Eufloria Review

Sow and sow.

Version tested: PC

Pretend that you are a world famous artist, and that I am the King of France. Knowing your unique ability to capture the rawest essence of your subject, I have commissioned you to draw a 100ft tall portrait of me to celebrate my 70th birthday. The special day came - all too quickly, as they do in a man's later years - and you have unveiled your picture in front of a crowd of twirling courtesans and the very top levels of the French aristocracy. The room erupts into outrage: your drawing is a childish - and gigantic - sketch of a dog turd. Calmly, you explain yourself.

"Your Majesty, I said I would capture your essence. And I find you to be odious waste. I have drawn smell lines to signify your self-serving motives and desires, and the flies are the people who surround you, suffering your repulsive nature to extract whatever nourishment life has failed to already draw from you."

"Well that's fair enough, obviously," I reply. "But I've also got arms and a big face. It would also have been nice if you'd put a crown on it, or a couple of elbows."

A similar - I'll admit, not identical - situation must have faced the makers of Eufloria, when deciding which elements of a strategy game to extract and reproduce for their minimalist, ambient game. Developed from the award-baiting proof-of-concept Dyson, Eufloria builds ever so slightly on the themes of space exploration and culture expansion. So much has been stripped from what an experienced gamer expects from the genre that it becomes interactive artwork rather than a full game: beguiling, with its stark procedural graphics and movement, and mellow wind-chime soundtrack. Elegant, with its one-handed gameplay that lets you rest your chin in your other palm and drool yourself into a unfocused reverie about the last time you went outdoors. But the self-imposed limitations do make Eufloria something of a curate's egg.

'Eufloria' Screenshot 1

Hide-And-Seek: one of the more memorable levels, and one of the few that took more than one attempt.

Let me take you on the journey that Eufloria asks you to follow. In the first of 25 story levels, you learn to move seedlings from asteroid to asteroid. Seedlings are your currency, your foot soldiers, and your resources. But for now, we're just moving them around, using a remarkably clever drag-and-drop system. Left-click on the centre of an asteroid with your seedlings on it, and a green orbit appears. Move the mouse from the asteroid to this orbit, and you'll select anywhere between one and all of the seedlings. Cross the green line without letting go of the mouse button, and you'll move them all. You can select a single unit with a right click - useful for scouting missions. It's an elegant and intuitive system - if the Eufloria team wrote an operating system, I'd want to use it.

But, I can tell what you're thinking. You've played a few strategy games in your time, and only having one unit is instantly alarming. But there is some variety. Seedlings inherit properties from their asteroid, and there are three properties. Energy determines a unit's physical size, its HP, and its ability to sap an enemy core (more on that later). Strength is the ability to deliver damage: not much good without energy unless you're attacking an unprotected asteroid. Speed is obvious, but the difference between slow and fast is the difference between drumming your fingers and feeling like an intergalactic plant commander. This is all represented by the size and shape of your seeds, when you're zoomed in: zoomed out, they're a pixelswarm.

Level two introduces us to colonisation, and the limitations of where you can send your seedlings. A colonised asteroid adds to your explorable area, and larger asteroids provide a larger radius in which to travel. This leads to some interesting opportunities: you can cut off over-adventurous units, leaving them unable to move. You should also be careful using a giant asteroid's range, as it could easily be a one-way journey. Finding bottlenecks and using this range to your advantage is one of the more interesting parts of the game, and it quickly becomes second nature.

Level three brings on the Greys - a mindless, angry threat, whose aggression upsets Mother Tree, your narrator. "They are mad with violence and anger. Why do they fight us?" Her answer comes in level four, where other seedling empires are ushered in. Upon meeting them, your seedlings instantly attack. Who knew that seeds are basically aggressive pricks? It also shows the limits of your interaction: all you can do with seeds is tell them where to go, and to build trees.

Attacking an enemy-controlled asteroid is a matter of overwhelming it with seeds, destroying one of their trees, and barrelling down its roots to infect the core. The lack of control is frustrating: you can't focus your attack on a particular tree, so your seedlings might destroy a tree with a flower - something you'd obviously prefer to capture. You inherit the surviving trees on the asteroid, but the destroyed tree is always replaced by a seed-producing Dyson. This means you have little say in the loadout of your asteroids, as you can't destroy and rebuild, either. Still, it's a spectacle - once the tree is destroyed, and the path to the core opened, your seedlings gain a sense of urgent purpose - hurling themselves at the impassive asteroid like the over-excited gametes they are. The asteroid only accepts one seed every so often, so a haze of rejected seedlings bounce from the surface. It's one of the most comical and charming uses of swarm AI I've seen.

'Eufloria' Screenshot 2

While you're zoomed in looking at the branches shiver and glow, someone could be pummeling your prize asteroid.

So far, still so very simple. The remaining elements are drip fed. Defence trees - the second and only other form of tree - are introduced in level five. Level six tells you how to select seeds with a certain quality - double-clicking on a asteroid lets you select from strong, fast, or energetic seeds, and move them individually. A strange note, though - seeds can possess all three qualities. If all your seeds are strong, and some of them fast, there's no explicit way to leave the fast ones behind. An option to right-click to exclude certain seeds would be useful - at the point when your army is attacking the core, you really want to send non-energetic seeds away, and there's no way to efficiently do so.

The last thing you'll learn about is flowers. Produced without any discernible pattern by mature trees, flowers can be plucked off and planted on any asteroid to dramatically enhance a single Dyson or Defence tree. They also cause trees to grow the occasional mine - a strong weapon that can be despatched to defend or attack asteroids, delivering tri-lasered death to enemy seedlings.

And that's it. As immersive and engrossing as it can briefly be, the simplicity of the gameplay hobbles the game. Take a mission in which you're given a novel win condition: protect the greys. At first, it's a welcome change. But because of the unchangably hostile seedlings, this simply involves retreating when the greys attack. It's not a satisfying level at all, suffering the whim of swarm AI.

The way your units attack asteroids can be frustrating. Ideally, you'd want all your seedlings to arrive at a heavily fortified planet at the same time: overwhelm the mines, destroy a tree, and infest the asteroid's core. But because your seeds may have been produced by different asteroids with different speeds, and will leave from wherever they were in their orbit, they can form a tunnel of easily picked off loners. This is only really noticeable on despatches from larger asteroids, but it's another factor that encourages you to simply wait and grow your army.

A second, crippling weakness - and one that I discovered by rubbing my eyes, and going to make a cup of tea - was that going to another room for a few minutes solves all your tactical problems. Each planet has a seed cap, after which it'll stop producing new ones. But there's no meaningful limit to how many you can move to an asteroid (I started getting rejected orders at 687 - in a rare moment of poor communication, the game didn't explicitly tell me it was failing, the orders were simply not obeyed).

In the first 20 levels, at least, the steady production of your Dyson trees and the lack of thoughtful hostility from enemy empires mean you can play a couple of rounds of Civ and come back to Eufloria for an easy seed-rush win. The simplest and almost inevitably successful tactic is to wait and overwhelm. It's so simple to do that any other tactic is only employed to make yourself feel less cheap.

'Eufloria' Screenshot 3

In two seconds' time, they'll all be slamming themselves against that grey line, the randy pink sods.

There are exceptions: in Hide and Seek, the idea is to avoid direct conflict. I came back to the PC, with my thirteenth cup of tea, to find my Dyson trees subdued with enemy mines, and no surviving seedlings. I was being kept alive purely for the entertainment of the turquoise empire, who still couldn't understand why I butchered them so senselessly in level three. In level 23, Collision Course - and some of the Skirmish levels - you'll find yourself beseiged and fighting a war on multiple fronts. At these moments, suddenly it matters how you've distributed your armies. Suddenly, waiting isn't an option. Respect becomes finally due: but this just doesn't happen enough. Even in Dark Matter mode, an even prettier version where the AI is supposedly tougher, the mental challenge is rarely more than extreme patience.

It says something about Eufloria that I've written 1500 words about it, and the only thing stopping my writing another 1500 is consideration for you, the reader. For a game with so few rules, it manages to generate a real desire to talk about every decision made by the developers.

Let's go back to the King of France. I wouldn't want anyone to get the impression that I was suggesting Eufloria is a dog turd, because it's a beautiful, thoughtful curiosity. But somewhere in getting at the essence of strategy gaming, Eufloria has become a sketch, a distraction, a showcase, and a toy: it's an experience that you'll enjoy, rather than a coherent and satisfying game. And how do you give that a score? Those who'll love it - and there'll be a vocal many who do - will be fuming at the 4 I want to give the game. But those who despise imagined pretentiousness will queue up to call me a pseud bell-end if I give it a meaningless pat on the head with a 7. The sad answer is this.

5 / 10

Eufloria is available to buy from the developer's website.

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (40) Latest comment 9 months ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • mowgli #1 2 years ago

    Eek, looks nice though.
  • Der_tolle_Emil #2 2 years ago

    I found this on Steam and downloaded the demo because it looked nice (and I also really enjoyed Osmos - somehow I got the same vibe from this).

    Had no idea what to do in the game and it just wouldn't click at all. Now I know why.
  • EvilBob_leeds #3 2 years ago

    That's a shame. I thought Dyson deserved all the awards it got.
  • penhalion #4 2 years ago

    three pages for a 5/10 game?
  • orakio #5 2 years ago

    I had great expectations, but after reading this I will pass until 2 conditions are met:
    - A boring, rainy day with a certain amount of hot chocolate at my disposal
    - An weekend deal from steam where they practically give it away for a dime or 2
  • chukcyQ #6 2 years ago

    Looks like one of those "I want to be called ART", but in reality the game's just lacking and boring and plain.
  • WJF #7 2 years ago

    My impression from playing the demo was that it was a strategy game with no strategy.

    Liked the calming atmosphere though, just felt a little boring.

    Fully expecting this to be another gushing critical darling styled review because that's what EG tend to do in these occasions. Good work Mr. Blyth.
  • chudders #8 2 years ago

    Nice review, thanks.
  • schachmatt #9 2 years ago

    Well, at least I got a good read out of this game. Reviews like this are the reasons I come here regularly.

    But, grow up, EG, and ge rid of the scores. It's not timely anymore to have those meaningless numbers.
    Fuck the extra-revenue through visits from MetaCritic and GameRankings and page-visits from trolls!
  • Tomo #10 2 years ago

    0_o

    Surprised by this. I'll have a read a bit later. From what I've played it's a lovely game - 8/10 territory.
  • bit_mite #11 2 years ago

    "Games and art are mutually exclusive. The earth is not the moon, and air is not water."

    I couldn't disagree more. Artistry is a hugely important part of most games, and some succeed or fail because of it. BioShock is an obvious example, but there are plenty of others...

    Shame about this game. The enjoyed the free pre-release version, but it did get repetitive quickly. Sounds like the devs didn't expand greatly on their original idea - which is a shame, because it was awesome!
  • Vin #12 2 years ago

    Not really a game you can score out of ten. It is worth experiencing, though.
  • Blerk #13 2 years ago

    A little harsh on the game, I feel - although I can quite readily accept most of the criticisms. I think part of the problem is that you can't really treat it as (and therefore compare it with) a traditional RTS, it's almost like something else entirely. I find it superbly relaxing to play and it makes a great lunch-hour filler.
  • DDevil #14 2 years ago

    I really enjoyed the demo of this, and the only reason I haven't picked the full game up yet is the lack of funds. Like Blerk says, the score seems a bit harsh to me.
  • Hypercube #15 2 years ago

    Games and art are mutually exclusive. The earth is not the moon, and air is not water.

    Wow. Just wow.Your second sentence is factually correct but meaningless, and your first sentence is so completely missing the point I don't know where to begin.

    I expect you'll tell me that bricks can't be art. Or that you are able to define the boundaries of how I conceive of art. I can believe that games will never be art to you, but you've got to get past your own narrow subjectivity.
  • Razz #16 2 years ago

    Disappointing. I'll still buy it though.
    Edited by 1 at 11/11/09 @ 11:20
  • Rirekon #17 2 years ago

    I love this game, it's so tranquil to play but still requires some thought and input - 7/10 from me but I entirely get the reviewer's p.o.v
  • haowan #18 2 years ago

    Thanks for the review! Completely understand all the criticisms, and we hopefully will be addressing all of them - I'll actively be producing some better AI in forthcoming updates, for instance. And enough people have complained about the clickmania that I expect we will be looking into that too. But yeah, great to see so many words about the game, it's lovely!
  • haowan #19 2 years ago

    p.s. this isn't an 'art' game as such, it just looks pretty and has a nice atmosphere - something so lacking in so many modern games that clearly the response from most people is "oooh, arty eh?".
  • JEPC123 #20 2 years ago

    'Games and art are mutually exclusive. The earth is not the moon, and air is not water.'

    Don't some scientists think the moon is actually a chunk of the Earth knocked off due to a meoteor strike? And air does contain hydrogen and oxygen atoms, as well as precipitation... So the line between your categories, just like the line between games and art, is a blurred one.
  • Hypercube #21 2 years ago

    @JEPC123 - ooh, I hadn't thought of that! In which case, perhaps notmyrealname is making a point whose subtlety was lost on me :(
  • udat #22 2 years ago

    +1 for devs showig up and talking about their game in the comments thread!

    I quite like the look of this, and it also sounds quite relaxing. I wonder if it would run on my work PC. :)
  • kangarootoo #23 2 years ago

    Surprised at the score. In particular because of the comment "it's an experience that you'll enjoy, rather than a coherent and satisfying game", which seems oddly contradictory.

    Regardless, most of the gameplay issues sound like they result from a lack of testing time.... which brings me to my second comment.


    "if the Eufloria team wrote an operating system, I'd want to use it"

    The Eufloria team is actually three people (including the composer of the music) :)

    I'm not saying the game's issues should be overlooked out of a sense of charity, but I think some context is important. I for one will be watching for improvements and maybe even a sequel.
  • Bremenacht #24 2 years ago

    Sometimes, a 'meaningless pat on the head' score can be the right score. There have been enough reviews of much bigger and well-funded games on this site that do the 'pat on the head' - Dragon Age for example - following a much more critical or disdainful review. Soft on big developers, hard on little indies?

    Aside from the score, the review is good, and the criticisms are deserved. I'd still recommend it to anyone who enjoys a nice windowed game, which they can alt-tab to every minute or so while something else is on the go.
  • Obit #25 2 years ago

    Haven't played it, but I bet if it was on PSN or XBL it would get high scores all over the place since it's "art" :D
  • Mooglepies #26 2 years ago

    Looks a bit like Flower (in terms of reception, rather than gameplay) from the responses.

    Fair 'nuff, the world takes all kinds after all.
  • Cappy #27 2 years ago

    I'll definitely give this a go if there's a way of getting it working on my Intel Mac.
  • Bremenacht #28 2 years ago

    Cappy - check out the forum thread. I'm sure that was discussed at some point.
  • Cappy #29 2 years ago

  • HonestJoe #30 2 years ago

    £15 - and they say the likes of EA and Activision are ripping off consumers...
  • Yeevle #31 2 years ago

    Huh, I got more out of this review than I did thinking about buying it. Cheers Jon.
  • Neut #32 2 years ago

    @JEPC123 - ooh, I hadn't thought of that! In which case, perhaps notmyrealname is making a point whose subtlety was lost on me :(

    I think he was just trying to sound smart and ended up sounding retarded :D

    On that note, yes JEPC is right the current hypothesis for moon formation involves a body smashing in the earth. Also by air I presume he means the mixture in the atmosphere that we breathe which always contains some water vapour, so in this case air is definitely part water and a part of the moon is earth :p

    As for the game I played the demo and found it relaxing (also fair dues to the 2/3 people that made it) but it didn't really keep me interested enough to keep playing. 5/10 kinda makes sense for a game that's "decent but will divide opinions", if y'know the whole scale was used as opposed to the current one where anything below 5 might as well be a negative score.
    Edited by 1 at 11/11/09 @ 14:32
  • KDR_11k #33 2 years ago

    Yeah, I played it to the end, it's a fairly mindless game and really fails to deliver a challenge. The authors sound like it was intentional but I think it just doesn't work out well. Again I'll point at Kernel Panic as an example of a resourceless RTS that works even when played competitively.
  • john_silence #34 2 years ago

    I lost most of my interest in Dyson when it was re-named "Eufloria". What remained is gone after reading this review - but at least it was a great read.
  • Waldo #35 2 years ago

    Three pages for a 5/10?
  • kangarootoo #36 2 years ago

    "I lost most of my interest in Dyson when it was re-named "Eufloria""

    o-O
  • Sharzam #37 2 years ago

    I played this at the Expo and to be honest i got a little confused i like arty games but personally i didnt understand what i had to do.
  • RedPanda #38 2 years ago

    Post deleted at 14:31:59 28-01-2012
  • mgdistributor #39 2 years ago

    Your post is really awesome man. Thanks for sharing it.
    Here you can buy new high quality gun spray, hvlp, hvlp spray on MG Distributors.
  • vapourmile #40 9 months ago

    I've played the game and this review is about right. In an industry dominated by a very limited amount of play styles, a design with positive signs of originality should be rewarded. The biggest flaw is, as is said here, since there is no penalty for just waiting around for your army to grow, that's what you end up spending a lot of time doing.

    A small error in the article says that there is no cap for migrating seedlings to asteroids, however, the maximum population of an asteroid is proportional to its size. Meanwhile Dyson trees will cease populating an asteroid that has 40 or more seedlings.

    It is an interesting game in many respects, and my guess is that despite the flaws detailed here, it's one of those titles that does have you coming back for more.