Starcraft: Ghost

Ectoplasma guns, presumably.

It'll only work once with any individual, but that once is worth everything.

You'll be in a close firefight with some kind of Terran Marine. He's bombarding you with bullets. You are a tiny Zerg creature, caught alone, trying to dodge fire and failing. You press the appropriate button to use your special ability of burrowing into the ground. The best defence is a good offence, yes, but a couple of metres of earthy soil works just as well in most situations.

The Marine runs up, firing at the soil, bemused. Perhaps a friend will join him, firing a few bursts at the mysteriously disappeared Zerg. Eventually, they'll give up, turn away and start to jog off, looking for less mysterious prey.

And then you'll burrow back up to the surface, run up behind them and cut them to pieces with your alien talons.

While laughing.

Loudly.

When playing Starcraft: Ghost for the first time, when the game's rules are a mysterious, unexplored country, everything is simultaneously a joy and a terror. You get the gift of a surprise - in an unexpected yet completely logical feature like Zerg-burrowing - and the cost of... well, I'll get to that in the end.

'Starcraft: Ghost' Screenshot ghosts

Ghosts kick ass. And the back of knees.

Of the two new games being given hands-on play access at Blizzcon, it's Ghost which rewards most play. The queues move faster, as more games get played. It's perfectly possible to drop in for a quick play and get one relatively swiftly - unlike the enormous lines of people which haunt the relatively slovenly World of Warcraft: Burning Crusade displays. And because it's possible, people do.

The game's development history has been tumultuous to say the least, with the main stealth/action game being conspicuous by its absence from the show. But in terms of multiplayer, we can really get a feel for the game.

And mostly, it feels good. The two sides available to play - the Terrans and the Zerg - seem impressively faithful to their strategy game counterparts. This may be a matter of faith for Blizzard. One moment that snags in the mind involved being led to play a second game. "What side do you want to play?" the gentleman asks. "Humans, please", we reply. "The Terrans sit here," he corrects, pointedly. No matter what failings Ghost may eventually have, you can sense that it's something they care about.

'Starcraft: Ghost' Screenshot screw

"Don't screw up. Don't screw up". A Ghost Screws up.

Of the two game types on show, the Invasion game was the most entertaining. This is a control-point system, with the two teams' bases connected by a web of other control points. Each has to be captured in turn, and you can spawn at more forward bases if you're able. It's tense, directed and - especially with the mini-map - an immediate experience. A Counter-Strike-style system is included, where the number of kills you make earns points that can be spent upgrading to a better character-type. So, if you play as a Zergling for a few rounds, you're able to save for a chance to fly above the battlefield in the body of a monstrous Mutalisk.

The Zerg side's natural abilities are what make the Zerg fearsome. The Zerglings are small but fast, able to skip across the battlefield with great manoeuvrability. With the burrowing into soft soil, they're especially apt for surprise attacks or infiltration. It should be noted that the designers smartly chose for a fair chunk of the ground not to soil, to provide areas where the huma... I mean, Terrans, can be sure of not having a horrible alien beast jump up behind them.

One step up from the Zergling is a Hydralisk, whose special abilities include tearing pitiful little humans who fight them into pieces. Their devastating hand-to-hand prowess is married to the Zergling's tunnelling. Then there's the infected Marine, offering the Zerg side some more Terran-styled firepower with its automatic machine-gun, married to a nasty twist. By holding down a button, you're able to activate a self-destruct ability that raises a smile during those kamikaze runs into an enemy base. The top level is the Mutalisk, who are the least accessible for the Zerg. Not just in terms of points you have to spend, but the skills required to master their slow flying and ranged area effects.

'Starcraft: Ghost' Screenshot helios

Hi mom. This is me on Helios. Miss you!

The Terrans are generally a little trickier than the Zerg, relying on more esoteric abilities. The basic soldier, for example, is claw-bait to begin with, but is best put to use creating defence turrets. These are some of the best anti-Zerg rush abilities available, one generally picking off an unaware individual or causing annoyance for a group. Soldiers also able to follow Halo's lead and climb into vehicles. The marine operates much like the infected marine, with a high rate of fire, decent armour and more resistance to being eaten alive. The firebat is a specialised marine with a pair of dual flamethrowers, which are operated individually on the two triggers and are brutal. Finally, there's the eponymous lead of the Ghost, who can do the whole turn-virtually-invisible thing as well as possessing a genuinely nasty sniper rifle.

And in the Invasion mode it works beautifully, playing as a compulsive multiplayer experience. It's lucky it was the game we played first, as the second mode on display, the Global Conflict, made less of an impression. Here two Terran teams fight to capture a flying base of some kind and keep possession of it for as long as possible. Or, at least, that's what we presume we had to do. Seemingly bereft of the mini-map, it lacked the accessibility of the other mode, and the game was swiftly won by someone on the opposite side who knew where the flag was, captured it, and drove it off into the opposition's defended area. Meanwhile, my group wandered around not quite sure what was going until the win timer ran down. Oops.

The teenager to my left grinned, bemusedly. "What happened?" - I replied with a shrug. A kid behind me commented loudly as he walked away: "That sucked!" If it wasn't for the Invasion mode's quality, I'd be tempted to agree. As it is, it makes me glad that it isn't being Zerg-rushed onto the shelves, as there's still much which needs to be polished.

Comments (32) Latest comment 6 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • jonnyreb #1 6 years ago

    Hmmm, I'm confused now after reading that...

    Up until now all the preview's for Ghost that I've seen show some kind of one player "Splinter Cell in the future" type game.

    From what I read here this sounds more like Battlefront :/ So, is it a multiplayer only strategy type game? A multiplayer action game? Is there also a single player game, but you just played the multiplayer portion?

    Blizzard has never been involved in a game that I haven't liked, so I'd love to know what the actual game model is now........
  • caligari #2 6 years ago

    Too...early...to...read...
  • Xerx3s #3 6 years ago

    Lost interest in this for a while. This certanly sounds interesting. Might buy this. Release date?
  • Wobble #4 6 years ago

  • Hog-lumps #5 6 years ago

    This actually sounds alright!

    Presumably the multiplayer is online only?

    I also heard that they were canning the GameCube version. I hope this isn't true.........

    Edit: Damn, I just read the news confirming that they are indeed canning the cube version! Oh well.
    Edited by 1 at 03/11/05 @ 09:06
  • NonnyMouse #6 6 years ago

    Your entire article doesn't talk about release date!
    This one has been locked in development hell for sooooo long.
    Right now they're probably locked in meetings to see if there's any way of
    upgrading their presumably vast investment in graphics to be suitable
    for next-gen consoles...
  • Teeth #7 6 years ago

    Oh what, they changed the main character now? She was hotter before.
  • krudster #8 6 years ago

    Given that I saw this being demoed back in early 2003, I think talk of a release date is pretty meaningless. They'll release it 'when it's done' basically. We could say mid-2006, but we have no idea, and neither does anybody else.
  • Tyronne #9 6 years ago

    Is this still being worked on?Blimey thought it had gone the way of the `vulcan fury/forge` game that was canned years ago,yet sadly the last ever original series star trek episode/game to use the actors before they began to die.
  • space_ace #10 6 years ago

    what is starcraft: ghost?!
  • Spanky #11 6 years ago

    Gah Blizzard better sort it out! and get info out on the singleplayer campaign. Hasn't it been proven already that the majority of console players aren't that interested in multiplayer, i'm not, I couldn't give a rats arse and wish they'd get to the meat and potatoes.
  • Heds #12 6 years ago

    Wow. I've always dreamed of being a Hydralisk! Let's hope it's not just the one game type that lets you be Zerg.

    What happened to the Protoss, anyway?
  • Dr_Actually #13 6 years ago

    Hasm' this been in development for at least a million years?
  • BremXJones #14 6 years ago

    Jonnyreb: Single Player is a Splinter-Celly thing, though it seems with a more action bent. The multiplayer, however, is like... well, like this.

    KG
  • BremXJones #15 6 years ago

    "What happened to the Protoss, anyway?"

    Something a journo said about another interview was that a developer said that they'd be a third side in the multiplayer, The Protoss. Which, was such a major announcement which I didn't hear from anyone else, I presume had to be a fancy lie... or a major slip on the developer's part.

    (The latter with Blizzard is fairly unlikely. They play their hands close to the chest)

    Either way, since I don't have access to the tape, I didn't feel comfortable even reporting it as rumour. I mention here because... well, you asked.

    KG
  • Heds #16 6 years ago

    Cheers Kieron. :)

    We can but hope.
  • Chaser #17 6 years ago

    They had SC:Ghost mutiplayer running at E3 with 4v4 games - was pretty good, I think it was just terran vs. terran. The whole mutiplayer thing is 100% pitched at live and from what i saw, it really does kick the crap out of Halo online.

    Then again, as stated, it probably does need a ton of polish to complete.
  • Eighthours #18 6 years ago

    Did anyone else see the frankly bizarre preview of this in OPS2M this month?

    It was barking. A sarcastically reported double-page interview with the head of Blizzard, plus a load of jokes about how the game was obviously going to be s*it.

    One of the strangest things I've seen in any magazine for ages! I can't believe that Blizzard approved it!
  • Fatfish #19 6 years ago

    @ eighthours: Perhaps that's because they know that the PS2 version will be shite?!? ;)

    PS 4tehWin!!!

    ....sorry, couldn't resist it.....

    /hangs head in shame after lowering tone to that of scabrous fan boi/

    ;)
    Edited by 2 at 03/11/05 @ 11:27
  • Teeth #20 6 years ago

    They probably didn't approve it. Surely the journalists can write what they like.
  • Hog-lumps #21 6 years ago

    said that they'd be a third side in the multiplayer, The Protoss.

    They also mention that the Protoss will be part of multiplayer on 1up.com. Of course that doesn't mean it's true though!
  • BremXJones #22 6 years ago

    "They also mention that the Protoss will be part of multiplayer on 1up.com."

    I met the reporter from 1Up there, and they weren't the one who passed me the rumour. So if they were in the Q&A session where that was supposedly said, it may lend weight to the rumour.

    Wouldn't surprise me. They're really trying to get a "Starcraft, ground level" feel to the multiplayer, so it would fit right in.

    Re: OPM2 preview. It's very rare that there's any form of copy approval in a magazine.

    KG
  • absolutezero #23 6 years ago

    This game will never be released. Ever. Its like Duke Nukem Forever but with the potential that it may be quite good.
  • Ryuken #24 6 years ago

    DNF may be quite good too, just try to follow the 3D Realms forum now and then.

    Ghost sounds promising (great CGI-trailer too) but a PC-port is the least they could have done to please the majority of the real Starcraft-fans (after all, the story still takes place after Brood War). Seeing that model of Mengsk on the site, it almost convinces me to buy a console anyway though.
  • Royal Fool #25 6 years ago

    Once this game finally gets released, I'll gladly be purchasing my Xbox copy. Although I must say I liked the game's old style (Pre-developer change) better.
  • Freek #26 6 years ago

    Singplayer is still there they just diden't demo it. Or i'm asuming it is since there's been no anouncement of it being scrapped. If it has been then I'm not buying this.
  • Dizzy #27 6 years ago

    >great CGI-trailer too

    Link?
  • Freek #28 6 years ago

    It's the intro sequence verry awsome. They also got the Broodwar intro up there, was also shown at Blizzcon. Gametrailers seem to think it's related to Ghost though for some reason.
    Edited by 1 at 03/11/05 @ 14:57
  • Repsode #29 6 years ago

    Just commenting on the cube version cancellation. It seems to me that single player could be the weakest aspect of the game. It was canned due to the lack of a good online service. This makes it look as if the multiplayer is the focus of the game, as they weren't prepared to release an incomplete and inferior product. So anyone interested in this without a BB account, you could well be striking it off your list.

    Wouldn't surprise me
  • Dizzy #30 6 years ago

    >So anyone interested in this without a BB account, you could well be striking it off your list.

    Of course that might mean that people with a BB account might need to put it on their list.
  • Repsode #31 6 years ago

    Well Blizzard are known for their high standards, I suppose. That is assuming it doesn't get shifted to PS3 and XBOX360. They couldn't cancel it now not after 5 years and two studios.
  • firm3d #32 6 years ago

    I'll put up with any delay for this, as long as does get released; hell, if get pushed back far enough I might be playing it on my PS3, which I'd much prefer ...