Fallout 3 Operation: Anchorage Comments by Tom Bramwell

I've got a few games to complete before I start on this one (been sat there staring at me since release day) and I'm just wondering whether it's worth starting this yet. Obviously there is the patch coming then from what I can gather, once you complete it that's it, or does it drop you back in the world and allow you to do other missions? If not why would anyone play it until all the DLC is released?

Fantastic news guess thats another chunk of my life gone. Does that mean we will see new game content such as new armour, guns and soundtracks? Hopefully I get a chance to down a few more behomeths, loved toppling those meat crates.
For PS3 owners I think its a shame they cant get there hands on the extra content. The game requires a huge investment in gamer time to complete and by that time your completly addicted to the fallout 3 universe. Hopefully Bethedesa may see the light and and devlop DLC for our PS3 cousins. In the past not all exclusivity deals last...

@Garulon

With all respect to tech i did not mean that. I think this is all about the xbox getting exclusive content, the problem is these deals are done with certain games a few years into a consoles life when people have made there choice, but thats why microsoft does this sort of thing, sony did it for years with full games, this is why microsft went aggressive with pricing the cheaper it is the bigger market you have as i am sure you know the marketing "tech" runs just as deep if not deeper and soon everyone will be able to afford an xbox and this is another reason why.

Don't worry. Maybe they'll release DLC for PS3 just like they did for Oblivion.

For those saying it is unfair (weither these be PS3 owners or not) and complaining about MS monopolising exclusive DLCs or suchlike, throwing about money like there is no tomorrow - I have a few points to make.

Point One. Sony has in-house game developement studios. MS doesn't, anymore.

Point Two. I would guess that Sony has thrown alot more money around than MS, although not into DLCs. Their money went into getting movie studios to gather around Blu-Ray. Sony had too much to lose had the movie studios gone HD DVD (PS3 might have gotten buried).
Point Two b. MS/X360 has lost (almost) nothing on HD DVD not becoming mainstream.

Point Three. MS is mainly a software company. They know their stuff. An undeniable fact. This is why developement for games is easier for X360 than for PS3 (and ports are easier). Sony on the other hand is mainly a hardware company. PS3 does in fact have the upper hand on tech specs but even so, what matters most is how easily available you make it for game developers to squeese the most juice out of the machine. This is where PS3 falls flat on its back (note that the same problem was around in PS2).

Raising the cap=sale.