Fallout lawsuit continues - Bethesda
Fate of Interplay's MMO hangs in balance.
A flicker of hope that the legal dispute between Interplay and Bethesda over the rights to Fallout might have been resolved has been quickly stamped out by Bethesda.
The court case casts a shadow over the future of Interplay's planned Fallout MMO; Bethesda is seeking to stop production of the online game.
Fallout fan site Duck and Cover reported that Bethesda had dropped an appeal against a judgement in favour of Interplay, but Bethesda spokesman Pete Hines told Kotaku that this didn't mean the legal battle was over.
"That is still ongoing and has not been resolved. It is a minor procedural thing that took place, not a dropping of the lawsuit... The bottom line is it's an ongoing legal matter, it's in no way, shape or form done," Hines said.
Bethesda began threatening to block the Fallout MMO a year ago, claiming a lack of progress in its development violated its agreement with Interplay. Bethesda bought the rights to Fallout from Interplay in 2004, licensing the online rights back to the struggling older outfit.
Bethesda then took a different tack in September, claiming Interplay was selling older Fallout games without permission, and requesting an injunction against the sales and work on the MMO.
That request was denied by a judge in December, and it's Bethesda's appeal against that decision that has now been dropped.
Interplay was quick to confirm that it would continue to sell the original Fallout games and work on the MMO, according to Gamasutra, as well as pursue counter-claims against Bethesda. Interplay claims that Bethesda is wilfully trying to exploit the weakness of its financial situation, saying the rival publisher was "keenly aware that Interplay could not fund expensive, protracted litigation".
You may also like...
-
Gravity Rush Review 54
-
Sony patents method to interrupt your gaming with an ad 127
-
Wii U Aliens: Colonial Marines is best-looking version because of console's "more modern tech" 90
-
Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning needed to sell 3 million to break even 75
-
XCOM: Enemy Unknown Preview: First Contact 10
-
Activision vs. Vince Zampella and Jason West: Inside the game industry trial of the decade 73
-
Arma 3 in-engine footage shows off lighting tech 24
-
Skyrim gets mounted combat in new update 60
-
App of the Day: Go Robo! 3
-
Jet Set Radio announced for PlayStation Vita 30
-
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Review 132
-
Dirt Showdown Review 90
-
Minecraft overtakes Black Ops on XBL activity chart 26
-
Minecraft total sales hit 9.2 million 9
-
Anarchy Reigns delayed in the West, Platinum says 13
Comments (15) Latest comment 2 years ago
Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Do people want a Fallout MMO? If so do you want Interplay to make it or for Bethesda to take control and make one? Do you think Bethesda would make an MMO version or just trying to protect there rights to Fallout?
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
am just playing FO3 at the moment, and was wishing it was an mmo rather than an rpg, simply to expand the enjoyment.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
As it stands I'm not sure who would make the better MMO, but I'm not impressed with Bethesda's apparent behaviour and so far neither is the law.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
If they can't afford to defend themselves, how on earth can they afford to make an MMO?
I don't mind which company makes a Fallout MMO so long as it's good, and lives up to the brand. The chances of a good Fallout MMO being made on a shoestring are pretty slim... so I have to default to Bethesda's side in this case.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Except Black Isle are now reborn in the form of Obsidian, who are developing Fallout: New Vegas for Bethesda.
I was under the impression that Interplay have languished on the rights and then quickly farmed it out to an East European studio when Bethesda rightly got pissy about the contracts not being fulfilled. I'm for Bethesda on this one - I loved Fallout 3, and giving New Vegas to Obsidian is surely +1 for karma.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
As it stands, we know Bethesda can't do a Fallout MMO because we already know they have The Elder Scrolls Online in the works. I think after a lot of chest-beating, Interplay will probably keep the rights but Bethesda will be breathing down their necks at the end of every week to make sure that this time a schedule is stuck to.
However, for me - Elder Scrolls Online > Fallout MMO. Oblivion continues to this day to ruin my insomnia-riddled nights... mercy on my soul for when the mmo hits...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
This disagreement is going nuclear.
This fallout is ugly.
Pick one of the above for terrible pun of the day!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
One interesting development, especially when considering the situation re: Activision Vs West/Zampella, isthat Interplay seem to have won the legal skirmishes so far. It makes you wonder if the the larger publishers have a strategy of filing suits against little developers, irrespective of the legal defensibility of their actions, in the hope that mounting legal costs will result in cheaper out of court settlements.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Now that I did not know.