Fire Emblem: Path of Radiance

The future's bright.

Fire Emblem's quite popular in this house. So much so that last week I decided to resolve important life issues in the style thereof. Asking Kristan if he wanted me to pick anything up from Sainsbury's involved striking a heroic pose whilst peering out of the window, humming the theme music, and holding up bits of paper with flowery motifs bordering nobly worded guff about journeying to the merchants in the north in pursuit of sustenance. Getting into a turn-based bar fight was more challenging. [One of these anecdotes is actually true. Guess which. -Ed]

So much is it popular, in fact, that I spent several hours at E3 last month playing the partially-translated US version of the GameCube's first instalment, Fire Emblem: Path of Radiance, memorising menu layouts so that I could come home and import the Japanese version. Ladies, I'm still yours for the taking.

Alas, I didn't remember everything (damn you airport bar!) but it proved useful nonetheless. Having become so engrossed in the several-chapter demo on display at E3 for story and mechanical reasons, being forced to skip through all the Japanese exposition due to a total inability to comprehend any of it gave me a much better appreciation of the raw procedural stuff.

First impression? It's pretty much exactly what we had before, except in three dimensions, and featuring a phenomenal 3D cel-shaded introductory cut sequence (Dear Nintendo, please leave this subtitled as you did at E3, or I will SMITE YOU).

Second impression? Ooh, they did some things.

But first, let's sort out the basics, since only about forty-seven of you bothered to buy the first Western version of the game on GBA last year - despite it being by my favourite developer of all, Intelligent Systems, and despite it being a taste that once acquired lasted longer than chewing gum with time-release pockets of flavour built in.

If you've played Fire Emblem before and know what it's all about, scroll down until you see me waving. The rest of you, continue on. Consider this a side-mission. ImpressionsX.

Fire Emblem is a turn-based strategy game with role-playing overtones. You control a band of transparently and endearingly noble adventurers who are on a vital quest to save a fantasy world from destruction at the hands of almighty reawakening evil. The story and characters change from game to game, Final Fantasy-style, but that's the usual gist of it. The Cube one obviously does this too.

'Fire Emblem: Path of Radiance' Screenshot 1

The game is played out chapter by chapter, as you move your band around a playing area split into a grid. Each unit has a particular class from which you get various weapon or magical abilities, movement ranges and the like - so you might have a mixture of mounted knights who use lances and swords, heavily armoured but clunky generals with enormous javelins and lances, nimble swordsmen with rapiers, mage-like cloaked types who hurl fire and brimstone, benevolent healers, and so on and so forth. You have at least one particular unit who must survive at all costs and, critically, if somebody dies then that's it for them. They are dead. You can keep going, but you generally can't bring them back in controllable fashion in any of the subsequent chapters.

There are lots of other layers to it as well. You can befriend certain NPCs on the battlefield after mid-chapter in-game cut-scenes show events unfolding, you can use your character's turn to buy items like armour and health pickups from various shops, you can spend a turn sat on a fort-like icon to recharge yourself a bit, and you have to worry about things like the weapon triangle - which in paper/scissors/rock-style sees swords as stronger than axes, axes than lances, lances than swords.

All of this is played out ingeniously, with some of the finest and most elegant presentation witnessed in any role-player or strategy title on any format, battle animations on separate screens, sweeping scores - despite it being a largely 16-bit series - and memorable characters, unpredictable plot twists and more.

Its chief flaws are the divisiveness of the "perma-death" system, waiting for animations to play out, and some other time wasting bits and bobs. (And, actually, the way the game clock accumulates only time spent on the occasions you successfully complete missions. Given how much effort I've sunk into replaying Fire Emblem to emerge victorious with my entire troop intact, restarting chapters and skipping lengthy cut-scenes repeatedly, a bit of recognition would be nice!)

'Fire Emblem: Path of Radiance' Screenshot 2

Onto the Cube version then. But first...

COOO-EEEE! OVER HERE! YOU CAN JOIN IN AGAIN NOW!

Right, that should be everyone back with us.

Fire Emblem on the GameCube has given me two rushes of excitement sandwiching a big long streak of contented strategising. The first excitement had to be the way it looks. Kicking off with a phenomenal intro sequence that sees our hero sparring with his father - movement, facial expressions, body language and the warm summery environment gorgeously cast - with a glorious 3D anime look that could hold me for the duration of an entire film, it quickly heaps on comic-book-style story sequences where beautifully hand-drawn characters' dialogue is shown in speech boxes fleshing out the plot, and then onto the actual battlefield where units and the environment are fairly well detailed, before climaxing as you go into your first proper battle screen and the animations give Intelligent Systems' artists much-deserved licence to explore the intricacies of these ornate warriors.

Fans of the series, incidentally, will get a double-kick out of seeing familiar-looking units borne out polygonally.

'Fire Emblem: Path of Radiance' Screenshot 3

Then comes the big long streak of contended strategising as you just play it. It works in much the same way as it has in the past. When it's your turn, you select a unit, choose a square within your movement range - marked by blue highlighting on the battle grid - move there and then decide what to do, whether it's Attack, use an Item, or just Wait. (I'll get onto other things in a jiffy.)

Winning is simple but also very complicated, particularly as you get further in. Of course all you have to do is survive and meet the victory condition, whether it's "seize the gate" or "defeat the boss" or "defeat all your enemies" or what-have-you. But you want to be careful and meticulous, visiting the houses of villagers for item pick-ups, doing a spot of shopping, making sure you never position an ally within the movement range of an enemy if he or she is low on health, not killing enemies who you might befriend by using the "Talk" command, not exposing those flying Pegasus Knights to archers, trying to avoid striking an enemy on your turn if you think conceding two blows would kill you, because you will inevitably receive one in response and then be left at the mercy of the computer when your turn concludes and it's "Enemy Phase". And so on.

It's incredibly absorbing in the exact same ways the others were, and, but for a few quirks of the "This is our first stab at doing this in three dimensions" variety, like horses that zigzag along grid lines instead of just running from A to B, it's exactly what was required.

'Fire Emblem: Path of Radiance' Screenshot 4

And then comes the second dollop of excitement when you start to realise what's changed on a subtler level. There are new character classes. You can assign skills to characters between chapters so they can see further and so on. You can zoom in and out and rotate the camera.

And my two favourites. First, when a unit completes a turn-cycle weakened and you realise they've fallen just within the attacking range of an enemy, which so often means a complete reload of the chapter in Fire Emblem games past, you can now opt to nudge them one square in a particular direction using another unit.

Second, and I have to confess to reading about this one on the Internet and not actually extracting it from the impregnable throng of Japanese text using my powers of intuition, you can now apply experience to particular characters post-battle. This will be incredibly useful, because you're often limited to a certain number of units in a particular fight, and unless you cycle them chapter-to-chapter (which you inevitably won't because you'll pick favourites), then a number of those on the fringe will be totally useless later on. By applying this pool of experience to those who sat out, this is less likely. Heh - an intelligent system.

'Fire Emblem: Path of Radiance' Screenshot 5

So yes, Fire Emblem remains popular around here, and this being a first impression I need make no apology for being so hopelessly in love with the whole series. But it's a good thing I'm making no secret of it either, because it's entirely possible that when the game comes out in the US this October or Europe a month later you'll remember this write-up and think "Gosh, I should have a go at that". Yes you should, but it will be something that you either love in spite of its slight flaws or come to hate on account of them - a mystery I'll try and unravel for you when I'm sitting in front of a fully English-language review copy later this year.

In the meantime, this is definitely one to watch, and fans of the series will be pleased to hear that it plays just as well, looks great without losing sight of what was charming about it in the first place (witness the death animations, which see characters yield by slumping to one knee), seems to have been refined in a few interesting ways and, judging by the E3 build, will be translated with the same grace and elegance as the GBA instalments - refraining from slipping too much into the traditional "goofy" territory that Final Fantasy and others have become associated with here and there.

And, in the hope of getting a sound bite onto the back of the PAL box, let's end on one, with a bit of carefully positioned emphasis to stress the potential subjectivity: "Walking the Path of Radiance left me beaming." Sorry.

Fire Emblem: Path of Radiance is due out on GameCube in Europe this November.

Comments (47) Latest comment 6 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Galvanizer #1 7 years ago

    The FMV is truely beautiful! It very different from the type other game developers use (Square Enix). It even looks cel-shaded.

    I heard Nintendo are now making movies. If they make a Zelda movie which uses FMV like this it will OWN!

    Watch out Square Enix Ninty are catching up! :-D

  • Tabasco #2 7 years ago

    Ok so I have been trying to get hold of a GBA copy for many a moon now - None of the local shops seem to sell it! Tom - which version should I go for? GBA or Cube...
  • Blerk #3 7 years ago

    Yum, and indeed, yum. Fire Emblem is my favourite GBA turn-based strategy - it's criminally overlooked in favour of Advance Wars (which is still excellent but not as good as FE imho).

    I shall be getting this one. Oh yes.
  • Lutz #4 7 years ago

    FFS I think I need to buy a GC again... :(

    GAH.
  • Blerk #5 7 years ago

    Never sell your old consoles, Lutzie. They save all the games you want to play until you've done it, just to spite you.
  • Aretak #6 7 years ago

    I would have bought FE for the GBA, but I reckon only 10 copies ever made it to the UK. I certainly never saw it in shops.
  • Jos #7 7 years ago

    Er.

    Is it not available here...?

    <a href=http:/ /www.simplygames.com/product.asp?id=4040> www.si mplygames.com/product.asp?id=4040 </a>
    Edited by 3 at 07/06/05 @ 14:22
  • Tabasco #8 7 years ago

    Aye Jos it is but as I have no CC I have to trailblaze to my crappy indies to get it because stores like Game and Gamestation don't have the nuts to stock something so 'Out there' :o)

    Of course I did spot it in Gforce in Glasgow but by the time I'd gone to get money and go back the fecker wasn't there anymore!
  • Dizzy #9 7 years ago

    I played this a lot in Japan... the problem is that this game is just the GBA version with better graphics and some extras. I would advise buying the GBA version(s) since they are just as good and you can take them with you. They could have really done more with the GC version IMHO.
    Edited by 1 at 07/06/05 @ 14:37
  • Genji #10 7 years ago

    Done... more? It's fine just the way it is! I wouldn't buy it if it was realtime strategy or something. The GBA FIre Emblem is one of the few RPGs where I actually care whether the characters live or not. If the GC version has that, at least, then I'm sold already.
    Edited by 1 at 07/06/05 @ 14:43
  • smelly #11 7 years ago

    Come on.. where are all the sony/microsoft fangirls who havent even read the article telling us how their systems are going to have better 1st party exclusives this year but not telling us what?

    Feels almost a shame they havent appeared yet.. Therefor I reacon this game will be pants as it's not got the owners of the other systems upset yet.

  • Horse #12 7 years ago

    I... dunno. I played the GBA version for literally hours, getting about 80% through before getting too annoyed to continue. The strategy aspect is fantastic but I'm the kind of anal retentive that can't allow myself to play on if one of my characters get killed. Eventually the repetition killed it for me. The presentation values were absolutely excellent, and I far prefer it to Advance Wars, which is almost simplistic in comparison.

    The nudging feature sounds like it could be the safegaurd I need, but why oh why couldn't they just let me save my game when I want to? That way I can experiment (running to a house to see if there's anything interesting in there, or practicing new attacks, or seeing how new characters play) without knowing that if I'm wrong at least one character will die. Grrr. Then I realised that a game that stifles my sense of play probably has some flaws (the alternative is that how I play these games has flaws, but I find complaining on internet forums is easier than changing myself).

    Looking forward to the review!
  • Dizzy #13 7 years ago

    > Done... more? It's fine just the way it is!

    Well look at Disgaea for example....

    I dunno.... like I said I played it a lot in Japan and I guess I expected a lot more from the GC version. It even feels like they have used the scenario editor from the GBA version. This could have been so much more.
  • Genji #14 7 years ago

    But the Perma-Death system is exactly what I like about it! It added a certain quality to the characters, something that you don't get when you know you can just use a fenix down to get them up and running again. I can understand what you're saying - I had to restart more times than I can count. It did get better, though, when I learned not to put my weak characters in harms way. The Perma-Death forces you to become better.
    Edited by 1 at 07/06/05 @ 15:02
  • Horse #15 7 years ago

    Did you ever leave a character dead, Genji?

    I did become better at it, in a way - I got better at avoiding situations involving certain death. But I just couldn't stop taking chances, which seemed to wound up in my being punished every time, rather than just some of the time.
  • Genji #16 7 years ago

    I became very conservative, I must admit. If I could see a character was in trouble, I sent out Oswin and did a rescue. I used characters with high DEF as bait, especially on those bloody fog of war maps. I still screwed up occasionally, but I was never frustrated. In my first game, I did let Batre die, though. He just sucked. :)
    Edited by 1 at 07/06/05 @ 15:24
  • smelliot #17 7 years ago

    I bought Fire Emblem on the day of release last year. I still haven't completed it >_<

    It doesn't fill the hole I have after playign the first Advance Wars however. The second one could barely be caled a sequel, hopefully Dual Strike will sort that out.
    Edited by 2 at 07/06/05 @ 16:37
  • Burton2000 #18 7 years ago

    is the new advance wars called duel strike cool
  • twinbee #19 7 years ago

    While I am really looking forward to this I wish Nintendo would release The Sword of Seals (aka the one with Roy) in English.
  • Scimarad #20 7 years ago

    This is an honest question and not a fanboyish comment so hold off on the flaming.

    I actually have quite a few strategy RPG games on the PS2, does this one match up to/surpass them? It's not as if there is a huge amount of SRPG competition on the cube but it does sound pretty interesting.
    Edited by 1 at 07/06/05 @ 18:10
  • twinbee #21 7 years ago

    I haven't played Radiance but if it as good as past Fire Emblem games then it will be worth buying.

    Fire Emblem is my favourite SRPG series and imo, better than Shining Force, Final Fantasy Tactics, Final Fantasy Tactics Advance, Advance Wars and better than any other SRPG I've played (haven't tried Disgaea though).
  • Lothar Hex #22 7 years ago

    Just picked up the first GBA game, marvellous bit of software that.

    The Cube version will probably be bought.
  • JinTypeNoir #23 7 years ago

    Dizzy, you're right there isn't much changed from the past versions.

    Whoops! Except for the addition of slotting skills from a list of dozens into a character's capacity points to allow you to do all sorts of nifty things and twist the engine all over the place. Except for the fact that you can modify weapons now at the base, and that of course the new base system is, well, new. Except for the new units who can transform into beasts or animals. Except for the biorhythm of each character that determines how their stats fluctuates when they're feeling angry or out of energy or some such thing. Except for the new special attacks that open up based on a character's type stat, which is also new. Except for bringing back old things like the possibility of destroyed houses, triangle attacks and more girth to the horse-riding aspect. Except for the fact that there's some voice and FMV and first one in the series to be entirely 3D. Nah, you're right, they didn't change a thing at all.
  • Burton2000 #24 7 years ago

    lol at reply to didnt change aqnything at all comment. but didnt gba fire emblem have a triangle attackk in it. im sure if u had all 3 pegasus night then u cud do the triangle attack or what have you
  • Genji #25 7 years ago

    I don't know about this game, but I'll answer based on the ones I have played:

    1. Battles are not random - you complete one, the story movies forward until the next one. You might be able to revisit past battles, but that I'm not sure about.
    2. If the learning curve is anything like the last GBA title, it will be quite generous indeed. We're talking training missions with no Perma-Death, easier difficulty levels, etc.
    3. You don't have any cities to explore; your in-game time will be spent in battles. You can visit shops, however.
    4. Not very complex. The system of weapons and magic is pretty much just like a rock/paper/scossors game. You upgrade your units, buy them new weapons. It's certainly less complex than, say, Advance Wars. The fact that you can't resurrect your characters makes it a little more challenging - once they're dead, they stay dead. FE doesn't forgive mistakes nearly as readily as Final Fantasy Tactics. That said, I was a newbie to FE when the GBA game came out in Australia, and I love it now.
    5. Epic music, nothing to write home about, really. Don't know about the Cube version, but it's safe to say that it will probably include some voice acting.

    And the GBA Fire Emblem did have a triangle attack, if you had all 3 pegasus knights. It wasn't really worth it. You would have to deploy 3 pegasus knights at once, which was normally a pretty silly idea.
    Edited by 1 at 08/06/05 @ 08:01
  • Blerk #26 7 years ago

    I actually have quite a few strategy RPG games on the PS2,
    does this one match up to/surpass them?


    Here's a non-fanboyish answer, Scimirad. :-)

    Compared to the likes of Disgaea, Phantom Brave, etc. Fire Emblem might well seem a little... basic, shall we say. Whereas Nippon Ichi's stuff deluges you in options, stuff and extras, Fire Emblem is a bit more traditional and offers what you need and a little bit more to add variety.

    That's not to say it's not good, though. It's difficult to say that one SRPG is 'better' than another. Given a choice between Fire Emblem and Disgaea I'd choose Disgaea every single time, but I'm still very much looking forward to Fire Emblem.

    Does that make any sense whatsoever? :-)
  • Mr_Brown #27 7 years ago

    Well as huge fan of the turn based strategy genre, I'd have to say Fire Emblem is one of the best. To call it basic compared to the likes of Disgea isn't fair though. I can see why though. Fire Emblem may not have alot of features Disgea has. But it has an epic story which is very complex and we implemented. And Fire Eblems tend to be extremley long.

    Hopefully this is very well recieved. If so the sucess of this and disgea may convince Konami to make a Vandal Hearts 3. Which is, IMO the best series in the genre, bar none.
  • Blerk #28 7 years ago

    It's not really fair to compare other SRPGs to Nippon Ichi's stuff, though - they're in a class of their own. I think perhaps I was a little unfair there.

    I'm with you on Vandal Hearts, though. Please bring it back, Konami. And not just some silly PSP remake.
  • Nemesis #29 7 years ago

    I'm still in the early chapters of FE at the moment and really really enjoying it; so it's well worth a pick-up if you can find it.

    You *will* find the hours slipping by, so be warned.

    I should hopefully have it done and dusted ready for the GC version which is looking superb!
  • Gastrian #30 7 years ago

    For those of you who haven't got a copy |I'd recommend picking up the sequel on import from America. Not a lot has changed but some tweaks have been made to make it a better game.

    Not only do you get new classes but you also get upgrade options. For instance, your cavaliers get the choice of becomming Paladins or Great Knights.

    The tent is now part of the main character, so he/she can supply nearby units and you don't have to have a unit left playing watchdog.

    2 side quests have been added in the form of multi-level dungeons which have to be completed in one go. You can't save between levels.

    There is a world map with random undead armies spawning which can be ignored or fought for experiece.

    Shops and armouries can be revisited on the world map for missions you've completed. Its a menu option which can be accessed on the world map.

    Dual storylines. After completing the first segment (there is no practice missions, characters that die do so for good) you get to choose to follow the path of one of two warriors, thereby adding replay value.
  • Killerbee #31 7 years ago

    Sounds good. Definitely towards the top of my Cube games wish list. The only thing I'm not keen on is the permanent death thing. Maybe it'll seem more reasonable in context, but I can just see this being one constant stream of restarts every time a favourite character bites the dust.
  • Scimarad #32 7 years ago

    "I'm with you on Vandal Hearts, though. Please bring it back,
    Konami. And not just some silly PSP remake."

    Apparently Stella Deus is quite a bit like Vandal Hearts - Having not played more than 10 minutes into it I couldn't really say...;-)
  • Genji #33 7 years ago

    STEEEEELLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
  • Galvanizer #34 7 years ago

    Come to think of it....

    Is Stella Deus gonna get a PAL release? And why don't Squenix publish ATLUS's games over here?
  • Genji #35 7 years ago

    God damnit, nobody is getting my clever reference!
  • Galvanizer #36 7 years ago

    ^ That's a reference? O_o
  • Genji #37 7 years ago

    No, when I screamed 'stella'. Never mind.
  • Blerk #38 7 years ago

    I'll have a pint if you're offering.
  • Genji #39 7 years ago

    I'll send it via airmail, pronto.
  • Blerk #40 7 years ago

    Cheers!

    Have you got any crisps?
  • Genji #41 7 years ago

    If by that, you mean 'potato chips', then yes! Beer nuts?
  • Blerk #42 7 years ago

    Nah, it's just these pants are a bit tight.
  • Genji #43 7 years ago

    Beer helps me play!
  • masterlegolas3 #44 7 years ago

    This game is pathetic and is going to be a flop
  • Galvanizer #45 7 years ago

    ^ Hey the Sony forums are THIS WAY: -->

  • Duckers #46 6 years ago

    Is Marth in this one? Or Roy? Or have I got totally confused with some other game? Help me on this one, guys!
  • Duckers #47 6 years ago

    Own, Galvanizer? Don't you mean "PWN"? I might have got it totally wrong, but who knows?