Dragon Age: Origins

Age discrimination.

Say what you like about BioWare - the Canadian RPG specialists always did think big, and they've never thought bigger than they are right now. While the Austin-based offshoot prepares the company's maiden foray into MMOs with the huge Star Wars: The Old Republic, home base is about to make not one but two monster releases - Mass Effect 2 in January, and Dragon Age: Origins next month.

Given the popularity of Mass Effect the former's something of a home run, but there's much more riding on Dragon Age. Having spent a good six years exploring science-fiction, kung fu, SEGA mascots and console-led development, BioWare is returning to neglected roots with Dragon Age - PC-centric, trad fantasy roots, which drew on Dungeons & Dragons to grow Baldur's Gate and Neverwinter Nights.

The scale of Dragon Age's ambition dwarfs those games, however, as BioWare debuts a new fantasy universe and RPG ruleset that are all its own work, and that will in time form the foundations of much more than this one game. One immense game, which estimates put at something between 50 and 100 hours in length depending how much of it you want to see, and many more if you want to explore the permutations of its narrative in multiple play-throughs. Then there's the unprecedented two-year plan for DLC releases which will extend Origins' lifespan (and, no doubt, help pay for its epic development).

It's an important game, then; we got an indication how important (and how big) when publisher EA started distributing a complete PC review version to press months before its release. That never happens. We've already had plenty of time to sink our teeth into it, and bring you this run-down of how it all fits together ahead of our review in the coming weeks.

'Dragon Age: Origins' Screenshot 1

Morrigan is a standoffish woman, surprising when you consider her dress sense.

Character creation you may already be familiar with; PC players had a chance to download the character creator for free last week, a naked promotional exercise that will nevertheless save you a good hour or two once the game arrives on 6th November, because there's plenty to think about.

The class choice, at least, is simple: three basic and familiar archetypes, warrior, rogue and mage. Choice comes later, when you get a chance to learn one of four specialisations at level 7, and another at level 14. These are interesting and powerful variations - examples include the anti-caster Templar for warriors, druid-like Shapeshifter mage and the marriage of the Bard's party-buffing with the close-combat skills of the rogue.

Acquiring these specialisations isn't necessarily straightforward - even the phone-book-sized guide provided by EA with the review copy is evasive, calling the process "difficult". Some can be taught by party companions if they like you enough, others bought as manuals from certain traders... The rest, we have no idea, but it will probably depend on certain questing and story decisions you make.

'Dragon Age: Origins' Screenshot 2

It's a bid odd that this screenshot has been released, because we're forbidden from telling you what's happening in it.

You're hardly stuck in a rut, though, as customisation within your class occurs straight away. You get all your spells and abilities from talent trees, with points awarded at the start and every level, so character development is a purely personal choice throughout. Warriors and rogues choose a blend of weapon and class skills while mages choose from four schools of magic, and these give you a loose framework within which to define a role.

You also have non-combat skills that encompass crafting and the like. Then there are your character's core six core stats, which you can also shape yourself at the start and every level, being sure to bear in mind that unlocking certain talents depends on a stat requirement. It's a good RPG system - complex relationships and plenty of flexibility, but built on a simple foundation. Exactly as it should be. If you have no interest in it, both the player character and party companions can be set to auto-level-up along preset paths.

Your other principal choice at the start - your character's background - is a narrative one. This will dictate which of the six origin stories you play through before your character joins the elite Grey Wardens and begins the fight against Dragon Age's antagonists, the Darkspawn, in earnest. Each of these short stories (an hour or two in length apiece) puts BioWare's new fantasy universe in a different context. Several have political undertones; the downtrodden City Elves rebelling against their human overlords, for example, or the struggle of the Magi to exist under the tight control of the devout Templars. It's worth playing through some or all of these to get a feel for this entirely new, and surprisingly detailed, fantasy lore.

After your origin, you're ushered through a linear prologue (itself a good few hours long), which sees your character inducted into the Grey Wardens, introduces two key companions - the mysterious witch Morrigan, and faithful Warden Alistair - and which covers, via a brief dungeon, your role in a key battle against the Darkspawn. Treachery leads to defeat, the Wardens are decimated, and your character and Alistair set about picking up the pieces and rallying the fight against the Darkspawn in the troubled land of Ferelden. It's only at this point that the real Dragon Age: Origins begins, the game opening out into four major quests and a plethora of side-quests, all of which can be attempted in any order you like.

In gameplay if not dramatic terms, then, Dragon Age is a slow-burner. Throughout the origins and the prologue, combat happens in brief bursts, while storytelling happens in great spools of meandering, branching conversation as the world, the plot, the forces at work and the principal characters are mapped out in loquacious detail. It's not until you get stuck into your first major quest that you will spend as much time fighting as you spend talking, and by then you could be a dozen hours or more into the game. You will also have spent much of your time fighting accompanied by bit-part-players rather than the long-term party companions, interaction with whom - both on and off the battlefield - defines the game.

'Dragon Age: Origins' Screenshot 3

The "persistent gore" option that coats everyone in a fine spray of blood-spatter after combat. It makes some conversations look odd, to say the least.

When it does eventually reveal itself in full, Dragon Age proves to be a flexible RPG that accommodates a wide range of playing styles. Baldur's Gate veterans will be happy pulling the camera back to a top-down view, pausing the action with the space bar and micro-managing the party's actions and placement in a quasi-turn-based mode. World of Warcraft players might prefer to zoom in close, let AI take care of party behaviour and punch out skills in real time, flicking between characters for variety. It's perfectly possible to smash through the game in this way on easy mode (the difficulty can be adjusted at any time) without ever hitting pause or needing to think, but even the normal setting is a significant step up that will require the occasional moment of reflection.

Or you could choose to do this reflection in advance - if that's not an oxymoron - by using Tactics. Tactics are a smart lift from, of all things, Final Fantasy XII. They are a version of that game's Gambits, a brilliant system of programmable rules for party behaviour that had the potential to revolutionise the single-player party RPG, but that we'd given up hope of ever seeing again after Square Enix dropped it. Happily, BioWare has had the good sense to revive it.

Using Tactics, you can tell a party member to always attack the target of the player-controlled character, for example, or always assist the healer if it's attacked, or use a certain skill on enemies with less than 25 per cent health, or always heal party members with less than 50 per cent health. You can also choose to stick with that character's presets, or use one of a handful of standardised setups, or expand either of those by investing in extra Tactic slots. Or ignore the system altogether. It stops short of FFXII's extreme automation - you must always maintain control of one character - but still, with a good, hand-crafted Tactics setup it's possible to play Dragon Age: Origins entirely in real-time, even on higher difficulty settings.

What Origins doesn't share with FFXII is that sense of a large, contiguous over-world populated with wandering monsters, MMO-style. This game is defined by events, not places, and the locations are relatively contained, with travel between them happening on a small, windowed world map. Sometimes random or plot events happen on the road, and once you're in the game proper, you can jump to the party camp to use the trader and talk to your companions.

There's no doubt that events in the game's main storyline can take a dramatic turn depending on your choices in conversation. At the end of the Broken Circle quest line I chose to play first, there was a decision that would lead to either the Mages or the Templars joining the Grey Wardens, which might also alienate an important party member. But there isn't much fluidity to these instances, and most of the time you sense that you're talking your way down a guided path with occasional forks in the road.

'Dragon Age: Origins' Screenshot 5

Even early on, boss fights require some tactical thought and awareness.

However, companion interaction is more variable and more subtle. Some companions the game forces on you, but most will join your party or not depending on choices you make - and they could well leave, if you suggest it, or if they disapprove of you enough. Their approval rating is influenced by giving them gifts, but also by how much interest you show in them in conversation, whether you say the right things, and whether you make decisions they like. Approval can also give them a gameplay buff, and a combination of approval and gameplay and conversational choices can allow you to strike up a romance, get them in bed, or unlock a personal quest. Alistair and Morrigan in particular play an important role in the game's story, so how you handle them will shape how your game develops.

Dragon Age: Origins is certainly pure, distilled BioWare, and it doesn't seem the developer has lost anything by shrugging off its ties with D&D, or had its understanding of classic fantasy adventuring clouded by a few years of Sonic and spaceships. As an RPG, it's engrossing, easy to grasp, and moulds itself to how you want to play it (as long as that includes a willingness to invest time in its characters, story and the wider setting of a new fantasy world that, it must be said, struggles to assert a strong identity - there doesn't seem to be much new about it).

'Dragon Age: Origins' Screenshot 6

Only Canadians could make a game in which the coolest, strongest character is called Duncan.

It's also beautifully presented, with a superb interface, crisp graphics, and a stable, smooth and scalable engine. If only all PC games were this well sorted this far in advance of release - or even at the point of release, come to that. For once, the tables are turned, and the question mark hangs over the PS3 and Xbox 360 versions that we haven't seen yet (aside from one brief glimpse) and that, to be honest, we find difficult to imagine. Perhaps that's no more than an indication of how perfectly this version has been tailored to its format; it feels like the consummate, traditional PC RPG. BioWare has come home.

Comments (73) Latest comment 2 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • velimirius #1 2 years ago

  • DrRobotnik #2 2 years ago

    Looking forward to this. I hope it's just as good on 360.
  • PearOfAnguish #3 2 years ago

    I take it this is more like Baldur's Gate in terms of combat than Mass Effect or Jade Empire?
  • cianchristopher #4 2 years ago

    I heartily endorse this product and/or service :)

    /waits for karma rating to rise
  • Fletche #5 2 years ago

    Really hope this translates well to the PS3, could be a duffer on the consoles and as much I want this game I really can't see myself going back to PC gaming.
  • Widge #6 2 years ago

    Gambits sound interesting, I actually liked that approach in FFXII.
  • Eraysor #7 2 years ago

    The only thing that's going to be hurting gaming-wise in the next month is my bank balance :S
  • AphoticCosmos #8 2 years ago

    Really looking forward to this now, and we've still got ME2 to look forward to in January!

    Bioware - you are awesome.
  • Widge #9 2 years ago

    This looks like its going to be a "play on PC" one unless a review can sway me otherwise. I think EG needs to weigh in with a PC and console review. I'd LIKE to play it on the PS3 so I could absorb all the story while wedged on my sofa but if playing it feels like a nightmare then no way (highly doubt they're doing mouse and keys for it either). I had to skip on Red Alert after trying the demo of that, awful.
  • DrR0b3rts #10 2 years ago

    Jez: I'm a dirty hobbit and she's a sexy elf so she might be... "Oh! You dirty hobbit. Take off my bodkin and my jerkin." "Oh, yeah... pixie ears. But that sword." What if she was a hobbit slayer? I'd just use my enchanted amulet. "Yeah. Yield to me, hobbit-slayer. You will touch my magic cock."
  • Hantheman #11 2 years ago

  • anomagnus #12 2 years ago

    Apart from WoW, my beutiful Sexbox had taken the reigns on my gameplay.

    But not for this baby. I'm buying a new pc, and booking a long weekend of work for this!
  • Turrican #13 2 years ago

    Isn't the reason you got a PC review copy early because they finished it first and decided to delay the launch until the console versions were ready?

    For whatever commercial reason its been done, I will applaud the rarity of a polished PC game launch, and from the sound of this preview its heading for a 9, marked down only for the bland setting that seemed to come out of the trailers shown so far.

    Also, having rattled through ODST and Operation Flashpoint in a matter of evenings, I'm looking forward to a game that will last a good while without being an MMO!
  • Yossarian #14 2 years ago

    Fingers and toes crossed.
  • linea #15 2 years ago

    gah.

    The prospect of Baldur's Gate-style top-down combat in a new Bioware RPG has me positively frothing. Sadly I only own an x360 and I can't see that mode being much fun with two sticks (though I'm sure the more KOTOR/Mass Effect type modes will be fine I really miss that infinity engine combat....)

    EDIT: Actually I do own a PC but I can't see this running on an EEPC 4G. Or a dusty Pentium 4 with a broken DVD drive :/
    Edited by 1 at 19/10/09 @ 15:55
  • paulf #16 2 years ago

    totally and utterly sold
  • SheffieldSteel #17 2 years ago

    Nice preview.

    It's good to see both pros and cons listed - it feels like I can get a fair impression of the game, without the frothing at the mouth that I've seen elsewhere (no names, no pack drill).

    I'm very much looking forward to this game.
  • Pike #18 2 years ago

  • ybfelix #19 2 years ago

    Well.. please let console version be good.. I plan to buy a new PC next year after collecting the bonus, but can't wait to play this so I will pick up a xbox one first.
  • sirtacos #20 2 years ago

    Hmm... I'm a bit worried about the lack of "fluidity" in the major plot points they mentioned. That said, I couldn't want this game more if it came delivered with Scarlett Johansson reclining naked on a pile of money and drugs.
    Edited by 1 at 19/10/09 @ 16:19
  • foamy #21 2 years ago

    i wanna have sex with it
  • Tyranix #22 2 years ago

    I wouldn't worry too much, how many games have plot turning points that are truly fluid? I actually cannot think of any
  • ybfelix #23 2 years ago

    Some JRPGs have quite fluid plots, those tend to be more linear, though. I believe it's possible to achieve openness and natural-flowing plot both, but that would demand heavily from writing talents

    As for the humor part mentioned in article, I also wonder when did WRPGs generally lost their humor and became "so serious"? I remember in my younger days WRPG dialog lines were likely more funny than today's.
  • kingmong #24 2 years ago

    maybe you've lost your sense of humour or grown out of the jokes
  • mkreku #25 2 years ago

    Hmm, turn based (or quasi turn based, since some people seem to be stingy about that) and a contained feel? Doesn't bode well for me who really likes to explore and don't mind having actual control over my character.

    But 80 hours of epic gameplay! I will keep my eye on this.
  • Skurmedel #26 2 years ago

    Bring on turn based! I like diversity and, frankly turn based western RPGs have been pretty scarce lately.
  • seanm2 #27 2 years ago

    Early reviews so far have been positive. Looks like it could be a quality game.
  • MrWonderstuff #28 2 years ago

    One difference between console and PC versions is the fact that you cannot zoom out on the console versions due to memory constraints.
  • actionfitz #29 2 years ago

    "As an RPG, it's engrossing, easy to grasp, and moulds itself to how you want to play it (as long as that includes a willingness to invest time in its characters, story..."

    Sold!
  • ChthonicEcho #30 2 years ago

    So long as Dan keeps away from this, it should score a 9, with a slow start being written off as the main detractor.

    I know it'll be a 1000/10 in my book. I'm a shameless BioWare fanboy and will eat up anything they give. 'Anything' being highly polished, in-depth RPGs that keep the genre alive and at the same time push it forward.
  • Danoxth #31 2 years ago

    Toss me like a Dwarf.

    Day one purchase for me, my PC has been groaning like a panther in heat ever since I finished Batman, she needs more game love.
  • kingmong #32 2 years ago

    really looking forward to this.

    i played around with the character creator - epic beardage!
  • ASHBERY76 #33 2 years ago

    This is gonna be the greatest RPG since Baldur's gate 2.
  • f00b_inc #34 2 years ago

    Keeping on eye on this, hoping it's the game to justify my purchase of an overpowered (I only really needed one for internet/movies..) laptop a few months back!
  • WMain00 #35 2 years ago

    This game is going to be great :D
  • poopmonster #36 2 years ago

    Sounds great.

    But (go on then, mash that negative button)...looks a bit bland visually.
  • asphaltcowboy #37 2 years ago

    Sounds great, but can we have some more info on how the combat plays out? Does it come off looking like an MMO where the two characters stand next to each other playing attack animations, or does it actually feel like it's a proper fight with characters actually connecting hits? Is there any sense of "you hit a button and an attack happens" or is it, "press a button to send them off and they'll just keep attacking til they win/die"?
  • RandomTerrain #38 2 years ago

    Ah, so more fun than Oblivion then? I still haven't finished that, lol, such a huge game.

    This sounds good, will have to give it a try.
  • jimbo118 #39 2 years ago

    ''For once, the tables are turned, and the question mark hangs over the PS3 and Xbox 360 versions that we haven't seen yet (aside from one brief glimpse) and that, to be honest, we find difficult to imagine.''

    What does 'that' refer to exactly?
    Edited by 8 at 19/10/09 @ 17:53
  • morriss #40 2 years ago

    Read like a review, that.
  • jimbo118 #41 2 years ago

    '' a new fantasy world that, it must be said, struggles to assert a strong identity - there doesn't seem to be much new about it).''

    Interesting. The PC Gamer Uk review said: '' It's an unashamed high-fantasy RPG, rooted in the most traditional soil, yet set in a highly original world."

  • curtlikesmeat #42 2 years ago

    This game is defined by events, not places, and the locations are relatively contained, with travel between them happening on a small, windowed world map.

    Denied. Like someone else said I'm more of the fan of big worlds - it's hard when you've been playing stuff like WoW and all of a sudden there's zoning and invisible borders.... will wait for more reviews before deciding.
    Edited by 1 at 19/10/09 @ 18:26
  • EmiliasHorse #43 2 years ago

    Total no brainer purchase for me. Bioware could release a turd on a string and I would buy it, thank god this actually looks epic.

  • PlugMonkey #44 2 years ago

    Sounds great, but can we have some more info on how the combat plays out? Does it come off looking like an MMO where the two characters stand next to each other playing attack animations, or does it actually feel like it's a proper fight with characters actually connecting hits? Is there any sense of "you hit a button and an attack happens" or is it, "press a button to send them off and they'll just keep attacking til they win/die"?

    I'd be interested to know that as well. I've had enough of RPGs where the protagonists face off and take turns to hit each other while numbers rise out of the tops of their heads.

    We only ever did that in the first place as it was hte only way we had to determine the outcome of a fight. We have extraordinarily powerful computers nowadays. We don't need to roll dice any more. Getting the extraordinarily powerful computers to roll dice on our behalf is not making full use of their extraordinary power.
  • Fillem #45 2 years ago

    I just ordered the Digital Collectors Edition from Steam even though I told myself I would never pre-order a game again. I hope so very much I won't be disappointed.
    If all item descriptions are like the bonus items, they won't whore out DLC too much (item packs? Please!) and they make the world an interesting place and the morality not a pure good/evil thing this might be a return to form for Bioware.
    I'm just afraid that now with EA patches will be few and far in between and the same for the DLC (they did promise us the same thing for Mass Effect and those DLC packs now number a grand total of....2).
  • EmiliasHorse #46 2 years ago

    @Notmyrealname

    NWN 2 was not Bioware. Obsidian wrote that.

  • Scimarad #47 2 years ago

    I'm definitely waiting to hear what the 360 version is like before making any decisions on this one. PC RPGs have a tendency to make me feel disconnected from events, Witcher being the exception.
  • SheffieldSteel #48 2 years ago

    Scimarad, if you want immersion I think either console version looks like a pretty good bet for you. You'll get all of the story and action of the PC version, and none of the bird's-eye camera view. The previews that have commented on the console interface say it was designed from the ground up to be slick (radial menus etc) and works well.
    Edited by 1 at 19/10/09 @ 20:02
  • butler` #49 2 years ago

    Good to see a solid PC RPG (The Witcher wasn't quite there for me) but the step toward more complex turn-based stuff doesn't bode well for the console versions.

    As much as I'd rather play this from my sofa on my 360, it's going to take quite some control scheme and UI to pull off.
  • Nephirion #50 2 years ago

    A good RPG on the PC? who would have thought it ^^
  • Miths #51 2 years ago

    I usually prefer my PS3 these days, but this one I'm definitely getting for PC - and I very much suspect I'll be playing it in isometric view with liberal use of the space bar, just like all the good old Infinity Engine games.
    Although that Tactics systems does sound intriguing (I played some 6-8 hours of FF12 a few years ago and kind of liked the Gambit system, even though it was a bit too much like running on autopilot).
  • metalangel #52 2 years ago

    Only Canadians could make a game in which the coolest, strongest character is called Duncan.

    So none of you clots have read Dune, then?
  • TheJuriel #53 2 years ago

    They've been VERY quiet on the console versions, not showing off anything relating to them, even this close to release. I expect those versions to suck horribly.
  • TheJuriel #54 2 years ago

    "Does it come off looking like an MMO where the two characters stand next to each other playing attack animations"
    Yes, it does. I was disappointed. Even NWN1 managed to have generic dodge/parry animations, but all gameplay videos of Dragon Age have featured only MMO-like stock animations where weapons happily pass through opponents, and everyone does their own attack animations, regardless of what's happening around them.
  • TheJuriel #55 2 years ago

    Also, Bioware has changed the encounters on the consoles. You won't get 10+ enemies on the screen at once, but rather fewer, stronger enemies. Why? Because their console coders suck.

    Which does bother me, since I did get a 360 to not have to be in an upgrade race with the PC gaming anymore. But I guess I should be happy it's coming out on those platforms at all, even if in a gimped form.
  • velimirius #56 2 years ago

  • SheffieldSteel #57 2 years ago

    "You won't get 10+ enemies on the screen at once, but rather fewer, stronger enemies. Why? Because their console coders suck."

    What makes you think that performance problems only manifest in proportion to the number of bad guys on the screen?
    Perhaps the consoles have fewer monsters because they have less memory, less PPU power, or less GPU power than modern PCs. Perhaps Bioware made a design decision to shift the balance of battle based on other factors, like what sort of player they expect to buy the game on a console, or what camera view they expect players to use (top-down = larger battles).
    Edited by 1 at 19/10/09 @ 23:04
  • Gunzberg #58 2 years ago

    This just got 94% in PC Gamer UK..80 hours of playtime at the least...sounds fantastic!
  • stryker1121 #59 2 years ago

    I'm pre-ordering this for XBox...i'm willing to trust BioWare to bring the goodness, even in console form. I sincerely hope I'm right.
  • Khanivor #60 2 years ago

    Unless my memory is messing with me Bioware allowed you to set up tactics for your party members in BG.
  • EggyDeth #61 2 years ago

    I tried the character creator, it has graphics from five years ago. What's the point?
  • Dizz #62 2 years ago

    Sold (PC version for me). I'm dying for a good solid single player RPG.
  • PlugMonkey #63 2 years ago

    Which does bother me, since I did get a 360 to not have to be in an upgrade race with the PC gaming anymore. But I guess I should be happy it's coming out on those platforms at all, even if in a gimped form.

    Er, just because you buy a console doesn't mean the rest of the world stands still.
  • TheSnotGoblin #64 2 years ago

    @Khanivor

    Yeah, but it was a little trickier than a drop-down menu system. You could pick from a number of AI scripts to assign to your team (Ranged fighter/healer/trapspotter etc) but they were quite limited. However, you could throw open notepad and write your own AI scripts from scratch. You were free to get as complicated as you want and whilst I never did it myself it was possible to get the game to a state where it could nearly play itself (Most likely you'd still have to micromanage the harder fights; dragons and the like).
  • Machetazo #65 2 years ago

    My concern about the console version is now filtering into annoyance. What are they hiding? I hope for a follow-up article on that, once things become clearer.
  • aarlev #66 2 years ago

    This is going to be pure RPG heaven! Much praise to Bioware for not leaving us PC gamers out in the cold like other developers are doing recently (cough..Infinity Ward..cough). Also seems like they're actually optimising this for the PC platform, and not just giving us a sloppy port. Well done Bioware!
  • Les #67 2 years ago

    Would love to play this on OS X.

    This game shows that there's room for proper art direction within a Western fantasy RPG setting. Unlike, say, the horrible Oblivion ... ;)
  • hiddenranbir #68 2 years ago

    Needs more beard.
    Edited by 1 at 20/10/09 @ 16:29
  • fluff_the_tiger #69 2 years ago

    i really really hope this is good on xbox or ps3 . I don't want to return to PC hell again!
  • BritishBlue1 #70 2 years ago

    Hmm, come November I've got to choose between buying Dragon Age or Modern Warfare 2 and getting the other at a (much) later date...so...immerse myself into a finely crafted adventure or listen to morons informing me of my homosexuality over PSN...tough choice(!)
  • UncleLou #71 2 years ago

    Can't we ever read an article about a cross-platform release without wading through loads of anti-console snobs?

    I always seem to see loads of anti-PC comments, even in PC-exclusive threads. Different perspectives, I guess.
  • Froggit #72 2 years ago

    "Can't we ever read an article about a cross-platform release without wading through loads of anti-console snobs?"

    "I always seem to see loads of anti-PC comments, even in PC-exclusive threads. Different perspectives, I guess."


    I see both. Go figure.

    (And I also don't know how to quote properly...)
  • TheTingler #73 2 years ago

    Sounds superb, really looking forward to it... but I think you've accidentally proven EA to be utter liars, Oli. They delayed the early PC release "so they'd have time to polish and optimise it", but if it was finished and reviewable months ago that was clearly bollocks.