Jump to navigation
Advertisement

Dragon Quest Monsters: Joker Review

DS Review by Dave McCarthy

12 March, 2008

The obvious comparison is Pokémon: when Dragon Quest Monsters was spun off from Dragon Quest proper, back in 1998, it was clearly, and pretty brazenly, inspired by Nintendo's pocket-sized behemoth. It combined the same top-down dimensions with the whole collect-'em-all shtick, and wrapped them up in a similar sort of RPG-lite. Now Dragon Quest Monsters: Joker has taken the series to two screens and three dimensions and it looks superbly fancy thanks to the sort of cel-shaded graphics that made Dragon Quest VIII such a joy to play. The design, however, remains fundamentally the same: wander round collecting monsters, fighting your way to the top of the latest monster-fighting tournament.

Apparently the game's producer, Taichi Inuzuka, wanted to compete with Dragon Quest VIII in terms of the game's visual appearance. Obviously the PS2 packs a bit more of a graphical punch than Nintendo's handheld platform, but within the limitations of the DS the game looks superb. It's got the same art style as Dragon Quest VIII, and it certainly matches it in terms of character design and so on. So the odd disappearing distant character, or blocky texture feels eminently forgivable, as you wander across seven islands to pick up enough darkonium to compete in a tournament to prove that you're the best at collecting (or scouting, as it's called in the game) monsters. But wait! It's the first year they've asked would-be scouts to collect darkonium. And your dad's asked you to carry out a top-secret undercover mission for him. And who's this Incarnus character, anyway?

'Dragon Quest Monsters: Joker' Screenshot 1

The top screen shows the game world in glorious 3D, while the bottom screen displays serves as a map and stats screen.

And plot provides the basis for another collection marathon, except, as with previous Dragon Quest Monsters games, you can also breed (or synthesise) new monsters as well as just collecting them. The combat will be familiar to anyone who's played any other Dragon Quest title, from the design of the monsters and the nature of their special abilities to the turn-based structure. Over the course of those turns, you can issue your team of three monsters with specific orders, or you can just provide them with general tactics. And if even that meagre amount of strategic effort is too much for you, you can trust your monster AI to take care of things, which it does extremely effectively - to the extent that for most of the game you can just sit back and relax, saving your energy for tougher enemies and the inevitable bosses.

That, actually, is the game's biggest strength. If there's a videogame equivalent of easy listening, this is it - in a good way. It's one of those games that just lets you kick back and soak up the atmosphere and pootle around, and it makes that pootling such gentle, inoffensive fun that you don't want to stop. If there are never really any outstanding highs, there are also no correspondingly offensive lows, and there are plenty of pretty decent moments that are scattered across the game's neat little dungeons. One of them has you hitting switches to make the floor go up and down, for example, or there's one where you have to talk to mirrors to warp around locked doors. But none of them are too taxing, and it's easy to find yourself spending hours doing very little apart from wandering around looking out for new monsters.

The downside of that easy-listening approach, however, is that it's actually quite easy to find yourself bypassing the game's more interesting features. Even the game's core appeal - collecting monsters - feels entirely optional. Without Pokémon's matrix of paper-scissors-stone-style strengths and weaknesses, it doesn't feel like there's any real need to expand your party beyond your core monsters. Synthesis, meanwhile, is conceptually sound, but practically you can get by without ever investigating it too much.

'Dragon Quest Monsters: Joker' Screenshot 3

All of your favourite monsters from other Dragon Quest titles are featured.

In theory, the game's difficulty curve should encourage you to use synthesis to create more powerful monsters as you hit new islands. In practice, effective synthesis requires a fair amount of level-grinding, and by the time you've done that level-grinding your existing monsters tend to be strong enough to survive until the next new challenge. And while you're levelling up all your monsters, it's easy to find yourself equipped with so much coin that you can afford more healing items than you could ever need. Then it becomes easy enough to simply dodge all the intervening monsters before using your apothecary to grind out a victory against the next boss.

That highlights the game's biggest flaw: the sheer amount of level-grinding. There's always a certain amount of level-grinding in any RPG, but in Joker there is an exceptional amount - and the game does little to disguise it. No matter how well you play the game, there will come a time when you're reduced to stepping a foot outside the nearest Scout Hut, fighting some overpowered enemies, and then retreating back inside to heal. Or wandering all over an island and fighting a multitude of underpowered enemies in the hope of gaining enough experience points for your latest round of monster synthesis, or the next big boss encounter.

Partly that's because there's fundamentally less to do here than a lot of RPGs; less to interact with. It's difficult to shake off the suspicion that the game is a bit slight. You can get through the whole thing in little over 20 hours, which seems a bit short for an RPG - especially considering the amount of level-grinding. There's just not that much content here. The dungeons are short and simple, each of the islands is small, there are relatively few diversions to keep you entertained while plodding through the main plot, and that plot is itself pretty bare bones. But it's an entertaining diversion, nevertheless. It's difficult to switch off Dragon Quest Monsters: Joker - you go round, collecting and trading monsters, and you use them to fight other monsters, and while you're doing that, it's pretty enjoyable stuff. So it's difficult to get too annoyed with its lack of substance when that slender substance is somehow so compelling.

7/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Dragon Quest Monsters: Joker on DS?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-15 of 15 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Dizzy
12/03/08 @ 11:22
#1
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
20 hours? That is not short.
Aretak
12/03/08 @ 11:35
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
In RPG terms it is.
Steroyd
12/03/08 @ 11:36
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
in RPG land it is.
Krelle
12/03/08 @ 11:46
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Love short games, but RPGs are an exception. Atleast make em 40h or so.
systems
12/03/08 @ 11:50
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I've had the US import since release day there. I agree with the review.

It's not as pretty as you remember from DQ VIII, but not bad. It's pretty much just like the Arena Battle part of DQ VIII. Lots and lots and lots of level grinding to get your creatures tough enough to make it worth merging them together (not worth it below level 20 as you lose 10 levels for merging).

You'll probably do it in 20 hours if you powergame through it, but most people will need a few hours more.
johnlenham
12/03/08 @ 11:54
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I spent 70 hours on it >_> if not more.

Also the Wifi is quite eaddicting and your rewarded for even just taking part

Thought it was a quality game myself atleast one of the best ive played on the DS anyway

Oh and also after you beat the "last boss" theres still more to do not to mention through a bloody long synthise chain that i did you can actually get the last boss as a monster to fight or you :P

Actually ive just notcied the review dosent even mantion the WiFi world wide and nation wide ranking tournys...
Edited 2 times, most recently on 12/03/08 @ 11:58
Les
12/03/08 @ 12:00
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I've watched too much Dragon Ball Z to be able to cope with this art style any longer...
retrend
12/03/08 @ 12:04
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
i really enjoyed this, ploughed about 30hours into it before i got horrendously stuck and had to stop like a failing failer
Dizzy
12/03/08 @ 12:05
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
>In RPG terms it is.

Not for me.

20h is a sweet spot.
Cid
12/03/08 @ 12:15
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This is winging its way to me as we speak. The Monsters series is bloody excellent.

I can't help but think the (relatively) short lifespan is perhaps the fault of those fancy visuals. The two GBC games were massive, and DWM2 had randomly-generated worlds you could visit even after the game had finished. Joker also appears to have fewer monsters than DWM2, and MANY more pallet-swaps.

I don't know. I suppose the graphics will get the game noticed a bit more, and they are very nice. But I probably would've preferred it if they'd kept it as a 2D, top-down RPG in order to retain (and indeed improved upon) some of the elements that made the original games so great. And, of course, avoid the need to cut any monsters.

Oh, and no more feeding meat to monsters in order to recruit them? :'(
johnlenham
12/03/08 @ 12:24
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nope you have to "impress" them it works quite well.

I think in total theres 200+ monsters and only maybe 15-20 are colour swaps.

But to be fair if you play this for its RPGness then its kinda meh, try to see it as more of a pokemon catch em all and it will be alot better as there sheer amount of combinations and potential mega beasts is crazy.
Cid
12/03/08 @ 12:40
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
DWM2 had just a shade over 300, and less than 10 (I can think of 7) were pallet-swaps. :p They've actually cut a LOT of monsters from back then (although there are a fair few new ones), and I've seen some who now have two different recolours, which seems a bit lazy.

I'm still going to love it (hopefully), but I get the impression it's going to be a tad different from the Monsters games I'm used to.
Aretak
12/03/08 @ 13:12
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Not for me.

20h is a sweet spot."


Well, good for you. It doesn't change the fact that a 20-hour RPG is considered short.
otto [mod]
12/03/08 @ 13:29
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
My biggest complaint about this game (which I'm enjoying) is simply that you don't develop the same kind of bond with your party that you do in a more standard RPG. The Pokemon-style play where you're constantly upgrading your party somehow diminishes the experience. Other than that I think it's a fantastic game.
lemonfist
12/03/08 @ 19:17
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This is better than any Pokémon, but still pretty dull in the long run.

Comments: 1-15 of 15 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery