Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin Review

Xbox 360 PC PlayStation 3 Review by Kieron Gillen

10 February, 2009

Page 2 of 2. <- Page 1

What else helps is the sense that Monolith really does care about this little world. As well as in-game cut-scenes and visions, there are logs all over the area for you to collect. These short bursts of information add a lot of colour to the proceedings, and in a BioShock-esque way add light and shade to what at its heart is a Resident-Evil-by-way-of-Akira ooh-those-corporations-they're-bad'uns plot. In fact, the most chilling moment in the game is delivered off-hand in one of these.

Monolith really has developed a setting, even if it's not that interested in explaining it. Take the monstrous creatures you fight - the fairly standard fast-gooey-teary-things, ghosty-telekenetic things and puppet-master-zombie-controller things. Bar the former, I got no sense of what they were there for. I actually knew the story behind them, because a developer explained their background during an interview I did, but it's not made clear in actual play. While I understand the idea that the strange and unknown is fearful, it's not how the monsters come across in the game. Generally speaking, they just come across as something novel to shoot.

As I said earlier, it's a game that leans more towards the combat than the story-concepts. This makes the aforementioned giant robot suit a logical - if predictable - extension. It's a robot suit. You get in it, and shoot bad guys with mini-guns and rockets until you reach the inevitable bump it can't get over. Then you get out. That's it. The quick-time events, thankfully, aren't actually based around complicated button sequences, but rather bashing one button like an old eighties sports game when you're grabbed by a monster. When a couple of major conflicts are reduced to this, you can't help feeling underwhelmed.

'F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin' Screenshot 3

Corridorable.

Multiplayer exists, featuring four modes and six maps, but I wasn't able to find any games pre-release to play, and there are no bots to just get a sense of the levels. (CORRECTION: There are in fact five modes. "Six if you count Team Deathmatch and plain old Deathmatch as separate ones," writes Kieron. "And while there's six maps in most modes, in Armoured Front, there's three other ones. And also online games to play now, which is nice." Apologies for the error.)

Eurogamer will look at this area again following release if it proves to offer anything more than other shooters, but on the surface of it the most interesting aspect is the character set-up options. You have a set amount of points, and purchasing each weapon or equipment option costs a number of points. So if you buy the highly expensive sniper rifle you're not going to be able to afford fancy armour, let alone a handy helping of grenades.

But back to single-player. FEAR 2 is most notable for being a game that doesn't even attempt to engage with any of the failings of the linear first-person shooter. Playing through on the average difficulty level, what slowed me down most was the handful of occasions when I couldn't locate the one place to progress (a process which the general gloominess of environments exacerbates). While the developers said they were expanding the size of the "corridor", in practice it's still a far more prescriptive game of where you can go than, say, Half-Life 2.

And Half-Life 2's levels made more sense conceptually too. It's rarely obvious why you're going the way you're going. I moved by instinct, knowing that heading in a certain way was what the game wanted me to do - but also knowing it didn't make much sense. FEAR 2 is a game that works off an engine of atmosphere, and the unreality underpinning it all just undercuts that immersion.

'F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin' Screenshot 4

You're right, that is a pretty hot tramp stamp.

In other words, I found the experience of playing the game to be simultaneously exhilarating and depressing. The smallest fundamental parts - such as the combat - work. But on a higher level, alienation grows as the game becomes a chain of well-worn genre standards. I found myself thinking the back-handed compliment, "Well, at least I haven't done a gun-turret bit yet." Then, predictably, one turned up. Every time I started a new level I ended up wondering whether this one would be the moving-platform-train-bit. Surely it would arrive eventually? And it did.

It's a checklist of genre-tropes, well performed. If you're just looking for more well-polished shooting, this will while away the hours pleasantly enough. If you've never played a first-person shooter before, you'll probably be in love - this is as archetypal a corridor-shooter as has ever been made, and there's a reason why it works. But for anyone who's been running down corridors with shotguns for most of their adult life, this is so uninspired that you worry for the spark of Monolith's soul. You guys made No One Lives Forever, remember? You're smart. You're better than this.

FEAR 2 isn't terrible. That's the most terrible thing of all. Is mere competency enough to garner gamers' love? I don't know. But it's the one thing I really do fear.

Advertisement

Are you excited about F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin on PC/PlayStation 3/Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 347 in total | next 50 »

1-50 | 51-100 | 101-150 | 151-200 | 201-250 | 251-300
Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
andywilkie35
10/02/09 @ 00:06
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
confirmed no buy, bang!
NotSoSlim
10/02/09 @ 00:08
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Finally a proper review as the demo was crap imo
ASHBERY76
10/02/09 @ 00:12
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The review doesn't read like a 5 score game.
absolutezero
10/02/09 @ 00:15
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Remember EG gave the first game 9/10. and by the sounds of things not much has changed in this follow up, if thats worth halving the score then all games bar the first the series should be under 5/10 aswell.

Gillenlol
Eraysor
10/02/09 @ 00:15
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Bollocks. I was looking forward to this for ages. Good job I bought Chrono Trigger instead.
Xerx3s
10/02/09 @ 00:20
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"I found myself thinking the back-handed compliment, "Well, at least I haven't done a gun-turret bit yet." Then, predictably, one turned up. Every time I started a new level I ended up wondering whether this one would be the moving-platform-train-bit. Surely it would arrive eventually? And it did."

I'm not going to buy this game but this raises an eyebrow. EG has - recently - highly reviewed many games that have exactly those bits.
Yossarian
10/02/09 @ 00:23
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Zing!

Demo pushed me from an instabuy onto the fence, and this confirms it. Money well saved. Monolith are now 2 for 2 this generation when it comes to fucking up good games with bad sequels.
Hangman
10/02/09 @ 00:24
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
right, so worse than files? i don't think so.
DUFFMAN5
10/02/09 @ 00:24
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Really, oh well
Katsumoto
10/02/09 @ 00:25
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
EG =! KG. Not a hive mind. No.

"The close-combat flying kicks have been excised" - they were in the demo! How silly.

This sounds like something to pick up once the price has gone down. Plenty of other games to get in the mean time, thankfully.
Eraysor
10/02/09 @ 00:28
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"The close-combat flying kicks have been excised" - they were in the demo! How silly.

I noticed that too >_
Hangman
10/02/09 @ 00:29
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"The close-combat flying kicks have been excised, reduced to the standard weapon-bash"

Oh dear. Not only are the flying kicks in, but also the melee slide, and the jumping roundhouse.

" I may be belabouring the point, but it's the core mechanic's solidness which makes FEAR 2 impossible to condemn"

5/10!




Anon_642
10/02/09 @ 00:31
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I will copy what I wrote on the IGN Board:
"I don't think I will be picking this game up unfortunately. I enjoyed the first F.E.A.R on PC which I played at a friends house but when I got the same game on the Xbox 360 it was lacking.

My PC is not very powerfull so it was always X360 or nothing and I guess in this case in will be nothing, which is a shame as I was looking forward to this game right up until the demo which I honestly thought was EXACTLY the same as the original F.E.A.R albeit with slightly more intresting enviroments and SLIGHTLY better graphics.

Shame that the developers could not deliver, perhaps I will rent it one day when it is dirt cheap but not worth spending £39.99 on if I am not sure it will be decent or not.
Anon_642"
mkreku
10/02/09 @ 00:32
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well, seeing as the first game was horribly overrated by Eurogamer, I guess the sequel is getting a bit of the blame left over from the first review.
Katsumoto
10/02/09 @ 00:36
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"" I may be belabouring the point, but it's the core mechanic's solidness which makes FEAR 2 impossible to condemn"

5/10!" I don't think 5/10 is condemnation really. Read EG's scoring policy, 5 is marked as "not as disaster" whereas its only at 4/10 they talk about "getting into the realms of poor"
Postumo
10/02/09 @ 00:38
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
There are kicks in this game, but not as good as in the first one.

They were my primary weapon!
polaris70
10/02/09 @ 00:39
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Jeez, did the reviewer get kicked in the nuts by his girlfriend while opening a letter from his landlord saying he's getting evicted, just before he wrote the review? Maybe you shouldn't write reviews until you've been out for a few pints, won money at the local casino and got the number of the hottest chic in the nightclub. 5/10 lol.
muters
10/02/09 @ 00:43
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh dear. With the first FEAR, I could appreciate the mechanics of the AI and gameplay, but couldn't get past how unremittingly dull the level design was. I played the demo of this and liked that it wasn't all offices, but once I got into a mech suit it just felt like any other shooter. And I couldn't see what the hell was going on half of the time. One for the inevitable '£9.99 at play.com' list then, I think.
Hangman
10/02/09 @ 00:44
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
edge gave it 8/10, higher than killzone.who to believe?
polaris70
10/02/09 @ 00:48
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well, It's still a buy for me, I even thought the demo was worth more than 5/10 lol. Best 15 minutes of FPS gaming I've had for a while, especially considering the deluge of over-hyped garbage that came out at the end of last year :)
Snidesworth
10/02/09 @ 00:48
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I rather liked the demo, and it felt quite similar to FEAR 1 (which is a good thing in my eyes). Is this a case of more of the same with no improvement, or is it remarkably worse than the first? If it's the former I'll still be picking it up.
hmmmmm
10/02/09 @ 00:48
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Must say the demo scared me shitless and thought this would get higher. I don't actually mind, but it will be interesting to read the forthcoming Resident Evil 5 review. 5/10 because it follows the previous formula: small houses, windows, zombies, tunnels, slow turning... ?
Ged42
10/02/09 @ 00:54
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
And there's me hoping it would be good enough to help put enough money Monolith's way, for them to make NOLF 3, oh well 'sigh'
local_celebrity
10/02/09 @ 00:55
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Props to Kieron for the use of belabouring. That's probably the most bedazzling word to befall here for a while.

Can't say I'm all that surprised at the overall verdict, though. Downloaded the demo for this the other day. Five minutes in, I started dozing off. Now I just fire it up to combat the insomnia.
nardop
10/02/09 @ 01:03
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
im sorry, but that review is pretty much BS tbh.
MrED209
10/02/09 @ 01:06
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
5/10 is the score you should have given the first version of this game instead of wasting my money by wanking an 8 or 9 all over it, or whatever it was.
Katsumoto
10/02/09 @ 01:06
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@nardop, STKD - Have you guys played it then? What did you think? What is that you disagree with in this review in particular?
Edited 2 times, most recently on 10/02/09 @ 01:09
nardop
10/02/09 @ 01:08
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
yes
3william56
10/02/09 @ 01:12
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I thought the FEAR2 demo was ok, with excellent sound design, ok visuals and a bit of style in the ghosts and visions, right up until the ping of the Killzone2 download complete sounded. Comparing the two side by side, and FEAR2 is definitely relegated to the bargain bin. Unless the demo was very different to the final game, the AI was shocking (running brainlessly backwards and forwards between 2 or 3 cover points is about it), little scenery interaction (I spent 5 minutes last night just shooting tables and chairs and barrels and tittatin KZ2 just to see how it reacted) and corridor after corridor after corridor. I resumed the reason I didn't know why I was shooting the other soldiers was demo-itus, but obviously not. Sure KZ2 is a little generic, but it does everything so well that it covers any (deliberate) lack of innovation, which ruthlessly highlights lesser games with neither innovation or KZ2's polish.

On the PS3 at least, Killzone has changed the game, and other FPSs are going to have their work cut out keeping up. Which is excellent news - a real kick upm the ar$e for a genre that has stagnated so badly recently.

BTW: anyone else suffer a sound bug where every sound apart from the backgrond wind noise cuts out when you exit the underground train station? Happens every time for me, and nothing will sort it except a die and restart.
Hangman
10/02/09 @ 01:14
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Well, at least I haven't done a gun-turret bit yet." Then, predictably, one turned up. Every time I started a new level I ended up wondering whether this one would be the moving-platform-train-bit. Surely it would arrive eventually? And it did"

what, like in Killzone 2, where there is actually a turret sequence on board a fucking train! 9/10 for that one though, make up your minds...
Katsumoto
10/02/09 @ 01:16
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The reviewer for this game had nothing to do with the KZ2 review, though? He's probably not even played the demo, in fact..
Sidgo
10/02/09 @ 01:29
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So far the reviews have been pretty good. IGN UK just gave it an 8.5.

http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/952/9525...

And VideoGamer just gave the game a 9/10.
http://www.videogamer.com/xbox360/projec...

All I can say is that I'm not letting one reviewer decide whether or not I buy a game. Especially a review that's inconsistent with the score (his review sounds like he's going to give it a 7 or so). Crapping all over an FPS game because it does all the right things perfectly but doesn't innovate is like bitching about a incredibly well made slasher flick because it sticks to the established rules. If it's well done, it can still be a lot of fun.

I don't need in innovation every time I fire up a movie or play a game. I just want something that's fun to watch or play and keeps me entertained.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 10/02/09 @ 01:34
N@
10/02/09 @ 01:35
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This scored higher than Killzone 2 in the latest edition of Edge.


:/!
figaro7
10/02/09 @ 01:35
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I purchased the original fear based on eurogamers review, traded it within a month, i just couldnt see what was so special about it. I might pick this up when its cheap later down the road if theres no other decent FPS down the line that is.
Ywap
10/02/09 @ 01:37
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If the full game is anything like the demo, then 5 seem to be a very generous score. Personally i think it felt as shallow and simple as the junk they call Gow and Cod. Fear 1 was a great game but with the sequel Monolith seem to have lost the magic and sold their souls.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 06/08/09 @ 03:30
N@
10/02/09 @ 01:41
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Shooters nowadays need to meet the bar which was raised by Halo 3. The problem is that's an extraordinarily high bar to reach"

O_o


Replace Halo 3 with Killzone 2=(y)
skillian
10/02/09 @ 01:43
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I loved the first game - really did love it - but I really couldn't get on with the demo for this.

Don't know exactly what it was, but the "feel" was all wrong and even the general combat just didn't grab me. It was almost like I was playing at a low framerate although my FPS was fine at around the 50 mark. The shotgun was about a quarter as much fun as that in the original, and by the time I got in the mech suit thing I was just thoroughly disappointed with the whole thing.

Perhaps the full game could have sucked me in if I gave it some time, but honestly this isn't something I'm going to buy now so I guess I'll never find out.

edit: talking about the PC, by the way.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 10/02/09 @ 01:44
pWnz0r
10/02/09 @ 01:47
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"You explore an alternate part of the world as another FEAR team"

Thats just not true.

"The close-combat flying kicks have been excised, reduced to the standard weapon-bash"

Neither is that.

"FEAR 2 is guilty of the arrogance of videogame sequels which do little to reintroduce their plots"

Its a sequal...

I can always count on eurogamer for a pretty innacurate, worthless review :D
Think ill be picking this up on PC.
Jim Bob
10/02/09 @ 01:50
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"FEAR 2 is guilty of the arrogance of videogame sequels which do little to reintroduce their plots"

This should read:

"Keiron Gillen is quilty of the arrogance of a former. Edge freelancer which is most unhelpful in determing whether this game is any good or not"

Read the review and my brain speaks 7 or 8, but 5 come on - traffic whoring if ever I saw it. Even Edgegave it an 8 Gillen!
AdamVGR
10/02/09 @ 01:53
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
More proof that EG has no fucking clue how to score. I've played this game already and can tell you it's definitely not a 5, just like Rise of the Argonauts wasn't a 3. But give them Killzone 2 which is a incredibly short game and they give it a 9, god what a bunch of snobs.
Baranga
10/02/09 @ 01:59
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh dear. How on earth could he miss the flying kicks?
Ghost5786
10/02/09 @ 02:01
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
From the demo I played of this and the last FEAR game, it is my opinion that they are exactly the same, bar a difference in graphical quality.

On a side note, is anybody else fed up of audio/text logs dotted around levels? As a narrative device it is overused and from a gameplay perspective it forces the player to stop playing the game, usaully to read/listen to somebody's really inconsequential and banal writing/acting.

And also, not catching the flying kicks as being in the game is an obvious faux-pas Kieron. 5/10 however is not inconsistant with what you've written considering you believe the game to be highly formulaic in a lot of ways. Again, it leads back to a problem with a 10-point scoring system in which several reviewers give 7/10 scores to average games which in reality should technically be receiving 5s.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 10/02/09 @ 02:06
markgreyam
10/02/09 @ 02:34
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Shooters nowadays need to meet the bar which was raised by Halo 3. The problem is that's an extraordinarily high bar to reach."

I think you're confusing yourself with the bar you raised for Halo 3.
actionfitz
10/02/09 @ 02:49
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
harsh. i've read more scathing reviews that got far better sores on this site.
confused :/
- add this to the rent b4 buy pile (just in case).
rodpad
10/02/09 @ 03:06
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Halo 3 raised no bar whatsoever. Utter pish.
Ferose999
10/02/09 @ 03:56
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I just read d review of fear 2 by eurogamer. In d review i didnt find dat reviewer had any true problem wd game vch is fantastic infact n reviewed fairly by other sites. Isnt it cheap to give a game like fear 2 just 5 out of 10. They cant deteriorate gaming n media dat way. I hav usually seen d reviews 4m eurogamer r not so relevant both in terms of context n rating. They dont speak true gaming...fable 2 got 10 out of 10 despite its so many problems. Amazing na?
Ferose999
10/02/09 @ 03:56
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I just read d review of fear 2 by eurogamer. In d review i didnt find dat reviewer had any true problem wd game vch is fantastic infact n reviewed fairly by other sites. Isnt it cheap to give a game like fear 2 just 5 out of 10. They cant deteriorate gaming n media dat way. I hav usually seen d reviews 4m eurogamer r not so relevant both in terms of context n rating. They dont speak true gaming...fable 2 got 10 out of 10 despite its so many problems. Amazing na?
rob177467
10/02/09 @ 04:05
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ferose999, that is some of the worst English I have ever read.
Ferose999
10/02/09 @ 04:33
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Rob wts bad wd ma english?
Ferose999
10/02/09 @ 04:33
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Rob wts bad wd ma english?

Comments: 1-50 of 347 in total | next 50 »

1-50 | 51-100 | 101-150 | 151-200 | 201-250 | 251-300

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery