Jump to navigation
Sponsored by Alienware tracer
Advertisement

F.E.A.R Single-Player First Impressions

PC First Impressions by Tom Bramwell

20 January, 2005

'F.E.A.R Single-Player' Screenshot 1

You are a man. (Apologies if you're not.) You are holding a big gun. You run into a room. People are standing around. Some more race in through doors nearby. They try to shoot you. They're a bit crap at it. You try to shoot them. So are you. Since you can use the health items you picked up earlier, you eventually overhaul them and they flop to the floor, dead. You loot their corpses, then set about finding the way to the next room.

This is what first-person shooters are generally like. It's what F.E.A.R is generally like. Rooms aren't always rooms - they can be corridors, or balconies, or whatever else you can imagine - but there's usually shooting. Perhaps with a few hand grenades literally thrown in for good measure.

You're probably wondering how, having lured you in with suspicions of F.E.A.R being one of the brightest FPS prospects due out in 2005, we came to decide that that was a good way of introducing it to you. The higher-ups at Vivendi-Universal Games, whose tirelessly cheery reps transported a gaggle of boggled British journos to Paris this week to witness the game first-hand and who will want to establish whether they got their money's worth, are probably wondering the same thing.

But, you see, we don't want to mislead you. On a fundamental level F.E.A.R is little more than a generic first-person shooter. There's no gravity gun to pick up the goalposts and shift them further down the field. Some of its basic ideas are more contemporary than others, but they are still ideas we've seen before - would we be using first-person melee roundhouse kicks and sweeps if games like Riddick hadn't already proved how well they can work? Even adding that it features a slow motion Bullet Time button is unlikely to stir you too much - particularly if we then note that Monolith reps were unable to really justify its inclusion at all to us when we asked, arguing somewhat confusedly that it was both loosely threaded into the story and a Max Payne-style "it's there because it's there" mechanic and encouraging us to make our own minds up.

'F.E.A.R Single-Player' Screenshot 2

And yet F.E.A.R is deserving of some quotable hyperbole. With the exception of Half-Life 2, it's "The most interesting FPS we've seen in the last two years." And it's not to do with miraculous innovation; it's to do with a refreshing blend of ideas and a strict mandate to leave you wanting more (we spent most of the second half of Half-Life 2 crying over our missing Antlions, you know). And on that most fundamental mechanical level it's to do with something that Monolith thinks is so crucial to your understanding of it that director of technology Kevin Stephens used the words "core concept" about 25 times in 25 minutes when we interviewed him; it's to do with the fact that it's been designed as an action movie. It's been designed not only for you to kill things, and wonder, but to make you look and feel very, very cool when you do it.

It's all about the layering. Let's stick with Max Payne, since that calls to mind a fitting example of what F.E.A.R gives us that we want so much. Having finished Max Payne several times in a few days, yours truly got into the habit of piling up Winamp with rock and metal (Rage Against The Machine was a regular) and then diving into a chapter midway through (that one where you clear out the hotel with the dodgy camera set-up, culminating in a gunfight in a bar, is a good example) and spending hours and hours simply leaping into rooms in slow motion and watching bullets crawl through the air on an inexorable path towards legions of nutters as Bullet Time followed their brain's natural impulses to expand every last one of their few seconds of remaining life into hours of last-minute reflection and reaction. We lost interest in doing that around about the time we'd seen everyone die in every way, and charting the path of bullets, ejecting brass and Max's flowing trenchcoat lost its charm - and our imaginations had nothing left to graft onto the experience.

With F.E.A.R, it's hard to imagine ourselves losing that desirable sense of cinematic intensity and the adrenaline it pumps before we've unravelled the mystery behind the game and killed everyone at least four or five times. It is just that spellbinding a spectacle to participate in. Let's revisit that opening scenario, shall we, and look a bit closer.

'F.E.A.R Single-Player' Screenshot 3

You are a man. You are holding a big gun. It's a big shotgun, actually. You run into a room. It's a sort of lobby area. People are standing around on a reflective marble floor. You can see a conference room on the other side of the lobby through glass panels that warp your view like some sort of mass of square-bottomed milk bottles pushed together. The people try to shoot you. You try to shoot them. All of a sudden the room is choked with billowing smoke, little clouds of blood-mist escaping through punctured Kevlar, bullets visibly embedding themselves in everything, shattering and sheering ceramic tiling from the pillars around you as they fly in at acute angles, while your focus is almost split by the sight of everything reflected in the marble floor as your shadows dance over the top.

A few too many bullets find their homes in the arms and legs of your adversaries, who sway and stumble about with each impact and eventually fall over bits of the scenery and lie there gushing blood. But there's no time to think because all of a sudden more people come rushing through the door at the back of the conference room. You can see their misshapen forms as they flow like rivers of dark light along the convex estuaries of the thick obscuring glass wall between you, before all of another sudden they start firing through the glass. You hit the slow motion button you'd almost forgotten about and watch their bullets carve smoke-tailed paths through the air between you, sending specs, chunks and even whole panes of glass tumbling away from the frame as the bad guys themselves lurch forward after their bullets and send hanging blinds flapping back and forward to burst through into the lobby. You fire some more shells, hit empty and leap forward kicking at the air like Neo in his lobby and watching them topple under your boots.

Still in slow-mo, the misty blood-clouds and flying-everything starting to engulf your senses completely, you toss a grenade and watch as your enemies fail to scatter in time - their cries of fear and anguish warped into unrecognisable sprawling low-pitched verses by the slow-down - and gasp as the slow-motion explosion seems to momentarily suck in the environment around it before a translucent wave of pain erupts forth in every direction and lashes your enemies against pillars, over chairs and back through the flapping blinds onto a bed of glass - where, were the level designers being really cheeky, you might have seen the effect, witnessed elsewhere, of unbalanced overhead projectors sweeping their faces with bright light and projected bullet points to complement the bullet holes, the light perfectly mapped to the contours of their body.

'F.E.A.R Single-Player' Screenshot 4

Everyone's dead. And you feel like you're in a action movie. And your head is swimming. And more than anything you want to rewind and do the exact same thing again, because there's little chance that you managed to take it all in the first time around, and there's even less hope that you'll ever experience the exact same gunfight twice.

The only word for what F.E.A.R does is carnage. The art of the special effects, flying particles, bouncing light and other sights and sounds is utterly intoxicating, and throughout all the worlds of realistically flighted falling boxes, alien landscapes and big explosions that we've explored in our time, including Max Payne's vision of dystopian New York, we've never felt as enamoured with a simple gunfight as we have done playing this game. Monolith talks about how content creation is a hugely time-consuming factor at this level, compared to the tail end of the last technology cycle; it's time well spent.

The difference is in the details, then. But is the devil?

No. Not on the evidence we've seen. We caught a glimpse of a pointy red tail in some of the clichés that underwrite the experience - the elite assault team being choppered in, each with different supernatural or heightened abilities (like a sniper with enhanced hearing); an installation overrun by some unknown force that literally rips a Delta Force response team to shreds after disrupting their communications; the team-leading Chicago drawl on the radio running commentary - but even these are executed with panache.

The reason being that they're all plot devices fuelling F.E.A.R's Japanese horror-inspired narrative, which despite its Eastern influences manages to harness the abovementioned hackneyed ideas to help guide you through the mysterious and inexplicable story of what's going on at the base - the delivery of which is typified by understatement and feasting on scraps of the unexplained.

'F.E.A.R Single-Player' Screenshot 5

Monolith's Kevin Stephens nailed it when he tried to explain the storytelling approach to us on Tuesday. Although he left it to his lead designer to truly deconstruct the lure of Japanese (and Korean) horror compared to western directness and apply them in code form - of which there are promising signs in the various set-pieces we've seen - his observations that ghosts are more worrying than monsters and that it's not what you see but what you glimpse are well founded, and grounding the tale in a western setting and western clichés rather than eastern culture and setting gives it the same sort of narrative appeal as something like Resident Evil. Or Alien.

You find a sliced soldier in a lift and you're all gung ho about getting whatever did it. So you hop in and head on down, only for your HUD and torch to start flickering. Something's about to happen. Then a little girl appears right in your sights, and then blinks away with the next flicker. Not quite the monster you expected.

Then the following sequence, despite its obviously cheesy dialogue, manages to result in the same moment of exquisite panic every single time anyone plays through it.

You creep into a room. Your eyes are immediately drawn to the blood. It's everywhere. As you crane your head to look up at the ceiling a well-judged pang erupts through the speakers to mark your realisation that it's caked with the stuff. "Jesus," your team leader blurts over the radio as he sees what you're seeing. He tells you one of your fellow elites will join you shortly, and as another lift door opens and your compatriot follows the barrel of his assault rifle into the room, you feel like turning round to him and giving him those WTF eyes. But he's obviously hard. "You must be the new guy. I hear you're a bad mother f*****. I hope it's true."

'F.E.A.R Single-Player' Screenshot 6

There's a moment of bleak but wary humour as he's asked what he thinks, and responds something like: "I think some bad s*** happened here." "No s***. Anything else?" As their darkly amusing exchange draws to an end with "Hey man, get off my d***, you asked what I thought!" it suddenly dovetails into a moment of tension. "Notice how there's no bullet holes? No brass? These guys never fired a shot." And yet they're all over the place. In pieces.

Thunk. Thunk. Thunk. As you near the far end of the room, the lights are thunking on. And off. And on. And off through a doorway shielded with shopfront-style shutters. "Something's coming." Suddenly the next thunk of light is punctuated by another taut pang of audio and the sight of a waist-high silhouette rushing arms-flailing towards the shutters from the other side. The sense of panic and the rounds of ammunition you react by wasting on this ghostly shape before it disappears with the next thunk are a testament to the sense of atmosphere and the sense of immersion. Clichés or not, you can't help but fall under F.E.A.R's spell.

Then the door opens. You have to go and investigate.

From what we've seen, F.E.A.R is going to be an experience that sticks to these ideas. When you fight, you fight clever enemies who communicate your position to one another, cover one another, and try to flank you - without ever being so clever that they overwhelm you as they might in reality with their numerical superiority - and the spectacle of taking them down is steeped in a peerless level of incidental detail, the intensity of it all accentuated by the moments of slow-motion and the first-person view itself, which adds another layer of involvement - something of a theme, as Monolith wants you to put yourself in the speechless, nameless role of the central protagonist much as Valve did with Half-Life 1 and 2. But the visually and mechanically arresting combat is an experience matched by the draw of the narrative and storytelling, which, in our admittedly brief encounter with the start of the single-player game, demonstrated a maturity and intelligence of style that gives us real hope for the final release. If you want a high-concept assessment, it could be Jerry Bruckheimer producing a collaborative effort from Hideo Nakata and Takashi Miike...

But you probably don't want high-concept. You'd be better off knowing that it left us wanting more. And if the whole game does that, as it seems designed to, Monolith will go some way to closing the gap between the words love and F.E.A.R in a lot of people's gushing write-ups.

So, in the end, the reason we began the way we did ought to be obvious: the beginning of F.E.A.R itself was sufficiently convincing all by itself. Vivendi higher-ups: you may just get your money's worth with this one.

Check back soon for more on F.E.A.R, including impressions of the multiplayer mode and a chat with Monolith director of technology Kevin Stephens.

Advertisement

Are you excited about F.E.A.R. on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-38 of 38 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Spanky
20/01/05 @ 15:30
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nice distortion effects on the glass(screenie with the fat man).
Bezzy
20/01/05 @ 15:39
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Bruckhiemer? Man, I know previews shouldn't be overly gushing, but at the same time, why the hate, playah?
mortykun
20/01/05 @ 15:44
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
sounds freaken cool, I want :)
symmetry
20/01/05 @ 15:46
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
WANT
PLAY
NOW
Artemus
20/01/05 @ 15:46
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Time to upgrade the old PC again?
kalel [mod]
20/01/05 @ 15:49
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm glad you guys are being positive about it. I saw a demo of it from PC Gamer or something, and it looked awful, but a bit 'early days' as well, so it's good that it's shaping up.
deathgibbon
20/01/05 @ 15:50
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Looks good and it looks like PC gamers will have to upgrade again.
symmetry
20/01/05 @ 15:51
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well it's about that time anyway.

Oh and doesn't that guy in the 4th picture look like Gabe Newell?
drumbaby
20/01/05 @ 15:51
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
/waits for Quake IV and STALKER...
Eraser
20/01/05 @ 15:56
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Watch the E3 videos of this game (I thought everybody would have by now), it's looking frikking awesome. Graphics seem mighty impressive as well.
Flib
20/01/05 @ 15:56
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Great article, I skipped a few paragraphs towards the end for fear of spoilers but I'm much less sceptical about this now. Looking good!
Milk
20/01/05 @ 15:57
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So did you get stuck on the eurostar back from paris Tom, or are they paying you by the word now?

It sounds good, but you know its gonna get a 7 out of 10 in the end.
Dr.Haggard
20/01/05 @ 16:02
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I was already very interested - despite the weapons seeming weak and the first person movement appearing light and jerky in the movie I've seen of this same level - but now it's at the top of my 2005 list.

Excellent article Tom.
groovychainsaw
20/01/05 @ 16:11
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sounds good - ill keep an eye out for this from now on,,,,
ralphwolfenstein
20/01/05 @ 16:16
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
sounds like the spiritual brother of Black
Royal Fool
20/01/05 @ 16:22
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Not frightfully (Ha!) interested, I'm afraid (Touché!), but I'm giving this game the benefit of the doubt. It's Monolith, after all.
tonynibbles
20/01/05 @ 16:51
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Half Life 2.

Nothing is ever gonna be the same.
BremXJones
20/01/05 @ 17:01
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I only finally saw the video of this recently, and thinks it looks ace. I just worry if they can keep up the pressure across an entire game.

KG
spindizzy
20/01/05 @ 17:20
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Wow. What with half life 2, it's really looking as if I'm missing out on some great games by having a prehistoric PC (and a very flash mac). I'm still resisting, but those screenshots are pretty amazing.

/resolve weakens a little bit more.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 20/01/05 @ 17:20
MonkeyMatters
20/01/05 @ 18:22
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
this game's on my list.
sam_spade
20/01/05 @ 18:24
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
/puts on list.

/waits
space ace
20/01/05 @ 19:04
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
sequel: "i.f.e.a.r."
Errol
20/01/05 @ 19:56
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
What are the system specs for this one ?
Eraser
20/01/05 @ 20:05
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"What are the system specs for this one ?"

Probably some supercomputer only Nasa can afford :(
Salaman
20/01/05 @ 20:24
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I've not actually paid any attention to this game at all sofar.
But this looks yummy.

/gets excited
deathgibbon
20/01/05 @ 20:28
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
symmetry: Maybe a bit of a dig by VU?
Psi
20/01/05 @ 22:02
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
yawn another fps.... how innovative
sam_spade
20/01/05 @ 22:13
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh look, another poster does the 'FPS Yawn' thing, how innovative.
Killerbee
20/01/05 @ 22:18
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sounds cool. Great preview - I've gone from knowing very little at all about this to putting it towards the top of my list for 2005. :)
Psi
21/01/05 @ 06:44
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
sam the yawn was coz im on f-ing nightshift :P

will be getting the game looks good but after the hl2/d3 bolloks forgive me for being piss sick of the fps genre hype

gonna replace the phraze "thats the best thing since sliced bread" with "thats the best thing since mouse look"
crofty13
21/01/05 @ 07:26
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
looks like EVERY OTHER FPS.

New Engine with some fancy shit - check

marines with masks and machine guns -check

corridors - check

hey the games done! lets do a sequel
fireclown
21/01/05 @ 08:32
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
bog off you length-mocking types. It's refreshing to see a reviewer working so hard to give an impression of the flavour of a game. And Tom's prose is rather decent. What, you complain about 'those describey bits' in novels too?

crofty - you're mocking a game for having *corridors* and *better graphics*? Maybe they should render it in wireframe and set it in a really big tree.
UncleLou
21/01/05 @ 08:55
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Maybe they should render it in wireframe and set it in a really big tree.

He, I like it! :)

Maybe (as pointed out in Tom's preview) it won't be the most original game ever, but ffs, who cares? Originality is overrated. Besides, there's a lot of stuff I haven't seen much in other shooters, like the whole idea with the ghosts, for example.
Magic Panda
21/01/05 @ 10:43
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Blah, you are dead inside.

This looks cracking..


Universal Hamster
21/01/05 @ 11:22
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well, Stalker has corridors, guns, monsters and such... Saying you are tired of thse things in FPS games is like saying you're tired of cars in racing games.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 21/01/05 @ 11:28
fireclown
21/01/05 @ 12:09
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
rdexter: 'Judging by the movie (and to a lesser extent by this review) this is yet another FPS with a masive bunch of massively dumb, massively faceless AI opponents thrown at you like massive cannon fodder.'

'When you fight, you fight clever enemies who communicate your position to one another, cover one another, and try to flank you'

I think we read different reviews. :)

'I am not necessarily tired of the genre, but why is there no FPS where killing scores of extra-idiotic enemies ISN'T the main objective'

I'd quibble about the 'extra-idiotic' in a lot of games. They're not as clever as a human but that's why we still run our own planet, which is fine by me.

But I agree, it does get tiresome. But there *are* FPSy games like DX and Thief where shooting people is not the main objective, and they tend not to be mainstream successes. Boys really like shooting things. That's why.
silentbob
21/01/05 @ 12:48
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I FUCKING WANT THIS NOW!!!one!!!!1
Varsity
05/02/05 @ 10:09
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think I'm beginning to realise what all the fuss is about...

Comments: 1-38 of 38 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Metaboli

X View gallery