Dragon Age: Origins

Hands-on with console and PC versions. Ogre and out.

It takes a lot of components to make a great game. You need glamorous stuff like lax unpaid overtime regulations, dangerous quantities of Diet Coke, and dozens of cubicles filled with half-built LEGO Mindstorm Robots. Also, throwing in a skateboarding chipmunk named Jimmy Lightning doesn't hurt.

But it also takes patience: vast reserves of patience. Consider Dragon Age, BioWare's latest blood-flecked, scaly, axe-battered moral playground: in order to get this one up and running, the development team first had to invent roughly 5,000 years of lore to give the game a genuine sense of depth. Then they had to build convincing digital actors, capable of delivering performances more nuanced than the average muddle of pantomime shrugs and fist-shaking that makes up most videogame cut-scenes.

Finally, before they've even had a chance to appear on Fox News to defend themselves from charges that they're trying to warp tweenagers' brains with loathsome interactive pornography, they've had to find a way to explain the massive scope of the entire enterprise to the games press. They've had to explain it to the likes of me, in other words: people whose brains have long been addled by constant sugar highs and too many Mini Cheddars, people who struggle to pay attention to any single subject for the space of even half an hour without being given either a free T-shirt or another donut to keep them ticking over.

BioWare's hit on an elaborate solution this time around. After the game's last showing featured a confusing couple of minutes of sexy slaughter speed-cut to strangely inappropriate sports rock, we're now getting a more serious look at the project the team's been working on for the best part of a decade. With the release creeping steadily closer, the developers want to show us that Dragon Age: Origins isn't just about whittling dwarfs into gooey chunks with flashy magic spells, or bedding sultry female minstrels for the price of a few groats. It's not even just about dragons. It's about choices: meaningful choices that really impact the way a gigantic story unfolds.

'Dragon Age: Origins' Screenshot 1

We suggested BioWare knock out the space in the middle of the title and go with Dragonage. You know, like luggage, but deadlier.

It's an agenda we've heard before, but developers have rarely gone to so much trouble to give us a taste of it in action. And that's where that elaborate solution comes in: our latest glimpse of a single section of Dragon Age on PC plays out on two separate machines wired up to two separate HD displays, while two separate party load-outs explore the same in-game situation with very different outcomes. It's taken a lot of cables, then, and EA has gone one step further, hiring eighties dual-keyboard wizard Howard Jones to run the complex presentation, too.

Okay, I made the last bit up. But it has taken a lot of cables. Luckily, the results appear to be worth it. Things start off fairly simply: the first thing our two parties - one containing a saucy, and fairly mean-spirited, female mage, the other rounded out with a hulking warrior - find themselves faced with is a guard who doesn't want to let us across a river. RPGs are filled with this kind of scenario. In fact, when was the last time someone stuck in the middle of a medieval fantasy world did want to let you across a river?

No matter - however your party's made-up, Dragon Age gives you some entertaining options, the first party using its mage's deadly feminine wiles to intimidate the guard into letting them past, while the second, predictably, lets the eight-foot warrior handle the negotiations. Rather less predictably, however, he turns out to be the softer touch of the two, choosing not to threaten the guard with violence, but bribe him with the prospect of some home-made cookies. Just to be clear: not making this bit up. Cookies and sex, eh? Three minutes in and it's already hard to tell which side of the Canadian border BioWare is generally found on.

Differing parties has given us a nice range of options, then, but it's hardly an earth-shattering example of game divergence. On the other bank of the river, however, events quickly get a lot more complex. Heading into a mysterious Mage Tower, fraught with all kinds of deadly supernatural hi-jinks, both parties are met by Gregor, the captain of the Templars. Depending on the choices made earlier in the story, players may or may not have already met Gregor (one team has, in this case, and one hasn't) and if they haven't, they won't be aware that he can't be trusted - an important piece of information that could result in a rather different interpretation of the wider mission.

From there, things get even more complicated, when both parties come across a powerful mage named Wynne further on in the tower. One of the two groups we're following is able to recruit her into the team - a bonus, as she's the most powerful healer in the entire game - while the other (it's all because of that pesky sexy sorceress again - and a couple of clumsy dialogue decisions) quickly falls out with her and has to fight her to the death. Clubbing a nice magical old lady into the ground is bad enough in any circumstances, but when Wynne finally expires, we're immediately shown a brief film detailing her potential impact on the rest of the game - what the world could have looked like, in other words, if we hadn't just put our enchanted shoe through her head. It seems we'll be missing out on quite a bit.

'Dragon Age: Origins' Screenshot 3

Each archetype has its own origin story, taking up the first few hours of the game, and impacting the way the whole story plays out. An idea worth stealing.

It's seamlessly done: small choices making invisible ripples that spread throughout the narrative, often causing the unlikeliest of consequences. But the real kicker comes at the end of the presentation when we realise what we've been shown: two or three decisions, some made early on in the game, some playing out in conversations, significantly impacting just 10 minutes of gameplay, in a game that eventually clocks in at about 60 hours. The potential is staggering.

Two PCs and two monitors is an effective way for the developer to make a point, but perhaps it's also a sign of nervousness on the part of BioWare - a move suggesting that the team isn't sure people have quite clicked with the property yet, confused by the muddle of sex and violence that's been shown so far, or unsure of what to make of the game's unusually dark take on fantasy. There's also the wider question of how, with its dozens of spells and handful of party members to control, the game will work when it's running on a console instead of a PC, and that, luckily, is where the next stop on our mini-tour of Dragon Age takes us.

If our stereoscopic glimpse at the PC version gave us a sense of the title's storytelling potential, hands-on with the 360 game allows us to gauge how it will play for those with their hands on a controller rather than a mouse and keyboard. Once again, it's a short demo - a single boss fight against a giant ogre - but it's also well-suited to the task of displaying the steps BioWare has taken in squashing dozens of hotkeys onto a pad's handful of buttons.

So while the PC version has a permanent tray of selectable moves mapped along the bottom of the screen, the console version has opted for something akin to Mass Effect's menu wheel. But the wheel has evolved: a squeeze of the right trigger pulls up the radial, showing basic actions - things like spells, skills and items - while each selection then pushes you out onto a second ring, where you can make more specific choices, such as which magic attack to unleash, or which trap to set. Bringing up the menu pauses the action, but you can also toggle between two trays of hotkeys mapped to the face buttons for more instant mayhem, while either bumper allows you to slip seamlessly between controlling the different members of your party.

It's a layout that can seem rather busy for the first few minutes while you try to get your head, as well as your hands, around it all, but the good news is that in the heat of battle it works brilliantly, allowing for quick switches between melee and spell attacks, and effortless transfers between your team members. Even better, the combat is as entertaining as it is elegant, with some dazzling spell effects on offer. Standard electrical and ice powers explode into action in a satisfying blur of particles, while more complex offerings, like the Walking Bomb, which inflicts incremental damage over time to any affected character before causing them to explode when they ultimately keel over, provide some really creative toys to play with.

'Dragon Age: Origins' Screenshot 4

Didn't see any dragons in this demo, but I did drop my pen on the floor a few times, so I may have missed them.

The character models haven't been too damaged in the squash onto consoles, either, even if the camera is a little more sluggish on a thumb-stick, and the animation throughout is excellent, the giant ogre looming in, snatching team members and smacking them about with a real sense of weight and swagger.

Both epic and clever, then, Dragon Age: Origins appears to be shaping up well on both consoles and PC. Along with smart combat, a promising party system, and hints of a narrative that will deliver genuine replayability, there are flashes of humour and intrigue that are so often missing from Western RPGs. BioWare's been biding its time with this one, fitting in almost two separate jaunts across the Mass Effect universe in the space it's taken to get the basic pieces of its dark fantasy working together, but this is a company that's never been short on patience. The good news is that, for the rest of us, the wait is almost over too.

Comments (51) Latest comment 2 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • ChthonicEcho #1 3 years ago

    Has anyone seen this? [link url=http: //www.youtube.com/watch?v=1e46Z7iFljk&hd=1
    ]http://ww w.youtube.com/watch?v=1e46Z7iFl...[/link]

    I've no idea how to feel about this game. On one hand, it looks mighty generic, what with the cookie-cutter storyline and setting, but on the other hand, I am intrigued by certain gameplay intricacies.
  • Eraysor #2 3 years ago

    The system of choices looks fun, but it has such a horrendously boring setting that I'm still not convinced.
  • _Price_ #3 3 years ago

    Nice to see that all's not lost with this one.

    Usually you shouldn't trust trailers because they all-to-frequently misrepresent the game's content and raise expectations to an unreasonable degree. In this instance I think it's safe to say that Dragon Age will very much have to speak for itself on release.
  • UncleLou #4 3 years ago

    I really don't care too much about the setting as such. It's the writing, characters and mechanics that will decide if it's a good game or not. Baldur's Gate has as generic a high-fantasy setting as you can imagine, that didn't keep it from being great, nor does Mass Effect win any prizes in that regard.

    Of course it's nice to have something more original like in Planescape: Torment or Fallout, but it's more the cherry on top for me rather than an essential thing.
    Edited by 2 at 08/07/09 @ 10:25
  • anomagnus #5 3 years ago

    timed buying a new pc, just for this game
  • Muneeb #6 3 years ago

    Looks good but I'm worried it will have OTT action segments which bore me.
  • ChthonicEcho #7 3 years ago

    @UncleLou

    It's quite early to judge the storyline, I admit, but it sounds fairly uninspired so far. It's nearly identical to what was the premise of Neverwinter Nights 2 - the blight spreading and poisoning the land, with no means to defeat it. It's an age old fantasy premise - a metaphysical presence of Evil that's harming the lands or pulling the strings of minor evildoers (Tolkien's invention).

    I can't argue that presentation might distract from the generic premise and setting, though.
  • menage #8 3 years ago

    I think Bioware is alienating a lot of fans with this game. All the blood gore and tits seem unncesarry and kinda put me off.
  • foamy #9 3 years ago

    i'm good with gory. In fact, i'm tired of hitting enemies with a sword and have sparkles jumping around. Blood, thanks.
  • Freek #10 3 years ago

    They should probably fire the entire marketing department and burn them on stakes. Because this preview seems to be comming from an entirely different game then what the trailers and pics try to suggest is Dragon Age.
  • TheTingler #11 3 years ago

    I think I will enjoy it, but I think Bioware have made a mistake not going for a licence like Forgotten Realms. This type of generic fantasy has been done to death, and with The Witcher Special Edition out there doing the fantasy RPG brilliantly with an interesting licence (and using Bioware's own graphics engine no less) I'm worried this'll get a big 'meh'.
  • b00n #12 3 years ago

    I kinda like this preview, and it got me back interested in the game. The E3 trailer really put me off, and didn't look at all like a spiritual successor to Baldur's Gate. Reading this gives me a little more confidence.
  • frostcircus #13 3 years ago

    Second time in a week that I've nitpicked a Eurogamer pun, but please don't make them separate to the actual tagline. Bad form. There are rules about these things.
  • mikeck #14 3 years ago

    I was really looking forward to this game, then I saw that trailer (what were they thinking...) and was put off. However, after taking some time out to calm myself, and reading this preview, I am intrigued again by what could be a very good game.
  • 3william56 #15 3 years ago

    Wow. 5000 years of history to develop, and what did they come up with? Mages? Templars? Dwarves and Dragons. Maybe even a barbarian? Must have taken them *ages* to think of those.

    And someone was criticising Katamari Forever for a lack of originality... O_o

    The problem with these sorts of "decision" morality games is when there's no clear sense of what your decision is, and the consequences thereof. What, for example, was the trigger to lose you the best healer in the entire game in a dialog tree? If it was something crass, like calling her ar$e fat, then fair enough. But if it was something mundane like refusing a cookie, then it sucks. Becomes the RPG equivalent of off screen insta-death. Choosing whether to slaughter innocents is one thing. Upsetting a cr*p AI with a dialog choice is another.
  • Eighthours #16 3 years ago

    I've got one eye on this, but I haven't yet seen anything that takes it out of genero-ville in terms of its setting. All seems a bit tired to me. I hope that the story within that setting can make me more interested, as no matter how well the gameplay works, if it's not telling a good yarn then it's not worth me ploughing 60 hours into.
  • Fidjit #17 3 years ago

    Who wants to have to complete a 60 hour game in this day and age?

    Life's too short.
  • WJF #18 3 years ago

    'The problem with these sorts of "decision" morality games is when there's no clear sense of what your decision is, and the consequences thereof. What, for example, was the trigger to lose you the best healer in the entire game in a dialog tree?'

    Hopefully it'll employ The Witcher's excellent technique where you were treated to a gravely voice-over and a few key stills telling you how you just messed up a decision/killed a good man because you thought you were doing the right thing two hours earlier.

    Ace game.
  • w00t #19 3 years ago

    Cannot wait for this. I have spent thousands of hours playing Bioware games (and ones based on their engines) - bring it on!
  • Kratos1986 #20 3 years ago

    It is Bioware so you can expect some quality without a doubt.

    It's nice Bioware are giving us a throwback to their old Baldurs Gate and Neverwinter Nights days. Those were Biowares best days.

    Plus if this goes well it won't hurt when they try and sell KOTOR Online to people.
  • Ranger101 #21 3 years ago

    If it's even half-way near what BG was like, its insta-buy for me.
  • the_dudefather #22 3 years ago

    I hear it has black vikings

    that's kinda cool
  • actionfitz #23 3 years ago

    @UncleLou
    08/07/09 @ 10:23

    Re: Planescape Torment - to this day still one of the best gaming experiances I've had.
    The quality of the story was just mind bogglingly good, at least for some one like me who had been used to the general high fantasy / emo-anime RPG game storys of the day.
    You pick up a game thats basic premise is "What can Change the nature of a man?"
    Quite meaningfully raised the bar in terms of games narrative... and so spoiled every lesser attempt at game story for me ever since :)
  • the_inchworm #24 3 years ago

    "Who wants to have to complete a 60 hour game in this day and age?"

    Me.
  • Janyamik #25 3 years ago

    Dx 10 + Game editor, is my choice ;) Besides maybe a 64 Bits "optimized for" version.

    We will have to wait and see what PC version offers.
    Edited by 1 at 08/07/09 @ 13:24
  • Hypercube #26 3 years ago

    Who wants to have to complete a 60 hour game in this day and age?

    Me. I did Lost Odydssey in about 70 hours and loved it.
  • ccfb #27 3 years ago

    Are these the same guys who said the medium needs to evolve out of using violence for storytelling?

    If so, surely this game is a retrograde step...
  • matrim83 #28 3 years ago

    ....a move suggesting that the team isn't sure people have quite clicked with the property yet, confused by the muddle of sex and violence that's been shown so far, or unsure of what to make of the game's unusually dark take on fantasy.

    And whose fault is that? We didnt ask for those shitty heavy metal gore/sex fest trailers.
  • UncleLou #29 3 years ago

    And whose fault is that? We didnt ask for those shitty heavy metal gore/sex fest trailers.

    Well, we might not have, but take a look at the comments under these videos on gametrailers.com. If their plan is to introduce a new, young audience in the US to beardy RPGs of old, it works brilliantly, as depressing as that may be for you or me.
    Edited by 1 at 08/07/09 @ 14:03
  • kendoji #30 3 years ago

    My faith in Bioware is virtually unshakable, I'm sure this will be good.
  • Nephirion #31 3 years ago

    Im hoping thats early beta as the models look pretty awful :( Also the Postal style OTT violence seems out of place in serious RPG
  • CouldntResist #32 3 years ago

    Maybe i'm a natural cynic, but just because they've shown you one section where there's all this dynamic storytelling going on doesn't mean that the entire game is going to be like that!

    Don't get me wrong though, am really looking forward to this.
  • ardamillo #33 3 years ago

    I still don't get it. That may be a good sign, though.
  • seanm2 #34 3 years ago

    Just because it is a fantasy setting, does not mean it will be generic, boring and overly familiar.

    A talented developer like Bioware will bring something fresh to it. They are capable of creating a rich world, compelling story and sustaining your interest. Baldurs Gate revitalised its genre. Likewise KOTOR did something good with the Star Wars universe.

    Whilst a less talented developer may just recycle concepts from better games and have an unpolished implementation.



    Edited by 1 at 09/07/09 @ 21:57
  • hiddenranbir #35 3 years ago

    All this dark gritty maturity is turning me on so much.
  • Thirith #36 3 years ago

    After all of the reports lately that sounded less than stellar, this article's the first one in a while that made me think that Dragon Age might be worthwhile after all.
  • Dynamize #37 3 years ago

    "Inventing 5,000 years of lore" seems to amount to "Dragons, dwarves, undead etc. with not-D&D background fluff/explanations."
    Bit hyperbolic and disingenuous.

    BioWare's been biding its time with this one, fitting in almost two separate jaunts across the Mass Effect universe in the space it's taken to get the basic pieces of its dark fantasy working together, but this is a company that's never been short on patience.

    I think in this case "biding their time" amounts to having this project worked on part-time by about three people who spent all those years prior to full production coming up with the same tropes with a different lick of paint.

    Anyway, it might still have some as-yet-unseen saving graces, so there's a chance I'll buy and enjoy being a Jed...Grey Warden.
  • WinterSnowblind #38 3 years ago

    The marketing for this game has been pretty bad, they seem to appealing to the masses.. with violence, sex and metal music, but when it comes down to it, it's a Bioware game, a spirtual sequel to Baldurs Gate at that. The Bioware fans are going to be turned off by how they're marketing the games, and those that are interested by the ads, are probably going to hate the game when they have to sit through more than 5 minutes of dialogue.
  • Scimarad #39 3 years ago

    I've got a lot of faith in Bioware but I can't help but think this looks and sounds so incredibly dull compared to a lot of their other stuff.

    I'm not sure why disc is at -14 for saying it sounds spectacularly generic and boring. It DOES!
    Edited by 1 at 08/07/09 @ 19:53
  • mkreku #40 3 years ago

    I love long games! I spent over 100 hours on Dragon Quest 8, Gothic, Gothic 2 and Gothic 3 (yes, I loved that one too). If a game is good, you never want it to end!
  • Scimarad #41 3 years ago

    Indeed! We both got 'minused' for even commenting on it!
  • UncleLou #42 3 years ago

    You can say negative stuff, but just saying "it's spectacularly dull" without giving any reasons gets punished, which is fine by me. Just look at Eraysor's post (the second). He says what he thinks is "horrendoulsy boring", but also makes it clear that he has read the article - tada, no negative rating.

    Now I don't think disc hasn't read the article and I am sure he has good reasons, but his post does read like random trolling.
    Edited by 1 at 09/07/09 @ 08:56
  • Demiath #43 3 years ago

    Yes, the "Violence" trailer was indeed laughably bad, but what got me really worried was the RPS editor John Walker's blog post about a few unintentionally funny and occasionally cringe-worthy moments in an E3 demonstration of the game. The article gives the distinct (if admittedly early) impression that the problem is not so much with the marketing but with the game itself - the pubescent Marilyn Manson-esque silliness is thus not confined to the trailers but is intrinsic to the product Bioware is trying to sell us.

    I think I'll just play Mass Effect 2 instead....
    Edited by 1 at 09/07/09 @ 10:49
  • kingmong #44 3 years ago

    still fire up BG2 occasionally so looking forward to firing up the +4 boot of nutkicking

    loved what bioware did with the main plot in ME. if we can expect similar quality from this, colour me excited.
    Edited by 1 at 09/07/09 @ 15:05
  • Scimarad #45 3 years ago

    @UncleLou

    I'm sorry but that's total crap. I said I THINK it LOOKS incredibly dull. That deserves punishment just because you assume I haven't read the article? O-Kay...

    It's not trolling, it's called having a personal opinion.
    Edited by 1 at 09/07/09 @ 19:37
  • UncleLou #46 3 years ago

    Erm, I wasn't even talking about your post (nor have I rated it), but disc's, but anyway.

    It's not trolling, it's called having a personal opinion.

    I don't think you're getting what I am saying at all. It's not what you say, it's how you say it. And the karma system works almost perfectly in that regard. It's the difference between "Halo is shit" and "I didn't like Halo because a)..., b)..., c)...". The first one will get buried, the second one not. Well, in the case of Halo, maybe it will, but I hope you catch my drift.

    Following your logic through, nothing that is also a personal opinion could be trolling, which is clearly utter nonsense.
    Edited by 3 at 10/07/09 @ 01:02
  • Scimarad #47 3 years ago

    All I'm saying is that it's a pretty big jump from "Dragon Age is shit" to "I'm sorry but I think Dragon Age looks a bit dull"

    It seems to me that too many people are jumping on the minus button merely because they disagree. Positive comments tend to get left alone but negative ones seem to get stamped on for pretty much no reason. Sometimes you just want to say 'I like this' or 'I think it looks a bit crap' without a long list justifying your reasons.

    Okay, reading it again, disc's comment could definitely be taken as trolling.
  • Lin #48 3 years ago

    i've been sceptical about this since it was announced almost five years ago. the name alonde is so awful it sound like it came from a random rpg name generator. I lost all respect for Bioware after they ditched Star Wars & D&D in the name of artistic license, only to come up with third rate knock offs of KOTOR & NWN (mass effect and dragon age respecively).

    and seriously, it sounds like the consequences thing s being massively overplayed. it doesn't sound any different to killing Okku in NWN2: Mask of The Betrayer. now that was one hell of an RPG. it had the best character creation system of any RPG ever made. and more better writing than bioware has had in anyof it's last three games. it looks and performs pretty good too. almost as good as this IMHO. and poly counts aren't really much of an issue when you're peering at everything from a great height.

    of course, nwn2 never got the hype of dragon age or masss effect because A) it wasn't on consoles B) Obsidian didn't court controversy by including alien sex and C) the media hates atari
  • ASHBERY76 #49 3 years ago

    NWN2 had a dreadfull combat system and graphics engine,and apart from the Mask of The Betrayer the other two games had boring storys too.
  • hiddenranbir #50 3 years ago

    I just want to know if the combat looks choreagraphed like in KoTOR style or just uses repetitive swings that don't look as visceral.
  • SheffieldSteel #51 2 years ago

    Agreed that story and setting are important.

    For me, though, I am most interested in seeing how the rules system shapes up, partly because of my relief at not having to use the D&D rules system (hey, I preferred RuneQuest, so sue me) but mainly out of respect for the sheer challenge of producing an entire system from scratch. Depending on how well they've done it, this game may turn out to be either be the next great western RPG - or, perhaps, the proof of the genre's demise. Having pre-ordered, I very much hope it's not the latter :-/