10) in the Average Reader Score box.
    We really appreciate you contributing your informed opinions... ;_;
  • jonsaan #27 5 years ago

    'I love the 4 votes this game got from users (2 x 1 + 2 x 10) in the Average Reader Score box.
    We really appreciate you contributing your informed opinions... ;_; '

    I never noticed that bit. I have voted too now. hahahaha
  • Feanor #28 5 years ago

    Clive, if you're going to buy games and not play them, buy something like Okami!
  • ERG1008 #29 5 years ago

    GTA:SA is one of my most played on & favourite games ever......... but I just couldn't get into LCS at all.
    It just felt "half-arsed" which is what this sounds like.
    Ah well as Mr.Reed puts it
    "Luckily, there's not long to wait for a real sequel to banish the memories of this opportunistic filler offering"
  • CitizenGeek #30 5 years ago

    It's sad that this'll be the game that knocks FFXII off of number in the UK. But, thems the ways.

    If I was going to get this game, I'd get it on PSP.
  • Tomo #31 5 years ago

    Think I'll pick up the PSP version inevitably. I must complete every GTA game in life - it is my sole purpose in life.

    Admittedly tho, GTA:LCS was the weakest I'd played, but purely being a PSP title made up for that.

    That said, I could easily understand the tedium of playing these on the PS2.
  • squeakyg #32 5 years ago

    I've played and loved very GTA game of this generation (plus some clones like Saints Row), despite the gameplay annoyances inherent to the genre. However, VCS is the only one I haven't played to completion. It didn't hold my interest. I finally decided that I don't want to play this genre *yet again* until the next generation brings a big overhaul. I've done it enough.

    Crackdown is great though, precisely because it's not like GTA.

    But you know one of the huge things this game was lacking, that no reviewer mentioned? There's hardly any pedestrian dialogue! The streets are silent. That took away at least 60% of the "character" out of the game. Perhaps it was because of the PSP's technical limitations, seeking the ped dialogue on the UMD and whatnot. Are the peds more talkative on the PS2 port?
  • Pulsar_t #33 5 years ago

    What are you on bashing Vice City? I never liked the GTA series that much, but as anyone who's watched every single episode of Miami Vice will tell you, Vice City had the best 80s atmosphere in a game, ever. It was worth playing for the soundtrack alone.

    As for this tripe, I won't bother with it.
  • MrFlintBlackman #34 5 years ago

    Vice City is best out of the lot of them, LCS was utter shite! I'd still get this over Saints Row anyday.
  • AutoTroll #35 5 years ago

    "GTA fans deserve more than this."

    Eh? It's complete bullshit.

    What exactly have GTA fans done to *deserve* anything? Cured cancer?
    Edited by 1 at 09/03/07 @ 23:34
  • kentmonkey #36 5 years ago

    I've never "got" any GTA game. The lack of a mid-level save game mechanic or worse still, not being able to start a mission with the weapons and armour you had has always made my blood boil. I have about 4 hours a week to game, I don't want to spend an hour of that shuffling back to and through bloody levels buying stuff again and driving all the way back across the city to the bloody level.
    RANT RANT RANT RANT RANT

    It's always suffered from the "jack of all trades" engine to me as well. Awful 3rd person controls, pretty poor AI and a functional driving section cobbled together I never really understood how it got so raved about or why so many people liked it.

    Sure the first one was very different, I can see the attraction for that one, but thereon in, not a chance. The series has always frustrated me more than entertained me , each to their own though.
  • kentmonkey #37 5 years ago

    Nope, we're the type that hold jobs don't have an awful lot of disposable time and don't want to have to restart a mission 10 times from the very beginning...without any pickups that you had when you started the mission and 52 miles away in the arse end of nowhere.

    Oh noes, we're not teh el1te!!
  • krudster #38 5 years ago

  • matt__jon #39 5 years ago

    Its good to see Eurogamer stop praising the game just because all the hype around it, and point out all the problems everyone else knew for years.

    For the most part I had put up with the shitty design just because there was no other game like it. Hey, means I get some practice time on guitar though!
  • kentmonkey #40 5 years ago

    Egster wrote: lol i have a 40+ hour job but that doesn't mean i'm braindead.

    No, you're absolutely right. Having a 40+ hour job doesn't mean you're braindead...but posting in the style that you do, does.
  • Ryze #41 5 years ago

    Yes, I'd like to campaign for a 'Continue or Restart Mission' option to be added to the Mission Failed screen, and for sections of the missions to be checkpointed so that when you restart, it's from the section that you failed.

    If you've played the mission when you're introduced to Lance Vance, followed by the car chase and the FUCKING STUPID AI SHOOTOUT WITH THE STUPID CONTROLS AND STUPID TIME WASTING SAVE SYSTEM, then you'll know what I mean.

    I've got the PSP version, and I work full time. Can't be bothered with the bollocks of back tracking, so the game is dormant - stuck at the last piss-about mission, like the last 2 GTA games I bought.

    Fix the game, Rockstar. Fix it for GTA IV, even if it involves changing the difficulty setting. Team Ninja managed it with Ninja Gaiden, now sort it!

    /rant over

    Greetings from Munich - The Z and Y kezs are swapped over here!

  • kentmonkey #42 5 years ago

    Greetings Munich! :o)

    Good point about Ninja Gaiden, just goes to prove that properly checkpointing or allowing for mid-level saves doesn't have to lower the challenge of a game.

    In actual fact, I think it adds more fun, you're more inclined to try different things out if you know you haven't got to do it all over again.