Crackdown 2

Killing in the name.

By now you've had time to read part one of our interview with Crackdown 2 producer James Cope and development director Gareth Noyce. Although, you know, fair enough if you haven't. It's only our livelihood.

Moving on, today's second instalment covers the progression from Crackdown 1 to 2. There was supposed to be some sort of theme to this, as part of a carefully coordinated PR campaign, so we didn't really pay attention to that and just asked some questions about things in game two, some of which were in game one. It's probably cool.

Read on to find out how the Freaks work, what the mission structure's like and what Crackdown 2 has in common with Harry Potter.

Eurogamer: Okay, I'm now officially asking you about whatever the second tranche of questions are supposed to be about. Will you need to take the Freaks and the Cell down in the same way as in the first game, bottom to top?

James Cope: There's a very similar approach in some respects. The mission hierarchy in the first game was just a bit repetitive - find the boss, kill the boss - and I think people rightly criticised it for being a little bit formulaic and boring, so one of the things we're trying to do now is the same freeform mission structure exists but within that mission structure there's a hierarchy of activities that create a system.

So effectively what's going on is that certain parts of the world are controlled by the Cell, the Freaks are running riot across the city at night, and the Agency is effectively working through Cell strongholds in something we call free tactical location, so it's a lot like destroy-capture-defend mechanics. That interplay of those three things is quite important to the way the mission structure works.

It's nice, but it's also very difficult to do because we've also got this design direction of needing to keep the game completely open so players can do things in any order. That's a very hard to try and structure. But there's a nice mechanic there that we're pretty pleased with, as ultimately the objective of Crackdown 2 is to retake the city and a big part of that is destroying the Freak population and the mechanic for doing that is quite exciting, and that brings in some of the new things like underground territories and things like that.

It's difficult [to describe] because there's a very big thing we've yet to talk about in the game and it's intimately linked to the mission structure [laughs]. It does involve the Freaks and the underground territories, and the ultimate objective in the game is pretty fundamental to that.

'Crackdown 2' Screenshot 1

No Volk and all play.

Gareth Noyce: I think there's one difference [between Crackdown 1 and 2], I mean Crackdown gameplay was the primary gameplay of the bosses and everything else was secondary. I think Crackdown 2 we've got primary, secondary, tertiary and then Achievements and bits and bobs, so I think there's a few more layers this time.

Like Crackdown, you don't need to do everything, you can just tackle what you want, but there's more layers to it this time, which is one of the improvements we were trying to chase really.

Eurogamer: I was quite excited when Eurogamer contributor Christian Donlan visited you and told me he thought there were new orb types. Can you expand on that a little, or is it too early? Or was he wrong?

James Cope: Ha ha, no, he's totally right, there are new orb types. I can't really say what they are at the moment.

Eurogamer: Can you say what colour they are?

James Cope: Er, green ones. Purple ones. I tell you what... if people imagine in their minds the Golden Snitch from Harry Potter they probably won't be too far from the truth.

Eurogamer: Awesome. Harry Potter Crackdown crossover exclusive! So, one of the things that was at the heart of Crackdown for me was the guy in the Agency tower. We thought maybe he'd been replaced. Is it the same guy?

Gareth Noyce: It is totally the same guy. I know that came up on the other thing you printed, but it's definitely him.

Eurogamer: I'll sack Donlan.

Gareth Noyce: I'll tell you what it is, I think they'd just not mixed his voice in the build that we'd shown before, so he sounded a little bit thinner, but it is the same guy.

Eurogamer: I'll reinstate Donlan. And does he have any awesome new catchphrases you can share with us? The Agency tower man, that is.

Gareth Noyce: He's got some awesome ones in PvP. He's got one in PvP which is... "You put the 'gent' in 'Agent'."

Eurogamer: He's still got it. Obviously, big spoiler for people who haven't played the first game, but he totally betrayed you at the end of it. What's his excuse now? What's he up to?

James Cope: That's a difficult question because that would probably give away a fundamental part of the game we want players to discover, but the Agency is still on a mission to restore peace and order and all that kind of thing.

To be perfectly honest, that plot point at the end of the first game is not something we wanted to develop on, because it was going towards the game in a different direction. We weren't really ready to deal with that - it was a bit of a sod that we kind of had that line to deal with, and we are dealing with it, I just can't say how at the minute.

Gareth Noyce: But you know, 10 years have passed and there's a pretty good story for what's happened in that time, so it does all sort of tie up.

James Cope: And I think Billy [Thomson, designer] has already spilled that we want to do Crackdown 3, so you've got to string the pieces together and figure out what's going on there, which will be nice.

Eurogamer: Fair enough. So no jokey ending betrayal to this one then.

'Crackdown 2' Screenshot 2

Freak in the morning and freak in the eeeeevening. Well, just in the evening.

Gareth Noyce: Well, there was always a line for Crackdown even from the first game. That plot line you're talking about was meant to take the game in a certain direction, and we're still heading through the arc that was originally kind of conceived, we're just doing it slightly differently.

Eurogamer: Since this section of the phone call is supposed to be about progression, could you maybe give an example of an ability from the first game and how you've evolved it for the second game, and how people will see it come through?

James Cope: Probably an easy one to talk about is just general hand-to-hand combat, because that's something that we felt in the first game was pretty limited. Throughout your whole character progression you only have the same hand-to-hand move, and that was really weak, and what we're trying to do now is make sure abilities and upgrades are skill-based, so you unlock stuff as you're going through your progression, and hand-to-hand's a very obvious one there: you get more moves as you go through the levels.

That's the kind of approach we wanted to take because it fixed a lot of problems and also because it's more rewarding for the player to get stuff unlocked. Another good example is driving skill - it was really frustrating in Crackdown 1 to level up your driving, because you try and run people over and they all dived out of the way, they were just too clever. The Freaks [in Crackdown 2] work well for levelling up your driving skill, because they're just cannon fodder.

Gareth Noyce: Yeah, that one's a good one. At the end of the first game you've got all the vehicles in one hit right at the end, so we're going to spread all the good vehicles out [in Crackdown 2]. We've kind of taken that approach with everything - make sure there's something for the player as they go up every skill level, so there's loads of bits and bobs you get access to as you go up through the skill level, and everyone I know seems to have levelled up everything but driving in the first game...

Eurogamer: I think I read on the infamous Wikipedia that you get a helicopter if you get your driving skill to a certain level...

Gareth Noyce: That's not actually tied to driving skill.

James Cope: Yeah, it's agility. The helicopter really is the ultimate agility tool, and that to be honest is because we don't want to break the game too early for people. We really want to be controlled about it. The helicopter, you know, takes you anywhere, and it's great fun. Especially jumping out and skydiving.

That's a careful thing we have to do. We do want to give people loads of fun toys, but we also want to make sure they have fun in the game without it being too fun too early.

Eurogamer: Absolutely. You've got to regulate it a little bit. It does genuinely say "driving skill opens up a special helicopter" on Wikipedia, so I think I might go in there and edit that. Wikipedia in "unreliable" shocker. Anyway, one of the things that's a bugbear of mine in openworld games is when you've collected about 400 of something of which there are about 402, you can't find the last two. Do you have a solution to that for Crackdown 2?

Gareth Noyce: Yeah, we are doing something to help the player with that. I'm not sure how much detail I can go into, but definitely. We're not giving them away, but the more you get the easier it will be to find some, and the other thing I'd say about the orbs is when you've got the helicopter it's going to be really easy to get anywhere you want, so I genuinely don't think people will have that problem.

James Cope: I think one of the biggest problems we had on the first game is you had to find another orb in order to know how many you had left. That was a bit of an oversight, which made a difficult challenge even more difficult. We won't be doing that again [laugh].

Eurogamer: One last question, then. What are a couple of cool things you've done in the game lately that don't really have anything to do with anything but are just kind of cool emergent things you've been doing?

James Cope: That's a good question, there's a lot there. One of the funniest things I've seen is playing on the fact we've got this seamless join-in-progress thing. At the moment when we're working on the dev builds anyone can join in anyone else's game, and you don't actually know when a player's joining a game, so it's quite funny watching Billy doing some work - placements for multiplayer or something - and Gareth just silently joined his game, walked over to Billy and twatted him one round the face.

'Crackdown 2' Screenshot 5

Yeah I'm using this screenshot in part two as well. What of it?

Eurogamer: Well, if there are loads of bugs in the game I'll just assume you couldn't help yourselves going into each other's games and ruining the whole QA process.

Gareth Noyce: I think it's just me. I've just got a bad habit of joining games and running people over.

James Cope: He speaks truth. I tried to play [Zelda] Four Swords with him once.

Eurogamer: That is not a game that enjoys co-op with people who grief. I had to review it and people just kept fouling it up for me for a laugh. My friends.

Gareth Noyce: That's what co-op's for though isn't it? I thought it was an extension of PvP.

Eurogamer: I think the clue is in the name.

James Cope: What else have we got, Gareth? What's good at the moment?

Gareth Noyce: I'm trying to think of things we can reveal. To be honest with you, I've just spent a lot of time racing. It sounds really dull, but just messing around with the new cars has been great. Also the chopper.

James Cope: Yeah, chopper with weapon attachments is good fun.

Gareth Noyce: I wasn't going to say that.

James Cope: I didn't say which weapons.

Gareth Noyce: Put it this way, you've just got to sing the Air Wolf theme in your head.

Crackdown 2 is due out for Xbox 360 in 2010.

Comments (18) Latest comment 2 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • cianchristopher #1 2 years ago

    Ruffian v Realtime Worlds....

    It's on like Donkey Kong!
  • GamerG #2 2 years ago

    i'm calling it....

    GOTY 2010!
  • RobotRocker #3 2 years ago

    Put it this way, you've just got to sing the Air Wolf theme in your head

    I'm doing this already

    /Dah danna na dah danna na dah dah dah dah dah etc.
  • darleysam #4 2 years ago

    ^ me too. That'll be in my head the day I get this game, too.
  • doragor #5 2 years ago

    dude spoiler alert please! I haven't finished this. major spoiler :(

    Edited for spelling.
    Edited by 2 at 22/12/09 @ 16:48
  • freakzilla #6 2 years ago

    Another interview?
  • FogHeart #7 2 years ago

    Oh, CRAP! Do you know how long it took to get the Airwolf theme out of my head last time it found its way in there? I'm gonna wake up on Christmas morning and it'll still be in there!

    Another victim of the 'surprise ending that makes things difficult for the sequel' syndrome, eh? There's someone called Isaac Clarke that wants a word...
  • Retroid #8 2 years ago

    After the original proved to be a massive surprise to me (I honestly had it pegged as a rubbish game being bundled with the Halo 3 beta invite, but was infact great fun and amazing in co-op) I'm massively looking forward to this :)
  • TheRankinator #9 2 years ago

    I picked up the first game a few weeks ago and have to say it's great, it has it's problems (the jumping is fun when running forward, but it's plain shit for aiming anywhere or climbing) but I'm definitely in for number 2.
  • monkeywithnoeyes #10 2 years ago

    so whats the difference between this game..and dlc like the GTA4 episodes? why does one warrent a £50rrp and the other an £17rrp? (note i'm speaking of rrp's..i know you'll pay less for both)
  • Pastici #11 2 years ago

    Cor, I'd quite like this. Not that interested in Mass Effect 2 to get it right away, this seems right up my street before FFXIII.
  • MENTAL1ST Verified Senior Software Engineer, Picsel UK Ltd. #12 2 years ago

    Killing in the name.

    THOSE WHO DIED ARE JUSTIFIED
    THEY CARRY THE BADGE, THEY'RE THE CHOSEN WHITES, and, err, blacks, Vikings, goths ad Maoris...
  • Froggit #13 2 years ago

    @ freakzilla: "Another interview?"

    Nope :)
  • markymark22 #14 2 years ago

    There's some games i dont get. This is one of them. To be fair i turned it off about two hours in and traded it cause i thought it was utter cack, maybe it deserved more time? Is it the kinda game that grows on you or do you know from the off?
  • TheRankinator #15 2 years ago

    I think you can tell from the off whether it'll be the kind of game you're interested in, however it needs a bit of time/exploration invested to reap the rewards (aglityi/driving/firearm upgrades), that's when the fun starts!
  • busboy33 #16 2 years ago

    I think it depends on what you mean by "get it from the off".

    The actual gameplay mechanics don't change from the beginning to the end, so if running, jumping, driving, collecting orbs, and blowing the sh!t out of things doesn't ring your bell, it doesn't change.

    On the other hand, Once you get a level or two under your belt, those activities become more fun. Once your agility bounces up, and you can make some massive jumps, the act itself becomes more enjoyable (at least for me), so doing the same thing as before has a different flavor.

    I enjhoyed the game more as I progressed . . . but I can certainly understand people that don't connect with it. If you like the idea of the mechanics, but didn't like how they felt, then you might like it as it progresses. But if the structure of the game itself wasn't working for you, and you were hoping it might change thru the game, then it doesn't.
  • markymark22 #17 2 years ago

    Yeah thanks, just didn like how it felt to control. No point in giving it another go then! Some games i just find dont take off till a couple of hours in (assassins creed) so thought i was a bit hash on it!
  • udat #18 2 years ago

    I'm now singing the Airwolf tune in my head.

    I love Airwolf.

    Edited coz i can't type.
    Edited by 1 at 23/12/09 @ 15:41