Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Sponsored by Alienware tracer
Advertisement

Crysis Warhead Hands On

PC Hands On by Christian Donlan

30 July, 2008

Page 2 of 2. <- Page 1

With our ally safely at the extraction point, we head for a nearby harbour. The objective here is to download something or other (probably two-for-one Wagamama vouchers) from an enemy terminal, but for us it's a chance to see a few more of Warhead's new tricks up close, as we fight our way from one building to the next. There are subtle changes, such as the ability to automatically pick up ammo as you move over it, and more noticeable ones, with entirely new weapons like the grenade launcher and twin-wielded SMGs. Large or small, every new idea seems carefully calibrated to speed up the pace of the game, and make the encounters more explosive.

The original nanosuit powers remain unchanged, however, and success in the heat of battle still turns on the speed and imagination with which you can chain your skills together - getting close with stealth and switching to strength to dish out some quick violence before dashing off to safety again at double speed, for instance.

Equally, the game's environment remains as destructible as it is beautiful, and in the middle of a more intense skirmish, with barrels exploding, trees flying through the air and the physics engine getting a real workout, it seems like business as usual. Like Valve, Crytek know how to turn a single object into a set-piece, and there are opportunities for improvisation everywhere: a huge wooden spool of wire from a container ship provides a useful refuge, then switches to moving cover once you realise you can set it in motion, and finally becomes a weapon, as it picks up speed rolling downhill.

'Crysis Warhead' Screenshot 3

If a barrel explodes in a forest and there's no-one standing next to it, is it still a cliché?

The North Koreans we fought seemed slightly smarter this time around, more eager to flank, and happy to fall back and regroup, but a big question still remains over whether this Crysis will suffer like the original when the aliens eventually enter the mix. "We've definitely spent a lot of time and effort working on the alien AI," says O'Donnell, who admits it was one of the main problems with the first game. "What we've tried to do is make them feel more human this time. We've incorporated some of the human AI values in there. They're reacting to your actions: if you throw a grenade, they'll evade it, they'll try and flank you, and it makes the experience more intelligent than just firing at these guys who run across the screen."

With multiplayer slotting in alongside the main campaign, Crytek is clearly hoping that Warhead's generous content, along with a budget price point, will lure in those who stayed away the first time, scared off by the minimum specs. "We got a bad rap in the community because of that. But actually it wasn't nearly as bad as anybody thought, which is what we're trying to make clear now," says O'Donnell.

'Crysis Warhead' Screenshot 4

Bringing down a building with one punch makes up for the fact that the nanosuit makes you look like the Michelin Man's emo brother.

"The technology's caught up, and it's cheaper to get a decent system." EA is currently unwilling to divulge how much the specs have changed since the original game, however, and the publisher is equally tight-lipped on what kind of copy protection will be in place. Given the effect illegal downloads had on the first game's sales, you can probably expect something involving retinal scans and blood samples.

There are many who argue that there's something perilously old-fashioned about Crytek's fixation with brand new technology. While it's never likely to turn off DirectX 10 and start churning out puzzle games, it remains a brave move to go ahead with another PC exclusive when most other companies are going multi-platform. A console Crysis is inevitable - and there are still genuine sequels planned - but for the time being, whether you view Warhead as a shallow cash-in or pure fan service, what we've seen so far suggests it's still more than enough to make many console gamers slightly jealous.

Crysis Warhead is due out on PC this autumn.

Advertisement

Are you excited about Crysis Warhead on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-37 of 37 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Pablo2k5
30/07/08 @ 07:41
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sold. Loved the first and I'm sure I'll love this.

Psycho is a cool character too!
mcbi4kh2
30/07/08 @ 07:43
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Can't wait.
Farzlepot
30/07/08 @ 07:46
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Jealous? Of a tech demo...?
DFawkes
30/07/08 @ 07:54
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Given the effect illegal downloads had on the first game's sales"? Missed the word allegedly there. I didn't buy it because it was too high-spec. My friends didn't buy it for the same reason. If they make the same mistake again, they'll pay for it with lost sales.

Although piracy is obviously a problem, all copy protection does is hamper the legal player.
Katsumoto
30/07/08 @ 07:58
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Jealous? Of a tech demo...? "

Good to see you've ever read a review of this game ever, or have any clue what it's about, and definitely haven't just looked at the screenshots.

""Given the effect illegal downloads had on the first game's sales""

Indeed, this was just Crytek being arses. They claimed for every copy bought 15-20 were pirated? Considering it sold something like 1.5 million, that's a LOT of pirating. As PC Gamer pointed out, that would be the equivalent of the entire population of the Netherlands pirating it. Also note that 1.5 million was far more than EA ever predicted this would sell.
Edited 2 times, most recently on 30/07/08 @ 09:01
mcbi4kh2
30/07/08 @ 08:08
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Crysis made the mistake of mis labelling their quality settings.
Crysis low = everything else medium
medium = high etc.

@DFawkes
Did you try the demo? How did it run on Low?
UncleLou
30/07/08 @ 08:41
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Jealous? Of a tech demo...?

You couldn't have made it more obvious that you are jealous if you had tried, hehe.
Eraysor
30/07/08 @ 08:44
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
My only problem with this game is that the first game's story was atrocious, especially the ending, and thus the fact they are telling the same story again makes it very dull.

However, it sounds like they have reduced the ridiculous amount of stealthing from the original in favour of combat.
BurningR
30/07/08 @ 08:45
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Given the effect illegal downloads had on the first game's sales, you can probably expect something involving retinal scans and blood samples."

Well that's what EA claim. Studies show that you can't make a direct link between the number of illegal downloads and lost revenue. (I can't supply the link I'd like, it's in danish, so....)

Meho
30/07/08 @ 09:08
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
For the umpteenth time (and for the love of Allah): how does 1,5 million copies sold ON PC ALONE in less than a motherfucking year for a completely new IP spell bad sales in anyone's book? I mean, goshfuckingdamnit, let's see some perspective here. Sure, Half Life 2 sold four million copies between October 2004 and June 2006, but seriously, that game ran on PCs barely stronger than cell phones. Civilization IV was released in October 2005 and by March 2007 it sold 1,5 million copies. Meaning it did worse than Crysis. I mean, hello: Half-Life and Civilization!! We're talking holy grails of PC gaming (that eventually made their way to consoles). Let's not even talk about multiplatform games (where, for instance, no GTA games managed to sell even a million copies on PC).

Crysis was released less than a year ago on ONE platform with pretty intimidating technical specs. As a hopeful starting chapter of an eventual franchise (Far Cry being more like a spiritual brother). And it still outdid Civilization IV. So, what the fuck, eh? Sure, Half-Life franchise sold over 16 million copies so far, but that is a ten year old franchise with smart people inventing new distribution channels for it (not to mention Counter Strike, Portal and TF2 as equally strong selling points).

Plus, one more time for the record: I downloaded a pirate copy of this game as soon as it hit torrent sites and I liked it so much I went out and bought a collectors edition as soon as it hit our shops here. What's with the whining, Crytek/ EA???
PearOfAnguish
30/07/08 @ 09:31
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"we sat down and looked at all the reviews and all the things people had said about Crysis and took that on board,"

Yay!

"We've definitely spent a lot of time and effort working on the alien AI,"

Oh :(

The alien stuff wasn't shit because their AI didn't work, it was because we'd just spent most of the game learning to use those awesome suit powers to tackle smart enemies in an open environment, then we got dumped into a boring and linear environment that was like a billion other corridor shooters. It was fucking dull.

While the development team have ensured that the stealth options from the original game are still available for those who want to take things slowly, the new lead's hard-nut temperament has given them an excuse to explore a faster pace of gameplay

But...the stealth was brilliant fun.



Edited 2 times, most recently on 30/07/08 @ 10:57
the_mtfr
30/07/08 @ 10:13
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Meho, amen brother. EA only sees the world in multiples of a million.
bodypopper
30/07/08 @ 10:24
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yes, us ex-PC gaming, console types who, like our PC chums. are about to receive the better looking (as a game) Farcry 2 are really, really gutted that we can't play another shooter about a man in a sci fi suit battling other blokes with a cheesy sci fi coda at the end. Crytek makes great engines, but its game plots are pure cheese.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 30/07/08 @ 11:25
DFawkes
30/07/08 @ 10:25
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@mcbi4kh2

The demo didn't run at all on my old machine, but I just got a new one so I'll have to have another go. They really should put a waring on the sleeve though - "Honestly, not as bad as people say! We have lower settings!"

I can't remember it getting much shelf space in my hometowns shops, where they all pimped the hell out of Okami on release. Maybe it's opposite land here :P

PearOfAnguish
30/07/08 @ 10:32
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Bodypopper, no one gives a fuck about the plot, Crysis was just a good fun FPS (well, until the aliens appeared).
Edited 1 times, most recently on 30/07/08 @ 11:33
penhalion
30/07/08 @ 10:44
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"We got a bad rap in the community because of that. But actually it wasn't nearly as bad as anybody thought, which is what we're trying to make clear now,"

Yes...yes it was as bad as the community thought. When no hardware can play a game at full settings it's a broken game. In Crysis case, it was litterally NO hardware that can play it at full detail with AA and Ani enabled. A new gtx 280 still can't play it with full settings on nor an ati 4870. I think someone managed it using a tripple sli 280 board setup costing thousands of pounds but, he had no proof.

It would be very wise for EA and crytek to provide the specs for this one as soon as possible otherwise, no matter how cheap or how well reviewed it is, no sane person is going to touch it.
Tormeh
30/07/08 @ 11:16
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Yes...yes it was as bad as the community thought. When no hardware can play a game at full settings it's a broken game."

Oh, really? Care to educate me as to how medium setting (which looks better than most games at high) isn't good enough?
Crytek just gives you the OPTION of cranking up the already very good graphics when, somewhere in the future, you have better hardware. Saying that it's broken because of this is like saying that a game from 1987 would be broken if it had the OPTION of playing the game in multiplayer, just because fast internet connections in those days were rare.
No sane person should bash a game for an extra feature.
AphoticCosmos
30/07/08 @ 11:28
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Will love.

Psycho > Nomad.
UncleLou
30/07/08 @ 11:42
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yes...yes it was as bad as the community thought. When no hardware can play a game at full settings it's a broken game

*Utter*, *utter* nonsense, and it's a shame that a game gets a bad reputation based on nonsense like this.

I once jokingly said they should have left the two highest settings out of the game completely, and relabelled the remaining ones (before they actually did that bit), just to shut people up about this complete non-issue. It almost scares me that that would probably have been a good idea.

What counts is how the game scales and looks, and higher settings overall means you can mix and match better, even if you can't put all the sliders to the right. Who says you have to?

Unless your complaint is that the game was somehow unoptimised and looked shit on lower settings than ultra. Which I can't believe.



UncleLou
30/07/08 @ 11:43
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yes, us ex-PC gaming, console types who, like our PC chums. are about to receive the better looking (as a game) Farcry 2 are really, really gutted that we can't play another shooter about a man in a sci fi suit battling other blokes with a cheesy sci fi coda at the end. Crytek makes great engines, but its game plots are pure cheese.


You sound even more bitter than Farzlepot, well done. \o/
bongoloid
30/07/08 @ 11:56
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I built a relatively potent SLI'd pc and suffered countless problems running Crysis when it was released, mainly because i was determined to see it running it in very high settings on a 1080p HDTV. After a bucket load of NVidia driver updates and two major game patches i can now run it at a playable and consistent frame rate at my chosen resolution on full settings. Playing through it again now is a wholly different experience. I'm certainly hungry for more! Hopefully the optimisations and refined design will make for another great game.
Edited 2 times, most recently on 30/07/08 @ 13:01
PearOfAnguish
30/07/08 @ 12:31
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I really do hope they make a Crysis 2, but drop the alien crap and have some urban environments.
Dynamize
30/07/08 @ 13:10
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nice, I'm perfectly happy with more of the same, aliens and all. Looking forward to it.

I'll agree that the interior sections with the aliens was a bit tiresome, but I loved the exterior stuff. Exiting the mountain to see WINTER MADNESS on a tropical island, that was awesome. Kind of a film-scale idea thingy. The switch from stealthing to take down poor bloody infantry surgically, to stealthing because there are some really big and dangerous things out there, lovely. I liked the sound design of the aliens too, all the distant clacks and hoots.
PearOfAnguish
30/07/08 @ 13:17
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"to stealthing because there are some really big and dangerous things out there, lovely"

But the stealth was rendered useless by the aliens being able to see you even when cloaked. It was just annoying.
Dynamize
30/07/08 @ 13:34
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm sure at the start of the descent from the mountain I cloaked past three little guys milling about. It's been a while though, so I could be wrong.

Anyways, I meant being stealthy in the sense of cautious and considered movement from cover to cover. Peeking out to see strong and awkward baddies milling about, and trying to think of a path that shields you from prying eyes. 'Proper' stealth, not high-tech stealth-at-the-touch-of- a-button sort of thing. The switch from biggest dog on the street to not-biggest was a pleasant sea-change.
dsmx
30/07/08 @ 13:47
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The irony is that if EA put in copy protection sales will be lower than the original and the pirated numbers will be higher.
skillian
30/07/08 @ 14:35
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This article doesn't appear on the RSS feed. Probably to late now for anyone at EG to see this comment though.
Ryuken
30/07/08 @ 16:42
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Yes, us ex-PC gaming, console types who, like our PC chums. are about to receive the better looking (as a game) Farcry 2 are really, really gutted that we can't play another shooter about a man in a sci fi suit battling other blokes with a cheesy sci fi coda at the end. Crytek makes great engines, but its game plots are pure cheese. "

Right, playing as a mercenary who is seeking revenge on a chap called 'The Jackal' in an exotic location really is so much better as a plot? Don't forget that Ubisoft still takes pride in the fact that they helped Crytek with the story of the original Far Cry, yes, that poor Island of Dr. Moreau wannabe-saga. And besides, FC2 will be out on PC too, it was even first announced for PC and the devs have mentioned more than once that there will be more graphical sweets than in the console versions. If everything goes alright then we'll be enjoying two great 'Cry'-games although they might both be overwhelmed by Clear Sky which will be out first.
Hypercube
30/07/08 @ 19:19
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yes...yes it was as bad as the community thought. When no hardware can play a game at full settings it's a broken game. In Crysis case, it was litterally NO hardware that can play it at full detail with AA and Ani enabled. A new gtx 280 still can't play it with full settings on nor an ati 4870. I think someone managed it using a tripple sli 280 board setup costing thousands of pounds but, he had no proof.

I've got an 8800 GTX, and I was playing it on 1280 x 1024 at very hight settings and it played very nicely. I didn't put AA, because it didn't need it. It was DirectX 9 (I've still got XP) but still looked incredible and I hadn't spent anywhere near a grand on my PC. I'm not sure if not playing something "at full settings" matters when it was a very, very good graphical experience for me.

Got a bit crappy when the aliens turned up though.
WrongShui
30/07/08 @ 22:04
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Do the Koreans still take sixty rounds to the chest?
Silvervein
31/07/08 @ 01:20
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@wrongshui

Probably yes. It's all that rice. Healthy eating keeps you alive, you know? ;)
Haloboy!
31/07/08 @ 01:21
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
For anyone who is still having problems getting the Crysis experience they want out of the game, check this out......

http://incrysis.com/forums/viewtopic.php...

And bleh to all those who still insist that Crysis was nothing more than a mere tech demo, what was Halo 3 then.....a bore demo? Crysis was a shit load of fun whatever way you chose to play it, and I can't ruddy wait for Warhead and more of the same on an even more open gaming plane.

APHIZM
31/07/08 @ 12:32
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Haloboy!

Cheers for the link. I'm playing in High to Very High with DX10 on a 4870, but it could do with a little optimisation.

Haven't even finished Crysis yet, but I'm already looking forward to Warhead...
LtMerc
01/08/08 @ 03:20
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I really hope they improve the AI. I could pick them off with headshots like I was the freaking predator by switching in and out of stealth, and they'd respond by wandering around slowly like they'd dropped their bloody car keys or something. Oh and the bloody helicopter which can see and shoot you from a half a fucking mile away. When you're swimming along the bottom of a river. At night. Stupid piece of shit.
Chalee
03/08/08 @ 09:59
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Haha farzlepot is so obviously jealous :D

Looks really good to me really - sort of like crysis with all the bad bits pulled out, and easier system specs.
Not that system specs affect me, given I'm so pwesome i can run crysis on high.
saku_luk
06/08/08 @ 19:53
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The first game wasn't so bad.....true it had no replay value :P but it was so cheap here in Poland that I just got it for the visuals sake lol....it ran smoothly on my rig at 1920x1200 but without AA....I'll prolly get this one too, since its even more cheap than the original....it cost half the RRP price you guys have in UK...
Orange
14/08/08 @ 11:46
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Crysis was lovely, although it did lack more of the open world jungle exploring. Just jumping in a jeep or on foot and going around progressing however I wanted.

Glad to hear they're adding more of that type of thing in, plus more blowing shit up.

Comments: 1-37 of 37 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Metaboli

X View gallery