Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Sponsored by Alienware tracer
Advertisement

Crysis Review

PC Review by Jim Rossignol

13 November, 2007

Page 1 of 2. Page 2 ->

It was about two hours into Crysis when I began to realise just how good it might be. The first couple of hours had been fairly unremarkable - there were some predictable first-person cut-scenes, a linear intro level, some spooky goings-on, US military deployment, you know the sort of thing. I had watched the sun come up across the island and seen the kind of tropical Far-Cry-revisited scenes that we'd all been expecting. I had even barrelled through the first of the villages and used some of the suit-powers (which your buffed up future marine has at his disposal from the start) to kill off some enemies. But it wasn't until a little later that I sat back and actually looked at it.

Crysis is much more than a highly accomplished graphics engine, to be sure, but let me just get this across to you for a moment. Playing on a high-end PC (for Crysis runs best on a Quad Core beast with a DirectX 10 card) it was so good that I had almost failed to notice the sheer immensity of visual information it was delivering. The Crysis environments are so naturalistic, so close to realism, that you find yourself thinking: "of course, because that's how things are supposed to look." It takes a few moments to step back and really look. I was in a stretch of a forested valley. The sun was shining down on the rocks across the valley, reflecting light with that certain stony gleam that long-polished rocks have about them. Those same sunbeams were filtering through the trees and casting dappled shadows across the exquisitely detailed forest floor. This is that HDR stuff deployed as it was meant to be - with a slight haze that jungles have about them, with the yellow sun dropping beams of light through the waving branches overhead. The jungle was alive. Ahead of me vegetation flicked and moved: enemies approached.

'Crysis' Screenshot 1

This chap is with you through parts of the game. He stops for neither tea nor biscuits.

And that's pretty much where my eyebrows went up and I muttered mild obscenities: I was playing a game where (at least some) vegetation moved as people passed through it. The fronds of a palm tree bent and flicked well before I could see the soldier who approached along the path. In the firefight that followed I levelled a great swathe of greenery as the bullets flew and grenades detonated. Branches fell from trees and saplings collapsed into the undergrowth: it was my own little re-enactment of the minigun scene from Predator. But it got better - thanks to the capacity of the nano-suit to give me a temporary cloaking field - I stopped being Arnie [surely Bill Duke - Predator Ed] and became the Predator in the space of about ten seconds. I reached out and grabbed a soldier by the throat. I took a few moments to examine his horrified, dying face in all its incredible detail before hurling him backwards into the undergrowth.

'Crysis' Screenshot 2

Yeah, it really does look a bit special on those hyper-accelerated graphics cards of the future.

I just need to say something about Crysis's fiction and functions at this point. You're a super-soldier sent to a Pacific island to investigate dodgy business perpetrated by the apparently invigorated North Korean army. You're equipped with a suit of hi-tech armour that can be configured into various modes, and you rely on it for almost all situations. Even if you run out of ammo, the suit can get you past the enemies. The nanosuit has a constantly recharging reservoir of energy, which means that you can use any of the powers for a brief period before you'll need to rest up for a few seconds. The default is armour mode, which allows you to soak damage and also rapidly heals you. That's the the mode the suit will revert to if you decloak. Then there's strength mode, which reduces your defence but allows you to punch people to death, to punch Humvees to death (although I never managed that car-flip thing from the trailer), and to leap on top of buildings like a superhero. Speed seems to to be the least useful mode, allowing you to dash a short distance at a stupendous rate. Best of all though, is the cloak itself. This allows you to move a short distance invisibly, and allows you to effectively disappear from pursuing enemies for a few seconds, or to close in on them for sudden, close-quarters violence. It's not the first time we've seen this kind of thing - Halo 2 did it - but the implementation in Crysis is impossibly entertaining.

'Crysis' Screenshot 3

Fights happen a fair bit. Here's one happening right now.

Anyway, back to the wooded valley. As the first stage of the firefight subsided, I realised there was a second enemy patrol closing in. They were wading across the nearby river towards me. I crouched and killed a couple of them at range - headshots are a boon - but I was soon out of rifle ammo. I would need to scavenge more. Crysis' group AI kicked in and the soldiers fanned out through the jungle to try and surround me. I cloaked again and headed further into the jungle along the valley. I'd seen some snipers hiding in rock formations on the far side of the valley, and I wanted to get behind them rather than face the main patrol up-close. Using the strength-mode jump I bounced across the rocky waterfall at the far end of the river valley and then, after hiding to briefly recoup energy, I cloaked and closed in on the snipers. I finished them off with a couple of close-range shotgun blasts, before taking their weapons to attack the patrol on the far side of the valley. Unfortunately, because I hadn't taken the time to watch the valley a little more carefully, I was jumped by a second group. They hit me hard at close range. Killing one, I backed up and cloaked as I passed behind a rock, losing them for a moment. I lobbed a grenade into where I thought they'd go, before closing in to kill two more by the water's edge - grabbing the first by the throat, I threw him into his buddy, killing them both and sending the bodies sprawling across rocks and into the water.

I took a moment to watch their bodies bob and then gently float away in the current, pushing aside reed-like water plants as they went. Reflective mood past, I closed in on the final, retreating soldier. He splashed across the river, trying to get to cover. A few freshly scavenged rounds from my rifle saw him tumble and take his last splash. Serenity returned to the wooded valley and I spent a while staring at the light in the trees, before I bounced away up the hillside towards the next objective.

To Page 2 ->

Advertisement

Are you excited about Crysis on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 158 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Digital~Orgasm
13/11/07 @ 08:00
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This is the game I have upgraded for, I know I will love this. Demo runs very well for me on high settings, although I have spent a lot on upgrading lately.

So many top games out at the mo tho.

Edited 1 times, most recently on 13/11/07 @ 08:01
Fitzmogwai
13/11/07 @ 08:08
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So better than / worse than (insert game of choice )

/shoots self. Dies.



On a more serious note, I'm just not excited about Crysis. I haven't had the inclination to download the demo, watch the videos, ooh and aah at the lush scenery. I think it's a combination of Vista / DX10 and memories of the Far Cry trigens.

I think it'll be a budget purchase in a year's time for me... Sorry Crytek.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 13/11/07 @ 08:12
davisorle
13/11/07 @ 08:10
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The game demo looked more than sunning. It made me lve my c as well. Was worth the effort and money!. Well I an't wait to play this game and DO use the editor indeed! I'll spend muh time there thoughcause of work dont have muchbut little at a time will do the work.

Crytek rulz... Great job guys. And thanks for the benchmark ;)
davisorle
13/11/07 @ 08:12
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@WOPR

"Will there be a Wii version?"

lol! Man sorry to tell you that but wii cant even play Crysis on recorded video :p
There is no way on earth they would even bother making a cheap version of this game for Wii. I bet you anything.It's really impossible and pointless.
TheDudesRug
13/11/07 @ 08:15
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Looks like my children will be going hungry again.
Fitzmogwai
13/11/07 @ 08:20
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Why haven't you already sent them to work? It makes paying for the upgrade cycle far easier. Put them into adverts. Or, if they're too ugly and foul-smelling even for commercials, put them up chimneys!
zozart
13/11/07 @ 08:22
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Seems like a very fair review. The demo was ace but to be honest I'm more excited about the technology and what the modding community will do with it than anything else!
ProtoformX
13/11/07 @ 08:25
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I like the little note at the end just confirming that the game will run on anything that runs Half-Life 2. This Christmas is really gearing up to be a fantastic one game-wise. My proiblem is because no-one will buy me games as presents I have to get the ones i want out of my own pocket. :-(
DB2k
13/11/07 @ 08:26
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
TBH after seeing the videos for Far Cry 2 I'm more excited about them. However since I'll never play either unless they come out on console, I'm not that arsed.
RedPanda
13/11/07 @ 08:32
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@davisorle: i think you may have missed some sarcasm there.
neuroniky
13/11/07 @ 08:33
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Crysis puzzles me. It is a game so much ahead of its time that, by not being portable to one of the current gen console and being so advanced technically (not to mention the fact that it requires Vista), its currently unplayable the way it is supposed to be played by 99% of the players out there. The remaining 1% will love it for sure, expecially since they probably upgraded their rig just to play it, but it's still puzzling how a company has concentrated all their efforts in a game and an engine that's so blatantly next gen oriented. And with the next gen still so far away, this engine may be too old when the next comes. It's so strange that a big company invests so much for a market so small (and I'm not thinking about the PC market in general, just of the small part of the PC market that is able to play it).
Unless it scales very well on lower specced PCs, which seems quite impossible given the level of realism I've seen on the video.

/NeuroNiky leaves the review with a ? floating above his head
Hamflank
13/11/07 @ 08:34
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I have a feeling this game would've gotten a bold 6 if it wasn't for the graphics.
Caimbeul
13/11/07 @ 08:34
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
ooh sparkly.
Killerbee
13/11/07 @ 08:36
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sounds great. I loved Far Cry in spite of the cheesy story and voice acting, so this has been very much one to watch for me.

This:

If you're an FPS-eater of any calibre then you should probably buy Crysis. It's going to run on any machine that will run Half-Life 2, although without a tricked-out Direct X10-supporting behemoth you're going to miss out on some of the atmospherics.

My ageing PC runs HL2 pretty well, but with games like Oblivion and Bioshock I feel I'm really pushing it too hard. So - is Crysis actually worth getting for humble single core P4, Geforce 6600GT owners like me or should I wait till the new year and try to scrape together enough cash to upgrade my PC first?
Kryon
13/11/07 @ 08:37
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This is why I hate PC gaming, I have to spend so much cash upgrading the fricken thing :(
Anyway, this game does look worth it I spose...
squarejawhero
13/11/07 @ 08:38
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Aliens in disappointment shock.

Well oi nivvah, didn't see THAT coming.

/sarcasm
cyacomini
13/11/07 @ 08:38
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
mac version maybe?
Darren
13/11/07 @ 08:40
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I found the demo a bit disappointing really and put me off buying the game somewhat. There's nothing wrong with as such, it plays well enough, looks amazing and has some impressive A.I. and physics, it just all feels a bit... well... Far Cry 2-ish, like I'd played it all before. OK so the full game may well be completely different but I'm not willing to spend £30 to find out, particularly as my setup isn't capable of really doing the game justice.

Although I got the demo running on my system at high detail, the framerate wasn't too great and a game of this type needs to be played on maximum detail I feel. Turning the geometry down to even Medium causes objects and scenery to popup jarringly as you move around and High causes the framerate to drop. I think I'll wait until I've bought a new PC next spring/summer before I buy this game, by then it'll likely be less than £20, the hardware will be powerful to run it properly and it'll be worth getting just to see what all the fuss was about.
Mho7276501
13/11/07 @ 08:43
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
can i just make clear that it DOESN'T require vista. That is just one of those myths that is really annoying as no-one in the know has ever said it does.

In fact the demo ran better on XP.
OnlyMe
13/11/07 @ 08:44
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If you have to spend money on better graphics to enjoy a game, then you know it's all about graphics, and not so much about the game. Is it that kind of game?

No I haven't read the review, but so far nothing I've seen of the game has interested me at all.
Talha
13/11/07 @ 08:48
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
2007: The Year of Games Living Up to their Hype. I haven't played it, but I can feel the excitement in the review. I agree that the main potential lies with what the community (and Crytek themselves) can do with this tech.

By the way, who will second Crytek's nomination as Developer of the Decade?

Hey guys, will my 1.86 GHz Core 2 Duo rig with 2 GB RAM and an 8800 GTS run it? Given that my resolution will be limited to the paltry 1680x1050 of my LCD?
UncleLou
13/11/07 @ 08:50
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Good review, pretty much as I expected. You say you felt some levels are a bit wasted, but isn't that part of the magic? You kow when you first play it that there's more to explore, and you can replay levels later - I usually never replay any games, but I spent more time in some levels in Far Cry than I did in other full games.

Crysis puzzles me. It is a game so much ahead of its time that, by not being portable to one of the current gen console and being so advanced technically (not to mention the fact that it requires Vista)

For the 100th time: It doesn't require Vista. :p
EraSerX
13/11/07 @ 08:53
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I played the demo and wa a bit disappointed by the gameplay. The graphics are awesome on my DX10-PC, but I wasn't too impressed with the gameplay. Rather crappy vehicle controls and the AI was quite boring.
Great tech-demo, rather boring game.. I had more fun playing Bioshock, TF2 or GoW on PC..
Edited 1 times, most recently on 13/11/07 @ 08:53
UncleLou
13/11/07 @ 09:00
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh, and shamelessley stolen from here:

4. Play on Delta difficulty. Regardless of your skill level. It’s a fun game on Normal, but on Delta it’s truly extraordinary. It’s not about nerfing all the damage you do, they’ve actually done difficulty modes right. There’s no crosshair so you have to use iron sights aiming, enemies speak entirely in Korean so you can’t comprehend their tactics talk, there’s no grenade warning or enemy glow, the AI is more perceptive and dramatically more accurate, and health regen in Armour is slowed from a sprint to a crawl. Oh, and bullets kill you. They really, really kill you.

So the game becomes entirely about engineering the situation, stalking your prey in Cloak mode, waiting for one man to stray far enough from the pack that you can abduct him and toss him quietly off a cliff. It actually requires less twitch skill than playing normally, because you simply can’t win uneven firefights. You’re forced to strategise around them, and the interestingness of your options goes up dramatically as a result.

Going back to Normal afterwards is just embarrassing - the enemies are like comedy B-movie goons, the red glow on enemies who’ve shot you is like putting stabilisiers on a bicycle, and Armour mode might as well be called Invulnerability. Worst of all, it encourages just hanging back and taking pot-shots at long range, which completely misses the point of the game and all the really fun stuff.

Plus, Craig tells me that in the game’s config files this is referred to as ‘Bauer’ mode. Are you really going to play on something other than Bauer Mode?


It's all true.
Ignatius_Cheese
13/11/07 @ 09:04
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Interactive benchmark software FTW quite obviously...
Cylinder
13/11/07 @ 09:12
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
My pre-order can't come soon enough. I've been replaying the demo in various ways for the last two weeks!
duncanf
13/11/07 @ 09:16
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This makes HL2 look old and frail because it's pretty? The first couple of hours are unremarkable and predictable but it's all ok because when you really look at it it looks like something approaching reality? I'm so disappointed Eurogamer. I thought you were above all this graphical graphical cock-whipping.
Trane
13/11/07 @ 09:21
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The demo is good fun and look nothing short of stunning on my rig, but does anyone else feel the game is just a little superficial?

I am enjoying it but can't seem to wrap myself up in the action like I can with HL2 and many other shooters over the years. Maybe I'm being harsh and the game gets a bit meatier further in, I'll give it a chance a few months down the line I think, once I'm done with the glut of other games higher up on my wishlist.
Wobble
13/11/07 @ 09:25
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
gah, spoilers :(
I didn't know it had anything to do with aliens.

The scenario you're in sounds a lot like Forever Peace, great book (Available in the trilogy, Peace and War) and is the main reason I'm going to buy this now. Joe Haldeman ftw.
neuroniky
13/11/07 @ 09:26
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@everybody: it doesn't require Vista per se, but IIRC it requires Vista to be played with all the effects turned on, and since this is a game that has to be played at high to highest graphical detail, I think Vista is pretty much a prerequisite to enjoy the full experience. Unless I'm missing something.
UncleLou
13/11/07 @ 09:27
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I found the demo miles ahead of Half-Life 2 in the gameplay department (which I loved because of the art direction, mainly) - AI, level design and integration of physics (even the grenades feel, um, physical) make it a lot more fun to play for me than HL2 ever was - I am really not sure how you can say it's superficial, it probably has as much depth as an action-FPS can ever have.

Try what I posted above and play the demo on Delta.
mcmonkeyplc
13/11/07 @ 09:28
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
My Children need WINE!

I had a quick go on the demo and worked fine on medium. I'll have a play around....update my drivers to see if it can run any better.

I have a DX10 card so it damn well better run!

FlamingCarrot
13/11/07 @ 09:35
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I am fully kitted up for this so cover me in chocolate and feed me to the lesbians! Its a cracking month for games.
Xerx3s
13/11/07 @ 09:37
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Did anyone mention Halo 1, 2 or 3 already?
Pac
13/11/07 @ 09:39
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"In fact, if I had to give a word to the overall single-player campaign, I would be patchy."

"it would be patchy" surely.

Unless you are patchy.
Downside
13/11/07 @ 09:42
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
so let me get this right... spank £1000 on a new mobo, obese RAM , a quad-core processor and a £300 graphics card, then i can play a £30 game with a lovely jungle level. That's a £1030 investment for an hour of fun.

Not an investment I'm going to make any day soon.

Crytek are in a strange business, can sales of this game really make them any money? (Bearing in mind most of the PC "gamers" are going to download it from Piratebay and not pay them anything).

/goes back to playing COD4 on the 360

drumbaby
13/11/07 @ 09:44
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
After spending all that money on the bits needed to play it it was going to get a 9, generic Euro fps or no.
Mentalist(air)
13/11/07 @ 09:46
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So we have

- Bioshock
- Halo
- Hl2:E2
- Portal
- TF2
- COD4
- Gears of War (if you, like me, didn't play through it last year)
- and now Crysis

all at 9 or 10 out of 10. Bloody hell, that's a lot of FPS games to get through!

Surely this is turning into the finest year for games there ever was! All Western, too...
Mentalist(air)
13/11/07 @ 09:49
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Crytek are in a strange business, can sales of this game really make them any money?

One word: bundling.

Surely the only commercial thing that would justify such an undertaking is kickbacks from graphics card manufacturers.
Hypercube
13/11/07 @ 09:50
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Maybe someone could explain this to me - do you have to have Vista to run DX10? Or can it be run on XP? I've got a card that will hopefully handle it...
afghan_jones
13/11/07 @ 09:50
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Weird really, cause the graphics are obviously a selling point (if not THE selling point) but on PC, the graphics always depend to an extent on the user's rig, meaning that for 90% of gamers you might as well knock it down to a 7 or 8 as they wont get to see the full graphical whizzbangs that give the game its edge.
Dr_Dave
13/11/07 @ 09:54
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"It's going to run on any machine that will run Half-Life 2, although without a tricked-out Direct X10-supporting behemoth you're going to miss out on some of the atmospherics."

I find this hard to believe. My old laptop, with an ATI Radeon 9000 Mobility graphics card and half a Gb of memory played Half Life 2 perfectly acceptably, yet died on its arse when it came to Far Cry.

Are you suggesting that Crysis scales back better than Far Cry did?

Dave
LFace
13/11/07 @ 09:54
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
DX10 at the moment is Vista only.

There are hacks in the pipeline to get it in xp but to my knowledge there is nothing substantial yet. Theres hacks for some games to enable stupidly high detail in xp that are usually reserved for DX10 in vista, but up to now thats all you have.
Darren
13/11/07 @ 09:56
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Hypercube - If you want to see the DX10 effects in Crysis then you'll need a DX10 graphics card and you'll need Vista. You can use a DX10-capable graphics card from XP but the game will only support DX9. Microsoft have chosen not to release DX10 for XP, presumably to "encourage" PC owners to upgrade.
Trane
13/11/07 @ 09:56
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"I found the demo miles ahead of Half-Life 2 in the gameplay department (which I loved because of the art direction, mainly) - AI, level design and integration of physics (even the grenades feel, um, physical) make it a lot more fun to play for me than HL2 ever was - I am really not sure how you can say it's superficial, it probably has as much depth as an action-FPS can ever have."

I don't mean superficial on every level, I just generally don't find it that involving - guess it's personal preference then. (1) Koreans shouting guyaka, and telling me when they reload just makes me chuckle, which I'm guessing isn't the intention.

(1) - possibly a slight bent on the actual speech.
mkreku
13/11/07 @ 10:00
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
What's wrong with me? I thought the demo was rather lackluster and linear (imagine that!) and not at all as good as the Far Cry demo they once released. And I still pre-ordered this game after reading this review. What the hell good does a demo do when I still can't stop my brain from ordering games?!
Cylinder
13/11/07 @ 10:01
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Trane

I wouldn't call it superficial. I've been playing on low to medium settings, 1280x1024, on my two year old PC (it still looks amazing though!) and it's the gameplay that draws me back to it, not the graphics.

I think the multitude of options you have at your disposable in every situation gives it a huge amount of depth. The fact that I havn't tired of the demo level after playing it for two weeks almost constantly is testament to that!

EDIT: Also, the explosions - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTSzr8lTf9s

I would actually describe Half-Life 2 as more superficial (even though it's my favourite FPS), because of its strictly linear design.

@Downside

Unless you really do favour graphics over gameplay, spending that much is quite pointless. Just checked the price of my PC online (although I only have Athlon64 3500+ and 7800GT):

£363, for AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+, Asus A8N32 SLi Deluxe Motherboard, 256MB XFX 7900GT, 120GB Hard Drive, 2GB RAM, 500W PSU from Scan.co.uk.

That's £363 without even checking around for the best deals on eBay and other stores.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 13/11/07 @ 10:05
Xerx3s
13/11/07 @ 10:08
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Crytek are in a strange business, can sales of this game really make them any money? (Bearing in mind most of the PC "gamers" are going to download it from Piratebay and not pay them anything).

You are looking at the small picture. Look beyond crysis. This engine will beat most others in the years to come. EA Needs a new engine that doesn't look like the cheapo stuff that they have now. They already have a licence for the UE3 for this but there is not a doubt in my mind that we will see several games in the coming years from EA with this engine. By that time, everyone will be able to run this engine.
Nomgle
13/11/07 @ 10:08
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Downside 13-Nov-07 09:42:26
so let me get this right... spank £1000 on a new mobo, obese RAM , a quad-core processor and a £300 graphics card, then i can play a £30 game with a lovely jungle level. That's a £1030 investment for an hour of fun.


Eh ?

Why would anyone buy a seperate games PC to play Crysis ? The only investment you need to make, is on a £129 graphics card for your existing PC - a 512MB 8800GT is a fine choice at that price point.

Your calculations are out by almost a factor of 10.

Downside 13-Nov-07 09:42:26
Not an investment I'm going to make any day soon.


That's because you pulled the figures out of your ass.

Downside 13-Nov-07 09:42:26
Crytek are in a strange business, can sales of this game really make them any money? (Bearing in mind most of the PC "gamers" are going to download it from Piratebay and not pay them anything).


Again, your viewpoint is skewed because you pulled the figures out of your ass.

There's plenty of money to be made from PC gaming, now that the hardware is so cheap. Hell, at £129 it's cheaper than any of the three main consoles !

Downside 13-Nov-07 09:42:26
/goes back to playing COD4 on the 360


How on earth did you afford to buy a 360, when you can't afford a video card for your PC ?

DISCLAIMER : You obviously need some sort of semi-modern machine to actually plug the graphics card into. And you should have already taken advantage of the fact that 1GB RAM sticks can be had for £15 these days. If your PC is from the stoneage, then you are a sadist. That will be all.
Edited 2 times, most recently on 13/11/07 @ 10:15
Xerx3s
13/11/07 @ 10:09
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So we have
[...]
- Gears of War (if you, like me, didn't play through it last year)
[...]
all at 9 or 10 out of 10. Bloody hell, that's a lot of FPS games to get through!


GoW isn't an FPS.

Comments: 1-50 of 158 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Metaboli

X View gallery