Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Mercury Meltdown First Impressions

PSP First Impressions by Tom Bramwell

6 July, 2006

Mercury is very bad for you. Not just very bad for you like alcohol, or dousing your crotch in oil and then dry-humping a fire, but mega-ultra-seriously bad for you. Even the American government, famously quite protective of things that cause massive amounts of harm (cf. guns, cigarettes, Tony Snow), declared in 1990 that mercury is a toxic pollutant that must be controlled to the greatest possible extent.

What they didn't do, and this was undoubtedly to Mercury-the-game's eventual detriment, was point out that whilst it must be controlled to the greatest possible extent, you also need to keep an eye on it. A rather beady, sharp, clear-sighted and sprightly one. And so when Mercury came out on PSP, even though the analogue control was almost perfect, the fact that it had a camera that often screwed you around and huge load times that sapped your concentration proved fatal.

Although I have no metaphor for the difficulty spikes - they were just bad.

Fortunately, on the evidence of our Mercury Meltdown preview build, much has changed for the better. As Ignition's Edward Bradley told us in our la-di-dah exclusive interview recently, the dev-team "didn't have the luxury of iterative design on the first one" - nor any final hardware to work on until it was almost too late. And that meant that things like the camera, the load times, the difficulty spikes, and redundant features like teleporters-which-are-the-same -as-suction-pipes simply had to be made done with.

'Mercury Meltdown' Screenshot undulations

Surface undulations are neatly shown up by changes in lighting.

In this regard, Meltdown's mercury has transitioned to a completely different state. The process of delivering your delicate blob of liquid metal from start to goal, running the gamut of endless obstacles, undulating surfaces and narrow ledges, rarely frustrates for reasons the developer didn't intend.

As well as quicker load-times, there are useful indicators, handy stabilisers and thoughtful options everywhere. A colour chart means that you can negotiate the levels that involve separating your mercury into smaller blobs, spray-painting them and then mixing colours without loading the Dulux website in the background; there's near-instant auto-saving after every level; you can change camera controls and even your mercury skin without exiting to some mother-menu; you can pause the game and roam around the level in free-look to get a feel for the challenges ahead; you can take on the 16 levels that make up the "lab" hub you're working through in any order, with more labs unlocked based on constituent progress rather than having to finish everything.

And for those who harbour rather unpleasant memories of Mercury's camera - even the second tutorial level began from a position where you couldn't see the blob - you'll be pleased to learn that the developer's promise to do away with level architecture that obscures your view has been mostly delivered upon.

'Mercury Meltdown' Screenshot complex

Even complex levels are easy to grasp after a few seconds in free-view - but it's still hard to control multiple parts.

Although most of the levels in our preview build (and even with less than half available, there are tons - it took me almost as long to get through them as it did to get to the end of the first game) focus on traditional elements - the challenge they pose is largely consistent with the first game's - there's a freshness to the gameplay that's invigorated by the improved design. It might be nice to have more than four camera angles to use, and it's worth noting that the vertical levels (usually a mix of platforms and travellators set against a steeply angled wall) don't really receive much help from the camera, but the free-look's very useful, and there are only a couple of minor examples that refute the claim about unhelpful level architecture.

More importantly, the way the game's been restructured appears to work in its favour. Last time out there were three types of goal: against-the-clock, puzzle and getting-to-the-end-with-all-your-mercury (they had better names though, obviously). Mercury Meltdown simply mixes things together; your efforts are rewarded in each area, but providing you do one thing satisfactorily you still complete the level successfully and bank a high-score. And then you can go back later and aim for perfection if you want - and based on my playing habits, you will want to.

One of the reasons for that is the wealth of unlockable content. Not just new labs - although there are eight of those in total and some secret levels too - but party games and new skins for your mercury. The former range from prosaic (race) to interesting (paint shop), and should give you something to do when you tire of the main game. You can also take people on at them wirelessly, and that multiplayer extends to tackling main-game levels with a pal too.

'Mercury Meltdown' Screenshot solidified

When your blob's solidified, you'll be able to roll it around these things. Just make sure it's purple by the time you hit that goal.

With only the early part of the game fleshed out fully, it's not really possible to get a total sense of the difficulty curve either - but in our experience it's usually possible to complete one goal even if you can't figure out the others to start with. The lure of high scores should prove interesting too - although in the absence of an Xbox Live style world leaderboards system for PSP, it'll be up to you how far you want to push it.

But with the design firmly weighted in the player's favour this time, the signs are good - and new elements, like rolling blocks to manoeuvre by obstructing their path, new types of mercury-targeting enemy and pads that affect the blob's viscosity, are likely to entertain players once they get past that initial thrill of fluid Mercury. The expansion of the level pool to 160 hasn't been a process of dilution by the look of it either - the quality stands up to the original game, with neat use of ice panels, speed pads, seesaws and other structures that force you to plot a course and apply some skill to navigate it. There are plenty of narrow ledges to hug, undulations to work against, colours to mix and multi-part blobs to worry about. Not to mention the usual array of difficult shortcuts to master.

This, really, was what attracted us to Mercury in the first place - and our Meltdown code throws up a good few. One, a vertical level that involves reaching turquoise spray-paint on the far side, can be cut short by deftly splitting the blob and then mixing more readily available colours - not something that you'll manage without a fair few spillages, and something that results in a big score when you master it.

If the full game can deliver more of that kind of thrill, and consistently avoids the pitfalls of the original, it could be essential.

Mercury Meltdown is due out on PSP this September.

Advertisement

Are you excited about Mercury Meltdown on PSP?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-16 of 16 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
DodgyPast
06/07/06 @ 08:01
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I did like the first one... though agreed it wasn't a superb title.

A more polished version would definitely be appreciated.
mingster
06/07/06 @ 08:04
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
looks good
JohnnyWashnGo
06/07/06 @ 08:06
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
When I was younger, I accidently broken a thermometer in my mouth. The contents, including the mercury, were swallowed instantly.

That was the one and, hopefully, only time that I had my stomach pumped.

It really tasted bad, not just during the accident, but for a long time afterwards.

So, the moral of my tale is mercury is bad, dont drink it, play it ;)
gth
06/07/06 @ 08:35
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
great, another good game for PSP :)
bubble
06/07/06 @ 08:48
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Does that make two decent games then Gth? :)

I love the concept, but it looks... ugly. Who ever designed that interface needs their copy of photoshop taking away from them.
gizmo
06/07/06 @ 10:00
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Cell shading FTL.
SeesThroughAll
06/07/06 @ 10:07
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Cell shading FTL.

Devs said in the interview that the cell shading is optional - I hope so, don't like it either...
Zero Beat
06/07/06 @ 10:35
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Still has that cheesy shareware look.
Tomo
06/07/06 @ 10:42
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I like the look of this. I enjoyed the first, but wasn't hooked on it. If it wasn't for the fact it was a launch title and most others were crap, I doubt I'd have even bothered with it.
Steroyd
06/07/06 @ 11:45
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So that's why your username is JohnnyWashnGo.
Cabelo
06/07/06 @ 15:21
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Johnny, I'd be fairly certain that (much unlike the game) the reason it tasted so bad, for so long, is that mercury can be absorbed into the skin on certain parts of the body pretty easily. Lucky for you it's only a "little bit" carcinogenic! ;)

But I'm sure you've thought of that :P

Original reason for posting though:

Travelator is totally the new word for "conveyor belt". As a result we're the first generation to want to work on assembly lines.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 06/07/06 @ 16:23
Nikanoru
06/07/06 @ 15:23
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Cell shading optional? You mean the black line around the mercury? That's not really shading now is it. If you mean the backgrounds, they're hardly going to provide two different model sets for that. Unless you think there's a "create realistic textures out of nowhere" pixel shader.

I think there are PLENTY of options when you're looking for realistic boredom anyway. Quit crying whenever one out of every three hundred games uses - GOD FORBID - a different visual style from the same old shit that you get with everything else.
SeesThroughAll
06/07/06 @ 15:58
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Cell shading optional? You mean the black line around the mercury?

Yes, exactly. Personally, I really dislike it, it can make the mercury blob feel much less physical.

That's not really shading now is it.

No, it's not. Must we get so pedantic?

Quit crying whenever one out of every three hundred games uses - GOD FORBID - a different visual style from the same old shit that you get with everything else.

? Quit crying about people crying - according to your impressions at least.
Nikanoru
06/07/06 @ 17:15
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Pedantic? If somebody would complain about the paintjob on a car when they actually mean that they don't like the wheelcaps, and I said something about it, would you call that pedantic? I mean, it's equivalent, really.

And the "stop complaining about people complaining" line? I thought that was scientifically proven to be obsolete years ago. Guess it's still in use.


Either way, like I was saying. I think we will all agree that non-celshaded games exist in absolute abundance. Why bash on this visual style the one time every five years it is used? That's like knocking the bare few 2D games we still get for being 2D when you don't like it.
bubble
07/07/06 @ 09:40
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm all for innovation so long as it's decent, which I'm not sure this is.

Different ≠ Good

EDIT: Visually anyway. The game itself looks quite interesting.
Edited 2 times, most recently on 07/07/06 @ 13:32
ProfessorLesser
07/07/06 @ 18:46
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"And then you can go back later and aim for perfection if you want - and based on my playing habits, you will want to."

Why would I want to revist levels based on your playing habits?

Comments: 1-16 of 16 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery