Jump to navigation
Advertisement

GamesIndustry.biz: Don't write off Sony tagopt_brief-feature_type-

tagopt_brief-feature_type- by Games Industry.biz

4 August, 2006

Published as part of our sister-site GamesIndustry.biz' widely-read weekly newsletter, the GamesIndustry.biz Editorial is a weekly dissection of one of the issues weighing on the minds of the people at the top of the games business. It appears on Eurogamer a day after it goes out to GI.biz newsletter subscribers.

Pastime of the week for this particular part of the summer silly season - at least, among those who are quite finished scrambling to come to terms with the fact that E3 has gone to the great convention centre in the sky - seems to be coming up with new and interesting ways to cast doubt upon Sony's prospects in the next generation console race. Fanboy arguments supported by misconception and exaggeration abound - and that's just in the mainstream media and among analysts. What's going on on Internet forums makes even less sense.

Sony only has itself to blame for this, of course, and we can't say that our hearts are bleeding with sympathy for the Japanese giant. The arrogance displayed by SCE boss Ken Kutaragi and his US right hand man Kaz Hirai every time they open their mouths on the topic of the PS3 can be explained by their success in dominating the last generation with PS2, but that certainly doesn't justify it - and the genial manner of the firm's studio boss Phil Harrison can only go so far in terms of repairing the damage done to the firm's image by his overbearing bosses.

However, even if Sony is failing to endear itself to the media, to analysts or to gamers at the moment, that's no reason for the reality of the next generation console battle to be ignored. Judging from reports in the past fortnight, it would be easy for an outside observer to assume that it's all over already; the media paints a picture of Microsoft being victorious before the first shot is even fired, with Sony's overloaded battlecruiser set to sink before it even leaves port.

The fact is that there's little evidence to support that assertion. Even if Microsoft reaches its 10 million unit target by the end of the year - which does look likely - that's still not a lead that guarantees dominance in a market where the top-selling console last time (the PlayStation 2) sold over 100 million units. Both Sony and Nintendo are planning to ship their new consoles at such a rate that they could, in theory, have caught up or passed out Microsoft by the end of 2007; a scenario which is not exactly likely, admittedly, but certainly not impossible either.

Equally certain is that Sony's price point will dissuade some consumers - but a host of factors could conspire to outweigh that price point. If Sony has software with massive appeal to the mass market - something which Microsoft will still lack even coming into 2007, with the resolutely hardcore Gears of War being its key title for Christmas - or better again, if Blu-Ray really does prove to be as popular with consumers as movie bosses seem to believe, then the price point could prove inconsequential, at least for the first ten million units to pass through the channel.

This is quite an optimistic way of viewing Sony's chances, of course - but it's worth balancing out some of the pessimism which has been doing the rounds so often that it almost seems to be accepted as fact in some quarters. Much of this, it's clear, is influenced heavily by the American dominance of English-language media. Microsoft is so hugely successful in America relative to other territories that it can skew the global perspective; whereas the Xbox 360 has sold 3.3 million units in North America, it has sold only 1.3 million in Europe and just 400,000 elsewhere, making it fair to say that North America is still the only territory where the Xbox 360 has seen major success.

However, to listen to the media you would think that the success of the console has been replicated everywhere - which is simply not the case. North America is unquestionably a very important market, but Europe is expected to overtake it in size terms in the coming years, and despite the waning importance of Japan, it is still a key market - and other Asian territories are growing in importance. Microsoft is, in a sense, picking up the easiest consumers first. It is converting Xbox customers into Xbox 360 customers, and playing to a highly receptive home crowd - which suggests that the second ten million will be a lot more difficult than the first, because it will have to expand its reach not only demographically, but internationally.

That's where Sony already has the advantage; the PlayStation brand is synonymous with gaming around the world and across a huge demographic, not just in North America and with a narrow range of players. When reading the various reports which seem to imply that Sony has already failed or that victory is in the bag for Microsoft, it's important to remember that. Microsoft's use of first mover advantage has certainly been more impressive than many observers expected, but come November, the firm will still only have its home crowd in the bag. 2006, and even 2007, are only a warm-up - the battle for hearts and minds among casual gamers, international markets and wider demographics hasn't even begun yet.

For more views on the industry and to keep up to date with news relevant to the games business, read GamesIndustry.biz. You can sign up to the newsletter and receive the GamesIndustry.biz Editorial directly each Thursday afternoon.

Advertisement

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 128 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Stormflood
04/08/06 @ 11:28
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yup.
tobi
04/08/06 @ 11:36
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
when the PS3 comes out its game over for MS!!!
SimonM7
04/08/06 @ 11:44
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Dammit, leave us alone with your realistic thinking! This is the window in which we can all dream of a better place, and actually half believe in that dream. It's like the Dreamcast's first year all over again, with a great lineup, great marketing, yummy online gaming and the thought of Sony just maaaaybeeee not killing everything around them.

At least a shoddy launch lineup has put off my purchase of the Ps3 into 2007 and Gears release cementing the dream for a while longer. :O)
alpha-0ne
04/08/06 @ 12:00
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
GamesIndustry.biz are simply a marketing arms for sony, very little challenging questions ever when they interview them
El_MUERkO
04/08/06 @ 12:03
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
i dont know why Gi wasted their breathe (or bandwidth) on that article, the people writing off sony wont be swayed they're far to blinkered
jellyhead
04/08/06 @ 12:08
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sony do have several hurdles to overcome though, there's no denying that.
well, we'll all just have to wait and see won't we.
jiveguy
04/08/06 @ 12:17
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Two words: The Real Next Gen


:\
Edited 1 times, most recently on 04/08/06 @ 16:42
Dizzy
04/08/06 @ 12:19
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
We don't care about dominance... we care about a more even market share.
PlugMonkey
04/08/06 @ 12:20
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
At least a shoddy launch lineup has put off my purchase of the Ps3 into 2007 and Gears release cementing the dream for a while longer.

Christ. It's a dark day for us all when our 'dream' is for the coporate, capitalist, money grubbing monster of Sony to be defeated by the cuddly, fun, champion-of-the-people that is Microsoft. Quite some improvement, that would be.

PS3 needs some killer exclusives titles or it will go the way of the PSP. Undoubtably the nicer, shinier, cooler piece of kit, but ultimately the preserve of the gadget freaks.
holloguts
04/08/06 @ 12:22
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sony don't understand that it's core of customers are casual gamers. They won't buy PS3 at any price, because the majority of them cannot buy at any price. Blue Ray has no importance to anyone at the moment except tech freaks, the casual gamer wants 'cheap' gaming regardless of specs. It seems to me that it's not just a case of buying a PS3 or 360 anymore, but buying a 360 and Wii or just a PS3. Regardless of Sony's bullish attitude and indifference to it's 'loyal' customers they will be succesful, but they will also alienate a lot of customers who will shift platform based on price alone.

I intend to buy a PS3 if it is succesful, but not at the launch price, ONLY when it drops below £250. If that means in five years, well, then I will have to decide if Microsofts new console would be a better choice. Microsoft have said the 360 will have a 5 year life. Sony say the PS3 will have a 10 year life.

Sony need to look at the casual gamer, they are not as brand loyal as they believe. Certainly not outside of Japan. And if Microsoft do not gain the lions share of the next gen market, I have to say it now looks like Nintendo may take it with a not too next gen console.

Sony are in for a far tougher battle than they are making out. It's ignorance is damaging it's sales already, before launch, couple that with developers holding back and showing they don't have confidence in the console makes the casual gamers look elsewhere.

The PS3 will be a great console, and will be no more powerful than the 360 (regardles of hype from Sony and fanboys alike). I hope it is succesful, but I would prefer it to be because Sony see sense and lower it's price. Because when the hardcore gamers have all bought their PS3's, sales will drop (outside of Japan at least).

Blue Ray and HD seem to be the main push for the PS3, but as with the 360, gamers are not rushing to buy HD TV's, so the Blue Ray and HD really don't have any importance. Casual gamers are not going to buy a PS3 (or 360) and then shell out another £800+ for HD TV. If it looks ok on a normal SD TV then they will be happy, and the 360 can do that at a cheaper price.

As far as games go, I have not seen anything announced for the PS3 that could be classed as a killer game. There are mediocre titles and exclusive mediocre titles. But nothing BIG.

This article was interesting, but it assumes too much by scratching the surface and too many IF's. Digging a little deeper and wider would show that there are too many IF's, and the exact opposite could be supposed or assumed.

Another big factor of the 60 or 100 million of the sales of the PS2 (Sony's loyal customer base as it believes), is that the consoles were bought for children by parents. They are the main customers and the biggest bulk of customers. And Sony's high price point will make them look at the other 2 consoles available.

Hard core gamers will que to get their hands on the PS3, but the main bulk of buyers will turn away at the first sight of the price tag.

Les
04/08/06 @ 12:25
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Of course you shouldn't write off Sony already. Gaming media is rapidly approaching tabloid level journalism. Last year Sony ruled the world and it was game over for Microsoft. This year, all of a sudden, it’s entirely the opposite. And it’s not as if the 360 is selling that stellar. Even PS2 is still selling better.

But let’s all just wait and see how the PS3 fares at launch and stop this silly speculation.
Les
04/08/06 @ 12:27
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Hard core gamers will que to get their hands on the PS3, but the main bulk of buyers will turn away at the first sight of the price tag."

But the same goes for the 360. See above, PS2 still outsells it even though shortages are not an issue anymore (rather the opposite).
Chtulie
04/08/06 @ 12:30
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Agree with the upthread mention that Sony's succesful because they captured the casual gamer. And the brand might have an advantage on their audience in the sense that it is familiar, it is not the gamer audience that has any sort of brand loyalty.
The ps3 at the moment seems to be shedding 3rd party developers and exclusive franchises.
Once the thing is out and it'll become apparent that the graphical diffirences between the 360 and ps3 is neglible (certainly not as big as say, between the x-box1 and ps2) but the price is double, the 360 will become a lot more interesting to the casual gamer. Esp. as it seems that the 360 is much more likely to be effectivly hacked/pirated (a big reason why the ps1 sold so well was because it's cd format allowed people to copy games very easily compared to all the other cartridge based games).
Tweakmonkey
04/08/06 @ 12:32
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Good article.
holloguts
04/08/06 @ 12:34
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"But the same goes for the 360. See above, PS2 still outsells it even though shortages are not an issue anymore (rather the opposite)."

Agreed, the PS2 may still be selling over all other consoles (but I 'presume' more in Japan than Europe or North America). And this shows exactly what I mean by casual gamers not being pulled to a high priced console because of it's specs. As I said, the casual gamer wants cheap gaming, and high specs are not important. When these casual gamers do want to move to a next gen console, they are not even going to look at the high price PS3 when they can 'probably' buy 2 new next gen consoles for less, and as far as they are concerned, deliver the same quality games.

PlugMonkey
04/08/06 @ 12:37
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
But let’s all just wait and see how the PS3 fares at launch and stop this silly speculation.

Yes! Let's all just sit here in silence and stare at the wall for 3 months!! Discussion about the future of the entire gaming landscape is just silly!!!

Of course the PS2 is outselling the 360. It'll be outselling the PS3 as well soon. I don't have the figures at hand, but I'd be astonished if the PS1 didn't outsell the PS2 for a fair time after launch as well. For some reason, this time round, everyone seems to expect the generation switch to happen overnight, rather than over a couple of years - as has been the case with every single previous generation.
Les
04/08/06 @ 13:35
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Yes! Let's all just sit here in silence and stare at the wall for 3 months!! Discussion about the future of the entire gaming landscape is just silly!!!"

Discussion is allright just as professional speculation is. But the gaming media know nothing of economics and fanboy discussions add even less value.
AcidSnake
04/08/06 @ 13:39
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nothing BIG?
AT launch maybe...The PS3 has a few exclusive goodies...
I care only about MGS4, but I'm sure there are others...
(riiiidge...)
Knot
04/08/06 @ 13:39
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Lol. On the contrary. Imo, GI editor Fahey is usually not fond of anything Sony.

Even though it might be or might seem an arrogant attitude displayed by Sony,
the same could be said about Nintendo at the end of the SNES era.

The first paragraph of this article sounds indeed very biased against Sony.
Indeed PS3 doesn't seem all too impressive atm, when compared with what
Sony claims it will be, but there's no need to write it off THAT quickly and it
serves nobody to talk about Sony as if it's 'dirt' all the time.

Eurogamer's objective integrity should remain.
fxgogo
04/08/06 @ 14:10
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
well put.
Balסּr
04/08/06 @ 14:48
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
No matter how you tilt, rotate or spin it. £425 is still a bloody enormous hurdle for the masses to get over. Worse yet, the console is already running months late and we've still seen next to no gameplay footage to justify spending £425.

By contrast the Wii60 bundle for less money and an incredibly strong line up of exclusive games has to be very, very compelling. Even if you rule out the 360 in Japan, the Wii will more than likely be in accordance with the DS vs PSP.

Sony have no future in videogames, not whilst they're trying to sell us glorified, overpriced DVD players (PSX2).

Edited 1 times, most recently on 04/08/06 @ 15:48
spongebob
04/08/06 @ 14:49
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This was an excellent article. I wish there was more editorials like this in the games media.

Truth is definitely at this point in time that no one knows what is going to happen. It's not over for anyone. And there's no winners yet either.
Les
04/08/06 @ 15:26
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"No matter how you tilt, rotate or spin it. £425 is still a bloody enormous hurdle for the masses to get over."

True, but I don't expect price to be a problem for the launch batch as there will not be enough consoles to fulfill demand (and I know this is speculation). And of course Sony shall not tell us what they will do with the price after the first batch to make sure as few as possible people postpone their purchase till after the first price drop.
Edited 3 times, most recently on 04/08/06 @ 16:28
AcidSnake
04/08/06 @ 15:29
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@spongebob
Cue Atari coming out of left field and becoming the winner of this generation with their new console...
Knot
04/08/06 @ 15:38
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
^ With their recent losses ? and having to sell certain licenses of theirs ?

Atari ? keep on kidding yourself.
TripleSeven
04/08/06 @ 15:53
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Seems to be a rather reasonable perspective. Oh, and I'm sure Sony will dominate this year's TGS (and Microsoft will announce a price drop for its 360).
It's imo a good strategy to get rid of all the bad stuff at once (E3) and to rule shortly before the console's release.
Ah, well we'll see. I'm definately sick of all that PS3 and Sony will fail comments.
AcidSnake
04/08/06 @ 16:03
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sorry, forgot to include sarcasm tags....
:)
Edited 1 times, most recently on 04/08/06 @ 17:03
04/08/06 @ 16:26
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
No matter how you tilt, rotate or spin it. £425 is still a bloody enormous hurdle for the masses to get over. Worse yet, the console is already running months late and we've still seen next to no gameplay footage to justify spending £425.

OK, this I don't understand. Little Johnny can't afford PS3, so decides to buy a 360 instead. For the masses, Playstation IS videogames.

Why would the gaming "masses" looking to play MGS4 or VF5 or FF13 (staple PS franchises) suddenly decide to buy a 360 because they can't afford the PS3 to play said games. More likely they'll just decide to sit on the PS2 and wait for a PS3 price drop.

By contrast the Wii60 bundle for less money and an incredibly strong line up of exclusive games has to be very, very compelling.

That doesn't sound terribly convincing.
toy_brain
04/08/06 @ 16:41
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Everyone loves to assume they know how 'the masses' will react to the upcoming console war.
In truth they know jack shit, and are simply trying to apply their 'logic' in such a way as to show how the PS3/360/wii is the 'logical' choice.

Consumers.... I mean average punters, dont nesecarily use the same 'logic' as internet fanboys and gaming nerds like us.
For some, price is a big factor. For others its strength of brand, oh and these people ARE able to afford £425 - via the magic of credit cards :P

So, anyone thinking of saying "When person X walks into a store and sees the PS3 for £425 and a 360+GoW for £350" just..... shut up please.
Or actually go and ask one of these 'average punters'. has anyone actually bothered to do that?
Balסּr
04/08/06 @ 16:58
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
OK, this I don't understand. Little Johnny can't afford PS3, so decides to buy a 360 instead.

Yes. Because the man at GAME said it's just as good, plays all the same games and cost £150 less. PlayStation may well be a big brand name, but only a fool would underestimate the Xbox brand or Microsoft's commitment to gaming.

That doesn't sound terribly convincing.

I'm curious to know what kind of gamer is it that doesn't find a great value console with some damn excellent looking titles terribly convincing? :/
Edited 1 times, most recently on 04/08/06 @ 17:59
Vin
04/08/06 @ 18:00
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"That's where Sony already has the advantage; the PlayStation brand is synonymous with gaming around the world and across a huge demographic, not just in North America and with a narrow range of player."

Tell that to Nintendo 11 years ago.
inpHilltr8r
04/08/06 @ 18:37
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
That would be the Nintendo that's still the most profitable video games company on the planet? You know, the one with the fastest selling platform?
drumbaby
04/08/06 @ 19:19
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Agreed, the PS2 may still be selling over all other consoles (but I 'presume' more in Japan than Europe or North America

No, pretty much in all territories actually (home console wise)....
Rash'
04/08/06 @ 19:37
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm shocked!! EG publishes, admittedly through a second source, a positive take on the PS3 situation. This was a refreshing read I must say. Having read so much bad press on Sony's plans for it's Playstation brand it's a nice change to have someone take the initiative and present a better outlook on the whole situation.
Rash'
04/08/06 @ 19:54
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Balסּr: "By contrast the Wii60 bundle for less money and an incredibly strong line up of exclusive games has to be very, very compelling. Even if you rule out the 360 in Japan, the Wii will more than likely be in accordance with the DS vs PSP.

Sony have no future in videogames, not whilst they're trying to sell us glorified, overpriced DVD players (PSX2)."

Talk about an uneducated response. This is what I mean about the bad press Sony's been receiving. Yes some I can understand, but crap like this is just unjustified. I'd like this person to tell me how much the Wii will cost and where he has receive this questionable info from when I know for sure no confirmation has been made by Ninty. Gaming is what it is today because of Sony, so remarks like; "Sony have no future in videogames..." just makes me sick. It is this level of ignorance that has no future in videogames.
Lex_Luthor
04/08/06 @ 19:56
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Good article.

Don't really care about the launch or how much it sells or whatever. All I need to know is it's got a lot of nice looking games on the way, and that's good enough for me.
Balסּr
04/08/06 @ 20:09
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Whilst it's not official, it is pretty much expected that the Wii will retail for $150 - $200, Nintendo themselves stated that it would not be over $250. Regardless of the price, you can't argue about the huge amount of exclusives for both the 360 and Wii which have already announced and then compare that to the amount of exclusive games announced for the PS3, and worse yet, even less of them shown to the public.

Whilst all this may make you ill, I for one, am glad that such companies like Microsoft and Nintendo are bothering to cater for the price conscious consumer and are not attempting to exploit their fans loyalty by demanding exorbitant prices for a DVD player.

As I said, as long as Sony are trying to flog that DVD player dressed up as a console, they'll have no future (See attach ratios for PSP / UMD vs DS for reference). To expand on that, should they decide to focus on the games again, by showing us some real games and showing us real reasons why those games require a machine that is £425, I'm sure Sony would not be shrouded by so much negativity.
azurelas_2
04/08/06 @ 20:18
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
As a "AAA" title, methinks Resistance: Fall Of Man will turn quite a few heads^^...

And what's so special about Gears of War? It's just a basic 3rd person shooter with good graphics.Revolutionary.

So far, microsoft have yet to come up with one game that can convince me that can't be done on current-gen hardware.
Lex_Luthor
04/08/06 @ 20:23
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"As a "AAA" title, methinks Resistance: Fall Of Man will turn quite a few heads^^..."

Perhaps, but it looks like just the usual done to death FPS type of thing we've seen so many times in recent years. I'll wait to see how the final game looks, but right now, it merely looks pretty but unremarkable.

"And what's so special about Gears of War? It's just a basic 3rd person shooter with good graphics.Revolutionary."

Good graphics and hype are all some games need to sell themselves though, as we've sadly seen proven in the past.
Balסּr
04/08/06 @ 20:27
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I thought I was watching a trailer for Resistance: Fall Of Man the other day, turns out it was just Black on the original Xbox. :/
spongebob
04/08/06 @ 20:28
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
What is it with grown up people bitching about the PS3 price point? Even damn kids are buying expensive mp3 players (iPod is not cheap), mobile phones and home theater crap. Or their parents are buying them.

Compared to what kind of money people are pouring on all these commodities (esp. entertainment), I don't think that 650 euro price point is going to make a difference. Just think what the damn HDTVs cost? And they're selling like hotcakes.

I've yet to hear what a regular consumer thinks of the price. Now, there's an idea for an article, Eurogamer/GamesIndustry.biz. Do a street gallup and ask the regular Joe/Jane who might not even know that PS3 is out in November what they think of the pricetag.
Rash'
04/08/06 @ 20:39
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Balסּr: FYI the multimedia set top box was what both Sony and Microsoft were aiming for. However Microsoft realised that realistically they couldn't compete with the Playstation brand if they went head to head. So rather than wait for HD-DVD they opted against and launched ahead. So technically Micosoft's product is one born out of necessity than anything else.

As for UMD, granted the format hasn't achieved it's projected success as a movie format, but as a portable games format few would argue with it, as games like Tekken will attest.
Les
04/08/06 @ 20:52
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"To expand on that, should they decide to focus on the games again, by showing us some real games and showing us real reasons why those games require a machine that is £425, I'm sure Sony would not be shrouded by so much negativity."

I'm sure Sony plans its press releases very carefully. Doing it right now doesn't make much sense strategically. In just one or two months the games will look even better than they do right now and there are no great 360 games coming in the near future that might convince gamers to buy the 360 afterall. You can only keep up the momentum of marketing hype for a limited amount of time, so they will make more and more noise as the launch date draws near.

"Perhaps, but it looks like just the usual done to death FPS type of thing we've seen so many times in recent years."

Well at least the setting of the story is more original than most recent FPSs save Half Life 2. A non-WWII fps that's not staring space marines in ridiculous suits actually seems quite refreshing...

"Good graphics and hype are all some games need to sell themselves though, as we've sadly seen proven in the past."

yeah, a certain fps sequel comes to mind...
Les
04/08/06 @ 20:59
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"As for UMD, granted the format hasn't achieved it's projected success as a movie format"

UMD was a really stupid idea from Sony. Making the lower quality version of a movie more expensive than the regular DVD one was sure to fail. They should offer some scheme that if you already own the DVD, you can get the UMD at cost or for a small fee. Or sell both in a single package at a small premium. I mean, you already paid for the IP of the movie, having to pay again and even more money to be able to watch it from a different format is crazy.

They wouldn't make much money from the UMDs themselves but it might boost PSP sales.
toy_brain
04/08/06 @ 20:59
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"(See attach ratios for PSP / UMD vs DS for reference)"

Dumbest.
Comment.
Ever!

How can you compare atach rates for PSP/UMD to DS? The DS does not have ANYTHING like an equivilent to UMD movies. So you are effectively trying to compare the PSP against...... nothing.
Well done :rolls eyes:

The fact that UMD movies have done poorly is a fair enough point, but they dont seem to have dampened PSP game sales any.
Rash'
04/08/06 @ 21:11
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"UMD was a really stupid idea from Sony. Making the lower quality version of a movie more expensive than the regular DVD one was sure to fail. They should offer some scheme that if you already own the DVD, you can get the UMD at cost or for a small fee. Or sell both in a single package at a small premium. I mean, you already paid for the IP of the movie, having to pay again and even more money to be able to watch it from a different format is crazy."

I don't think there's much wrong with the format for movies, but Sony seriously needs to re-evaluate how they intend for the format to re-establish it's early though limited success.
Balסּr
04/08/06 @ 21:28
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Microsoft already have a pretty successful multimedia platform it's called a Windows Media Centre PC. The 360 is certainly not aiming to become the Media Centre, its focus has always been on gaming first and foremost. The incredibly high attach rates of the 360 reflect this, as does the backing from all publishers, with not one of the worlds major publishers snubbing next-gen Xbox 360 development.

The PS3 however is being snubbed by a few of the big publishers already, and like the PSP, the platform is concentrating on being a multimedia device rather than a full-fledged gaming system. On the PSP platform, already UMD movies have failed, a precursor to Blu-ray some believe, and the attach rates for UMD games are disappointing too. You could attribute that to the fact that because the device isn't squarely focused on gaming people aren't buying it for gaming. If that trend continues with he PS3, which too, is more focused on the multimedia, then Microsoft could gain a lot more momentum and gather even further support for their system as their attach rate continues to appeal to publishers as well as the very high returns Xbox Live Marketplace is providing publishers.

EDIT: I was taking about each of the platforms software attach rates, PSP Games / UMD Movies vs DS games. My apologies if that wasn't clear.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 04/08/06 @ 22:34
Shawnzee
04/08/06 @ 21:51
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Too late, Ive already written it off, 600 dollar PoS with a crappy controller.
Rash'
04/08/06 @ 21:53
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Balסּr, Windows media centre PC isn't a product comparable to to the vision foreseen for the multimedia set top box. Respectively; one is a general purpose system, while the other is an all in one accessible entertainment device. Microsoft and Sony were both aware of this as they aimed for the latter. The Seattle giant's change in strategy I've already explained. Microsoft's new add-on strategy further backs my claims. If as you say the 360 was all about games then MS would employ a similar strategy to Ninty and not concern itself with the market Sony are aiming for with Blu-ray. Fact of the matter is their's is a strategy compromised by pressure. Now they have to resolve the issues they weren't able to address during the creation of the product through the use of add-ons, which history tells us is a risky strategy.
Les
04/08/06 @ 22:00
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"The 360 is certainly not aiming to become the Media Centre, its focus has always been on gaming first and foremost."

Yeah, that's why you can connect iPods to it and MS is stressing the HD-DVD add-on constantly...

Microsoft cares sh*t about gaming. All they want is total domination for its windows os. Which, as a company they are entitled to strive for, but we the consumers pay the price. There aren't many products that have an 85%+ margin like windows has. And while right now those excess profits fund the 360 and keep its price down, they will stop doing so once Sony and Nintendo are destroyed.

Comments: 1-50 of 128 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery