Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Sponsored by Alienware tracer
Advertisement

Cryostasis Review

PC Review by Jim Rossignol

24 February, 2009

Page 1 of 2. Page 2 ->

This strange Siberian action effort had the potential to be one of the most interesting first-person games of 2009. It's potential that it doesn't quite fulfil, but it is packed with ideas, and its wall of weirdness and mystery mean it's a breed apart from the corridors shooters we've all grown up with. Perhaps what's most immediately obvious about the game - which is set aboard a derelict ice-breaker ship in the far reaches of the Arctic - is that it puts its strange concept puzzles, such as they are, before combat. A moment where you use brains over brawn comes late to most shooters, but here it's one of the primary conceits. The fights that punctuate the rest feel like an afterthought, as if this was primarily an adventure game, and only secondarily a game about killing ice-zombies.

The subzero setting is certainly evocative. You're aboard the aforementioned vessel, The North Wind, presumably charged with the task of finding out what is going on. That's not explained. Instead you face a cryptic story about a mythical tribe, and are then dumped straight into the innards of a terrifying ship. As you head into the frozen spook-boat you discover two things: firstly, it's incredibly cold, and consequently you're on the verge of death. Secondly, you can travel into the past via corpses of people on the ship. The time-jumping sequences come thick and fast. Sometimes these are just flashback scenes from what happened on the ship, with you as disembodied observer. Other times, when you "enter" the past of a dead man, you are right there in the body of someone who died aboard the ice-breaker. You dive into their memories, become them, and change what happened to them. More on that in a bit. First let's talk cold.

Cryostasis does cold better than any game I can think of. Even Lost Planet seems like a fun snowy frolic by comparison. In the belly of the ship, and briefly out on the ice, you are at the mercy of horrendously low temperatures. Visually this is all splendidly realised: every surface is covered in a frosty, frondy sheen, and when things heat up the moisture trickles away in a slightly-too-fast defrost sequence. It's genuinely impressive stuff, and it leaves the game dripping with atmosphere. Plunging into parts of the ship where it's too cold even to breath is pretty intimidating, especially when you know you could be attacked at any time by the ship's terrifying inhabitants.

'Cryostasis' Screenshot 1

Frost and freezing effects are atmospheric. (Geddit! Aha.)

Fortunately, it's so cold that even the smallest heat source can offer you some solace. Your health and your temperature are one and the same, so if you're hurt then crouching over a fire or a hot piece of machinery will quickly restore you. It's an interesting idea, although it does seem a little foolish at times, particularly when you're warming your hands in the sullen glow of an electric desk lamp.

While the blood-stopping temperatures are a constant danger, they're never quite as worrying as the things which you encounter at regular intervals: creatures which were probably once the crew of the ship. They are basically zombies, but icy. They provide excellent scare fodder, leaping at you with a scream and a white-eyed face and teeth. They seem to have no trouble at all with the deep-freeze conditions, and even dive into the chilly waters that have part-flooded the ship. What are these things doing here? It's all part of the mystery, although it's clear that they were here when the vessel ran into trouble, because you encounter them in your weird embodied flashback sequences. Occasionally the flashback will collapse straight into the present, and someone you saw in the past will be just feet away, zombified and looking to kill you.

To Page 2 ->

Advertisement

Are you excited about Cryostasis on PC?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 73 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Gazza_UK
24/02/09 @ 11:38
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oooh never been first before ..... yay?
DFawkes
24/02/09 @ 11:38
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I saw a review for this. Apparently, there a bit where you can mental echo a piece of hanging meat, and as the Cow release yourself and escape to freedom! Then the meat is no longer there in the present. A silly little thing, but the kind of thing I love in games.
rhubarbandcustard
24/02/09 @ 11:41
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Cryostasis is a brave, fascinating, often very beautiful game, but I find it impossible to recommend it - and not least because it runs like an exploded dog on most PCs."

Insane system requirements is why my PC is mostly used to heat the room. For my gaming pleasure I stick with 360 and PS3 both of which could run this game without breaking a sweat.

So will it come to consoles? No. It's a Russian developer.
disc
24/02/09 @ 11:44
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Bloody shame about the system requirements, I heard this required some of the newest cards to run properly.
layleeloo
24/02/09 @ 11:47
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Just invest in a nice 4870 X2 and 8 GB of ram and you should be fine. I may give it a go. Give the old beast a work out since finishing Crysis. At least if its not fun for the player, it will give the machine tech something to enjoy! :-)
Triggerhappytel
24/02/09 @ 11:50
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Shame, sounds like an interesting concept that's not quite there. At least it's trying to be a bit different from most FPSs.
Der_tolle_Emil
24/02/09 @ 11:54
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It does sound very interesting. Maybe I can find a demo somewhere.
schachmatt
24/02/09 @ 11:54
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
rhubarbandcustard: How should a console even be able to run this without making the characters stick figures?
the_dudefather
24/02/09 @ 11:55
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Looking forward to the user review by Mr Freeze:

'This game kicks ICE, the graphics are pretty COOL, but the ending left me COLD

bit buggy though, it kept FREEZING'
Baranga
24/02/09 @ 11:56
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This game has cult status written all over it.
I finished it a few weeks ago, and found it to be an amazing experience. The story was great too.

By the way, that "cryptic story" is written by Maxim Gorky.
Tomo
24/02/09 @ 11:57
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This looks right up my street but sadly I have a shit PC nowadays :/
rhubarbandcustard
24/02/09 @ 12:09
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
LayLeeLoo: "Just invest in a nice 4870 X2 and 8 GB of ram and you should be fine."

Bargain.

http://www.ebuyer.com/product/148852
Gurrah
24/02/09 @ 12:09
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's under 20£ on amazon, I'm buying it.
rhubarbandcustard
24/02/09 @ 12:13
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
SchmachMatt: Please see Gears Of War 2 (360) or Killzone 2 (PS3).

A PC would struggle to run either of those without dropping frames. Windows comes with too many overheads on the system resources. Sure, you could re-install the OS and de-frag the hard drive AGAIN, but it really is simpler and cheaper to game on the consoles.
BobsUncle
24/02/09 @ 12:15
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Game, 20 quid. For the rest of the system to run it, there's Mastercard.
penhalion
24/02/09 @ 12:20
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
There is a techdemo that shows some water effects and does a framerate analysis for you. My quad core 260 gtx managed 50, 16, 75 i.e mostly 50 frames lows dropped to 16 and highs were 75.

This was running at 1920 * 1080 so I have no idea what a dog of a system would need to be not to run this game just fine.
Chufty
24/02/09 @ 12:22
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
A PC would not struggle to run those console greyfests. You're talking rubbish. And you really don't have to buy a £350 graphics card either, don't listen to the 'enthusiasts'.
Whizzo
24/02/09 @ 12:23
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
SchmachMatt: Please see Gears Of War 2 (360) or Killzone 2 (PS3).

A PC would struggle to run either of those without dropping frames.


Thank you for providing such insight, it's just as well I'd not taken a swig of my drink before reading it as my keyboard may well have been ruined.
robg
24/02/09 @ 12:24
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This just confirms my theory that games starting or ending with "Cry" take a lot of computing power.
rhubarbandcustard
24/02/09 @ 12:29
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Pc's couldn't even run GTA4 without major frame rate issues.

http://www.giantbomb.com/news/gta-iv-pc-...

They wouldn't have a hope in hell of running Killzone 2.
thesombrerokid
24/02/09 @ 12:30
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@rhubarbandcustard

for the price of a ps3 i could build you a pc that'll last till the ps4's out easy, i built a pc for £500 a year and a half ago and no game of this console generation will struggle on it, since it easily out performs the consoles the games need to be ported to.
Whizzo
24/02/09 @ 12:31
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Pc's couldn't even run GTA4 without major frame rate issues.
Bad port runs badly, what a shocker!

And yet Burnout Paradise runs stupidly well on not great PC kit due to Criterion doing a good job.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 24/02/09 @ 12:32
thesombrerokid
24/02/09 @ 12:31
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@rhubarbandcustard

again the aforementioned pc would run GTA 4 like you wouldn't believe (HD Gaming anyone? not if you don't have a pc)
Edited 1 times, most recently on 24/02/09 @ 12:36
rhubarbandcustard
24/02/09 @ 12:38
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The Sombrerokid:

It's not that I am not a PC gamer. I am and have been for going on 20 years. But, I genuinely believe that the 360 and PS3 have changed gaming in that the PC is effectively been made obsolete as a gaming platform if visual performance is your barometer by what you gauge as must have titles.

Sure, some people will stick with PC for keyboard and mouse control, but for visuals its HD consoles all the way.
makariel
24/02/09 @ 12:39
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@rhubarbandcustard:

There are some advantages consoles have over pc's when it comes to gaming, but hardware power isn't one of them. If you believe that I guess you're somewhat blinded by m$ and sony-propaganda. Yes, the 360 and ps3 where a bargain when they came out. No, time didn't stop ever since: PC hardware got faster, better and cheaper. And as long as you're not running vista you get great framerates at ridiculous resolutions.
degville
24/02/09 @ 12:41
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@thesombrerokid

Ok so your offer was to rubarbandcustard but I would dearly like you to build me a pc that will last until the PS4 comes out ( and by "last" it has to run all pc games to a reasonable standard that come out) for the price of a PS3.
So you have £250 to play with - can't wait to see it....
oh actually I won't because you are talking arse...
thesombrerokid
24/02/09 @ 12:44
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
ehh there aren't any HD consoles yet, they run shitovision barely getting erect enough to manage 720p on a handful of brutally optimised games and hugely compromising in texture quality and effect volume when compared to the PC build
Darren
24/02/09 @ 12:44
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Well I was totally engrossed in the review for the first part because the game sounded so wonderful and unique and different and then I got to page 2 and then saw the score at the bottom.

What a shame... the concept sounds terrific but the structure and combat don't sound too great. That said, isn't the sluggishness because you're on the verge of death anyway? I mean it would be pretty silly if you could just dash around normally in combat, right?

I've got the tech demo and it looks and runs superbly on my PC too with PhysX enabled (45 fps avg. @ 1680x1050 with everything maxed out) so I was really looking forward to this. I think I'll wait for it to drop below £20, at that price it could be worth checking out.
rhubarbandcustard
24/02/09 @ 12:47
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sombrerokid:

Wow, just wow.

I think I see now. For you its just classic PC snobbery. Honestly get over yourself. That kinda died out around 2005.
creepylizard
24/02/09 @ 12:52
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
then why oh, why did it get an above average score then? isn't that, by definition a recommendation?
IneptPercy
24/02/09 @ 12:52
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So this is better than Fear 2 and I really liked Fear 2 so should like this...

For the challenge of making a gaming PC that is better than the PS3 for games for £250 is possible... Just but that would involve some second hard parts and overclocking but it could be done.

Out of interest do people not consider the value added of a PC, as in it does so much more, most of you are sat at one now reading this (yes a say most before I get the smart remarks)

Most people are happy to spend £150-£200 on a PC for general use if not more so if you start with that as a baseline then add the price of the PS3 to add gaming ability to said PC, now that gives a £400 budget.

I am not going to say its for everybody and there is advantages to consoles as always in the ease of use/plug&play stakes, buy owning a reasonable gaming PC and then seeing the difference in corss platform games makes it all worth while (to me anyway)

Darren
24/02/09 @ 12:54
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@creepylizard - Very good point. It does seem rather bizarre to claim you cannot recommend the game you've reviewed but give it an above average score anyway. :?
Cappy
24/02/09 @ 12:57
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This game sounds wonderful, I would buy it if a PS3 port was ever released.
Baranga
24/02/09 @ 12:57
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Darren:

The melee combat is like in Condemned or Escape From Butcher's Bay, but with a much better fist-fight system. The shooting feels like in BioShock (a bit clunky...). The game is very slow paced, so the slow combat doesn't harm it in any way.

What level variety can you expect when the game is set in the exact replica of a Soviet icebreaker?
degville
24/02/09 @ 12:59
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
no the budget stays at £250.

I have a old pc that does the basics so no need to add in another £150

I accept fully that in the intervening years between console releases the PC catches up and overtakes the console ( at what point depends on how much you want to spend) but I know that a PS3 will still run games released for it right up until the end and the same cannot be said for this £250 quid pc I'm going to get built for me.
ps3owner
24/02/09 @ 12:59
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This game makes you and your PC "Cry"... get it? hehe, CRYostasis... oh man, I am having lunch.
Darren
24/02/09 @ 13:13
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This game is just £18 at Play.com, I've just ordered it now. Seems worth it at that price. :)
Darren
24/02/09 @ 13:18
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If anyone is thinking of buying a new graphics card for this game then go for an NVIDIA one as the PhysX effects in the tech demo are very impressive and they won't run on ATI/AMD cards as they don't support it. If you have a PhysX card then you'll be OK though.
Rodchenko
24/02/09 @ 13:22
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Pc's couldn't even run GTA4 without major frame rate issues.
Bad port runs badly, what a shocker!


Uhm.. correct me if I am wrong but aren't all games developed on PCs to begin with?
Cappy
24/02/09 @ 13:25
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yes, but GTA IV probably has a lot of code tailored specifically for the 360. Hence the problems with the PS3 version also.
Darren
24/02/09 @ 13:27
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nah, GTA IV was developed first on the consoles (I think the 360 initially) where it is heavily dependent on their CPUs. The PC version isn't very well optimised but is also biased toward the CPU and, as such, only runs well on quad-core PCs with high-end graphics cards at high to max. settings.

It runs great on my PC for example, 55 fps @ 1680x1050 with everything but the View Distance (45) at max, but then I do have a Core i7/GTX 280/6 GB PC.
Javier·de·Ass
24/02/09 @ 14:01
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"If anyone is thinking of buying a new graphics card for this game then go for an NVIDIA one as the PhysX effects in the tech demo are very impressive and they won't run on ATI/AMD cards as they don't support it. If you have a PhysX card then you'll be OK though."

The techdemo is somewhat over the top though, the game doesn't slap those effects on anywhere near as thick and its performs is also a shitload better than that techdemo was. A decent core2 and a 8800gt runs this game fine.
XENgamer
24/02/09 @ 14:42
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
A shame I was quite looking forward to this ...probably get it when the price drops though.
Darren
24/02/09 @ 14:45
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
How cheap do you want it... it's only £18 at Play.com.
roz123
24/02/09 @ 14:50
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I run the techdemo on my PC and and it run fine. I think the problem with it not running on half the PCs is that it dosn't run half aswell on an ATI card as it relies on the Physx engine which creates the water effects. (the same reason it wouldnt run on any of the consoles)

Rhubarb you are a fool. The problem with GTA4 was that it was completly unoptimized and rushed out for christmas. But the game runs superbly on settings that make the console versions look rubbish if you have a little clout.

I bought a PC recently for £600 that put the consoles to shame. This is including a monitor capable of HD aswell as Windows Vista.
E8500 Dual Core
9800GT
4 gigs Ram.

Rhubarb you always go round moaning about PC snobbery but its not its just people responding to your silly out dated views. As you are the one who is constantly trying to bait these same arguments everytime a PC is mentioned.
Another thing is that you can save a hell of alot of money on games and HD films if you are that way inclined.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 24/02/09 @ 14:58
UncleLou
24/02/09 @ 14:56
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Console this, console that. Just be quiet, noone is interested.
roz123
24/02/09 @ 14:56
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ Rodchenko

They are developed on PCs but they are made for the specific architecture of that consoles CPU. Its the same reason console emulation dosnt really work
rhubarbandcustard
24/02/09 @ 15:26
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Jim Rossignol - Eurogamer reviewer
"but I find it impossible to recommend it - and not least because it runs like an exploded dog on most PCs."

RhubarbandCustard - Eurogamer Forum Superstar
"Insane system requirements is why my PC is mostly used to heat the room. For my gaming pleasure I stick with 360 and PS3 both of which could run this game without breaking a sweat. So will it come to consoles? No. It's a Russian developer."

Roz123 - Apparantly thick as shit
"Rhubarb you always go round moaning about PC snobbery but its not its just people responding to your silly out dated views.. "


Hey, if the reviewer points out that a game is unplayable due to system specs I am going to muse upon why I have chosen to move from PC gaming to console gaming.

If you have a problem with that I suggest you bend over and fuck yourself with a long thorny stick. Asshole.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 24/02/09 @ 15:31
rhubarbandcustard
24/02/09 @ 15:28
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Or add me to your ignore list. Whatever.
UncleLou
24/02/09 @ 15:44
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hey, if the reviewer points out that a game is unplayable due to system specs I am going to muse upon why I have chosen to move from PC gaming to console gaming.

Just makes you look a bit silly if you follow it up with nonsense like you then did.

Not to mention that musing about console gaming in a review thread about a Russian game that wouldn't be on consoles in the first place because of tighter than Fort Knox, expensive license agreements is particularly strange.

Consoles just aren't an option if you occasionally want to break from the "AAA"-standard fare. Heh, these idiotic generalisations work great, don't they.

Comments: 1-50 of 73 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery