Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood Review

Xbox 360 PC PlayStation 3 Review by Oli Welsh

30 June, 2009

Page 2 of 2. <- Page 1

A number of chapters also enjoy a neat quick-draw contest, when you face off against a famous antagonist. The camera drops to just behind your hip and you steer your gun-slinger in cautious steps to left or right, circling your opponent, and guide your hand towards your holster with the right stick. When a bell rings, slam the right stick in to draw your gun and squeeze the trigger to kill. Not a fun game in itself - you either die or win, instantly - but a tense and superbly evocative bit of interactive cinema. There's also a decent, natural attempt at an FPS cover system that doesn't use any button-presses, just proximity and a slight modification to the way your look works. This works much better vertically than horizontally, though.

The majority of the game is entirely linear, but Techland has dropped a couple of free-roaming interludes into the middle. In each of these, you can explore a fairly wide-open expanse of first Mexico and then Arizona, picking up side-missions for extra cash, and buying new weapons at a gun store. They're a pleasant change of pace but feel very underdeveloped; the wilderness is largely empty, missions are few, and those there are aren't significantly different from the mildly objective-driven slaughter of the main story.

You sense that these episodes are primarily there to give you a moment of quiet to drink in the scenery. And although the dustbowls of Mexico and Arizona aren't the most interesting locations in Call Bound in Blood - those honours going to the misty, rain-soaked backwoods of Georgia and Arkansas early in the game - they are, like every setting in the game, subtly handled, starkly beautiful, and profoundly atmospheric. Techland's evocation of the frighteningly untamed expanse of the Old West, and the seedy desperation of a life spent clinging to it, is second to none in games.

'Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood' Screenshot 3

Visuals are mixed: tearing is terrible, animation iffy and depth-of-field overdone, but the lighting and environment art are superb.

Its storytelling isn't bad, either, although it is mostly quarantined from the endless, crackling gunfights of actual gameplay. Bound in Blood's tale is a little more grounded than the first game's, but has an epic sweep, and handles the filial tensions, the historical context, and the earthy dialogue quite well, managing a few surprises along the way. The cut-scenes are dignified by decent voice acting and let down by awkward animation; more effective, perhaps, are the expressive drawings in between chapters, with voice-overs by the third brother and conscience of the game, seminary student William. Only a weak collapse into novelty-videogame-boss-fight and pat, hurried coda undermines its authenticity.

Finally, it's well worth mentioning the multiplayer, which I wasn't able to test on this review version, but which we had already sampled at a preview event and came away impressed by. As well as adding the lovely scoring concept of "bounty" - a price on your head which mounts with your success as a player - to some fairly standard game-types, Bound in Blood also has objective-driven "Wild West Heroes" contests worked out for every map, which pit teams of lawmen and outlaws against each other, as well as a suite of unlockable character classes, and custom maps replicating famous moments in frontier history. It may not take the FPS multiplayer world by storm, but it's a solid, craftsmanlike effort with a strong sense of what western fans want.

'Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood' Screenshot 4

When will cowboys learn that shooting from rooftops makes them easier to see?

All of which can be said of Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood as a whole. It's far too unvaried and unrelenting a shooting gallery to earn an unhesitating recommendation; although the internal pacing of each chapter is good, they're all the same, and when you find yourself taking potshots at distant, silhouetted, Stetsoned heads 10 seconds into the umpteenth level, your heart can sink. It's a little rough and old-school in some places, but that suits its cantankerous, revisionist mood and down-and-dirty subject matter. But above all, it's a proper western, set in a tangibly real Wild West, with proper, honest-to-goodness cowboys, Indians and bandits in it. Experience tells us that's harder to pull off in videogames than you might think, and it counts for a lot, no matter where it comes from.

7/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood on PC/PlayStation 3/Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 74 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
udat
30/06/09 @ 16:09
#1
+6
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I am scared to click that link... (at work)
cloud_ix
30/06/09 @ 16:29
#2
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
it's not very safe
byron_hinson
30/06/09 @ 16:33
#4
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If you enjoyed the first one you'll enjoy this - though maybe not quite as much (just a slightly less) - graphically I've thought it was superb - excellent textures, good settings, but lipsyncing sucks. Speech is top marks again - though I can't comment on the multiplayer side as much as when I've been trying to play it no one was on and only 30 on the leaderboards.
bioreit
30/06/09 @ 16:35
#5
+5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ Oli

360 version? Loved the first one (even the Billy bits - my God that sounds dirty...) and this sounds pretty cool. Not every game needs to draw you in and amaze you with all elements - sometimes, a decent, solid effort with good graphics is all you need, like Black, for example.
brooza
30/06/09 @ 16:49
#6
+5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Does it have annoying stealth bits?

If not, I'll give it a go
schachmatt
30/06/09 @ 17:06
#8
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
7 must have a whole sub-score point range - 7 1/2, 7+, 7 ^3. It's probably only visible for people getting +7.

This review makes me think I should finally get its predecessor. I remember enjoying the demo and I always have the urge to play series from the start. I still have RE4 lying around, because I haven't played Code Veronica yet.
byron_hinson
30/06/09 @ 17:17
#9
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Brooze - one stealth bit which you don't have to use stealth in if you don't want to.
XdarXideX
30/06/09 @ 17:43
#11
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Im enjoying the first one in preparation for Bound in Blood. I played the PC demo way back before it came out. I dont know why I never picked up the 360 version before.
Rodchenko
30/06/09 @ 17:48
#12
-7
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Gerogia?
UncleLou
30/06/09 @ 18:42
#14
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hohum, it does sound a little more mundane than I had hoped for.
Ywap
30/06/09 @ 19:20
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
PC version pre-ordered, thank you very much :)
stephenb
30/06/09 @ 19:39
#16
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Think i will pick this up MP sounds decent. Am a bit of a sucker for a Wild West story anyway. Seem to remember a Lucas Arts title on the PC eons ago, Outlaws I think?
shotgun44
30/06/09 @ 19:54
#17
+23
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Beastmaster... What the fuck? It deserves a 7 because you haven't played it and didn't know it was out!? Jesus Christ, some of you 11 year olds need less gaming and more schooling.
BillyBrush
30/06/09 @ 20:33
#18
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Look forward to getting it...1st was great....you know why Ray's going to turn to the bible though, as opposed to the 1st which had a brilliant ending...and prologue...still, look forward to Friday
JayKwon
01/07/09 @ 00:33
#19
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It sounds as a good game, so a 7 seems nice. Maybe I'll pick this one up. I love western environments and the whole atmosphere at it.

@ schachmatt, it's a prequel:).
Edited 2 times, most recently on 01/07/09 @ 01:53
Tlaloc
01/07/09 @ 02:54
#20
-7
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
On spec, I think I'll give this one a miss, if only because the last one's "unique" blend of religion and violence made me so sick that I deleted the demo. I mean, if I want to play "Fred Phelps: The Video Game" I need psychological help... not a game to encourage me.
3william56
01/07/09 @ 05:11
#21
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Shooting The Men Who Are Quite Far Away And Difficult To See."

Gah! Pixel clicking!!! Can work on a PC or with a mouse, but sucks several sorts of b*lls on a thumbstick if you have to do it quickly. Would be much better up close and personal quick draw combat - particularly as a six shooter couldn't hit a barn door beyond a couple of dozen yards.
mkreku
01/07/09 @ 05:54
#22
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm wondering if this might be an 8/10 on the PC since hitting miniscule targets fast is a bit easier with a keyboard and mouse?
metalangel
01/07/09 @ 07:02
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I can't get along little dawgie, I can't even get one that's small ;)
dr_swin
01/07/09 @ 07:33
#24
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
reads more like an 8. It sounds great. Another dead space perhaps?
designerheadache
01/07/09 @ 07:37
#25
-2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
i got the impression that the review paints it as a rather dull game, shooting people hard to see in the distance doesnt sound like my idea of fun.
Nova5lag
01/07/09 @ 07:40
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Got my copy and looking forward to playing it. :)
kangarootoo
01/07/09 @ 08:08
#27
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm playing this now, and I quite like it. 7 is probably the right score. It won't blow your socks off, but its definitely worth a look and can be very atmospheric at times.
laudy
01/07/09 @ 08:26
#28
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
hmmm...it looks like I got nicely panned for my "lazy" comment...

I guess I'll just have to accept that 7/10 is the score that most games will get nowadays and rent them from that well known chain of video rental shops.

Dead Space got a 7 and I almost didn't buy it, which was a mistake because when I bit the bullet I found that I really really liked it...IMO one hell of a sleeper hit.

Alone in the Dark got a 7 and I did buy it. Junk.

Therein lies my frustration.

MiY4MOTO
01/07/09 @ 08:37
#29
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm really enjoying this game at the moment. I'm only on the third act, but as the review states it's a great old school shooter with some great touches. In places it's among the best looking FPS' of the current generation, and it's great to see a non Unreal 3 engined game standing tall against the best of 'em. The 'high noon' one on one duels are particularly well done, and stunning to look at.

This one plays much more like Call of Duty than the original, but that's not a criticism. For my money it's a much more 'even' experience than the first and one that I'm thoroughly enjoying.

If you like FPS games, and fancy break from the generic sci-fi / world-war 2 theme then this is well worth a look.
Darren
01/07/09 @ 09:30
#30
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I found the first game a bit scrappy and rough when I tried the demo plus it ran like a dog on my old PC. 360 version was even worse IMO. Got the sequel ordered for the PC though as it looks more interesting and polished plus the mouse and keyboard will probably make it easier to play than the console versions. :)
Darren
01/07/09 @ 09:35
#31
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@laudy - Alone in the Dark should never have got a 7 IMO. It was a terrible game on the PC and 360, mainly because it was ruined by poor controls, awful driving bits and other stupid design decisions like having to kill enemies with fire, etc. Even the improved PS3 version was still undeserving of a 7. 6/10 maybe.

How on earth EG thought such a broken game was a worth a 7 I do not know. Must check to see who reviewed the game and put them on my "approach with caution" list!
Harmonica
01/07/09 @ 09:39
#32
+10
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Therein lies my frustration."

@ laudy

Your frustration seems to be that you're buying games based on what the tiny number at the bottom says, and not what the previous two pages have told you about it.

My advice would be to, yes, rent before buying, and also canvas more than just Eurogamer when laying down money for something.
notmyrealname
01/07/09 @ 09:53
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ laudy

I hear you. But you don't go to EG for the actual numeric value of the reviews, you come here for the bad puns and many attempts at whittery (for better and for worse). Video reviews are so very much more informative. Try looking up gametrailers or classic gameroom HD for some footage on your game, that will probably give you more info to your liking about the well.. actual game.
UncleLou
01/07/09 @ 09:55
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Harmonica

I wanted to +1 you, but pressed -1 accidentally.

:-/

/sausage fingers

edit: Oh wait, I can still change that. Nevermind, carry on. :)
Edited 1 times, most recently on 01/07/09 @ 10:56
Harmonica
01/07/09 @ 10:03
#35
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
All is well in the world :)

I am a complete Westerns nerd, erm, as the name suggests, so I am pretty dead set on getting this, mainly because I have been burnt before on horrible games in the same genre (Gun, anyone?) but this looks like a peach. Frankly the review had me at 'authentic' and 'gunslinging'.

For those who have already played it: might Western fans add +1 to the score?
Darren
01/07/09 @ 10:07
#36
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
+1 for the mention of video reviews. GameTrailers are especially good for those. It's great to watch the game and listen to a commentary. They're also good for highlighting flaws and bugs in the game's too, something that you don't quite get a sense of from reading a written review. I wish EG would do video reviews, almost all the decent sites do them these days.
muscleblade
01/07/09 @ 10:30
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I prefer written reviews. Looks and bugs arent as important to me anyway. I feel i get more info from written reviews regarding the stuff that really matter.
laudy
01/07/09 @ 10:51
#38
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Thanks for the comments, gents

@ Harmonica

I read the reviews of both games in full before making the decisions I made. For me Dead space is more like 8 and alone in the dark more like 6. A generic 7 doesn't help to make informed decisions, which, after all, is what a review is all about no? You are quite correct about canvassing opinion though. I actually bought dead space after reading the review on gamespot...never looked back.

@ Darren

I cannot disagree with your assessment of alone in the dark. worse on the 360 you say? Good grief.

@ notmyrealname

That's fair enough, but I would be pretty put out as a reviewer on this site if folk didn't come on here to take their reviews seriously...depends how much they're getting paid I guess ;-)

@ muscleblade

I gave you a +1 because i prefer written reviews as well, you are supposed to get more from a written review. hands up, who on here prefers a book they've read to the big screen attempt of the same piece of work?
Bleh
01/07/09 @ 11:14
#39
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I prefer written reviews as well. They mostly cover more than a video review and you get a better idea how the reviewer looks/thinks about the game.
rotmm
01/07/09 @ 11:44
#40
-4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Milky1985, "..wonder if i can get alist of all eurogamer scores to see just how many 7's have been shelled out!"

I dunno. Where would you be able to find such a list?

Oh wait, I know. You could click on the fucking Reviews link on the left hand side of the page.

Yup, that'd do it.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 01/07/09 @ 12:45
UncleLou
01/07/09 @ 12:24
#41
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I prefer written reviews. Looks and bugs arent as important to me anyway. I feel i get more info from written reviews regarding the stuff that really matter

Same here, in general, but Gametrailers in particular - while the reviews as such aren't anything spectacular - are damn good at picking out flaws and quickly demonstrating them with a few accompanying gameplay scenes. I find that very helpful if I want to know if a flaw I just see mentioned elsewhere would really annoy me.
Darren
01/07/09 @ 12:34
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Written reviews are fine for detailed info but quite often I find reviewers don't mention things like tearing which can ruin a game for me so that's why I like video reviews. For example, in this review there's no mention of it at all, instead it's reserved for a screenshot caption where it's described as "terrible" and very easily overlooked IMO. They also show how smoothly (or not) said game runs, all useful things which you cannot envisage accurately from a written review. After all a reviewer's definition of a "smooth framerate" is a very subjective thing.

You also get to hear some of the voice-acting, music and sound effects too in video reviews, handy as audio is often overlooked in EG reviews unless it's noticeably bad. I think GameTrailers video reviews are the best out there for showing me what the game's like in the absence of a playable demo.

Of course playing a demo is the best way to experience a slice of the game but not every game has one, e.g. Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood! A video review is, thus, the next best thing in my eyes.
muscleblade
01/07/09 @ 13:24
#43
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"I think GameTrailers video reviews are the best out there for showing me what the game's like in the absence of a playable demo. "

Fine then you can go to Gametrailers for the video reviews no need for Eurogamer to do the same. Im not a huge fan of demos either btw. I usually just try the demos of games i know im going to buy anyway. The Too Human demo did put me off that game to be fair, but so did the reviews. The RE5 demo almost put me off that game too, but its my favourite game so far this year by far.
notmyrealname
01/07/09 @ 13:33
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
''who on here prefers a book they've read to the big screen attempt of the same piece of work? ''

Ehm.. in that case you are comparing the articles here to mostly literature pieces that are not rarely regarded as classical.. that's ... I dunno, that's WRONG

hahahaha:P No seriously I check this site more often too than I do video review sites. But I always view them (the vids) when I am having doubts on a possible purchase. And why not, it's all free

/scoots off to park
Edited 1 times, most recently on 01/07/09 @ 14:35
muscleblade
01/07/09 @ 13:37
#45
-3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Glad they didnt release a singleplayer demo for Bionic Commando. I didnt like the game all that much in the start. But after learning the controls and how to play the game well i loved it. My playthrough on the hardest difficulty is something i will remember for a long time. Hugely enjoyable.
meredix
01/07/09 @ 17:16
#46
-6
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Another mediocre on-the-rails FPS with poor graphics and boring gameplay. Character models and their animations look especially dated and awful. Feels like playing an old 2004 game...
Xuio
01/07/09 @ 18:17
#47
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
meredix, you've downloaded wrong game.
jambo74
01/07/09 @ 23:34
#48
-4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
meh!
costa_k
02/07/09 @ 01:09
#49
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Don't care what reviewers say.All i care is that it has a brilliant multiplayer.
Harmonica
02/07/09 @ 02:39
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Speaking from experience.. or?

The multiplayer does sound good, reminds me of RTCW.

Comments: 1-50 of 74 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery