Call of Duty: World at War Comments by Dan Whitehead
Still soldiering on.
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
previous 50
|
Comments: 151-158 of 158 in total
Poster
|
0
Stop slagging off Treyarch.
COD world at wars single players is miles better than COD4 single player campaign. Graphically as well COD world at war looks stunning. I'm also sick of Infinity Wards levels where you just get swarmed defending a hill/base/barn etc. Its just lazy level design. Thankfully there is none of that in COD world at war. |
|
0
once again i love playing cod games ive just finished playing world at war solo story campaign i always like to play on veteran level i always think its a good challenge and once again like cod4 the graphics are great the gameplay is fantastic and i really enjoyed the campaign even though i agree with alot of ppl it could be longer but hey the graphics are great so i dont think u can have everything but here it is once again i find myself complaining about the same thing as cod4 why is the AI so poor it doesnt help you they just get in your way its just a real pain i wish they would sort this out its the only thing that lets it down
|
|
local_celebrity
22/12/08 @ 01:23
+1
Allow me to eat humble pie.
I was on the forums slagging this off after the very disappointing beta. But now that I've finally picked it up, I've had a change of heart. The single player campaign is deeply impressive. Not only are the graphics jaw-droppingly good, but the level design is absolutely first-rate. There are so many incredible set-pieces here; you really feel like you're in a warzone. Granted, there are a few flaws here and there (an overreliance on AI grenade attacks springs to mind), but this is not the time for mere quibbling. Treyarch have done a fantastic job, and should be applauded. If you've enjoyed COD4 as much as I did, this is DEFINITELY worth picking up. Honestly. |
previous 50
|
Comments: 151-158 of 158 in total
Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!
Advertisement
