Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Preview

21st Century Toy.

At last: an answer to the ancient question of how videogame heroes manage to lug around enough military hardware to turn Stevenage into a smoking hole in the ground without wheezing and having a sit down every ten minutes. This future-soldiers in the new Ghost Recon stride around the world's battlefields wearing exo-skeletons, which enable them to keep running, jumping and pistol-whipping even when burdened with transforming machine guns, shoulder-mounted rocket-launchers and invisibility-generating projectors.

Clearly, Ghost Recon isn't a thinly veiled Iraq war analogy anymore. With Future Soldier, Ubisoft Paris has caught the bus half-way to Terminatorland. Want to come along too?

The plot concerns, as the Invisible Rules state all shooter plots now must, Russian ultra-nationalists attempting to seize control of their country and those around it. Shooting Russians is fine so long as they're ultra-nationalists, according to the Invisible Rules.

For the most part, you play the leader of the Ghosts, a commando squad sent to upset the ultra-nationalists' invadey plans. He's called Captain Edward Kachenko (nickname: Kozak), and he's an American soldier with Russian roots, so he has some personal investment in the brutal coup d'etat.

'Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Future Soldier' Screenshot 1

The Drone calls to mind the old tanks from X-COM. A reference meaningless to anyone born after 1985, I fear.

You will, however, spend some time seeing the game through the eyes of incidental characters, such as a non-ultra-nationalist Russian engineer defending his invaded land against neo-terrorists with mere buckshot, and the bodyguard of the soon-to-be-overthrown Russian president. This is, of course, nothing at all like Modern Warfare's switching perspectives and set-piece scenes of terrorism aftermath.

Where GRFS isn't bowing unthinkingly to the much-visited altar of near-future military shooters is with its squad setup. It's moved away significantly from the hyper-tactical approach of GR: Advanced Warfighter 1 & 2, but it's still about a gang of guys with complementary abilities.

They will have distinct personalities this time around - "We think you'll like these guys," claims senior game writer Gabriella Shrager. Bloodthirsty 30K, brattish lady-brute Bones and silent hunter Pepper will be Kozak's key chums for 14 missions, spanning 12-14 hours, and will be playable co-operatively. In fact, co-operation is sewn into GRFS' very fabric. But first, let's look at the different classes you can play as in any of the game's modes.

'Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Future Soldier' Screenshot 2

Optical Camouflage renders you unspottable when still but does the Predator-style light-bending thing if you move.

The idea is that everyone's an equally capable soldier in all fields, with their battlefield abilities defined solely by their gear load-out. The Engineer's main toy is his personal EMP burst, able to blackout any technology in the area. It's tech that does exist, with Ubisoft claiming it's recently been tested on Israeli tanks - what they've done here is to miniaturise it into portable form.

He'll be backing up the main fighting class, the Commando. This frontline soldier carries around a moldular rifle, whose jigsaw structure can be arranged to transform it between rifle, shotgun, grenade launcher and door-breaching modes. And more still, no doubt, as Ubisoft's Persistent Elite Creation unlock/experience/ranking system introduced in Splinter Cell: Conviction returns here. The fact it isn't called Tom Clancy's Persistent Elite Creation system suggests it's due to appear in many more games to come.

The Commando also totes the weapon that had viewers of the recent live-action teaser trailer quivering with gun-nerd joy: the Back Mortar, a micro-projectile missile launcher sported on the shoulders thanks to the muscle power added by the aforementioned exoskeleton. One idea presented a few times during the game presentation concerns 2030's soldier being an F16 fighter jet on legs, and it's the apocalyptic multi-kills of the Back Mortar that provide the strongest evidence for this.

The Sniper isn't anywhere near so much of a killing machine - instead functioning primarily as a spotter, thanks to his heartbeat sensor. This uber-tracker can locate enemies in the far distance, in hiding, through multiple walls, then share it with his team's CrossCom heads-up display. With a sniper in your gang, it's unlikely that anyone will get the jump on you.

The fourth class is weirder. It's an all-terrain robotic drone known as Dog - a nod to the mobile ammo dump/cover drone from the GRAWs, but now an active part of the fight. It's not simply an overweight remote control car anymore, but a machinegun-toting AI tank with its own set of controls and able to soak up a ton of damage before going explodey-bye-bye. It's expensive, but it's infinitely more replaceable than a human life with decades of military training. If things get too hot, Dog's your fall guy.

All these omni-death abilities mean Ghost Recon is no longer a game of skulking behind rocks, picking people off from great distances. Combat is much more close quarters, enemies far more plentiful and the cover system is far more like the one in Gears of War. While the use of gadgetry and teamwork means it's not a straightforward corridor-pounder, it's definitely much more of an action shooter than a tactical shooter.

Certain corners of the internet will be upset, and likely to use a certain phrase beginning with 'd' and ending with 'umbed-down'. True, accessibility in the name of larger audiences seems to underpin Future Soldier, but there's a good chance that'll make for a more enjoyable, bombastic game too.

Especially in multiplayer, where Ubi is trying something new to lure in players who traditionally fear being repeatedly shot in the back of the head and staring at respawn screens for hours. The Link-Up system is intended to evoke two highly-trained soldiers navigating through a war-torn environment back-to-back, ensuring 360 degree coverage of the battlefield. Select a team mate, hit a button and you'll be paired with him - wherever he goes, you go, with your brain left free to worry about finding guys to shoot rather than deal with navigation et al.

'Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Future Soldier' Screenshot 3

Laughably heavily post-processed bullshot this image may be, but it does display the increased melee power the exoskeleton grants you.

In other words, if you're a multiplayer greenhorn, this is your way in. It's a little like sharing a tank in something like Battlefield - one guy's driving, the other's manning the rocket launcher. "It saves you ten years of training in first person shooters," claims creative director Olivier Dauba.

Link-Up is worth it for more veteran guys too, as being paired with anyone grants a mega-buff and additional abilities - such as the Engineer's EMP shield and the Commando's fatter firepower. More power equals more points, and that's what even the most selfish player craves above all.

Does this, then, spell the end of lone wolves, the problem that dogs the likes of Battlefield and MAG? Link-Up is certainly going to shake-up GRFS's 8v8 multiplayer as well as its coop. Dauba calls it "a revolution", though we won't know until we've tried the thing ourselves whether that's anything more than standard press-release newspeak.

This latest instalment in the Ghost Recon series may be faster and flashier than its measured, belly-crawling predecessors, but its military hardware is so new and so different that there's no way a whole new clutch and concept of tactics won't spin out of it. Whether Future Soldier is armchair soldiers' future remains to be seen, but its wonderful toys definitely demand to be played with.

Comments (47) Latest comment 2 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • glottis0 #1 2 years ago

    Sounds like they're making it like Crysis. The whole appeal of Ubisoft's Tom Clancy stuff used to be their grounding in (albeit a hollywood version of) realism.

    Judging from the new Splinter Cell demo, HAWX, Ghost Recon 2, EndWar etc, they're relying too much on silly, contrived mechanics and far-future nonsense.
  • galerian86 #2 2 years ago

    Persistent Elite Creation is a new feature from SC: Conviction? Wasn't it was used in Rainbow Six: Lockdown first?
  • reelbigkris #3 2 years ago

    I briefly misread the frontpage title as "future sailors"

    Too much boosh... or perhaps not enough?
  • stuarty_2003 #4 2 years ago

    Looks like fun.

    Also, they could've come up with a better name than "Persistent Elite Creation System."

    +1 for fun, though!
  • mkreku #5 2 years ago

    You lost me (and all my interest in this game) at Russian ultra-nationalist. God I'm tired of hearing the same plot being used over and over to appease American fans.
  • dylman #6 2 years ago

    I got as far as Ubisoft and stopped reading.

    Which really really is a shame but there you go.
  • stuarty_2003 #7 2 years ago

    @mkreku - it's those Invisible Rules of modern FPS games writing.

    Does the new Medal of Honor have Ruski's in it?
  • sneetch #8 2 years ago

    +1 to Alec for calling it a bullshot, we could all see that but it's nice to see it being pointed out. :)
  • MiniAmin #9 2 years ago

    At Glottis0 +1

    I remember last gen, I'd be thrilled with the announcement of a new Ubisoft title. Splinter Cell and the former Ghost Recon titles all contained what you eloquently describe as "a Hollywood version of realism" it was addictive and great. Since Ubisoft bought Tom Clancy's name, they've tarnished it with games which contain these hyperbolic plot-lines and other far-future crap.
    Edited by 1 at 12/04/10 @ 17:34
  • patchbox360 #10 2 years ago

    not sure, but is it possible to preview a game that you haven't played??

    its just that there has been zero video footage of this game being played and if you have played it where is the video footage?
  • ChthonicEcho #11 2 years ago

    No PC release? Is that the direction Ubisoft claimed their PC versions will evolve in - total extinction?
  • DirtyDubs #12 2 years ago

    Whats with all the anti-russian stuff these days in FPS's. How about playing as a non-descript nationalist where you need to secure freedom for your country against the Brits or Yank capitalist scum. Would make a nice change imo.
  • sneetch #13 2 years ago

    @ChthonicEcho
    No PC release? Is that the direction Ubisoft claimed their PC versions will evolve in - total extinction?

    Nah, it's on PC and Wii too apparently.
  • sarcasmoidosis #14 2 years ago

    It will most likely be delayed on PC. For "further polishing" :|
  • Madafunkola #15 2 years ago

    I'd like more on the Invisible Rules!
    #47: You can spot a bad guy a mile off as he is the one standing next to the big red oil drum of explosive material.
  • magicpanda #16 2 years ago

  • newell123 #17 2 years ago

    Not sure about this one, I'm sure it will be fun - but the general consensus is right - future war theme is becoming tired.. maybe not tired but definitely lacking in originality. But Ubisoft are a business after all and they are catering for a market that will no doubt lap it up. Controllable tank thing sounds good mind :p.
  • coolbritannia #18 2 years ago

    I think it sounds awful. BFBC2 looks to continue reigning until Reach then.
  • Pablo2k5 #19 2 years ago

    @ ChthonicEcho ...you said "No PC release? Is that the direction Ubisoft claimed their PC versions will evolve in - total extinction?"

    Are you blind? It clearly states PC at the top of the preview page... and stop all this Ubi/DRM bashing nonsnse already.
  • des #20 2 years ago

    60 fps...hot hot hot
  • GamesConnoisseur #21 2 years ago

    I m looking forward to giving this game a fair go and hoping it ll turns out better than implied. As for no sales cos of this coming from Ubi, no disputes as that is your rights as to how you view the product and the company. Treating customer shabbily then no sales if that is the view.

    As for comments re tired future wars or tired Russkies, now if it was instead tired WW2, or exhausted space opera sci fi?? There are only so many ways to play war war and we jaded gamers are too hard to please perhaps?

    We loves to be delighted with new stories, genres or innovations, I would say GRAW3 would be too samey and that Future War is attempting to take the solid series forward?

    May be wrong but until we get the finished game in our hands, will reserves judgement.
  • metalangel #22 2 years ago

    glottis says it all. Not interested by this quasi-scifi alteration to the setting.
  • paketep #23 2 years ago

  • ChthonicEcho #24 2 years ago

    @Pablo2k5

    Didn't show up when I posted the comment.
  • LHH #25 2 years ago

    Well I was personally hoping for a graw 3 experience in terms of multiplayer co-op campaign missions. They always took teamwork. Ho hum I guess. Might look into it but not before a demo
  • Lotos8ter #26 2 years ago

    Definite purchase for me - even if the guns are moldy...
  • Shrike #27 2 years ago

    Instant sale if this link-up thing means actually holding hands online.
  • Crovax20 #28 2 years ago

    I am seriously disappointed, I didn't expect the franchise would take this route and I really liked GRAW and GRAW 2... I guess its best if I keep to those 2.
  • Frandroid #29 2 years ago

    "Also, they could've come up with a better name than "Persistent Elite Creation System."
    Oh, I'm sure it was so Ubisoft could boast about flexing their PECS.
  • muttler #30 2 years ago

    I think the far-future setting sounds kinda cool... but I was hoping the series would steer back to the gameplay style of the more tactical and realistic previous-gen GR's, instead it's gone even further into the Gear's camp. Which I dont have a problem with (and I love GRAW 1 & 2 sp and mp to bits- and Gears incidentally) but I think it's a damn shame that the ultra-realistic and strategic Ghost Recon gameplay of old is gone and looks like it aint coming back, especially since Operation Flashpoint 2 turned out to be shite.
  • SpaceMonkey77 #31 2 years ago

    I will still buy it, but I think Ubisoft underestimate seasoned players, who enjoy the series for its more tactical element. There's too many games tying to be like Gears now. Sure, you want high sales like the next guy, but be careful how much you compromise.

    I love being in command of squad and giving orders, and after the brilliant hell of BIA: Hell's Highway, more GRAW is needed. Don't mess it up, Ubisoft.
  • seanthejackal #32 2 years ago

    Russians...how original.
  • dnbuk #33 2 years ago

    Another game set in the future? Yawn.
  • 3william56 #34 2 years ago

    Takes away 10 years of training in FPSs?
    Um, if you need that amount of "training" to play a game, methinks there's a lot wrong with your game.
  • Ptarmigandalf #35 2 years ago

    "Kill Russians" is the new WWII...
  • Eraysor #36 2 years ago

    This sounds pants. Seems like they've decided to throw out the tactical nature of the old GRAWs and go for something a lot more simple and unoriginal.

    EDIT: And I thought post-apocalypse was the new WWII? I guess at least Metro 2033 managed to make the transition easy by including Russians as well!
    Edited by 1 at 13/04/10 @ 10:46
  • Br0ken_Engli5h #37 2 years ago

    No, "kill Russians" was the old WWII. Well, if you're a Nazi, that is. :D
  • Gazza_UK #38 2 years ago

    So let me get this right... we dont like the past, the future, the Russians, the Americans and we have an abundant amount of Modern shooters to play now and no doubt later. What DO we want in a new shooter!
  • Mirqy #39 2 years ago

    If it was a new x-com game I'd definitely be interested.
  • BobsUncle #40 2 years ago

    "All these omni-death abilities mean Ghost Recon is no longer a game of skulking behind rocks, picking people off from great distances"

    Which was exactly the reason I liked GRAW so much.
  • DAN.E.B #41 2 years ago

    @ muttler
    could,nt agree more i loved the old recons the were brilliant not 100% convinced with the nes SC either!
  • KilgoreTroutXL #42 2 years ago

    @mkreku:

    So, do you enjoy being an idiot? I Can't wait for another GRAW though, especially now that we're not shooting mexicans to appease the Europeans, right?
    Edited by 1 at 13/04/10 @ 21:17
  • metalangel #43 2 years ago

    @Gazza_UK: A Halo game with just aliens, no Flood!

    (and yes, I've conveniently forgotten ODST, because it was over too soon!)
  • Bluetooth #44 2 years ago

    Everyone complaining about the enemy/location/time setting just goes to show that we're fed up of war and we want peace. It will be Modern Warfare 8: Soap sleeps over at the Ruskie Base.
  • craziii #45 2 years ago

    nano suit? I guess they are challenging crytek!
  • Matthew_Hornet #46 2 years ago

    "...the hyper-tactical approach of GR: Advanced Warfighter 1 & 2..."

    Is GRAW what passes for 'hyper-tactical' these days?
  • evilrobot #47 2 years ago