Jump to navigation
Sponsored by Alienware tracer
Advertisement

EA man wants to charge for Spore content News

PC News by Ellie Gibson

30 July, 2008

The launch of Will Wright's Spore is still over a month away, but John Riccitiello is already considering whether consumers could be charged for extra content in the future.

Speaking in an investors' conference call, the platinum-coiffeured EA boss said he'd be keen to "monetise, if you will, body parts, plant parts, car parts and planets as a way to generate incremental revenue on an installed base of several million active users".

"But it's a little bit like pool," he continued. "I'm afraid if we spend too much time setting up the second shot, we'll miss the first shot."

Spore is launching in Europe on September 5th and in the US two days later. As you'll know if you've read our extensive previews, we reckon it's looking good - and Riccitiello agrees.

"I would love to imagine that two years from now or a year from now the debate is whether or not we need a 'Spore' label inside of EA," he said.

But at the moment, "It's all hands on deck to make September 7th the event that matters."

Advertisement

Are you excited about Spore on PC/Wii?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-22 of 22 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
DutchDemons
30/07/08 @ 08:07
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
*shock horror*!
the_dudefather
30/07/08 @ 08:09
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This was pretty much a given, hopefully it won't lead to 'Spore: ikea stuff'

Bitkari
30/07/08 @ 08:10
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I want to monetize incremental revenue in his face.
skillian
30/07/08 @ 08:10
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I like the pool analogy :)
kestral
30/07/08 @ 08:12
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I was afraid they were going to charge our creations based on the headline, this is just more of an expansion / micropayment thing.
johnnybrn
30/07/08 @ 08:13
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Good old EA havent changed a bit
Darren
30/07/08 @ 08:20
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Didn't the developer say that you could feasibly play this game for a lifetime and not see everything...?

If so, then I don't see why anyone would need to pay for any DLC. And besides won't the mod community go to work on this game meaning that there'll be a plentiful supply of unofficial content?
DFawkes
30/07/08 @ 08:22
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I defended you EA! I said you were doing better and not being such a bastard! No more for you. No more praise.
kestral
30/07/08 @ 08:26
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@darren i think you can play forever with the amount of variations you can create with the included body parts but all from the same pool of body parts. if you want extra parts then pay for it?

Don't see the problem if you like a game and you want to play more / get more, then pay a little? It's been the same since shareware / DLC so this is not any different. Eventually maybe they'll move to a free / very low cost basic game with paid expansions, to get the benefits of a big installed base and less piracy. Win /win?
Edited 1 times, most recently on 30/07/08 @ 09:28
Dizzy
30/07/08 @ 08:29
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
EA shouldn't really be the company that publishes this. I would prefer Valve.
Zomoniac
30/07/08 @ 08:31
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
EA shouldn't really be the company that publishes this. I would prefer Valve.

The same Valve whose last games were published by EA?
Eraysor
30/07/08 @ 08:37
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If they made a major difference to gameplay I would happily purchase extra body parts. I would prefer proper expansions though, because then they could add underwater creatures and space stations and stuff like that.
Kremlik
30/07/08 @ 08:46
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well seeing as mircotranactions are massivly part of the console industry these days and widely acepted, plus in the pc side cash shops in MMO seem to but doing well on the westen side of the market, then stuff like TV and music follow the same thing... it seems a logical move to me.

Put it this way I'd rather spend a little bit on stuff that I want that have a pile of cds with content I don't use just because I wanted one item (ala Sims), I perfer MTs for 'parts' over expantions when it comes to this type of game.
Dizzy
30/07/08 @ 08:48
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
>The same Valve whose last games were published by EA?

Hmmm yes.. you have a point :)

/feel stupid
tomkuryakin
30/07/08 @ 08:52
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm considering charging EA for the creatures I've created and uploaded to the Spore website for free.
Amajiro
30/07/08 @ 08:53
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
All that pool metaphor says is: "we are going to charge for incremental content, we're just not going to say so now for fear of frightening consumers away from buying the core product".
Redeye
30/07/08 @ 09:58
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
EA - still wanting to rob you blind, regardless of the spin coming out of JR's trap.
skillian
30/07/08 @ 10:11
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
All that pool metaphor says is: "we are going to charge for incremental content, we're just not going to say so now for fear of frightening consumers away from buying the core product".

That's why it's a good analogy. That's exactly what they're thinking.
michaelius
30/07/08 @ 11:01
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"All hands on the deck" that's what one of our socialist politicians said before his rulling party got totally demolated in next elections :D

Thank God I'm not getting spore :)
Dynamize
30/07/08 @ 12:54
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Creep.
Silvervein
30/07/08 @ 16:43
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Allrighty...so I got free creature creator...spent days of making different creatures, and uploaded them for free to their server...
Now they are going to use them to populate the game and charge someone for playing it...And then charge everyone for bits and pieces.
I regreat I didn't read EULA, but I wonder if I could get some royalties from them, due to using my creations for generating income without sharing it with me.
Heh.
Eroneouse
31/07/08 @ 08:10
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
First they have the SecuROM thing... 1 strike.
Then 3 activations and relying on EA's crap to non existant customer support to get further activations... 2 strikes.
And now they want to charge for extra DL content... 3 strikes.
YOUR OUT.

Seriously though if they want to charge people for expansion discs thats fair enough I guess as most software companys charge for expansion discs but they better have extra content worth paying for is all I can say. So far with myself they are on 2 strikes and that means I will be waiting 2 or 3 months before buying Spore as I will be following the forums and seeing how much grief is caused to players by strikes 1 and 2. If the game is problematic with its crapfangled SecuROM and 3 activations rule I will be playing but EA wont get any cash from my pocket I will wait for the torrent version to be released by the usual third party folks.

Comments: 1-22 of 22 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery