E3: S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Clear Sky

We get our webbed hands on it.

Having spent over six years getting Stalker into shops, GSC could have kicked back for a bit. They deserved the chance to, for want of a better phrase, zone out. At least for a bit. Instead they've come back with a game that's just as big. It's not even an expansion - it's a full-blown prequel. And it won't take them six years this time, according to Oleg Yavorsky and Valentine Yeltyshev, demoing the game at E3, neither of whom looks particularly worn out despite the developmental trek and the long flight from Ukraine. Perhaps, for them, the journey's the worthier part. (Bound to be more fun than talking to me, either way).

Clear Sky, as this one's called, plants you back in the irradiated boots of Strelok, as he embarks on one of his earlier visits to the Zone of alienation - the 30km exclusion zone surrounding Chernobyl's nuclear reactor. Shadow of Chernobyl had been built around his third. As usual, wonky things are afoot (they had a bit of an accident there, apparently), and a group of stalkers has made it to the power plant itself, their actions resulting in "an immense blowout" that destabilises the Zone significantly. There are no more safe bits, and there are new areas - Red Forest, Limansk and Pripyat's underground among them - while the effects have thrown up lots of our old friends the anomalies.

That's about all we're told about that, with Yavorsky and Yeltyshev preferring to showcase the DirectX 9 renderer (the game does support DX10, but it's too much of a work in progress to be brought over at this point) and the improved animations, character models and environments it's supporting, along with a few scripted situations involving a band of your fellow stalkers, as we slap our fingers on the keyboard and get back in the Zone.

'E3: S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Clear Sky' Screenshot gsc

Combat should be more dynamic than before, says GSC.

As we trundle into a busted up hospital that's subsiding as much as it's crumbling, our guide points out the heavy use of parallax mapping to give volume to brick surfaces, rusting metal and cracking tiles (the DX10 version will do superior displacement mapping instead), and says the game's done away with light-maps completely, so everything's dynamic. As we stare into a large hall with most of the roof blown out and balconies running around the walls about halfway up, gunfire from the opposing forces camped on either side pings off a rusting lamp, which swings back and forth from its lengthy cable fixture in response. The light from the muzzle flares strobe the enclosed upper levels for the duration of each clip, while the punctures in the ivy-clad rafters above sprinkle shadows across the surface of the dying metal as it swings. It all contributes to the atmosphere - a facet of Stalker we liked so much that we put it in italics about 18 times in our review of the first one.

Despite all this, the game's system requirements will be consistent with Shadow of Chernobyl, according to its developers. Which means that - yes! - you'll be fine to enjoy things like the increased use of physics, with wheelchairs tipping off balconies in confusion, boxes shattering under fire, and destructible environmental elements. And yes, your PC will continue to handle the scripted events, like the bit where your factional pals plant explosives at the foot of a wall and blow a hole in it to continue their progress, darting through the gap in swirls of plaster dust that shouldn't cost you any more frames than you ever lost anyway. That good old PC of yours, eh?

'E3: S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Clear Sky' Screenshot hospital

The hospital from our demo, looking pretty good. If it were NHS, anyway.

Meanwhile, a new animation engine couples itself to handsome new character models. Peering at the new stalker model (hooded by a top patterned as a cross between desert camo and a freeze-pop, by the looks of it, with a weathered battle vest, ribbed shoulder pads and insignia of birds fleeing a sun over water on either bicep), you can really appreciate the textural detail - it looks just like stitched cloth - but now there are a broader range of movements to match the fidelity and normal-mapped volume of the model, including a range of blind-fire attacks from cover, crouched running and lots of surprisingly conservative rag-doll deaths (involving, in this case, our God mode and Strelok's grenade launcher).

Yeltyshev makes promises of as much if not more freedom than we experienced in Shadow of Chernobyl, but in the demo's case we're funnelled through scripted encounters, raging as our assault rifle jams mid firefight and a helicopter attacks our faction in the hospital (its health-bar: no match for our invincibility), before we're pinned down in a bumpy second room by a machine-gunner and forced to fight off a trickle of enemies who descend on us for the two minutes that it takes our stalker pals to force their way through and drop a grenade on the gunner to enable our progress.

'E3: S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Clear Sky' Screenshot teaser

The leaning towers of teaser.

As well as more of these factions, Clear Sky also promises the chance to join any one we like, rather than just two. They're all fighting over the Zone, trying to take hold of different areas, including resource points (where they then hunt down artefacts to build up their wealth and assert themselves that way) and technology points (useful for access to better weapons and equipment), and if you ally yourself to any of them, you can conceivably lead them to victory, or at least improve your chances. They'll be smarter in battle, too, and go about their business without you if you shun their services - the A-life system giving them the freedom to engage one another for profit and glory, even if you're just a bystander.

After our demo having been limited to just an action sequence and techy banter, we're told end to expect a more substantial presence for GSC Game World at Leipzig's Game Convention, which we'll also be reporting from in late August. Yeltyshev is coy about discussing who will publish the game, simply saying that negotiations are going on behind the scenes, but he repeats the first-quarter 2008 release date, and sends us on our way with a disc full of fancy new screenshots, giving us about a dozen total. We thought we'd mention it here because the poor chaps were being forced to step away to their laptop every few minutes to burn a few more. Everything's as cheerfully warped and rugged as ever, then. Zone out.

Comments (40) Latest comment 5 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • souljacker2000 #1 5 years ago

    The hospital from our demo, looking pretty good. If it were NHS, anyway.
  • richardiox #2 5 years ago

    Can't wait for this, hopefully these new graphical flourishes will be offset by tightening the engine so I can still get acceptable framerates with dynamic lighting enabled.
  • T4RG4 #3 5 years ago

    The hospital from our demo, looking pretty good. If it were NHS, anyway.
  • GiantHaystax #4 5 years ago

    Is this simon says?

    The hospital from our demo, looking pretty good. If it were NHS, anyway.
    Edited by 1 at 13/07/07 @ 14:20
  • aldo_14 #5 5 years ago

    Don't suppose there's any word on sys reqs (need to buy a new PC soonish anyways...).

    Oh, and the hospital from our demo, looking pretty good. If it were NHS, anyway.
    Edited by 1 at 13/07/07 @ 14:21
  • Moonprince #6 5 years ago

    The hospital from our demo, looking pretty good. If it were NHS, anyway.
  • Moonprince #7 5 years ago

    Couldn't resist.

    ...I'm weak :(
  • El_MUERkO #8 5 years ago

    Looking good, I enjoyed what little I played of the first game but I need to build a new PC before I can have some proper fun.

    The towel from our demo, looking pretty good. If it were BHS, anyway.
  • Tomo #9 5 years ago

    The article says the system specs are the same as Shadow pretty much.

    Canny wait cap'an.
  • Bertie Verified Senior Staff Writer, Eurogamer.net #10 5 years ago

    Yarly. Tom says in the article that PCs running Shadow of Chernobyl will handle this and all its improvements.
  • YourMessageHere #11 5 years ago

    Smashing. Hurry up first quarter of 2008. Why aren't they allowed to say "Spring"?
  • Bertie Verified Senior Staff Writer, Eurogamer.net #12 5 years ago

    That caption is in there twice, funny you lot hadn't noticed.
  • Batman2100 #13 5 years ago

    The hospital from our demo, looking pretty good. If it were NHS, anyway.

    Sorry y'all, I like to follow the crowd...
  • zozart #14 5 years ago

    Give me vehicles, mod tools and more open environments and I'll buy it on the spot!

    Actually I'll buy it on the spot anyway, since the original was so damn good, but the above additions would rock!
  • sharpfish #15 5 years ago

    !Smashing. Hurry up first quarter of 2008. Why aren't they allowed to say "Spring"?!

    'Cos the first quarter of 2008 is Jan to March (not spring, mostly winter).

    btw I hear that in the demo, the hospital looks pretty good*


    *If it were NHS, anyway.
  • Verwandlung #16 5 years ago

    Fix the original first !
  • UncleLou #17 5 years ago

    Fix the original first !

    It's not broken.
  • IN4ARIOT #18 5 years ago

    So re:NHS comments you now get M.R.S.A and irradiated?....way to go topical....
    It's not broken..
    Edited by 1 at 13/07/07 @ 16:02
  • Varsity #19 5 years ago

    "Why aren't they allowed to say 'Spring'?"

    Spring for us is Autumn for the southern hemisphere.

    "It's not broken."

    Uh-huh.
    Edited by 1 at 13/07/07 @ 15:52
  • rudedudejude #20 5 years ago

    Lets hope they actually finish this game before release, that'd be nice.
  • vegard #21 5 years ago

    aren't you supposed to kill Strelok in the first game? how does that work if you play as Strelok?

    oh wait...
  • Nithron #22 5 years ago

    Strelok is your father.
    There, i said it.
    Anyway, i *loved* the first game, but was kinda disappointed that i couldn't run it with dynamic lighting on, despite having just bought a new graphics card that runs most recent games with decently high settings. Wonder what's up with that?
  • stoopidgreg #23 5 years ago

    man i can't wait. i think it's finally time i finished the last level of STALKER.
  • Pulsar_t #24 5 years ago

    The hospital from our demo, looking pretty good. If it were NHS, anyway.
  • Pulsar_t #25 5 years ago

    Oh and I wonder why I got the bad ending in the first game. It was ace, a solid 8/10 in my book (despite all the bugs). Had it been released back in late 2004/early 2005 it would have been truly stellar. Could have used a better interface though.
  • darc #26 5 years ago

    If not broken, then quirky in a hundred ways that I just could not tolerate any further. (And I played pretty far into the game, actually.) Why must the fans insist "not broken" instead of admitting, "yeah a little wonky, but worth it IMO." Not worth it to me, ultimately. How many times can you be expected to patch and restart a game, with no guarantee that all the bugs will be sorted? How long do you spend sifting through user mods before you consider simply playing a better game?
  • Dire #27 5 years ago

    hopefully the engine will run better in dx9 with this new game.
  • darc #28 5 years ago

    P.S. If Bioshock is half the game I'm expecting, I won't even remember Stalker by Spring 2008. :)
  • polymorph #29 5 years ago

    Shame i was hoping for a console announcement for the original one (im not sure my pc could run it?) and when i got my 360 i stopped upgrading my pc.
  • magicpanda #30 5 years ago

    The hospital from our demo, looking pretty good. If it were NHS, anyway.

    Ive said it before and I'll say it again, one of the best games I've ever played in 20+ years of gaming. Looking forward to this a lot.
  • polymorph #31 5 years ago

    @ Magic Panda
    what specs are you running it on lad?
  • magicpanda #32 5 years ago

    It runs at pretty much full whack (Dynamic lighting n all that jazz) on my ageing laptop. Things do get a bit shady when you're besieged on all sides by mutants and stalkers in a full on thunderstorm but then most things do in those conditions.

    Geforce go 6800 ultra
    2 Gig of ram
    2.1 GHz Processor
  • UncleLou #33 5 years ago

    Why must the fans insist "not broken" instead of admitting, "yeah a little wonky, but worth it IMO

    Because I didn't have a single problem with it?

    Admittedly, my tolerance level for complaints about Stalker is pretty low these days, as I've seen complaints about the silliest things. Many gamers obviously can't handle a game anymore that is a bit more difficult and let's you explore and find out a few things for yourself. ("OMG I had to walk two minutes and I was so bored because there wasn't a cutscene with a scripted boss battle every two steps).

    Best game I've played in years, by far, on the same level as Half-Life 1 or System Shock 2 for me.

  • darc #34 5 years ago

    UncleLou, I'm half-perplexed/ half envy you. I really wanted to enjoy STALKER, but instead, I'm just about to uninstall. Based on your post it seems next to impossible that we're even playing the same game. Not a single problem? There isn't the slightest bit of revisionism in this? "Not a single problem that bothered me personally" I could maybe understand. I'd still be impressed, but not utterly confounded.
  • darc #35 5 years ago

    Then again, I really enjoyed Gothic 3 and had a pretty much seamless experience with it, and if you've read the horror stories reported by other players, well... maybe I'll just chalk this one up to kharma LOL.
  • IN4ARIOT #36 5 years ago

    Well I had no technical problems with S.T.A.L.K.E.R. either...got to end...cried a bit it was all over..shorted G15 keyboard.
    I have heard of big probs for some ppl getting from Pripyat to Chernobyl NPP ...so "personally " goes in my post.
    Edited by 1 at 14/07/07 @ 15:47
  • Empedocles #37 5 years ago

    I stand vindicated.................................................. ....
  • UncleLou #38 5 years ago

    Based on your post it seems next to impossible that we're even playing the same game. Not a single problem? There isn't the slightest bit of revisionism in this?

    No, seriously, I found Stalker pretty much perfect, at least after the first patch.. I can't even say that I found any niggles I had to overlook - as opposed to Gothic 3 - now that game is a mess, but I still liked it ( though I didn't finish it because performance on my current PC is terrible).

    Really, the only thing that annoyed me in Stalker were the repeating voice lines in the bar and at some places. I am as amazed as you are that some people (I know you're not alone) found the game so full of niggles. ;-)
    Edited by 1 at 14/07/07 @ 22:57
  • Varsity #39 5 years ago

    Maybe you have a system identical to the lead developer's. :-P
  • Vandrius #40 5 years ago

    This interests me, purely because I hope it can be what STALKER had promised to be, but couldn't quite achieve.

    I enjoyed STALKER, bugs/issues/random CTDs aside, purely because it tried to be a bit different.

    With luck, this one will be good.

    The hospital from our demo, looking pretty good. If it were NHS, anyway.