Fight Night Round 3 Comparison 720p

Published 23 March, 2007

Comments (5) Latest comment 5 years ago

Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • TheAdmin #1 5 years ago

    You can't really compare the first two as the Xbox 360 ones are blurred, that's not fair.

  • Tweakmonkey #2 5 years ago

    I dunno - I like the dark and organic look of the 360, but the PS3 definitely wins with the high detail.

  • bivith #3 5 years ago

    Hmm, the motion blur looks better on the 360 to my eyes. And the depth of field effect is messed up on the PS3 version. Look at the second screen shot. There is a distinctive ring around the player shapes that has the background "in-focus" and it just looks wrong.

  • Carrybagma #4 5 years ago

    All these screenshot comparisons are awful really. There's a large enough margin for difference between the cables to make comparison pointless.

    The only thing that's clear (without having to write long, boring posts) is that currently the 360 represents better value for money if you want to play multiplatform titles with high visual quality.

  • BadBoyBonner #5 5 years ago

    So the PS3 has no motion blur (which is quite intensive to do well) has no Anti-aliasing (making the ropes look, ahem, ropey lol) and a very suspect Alpha silohuette around the boxers as well a terrible lighting engine which makes the fighters look like they are rendered somewhere else and then pasted into the ring.

    here is a better comparison for Fight Night 3

    http://uk.gamespot.com/features/6162742/...

    Turning Motion blur off, and reducing the lighting model to PS3 quality could probably allow the 360 to run Fight Night 3 at 60fps in 1080p.

    Edited by BadBoyBonner at 24/03/07 @ 19:14