Epic counter-sues Silicon Knights Related content
Too Human game info
Advertisement
Epic counter-sues Silicon Knights News
PC
Xbox 360
PlayStation 3
News
by
Games Industry.biz
Epic Games is counter-suing Silicon Knights, accusing the Too Human developer of attempting to "take Epic's licensed technology, pay nothing for it, and use it any way it pleases", GamesIndustry.biz reports.
Silicon Knights is currently suing Epic, accusing the Gears of War developer of failing to provide a final development kit for the Unreal Engine technology.
But according to a GameSpot report, Epic said Silicon Knights had complete access to the Unreal SDK and the company's support network for up to nine months before it entered into a licensing agreement.
Epic also claims that Silicon Knights' game engine, which it built to continue the work on Too Human and an unnamed title for Sega, is unauthorised and derivative work that violates its licensing agreement.
Epic is seeking damages of at least USD 650,000 and an order that will see any code and games that infringe the copyright to be destroyed.
Ello ello ello what's all this then oh it's GamesIndustry.biz.
Advertisement
Are you excited about Too Human on Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games
Thanks!
Related Games
Too Human
Latest Features
-
Too Human Review [168]
-
Too Human Interview [12]
-
Too Human Hands On [84]
-
Too Human First Impressions [38]
-
Too Human Interview [156]
Latest Videos
The Eurogamer TV Show: Denis Dyack on Too Human [2] 19 August, 2008
Too Human - Iceforest [1] 7 August, 2008
Latest News
-
Name of Silicon Knights game leaked [19]
-
Silicon Knights cuts 26 jobs temporarily [29]
-
Peter Molyneux picks apart Too Human [9]
-
Japanese charts: Afrika riding high [24]
-
UK charts: Tiger Woods roars to top [12]
Latest Screenshots
17 June, 2008 [26]
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
Comments: 1-30 of 30 in total
Poster
|
absolutezero
10/08/07 @ 09:31
0
Now that the might of Epic has been brought to bear I very much doubt that Silicon Knights has a chance in hell.
I think they managed to show what they wanted though, that Epic are a bunch of dicks. |
|
Britesparc
10/08/07 @ 09:43
0
Or they'll buy id Tech 5.
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 10/08/07 @ 10:43
|
|
0
Oh dear. Having read some of the rather good creator blogs over at IGN I have a certain amount of faith in this game, despite the awful XBL marketplace trailer and frankly embarrassing soundtrack video that's cropped up here at Eurogamer. I really want this game to be good - indeed, to be released at all - but that's seeming increasingly unlikely...
|
|
PlugMonkey
10/08/07 @ 10:20
0
The only people who are going to win here is the lawyers.
And I have to agree. All evidence seems to point to Epic being a bunch of dicks. I can't imagine demand for their engine is currently very big. |
|
0
It's good to see big-time game industry veterans such as menage, Hunam and PlugMonkey weighing in with their in-depth and substantiated thoughts on the matter.
Because nothing screams "dicks" and "uninteresting engine" as a plethora of games based on that engine developed by the aforementioned dicks. |
|
0
Well Martin, they call it as they see it. A lot of engines get used these days - you don't have to like the creators of the engine, but if you're paying money for a license and you're not getting the full thing or the right support for it etc. - you're not getting your moneys worth.
And it's not just Silicon Knights that aren't happy with Epic, that much is for sure. We've heard from some developers here on Eurogamer in comments that weren't happy with the treatment they were getting from Epic. In closing, menage, Hunam and PlugMonkey are just forming an opinion based on what they've read. Epic may have an awesome engine, companies may think it's a great piece of kit - but ultimately if the company behind it is growing increasingly intolerable, then people are going to look for the alternatives. It's alright to think SK is boo-hoo'ing. But then, if I'd paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for an engine license that the provider can't be arsed to keep me in the loop... I'd be boo-hoo'ing. And then I'd be ooh-sueing. |
|
0
"It's good to see big-time game industry veterans such as menage, Hunam and PlugMonkey weighing in with their in-depth and substantiated thoughts on the matter. "
Thank you, wasn't really much trouble at all. You can call me Shigeru though, I'm cool like that. Never said uninteresting engine though, just dicks.
Edited 2 times,
most recently on 10/08/07 @ 14:02
|
|
BadBoyBonner
10/08/07 @ 14:58
0
I have included the actual law suit that Silicon Knights lodged below.
It's a bit of a long one (for anyone not used to documents of this type) - but is a bit of an eye opener with what Epic said the engine would do and when, compaired to what was delivered, what is now available, and how technically deficient the engine is compared to it's early boasts (special mention to number of charactyers on screen promised - against what Epic now recommend as a maximum). http://cache.kotaku.com/assets/resources...
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 10/08/07 @ 15:59
|
|
0
I'm eagerly awaiting the next article, the one entitled, "Silicon Knights to Epic: Oh yeah? Well you suck!" followed by "Epic to SK: not as well as your mother!"
From afar this matter seems a bit, well, playground. I'm sure both side have grievances but... well, we'll see if the judge makes them shake hands and play nicely. Ah... after reading the complaint I reckon Silicon Knights should get their big brother to beat up Epic... it does seem like they have a case, breach of contract and all that. Anyone got the Epic complaint?
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 10/08/07 @ 16:37
|
|
BadBoyBonner
10/08/07 @ 21:23
0
I think that..
If I were Carmack I would be sat busily writing a program that converts levels/assets from UE3/UnrealED into id Tech 5 compatible data sets. Developers can then use the editor that they know an love, and have the engine that actual developer uses ASAP. Then everyone is a winner, apart from Epic of course (which I am sure would please the odd developers here an there). |
|
onyx_elite
12/08/07 @ 23:23
0
@ rashes
"$650000 that must be the cost of licensing Unreal Engine for a single game...? " Actually that's pretty cheap. The unreal engine has always been expensive to license, in it's hay-day even the unreal 2 engine would set developers back a cool $1,000,000 or thereabouts. In comparison to the time and money it takes to develop your own engine it's usually worth the money to license Epic's engine for that kind of money, particularly if the game looks like a big seller. Kinda makes you feel sorry for the guys who made Monster Madness. That had to have lost them a few quid. Edit: Fer clarity & grammar
Edited 1 times,
most recently on 13/08/07 @ 00:24
|
Comments: 1-30 of 30 in total
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
