Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 3 Next

Advertisement

CrimeCraft Review

MMO PC Review by Alexander Gambotto-Burke

12 November, 2009

Page 1 of 3. Page 2 ->

HalloweenJack frantically switches his useless shotgun for an Uzi, replacing the first gun - which, unhelpfully, looks almost exactly the same as the second one - in its invisible holster. He begins firing at the two clowns in front of him (part of the Rogue gang) and is genuinely impressed as they duck, roll, and return fire. He aims for the chest with the first one, and he dies instantly - HalloweenJack, that is. There isn't enough time left to respawn. The seven-minute timer has expired, and he's booted out of the instance. HalloweenJack comes to a horrible realisation: he was outsmarted and outgunned by two MMO mobs, historically at the lower end of the AI spectrum. Our hero considers logging off and hanging himself, but then he has an epiphany...

To a certain extent, every MMO requires a bit of make-believe. We need to dip into that remarkable, childlike ability to construct fantasies out of the everyday, lest we lose interest in the DPS and the PUG and the bippin' and the boppin'. It's how we see a freakishly broad-shouldered Paladin rescuing a struggling postcard-village from banditry - rather than, say, Nige from Brighton trading hit-points with yet another identical cluster of instantly-respawning NPCs while his wife shrieks at him to scrub the shower recess.

It's a testament to the talents of their respective developers that all the art, music, world design and narrative that gets slathered over World of Warcraft, EverQuest II, Warhammer Online and associates is able to distract us from the sheer meaninglessness of the these games' underlying mechanics. In this regard, Vogster's CrimeCraft is no different - of course, this time it's more "Yeah boy" than "Have at thee" - but in order to really appreciate it, you have to go one step further: you have to pretend it's an MMO.

'CrimeCraft' Screenshot 1

Combat is fast and merciless - leave your macros at the door.

It isn't, really. While CrimeCraft may well be marketed with a view to pulling the rug out from under APB's feet, it's actually a gigantic, brilliant con. In playing it - the MMO part, anyway, or so we're led to believe - I'm indirectly reminded of my early experiences with Ultima Online. Back then, this whole MMO thing was a pretty exciting business, and arguably promised a lot more than it eventually delivered. But when a visiting friend chanced upon the box and asked me to demonstrate, even my most masturbatory justifications yielded little more than a dismissive, "Oh, so it's basically a 3D chatroom." He was wrong, of course. For one, Ultima Online was 2D - ha! - but also, I'd actually seen 3D chatrooms, and they weren't this cool.

Remember VRML? I do: I recall a bunch of soulless companies integrating pathetic, ugly 3D hubs into their websites, and then swiftly abandoning them when people discovered how heinous they were. I even tried to make one myself: I spent a few bored hours erecting a blocky haunted house with a guy who had a half-lizard face, and then I stopped and went back to fantasizing about Gillian Anderson.

Advertisement

Are you excited about CrimeCraft on PC/Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-20 of 20 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
cragtek
12/11/09 @ 13:45
#1
+8
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Just the name alone had it down as a 4/10 in my mind.
Benno
12/11/09 @ 14:08
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Looks shit.
optimusprym8
12/11/09 @ 14:11
#3
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Think I'll wait for APB
makariel
12/11/09 @ 14:15
#4
+5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
4/10 sounds overrated to me.
thedaveeyres
12/11/09 @ 14:21
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Huzzah for double-barrelled surnames.

Yours sincerely,

Rodger Double-Barrell.
Korpers
12/11/09 @ 14:32
#6
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Never even heard of this. I can see why now.

Maybe they'll get sales from people who dont read reviews.
DanForinton
12/11/09 @ 14:51
#7
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Lingerie.

If anyone was wondering.

Not that I'm admitting to anything...
brider
12/11/09 @ 15:37
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
APB wipes the floor with this dogshit

its in closed beta and buggy and the game still plays 1000000 better than crimecraft
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/11/09 @ 15:40
Camorrista
12/11/09 @ 16:38
#9
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Artwork is gorgeous though.
Fl0yd
12/11/09 @ 16:47
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Comic Sans spotted
iokthemonkey
12/11/09 @ 17:59
#11
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Okay, I've never played CrimeCraft, nor do I have any interest in doing so, as it's not my thing.

However, this review is pretty poorly written. Yes, Mr. Gambotto-Burke, you're writing a review and trying to be witty. We get it. But please, instead of spending half the review wondering about Marge Simpson's level of nudity in an upcoming issue of Playboy, please just stick to telling us WHY it's only a 4/10.

So far all I see is that you find the AI too smart, you have difficulty playing it due to not being skilled enough and there are some strange lapses in its geographical logic. The latter, yes, that does sound like poor execution. The first two though simply sound like poor gaming skills on your part.

And regarding the subscription model - which I assume you dislike and thus penalise the game for including - can we expect WoW's scores to be lowered to reflect the fact that they too are now adding 'premium' (i.e. pay for 'em) items on top of their existing subscription model?

As I say, I've not played the game and it could be shite. However, I'm left wondering why the reviewer scored it so low because reading the review certainly doesn't tell us.

Entertain AND inform, Mr. Gambotto-Burke.
uglygamer
12/11/09 @ 18:47
#12
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
To be fair to the reviewer its 3 pages long. You dont need to write 3 pages telling people how bad a game is, usually 1 will be enough to let people know why this is not worth purchasing.
cairbre1977
12/11/09 @ 20:46
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think the screen shoots looked good. That said I don't like paying any subscription for a game after I pay €20-€30 for it. Paying a subscrpition makes me feel obliged to play it like gym membership or something so I think I will wait for APB which is none subscription I think but the game sounds like it could be
iokthemonkey
12/11/09 @ 20:47
#14
-2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
To be fair to the reviewer its 3 pages long. You dont need to write 3 pages telling people how bad a game is, usually 1 will be enough to let people know why this is not worth purchasing.

----

For one, if there's not three pages of on-point comment to make, don't try to spin it out to three pages.

And if he did spend a page explaining what's so bad, I'd be happy.

As I say, it may well be a 4/10 game. However, I'd like to know WHY. I think Halo is shit. However, were I to be paid to review it, I'd explain why and not just provide three pages of 'amusing' comments and then mumble something about it being not very good because mnum mnum mnum... bloo.
munki83
12/11/09 @ 21:00
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I think I remember reading a small article on this game a long time ago in PC Gamer. It kinda droped off the radar and I can see why. It kinda sucks as the world needs a lot more variety in MMOs
Spuzzell
13/11/09 @ 01:59
#16
-4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ iokthe monkey

I really enjoyed this review, it's a perfect example of why Eurogamer is my favourite site to read about games. It told me exactly why the game wasn't great and did it in a way that was witty and creative, two things that I'm going to have to assume you aren't.


Which is fine, I get that dull unintelligent people like yourself have a right to leave C&VG occasionally and come here to read EG, but if you could please refrain from trying to drag this website down to your mediocre level I'd appreciate it.

Some of us like a review to paint a picture of how a game plays, not just run through a checklist of pluses and minuses. If that makes it too hard for you to understand the points the author is putting across, then just leave.
iokthemonkey
13/11/09 @ 09:52
#17
+5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Really Spuzzell? You found the review informative?

It struck me as being a pretty weak attempt at self-promotion from Mr. Gambotto-Burke by showing us all how 'amusing' he is, at the expense of actually providing any critical analysis of the game. You might find it acceptable for your reviews to say 'it's crap' or 'it's dead good' but I personally prefer to read well-constructed, reasoned arguments and explanations as to why the game is receiving the score it's awarded and then make-up my own mind as to whether I'd find the same flaws or plus-points were I to play it.
DrowJones
13/11/09 @ 14:09
#18
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So is this diku-mmo or fps? Does it play like Tabula Rasa or more like Planetside or do you smash quickbar numbers like an autistic kid with adhd playing wow?

What a crappy review. I guess the game is pretty crap as well, but I have no idea what kind of game it is, even, based on this so-called review.
Fizzog
14/11/09 @ 04:45
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Love the review tagline!
JoeBlade
22/11/09 @ 11:42
#20
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I thought the random musings weren't merely included for comedy relief but were the reviewer's means of conveying how the game utterly failed to grab him; keep his attention even. Which by itself almost explains the 4/10 (distracting the player in a positive fashion is the whole point of a game, isn't it?)
I found it to be appropriate and pretty clever actually, but perhaps I'm just reading too much in that aspect :)

Comments: 1-20 of 20 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Get Games.  Download Great PC Games!

X View gallery