Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 3 Next

Advertisement

Boom Blox Review

Wii Review by Ellie Gibson

12 May, 2008

Page 2 of 3. <- Page 1Page 3 ->

The different elements combine to create more than 300 diverse and entertaining puzzles. Some are more entertaining than others, but few feel like filler. Some can be solved on the first go while others will take many attempts, or for someone else to come in the room and instantly see the trick you've been missing for the past 40 minutes (thanks, Oli).

The brilliant physics technology is what pulls it all together to form a superb game. Blocks wobble, see-saw, fall and knock each other over in exactly the way you'd expect. It's incredibly rewarding to watch a tower topple into another tower because you lobbed the ball at precisely the right block. You'll hold your breath as you nudge a beam from the bottom of a structure with the utmost precision, then sigh with relief as you pull it clear. And, best of all, you'll smile with sheer joy and satisfaction when yet another huge pile of blocks comes crashing to the ground.

The throwing physics work too. To lob balls you aim the remote at the screen and press A to lock your target. Then you flick the remote and release the button to throw. The recognition of whether you went for a soft or hard shot is excellent, and balls never fly off in directions you didn't expect. At first the on-screen pointer feels a little too sensitive, but it becomes apparent that lining up shots just right and pulling out blocks with careful precision are all part of the challenge. Similarly, when you first start playing the Jenga puzzles the physics don't feel quite right; the blocks seem too light and floaty. However, once you've gotten used to this (which doesn't take long) everything makes sense.

Before you know it, you're addicted. All you want is to be left alone to make things fall over and stop things falling over and watch things explode. But then real life comes blundering in and someone's standing next to you saying, "Can I have a go?" When this happens, say yes.

'Boom Blox' Screenshot 2

Knock over the gold ones, avoid knocking over the black ones. Sounds simple. Isn't.

Do not be afraid that you'll have to spend ages explaining what all the different blocks do and how the physics work and why they're not doing it properly (even if they're one of those people who still couldn't throw a Wii Sports bowling ball after 48 minutes of patient tuition), because Boom Blox is the very definition of pick-up-and-play. Everyone's played Jenga, and everyone understands the concept of throwing a thing at another thing to make it fall over. The game's control system is so intuitive and the gameplay so appealing they'll be hooked instantly.

Boom Blox features both co-operative and competitive multiplayer modes, and both are brilliant. As anyone who's played Jenga knows, it's great fun working out which block to pull to leave the tower standing but your opponent in shtuck. But there's a whole different kind of fun to be had discussing which block to pull with your partner, then berating them for a tiny mistake in the moving which just cost you the game. Again, not all the puzzles are equally entertaining; the ones where you have to knock over a huge number of point blocks go on too long. Almost all the rest, however, are superb.

To Page 3 ->

Advertisement

Are you excited about Boom Blox on Wii?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 109 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
ChrisTop
12/05/08 @ 12:48
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
LoL, what the heck is that?
SeesThroughAll
12/05/08 @ 12:50
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
You should have cut off a couple of points off the score, because the game lacks enough AA and runs at less than 720p!

That makes a game shit! Really!
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/05/08 @ 13:50
AtomicBanana
12/05/08 @ 12:52
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ellie, reviewing a game that isn't shit? What is the world coming to!?
Psychotext
12/05/08 @ 12:52
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Wow... that's a surprisingly good score.
Krelle
12/05/08 @ 12:54
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Boom Blox has got rather great scores all around.
Toonster
12/05/08 @ 12:55
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
hooray for Spielberg!
Scrumhalf
12/05/08 @ 12:56
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Psychotext: surely it is only surprising if you haven't played it :)
Benno
12/05/08 @ 12:58
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Better than gears then?
SeanLB
12/05/08 @ 12:59
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Did Spielberg have any real involvement in this other than name value (apologies if it is mentioned in the review as I went for the glance and quick question here first before reading)? I've seen things like on Gamer.TV/Plyer (whatever it's called now) with Spielberg playing the game, but nothing that couldn't have just been Steven visiting once a year to film some promotional vid's for TV/Internet to pretend he had an active part.
symmetry
12/05/08 @ 13:00
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
What about the head-tracking? Did that make it into the game?
Psychotext
12/05/08 @ 13:05
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Scrumhalf: Mostly surprising as I haven't seen any hype for it so I didn't know it was coming.
hula hoops
12/05/08 @ 13:06
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Boom Blox has got rather great scores all around.

Apart from in China, where the reviewers there are in a crusade to demean any products associated with Spielberg.

Game factor: 9/10
Speilberg factor: -10/10
Total score: -1/10
melatonin
12/05/08 @ 13:06
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Woah, woah, woah...

"I don't care for Super Mario Galaxy"

All my sympathy for 'crap game Ellie' has suddenly gone straight out the window...
CallousB
12/05/08 @ 13:10
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's a really great game but it won't sell unfortunately (and that's EA's own fault).

The art style is bland (EA could have done much better), it's £40 (which is too much for a puzzle game)...and it's the type of title that needs heavy TV marketing to get the casuals to buy it (I have seen no tv ads at all). It's a game that doesn't really hook you until you actually play it.

Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/05/08 @ 14:17
AmpH
12/05/08 @ 13:13
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's 32 euro's in the Netherlands. That's even less pounds...
M83J01P97
12/05/08 @ 13:18
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@SeanLB

Yep, he was involved in the games development since day one. Basically he 'directed' the game by pitching ideas and seeing if they could be implemented into the game and so on. So no, he hasn't just out his name on it to generate a bit of hype, he has been involved in the bulk of it's development.
morriss
12/05/08 @ 13:19
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nice review, Ellie. Still don't agree about Tomb Raider: Anniversary but I'll let you off! ;)
Killerbee
12/05/08 @ 13:22
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Sounds great. In fact, I was seriously thinking about going out to buy it but... £40. That just seems expensive for what seems to be screaming out for a nice £20-25 price tag to place it into that "impulse buy" bracket.
JonFE
12/05/08 @ 13:22
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
You've got to be kidding me!!! Ellie of all people...
smugla
12/05/08 @ 13:26
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
its £29.99 on play and amazon and blockbusters have it at £35 and so most game and gamestaion stores will price match blockbusters
Muddtallica
12/05/08 @ 13:26
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Huh?! I had this pegged as being a pointless piece of shovelware, but I'm seeing great scores coming in everywhere, and more to the point, it actually sounds like a lot of fun. The price tag is prohibitive, unfortunately; still, it might be worth a look in when the price falls a little.
Britesparc
12/05/08 @ 13:36
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Bloody hell, I was expecting a positive 7 and hoping for an 8 from this, but a 9?! Fantastic! AND I was sent a copy at work today, too!
Tonka
12/05/08 @ 13:38
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hayya....?
O_o
I used to love building towers and crashing them by the clever removal of abrick at the top when I was a kid. This game always seems like it could become the modern hasslefree version of that. Now it sounds like a buy.

secombe
12/05/08 @ 13:44
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Great news, will wait for it to get a bit cheaper though.

Slightly disappointed with the "doesn't have much depth" comments directed at Wii Sports though, I still strongly disagree with that statement (particuarly with regards to Tennis)
InsoFox
12/05/08 @ 13:54
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Told you so, whoever-that-guy-in-the-forum-who-said-this-would-be-crap-wa
s.
richardiox
12/05/08 @ 13:54
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Can't believe Wii games like this and Bust-a-Move retail on the high street for £40 - same price as most 360 games. What ever happened to Nintendos promises to keep Wii software prices low? If this was £30 I would have picked it up at luncthime.
MrED209
12/05/08 @ 13:55
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
When it's considerably cheaper I might give it a go.

Considerably cheaper, mind.
Machiavel
12/05/08 @ 13:57
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'll buy it! (When it's £20)
drumbaby
12/05/08 @ 14:00
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Was expecting a ten, seeing as pretty much anything gets it these days.
peterfll
12/05/08 @ 14:00
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I actually saw footage on Playr (on Bravo) at the weekend and was instantly charmed by the sound effects alone (very Nintendo sounding).

It was lucky I heard the game at all because the presenter of Playr is so appalling it really encourages you to watch it on mute.
Pac-man ate my wife
12/05/08 @ 14:04
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I thought that this idea had great potential and it's good to see that EA have knocked the ball out the park on this one. Another nail in the crap, misguided "Wii has no games" coffin!
byron_hinson
12/05/08 @ 14:06
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Been playing it far more than gta 4 in our house. Excellent game just a shame it lacks online multiplayer
Oli [staff]
12/05/08 @ 14:15
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Some can be solved on the first go while others will take many attempts, or for someone else to come in the room and instantly see the trick you've been missing for the past 40 minutes (thanks, Oli)."

40 minutes? Yeah whatever. Two hours, more like.

As an aside, why do you think people are reluctant to pay full price for puzzle games? You will get more hours' enjoyment from a good one than you will from most action games, especially if it has a good multiplayer mode.

I do agree with Ellie on this (not about Super Mario Galaxy, though). Boom Blox is excellent.
ulov3
12/05/08 @ 14:15
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Typical spielberg's way: made to make money. The man has no talent but he turns everything he does into someting very very good. (i worked with him in a movie in budapest btw).
Pac-man ate my wife
12/05/08 @ 14:20
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
the man has no talent

Indiana Jones, Jaws, the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park and ET say you are wrong!
Edited 1 times, most recently on 12/05/08 @ 15:20
Ignatius_Cheese
12/05/08 @ 14:23
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Anyone know how much this is going for in-store at Tesco's...?
rhubarbandcustard
12/05/08 @ 14:24
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
ulov3 - Spielberg has more talent than you could dream of.

And when you say you worked on his movie in Budapest, I think we can safely assume you were a fairly minor crew member at best.

Tea boy, per chance?
Darkedge
12/05/08 @ 14:25
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Woo! Ellie totally right about Mario Galaxy - the spin mechanic is rubbish and thats not all.

Nice review but still I'd pay £25-30 for this tops not £40.


"Companies with pedigree like Nintendo and SEGA can get away with this sort of nonsense; sorry, EA, but you can't."
they could 15 years ago when they were actually very good until they started with all the shovelware
Oh-Bollox
12/05/08 @ 14:25
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
As an aside, why do you think people are reluctant to pay full price for puzzle games? You will get more hours' enjoyment from a good one than you will from most action games, especially if it has a good multiplayer mode.

Development costs assumed to be less? Puzzle games don't often have the best graphics or sound. In fact, quite often the audio is distinctly shite, and drives you up the wall when you get stuck on a puzzle for x-amount of hours.

Nikanoru
12/05/08 @ 14:27
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I had this pegged as being a pointless piece of shovelware,


Why?
InsoFox
12/05/08 @ 14:31
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I don't really get why everyone's suddenly all defensive and suspicious when the name Spielberg crops up. First of all, I don't get how it's so inconcievable that he could have some ideas for a fun, cute puzzle game. I mean, why not. But also, how many games has be been involved with? There's The Dig (which perhaps isn't the greatest Lucasarts adventure, but is also not half bad) and then there's this.

Too many people have dismissed this thing before even seeing it. If it was Uwe Boll, I'd kind of see the basis for their suspicions. But yeah, this game is great fun. The cutesy element hasn't bothered me at all... in fact, the only part that caused me to cringe at all was mentioned in the review... the level with the EA logo in blocks made me roll my eyes - it's just not what I want to see. (Speaking of that level, I must have played it about 15 times before realising I was missing the totally bleedin' obvious 1-hit solution.)
smugla
12/05/08 @ 14:38
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Anyone know how much this is going for in-store at Tesco's...?

I think its £34 instore

best price is play and amazon £29.99 online
BiscuitBase
12/05/08 @ 14:42
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
But which version has the best framerate for christ's sake!
InsoFox
12/05/08 @ 14:50
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Actually, on reflection, about that 'EA' level, the thought of actually toppling EA to the ground in a big heap is in some ways pleasing...

...then again, if there are people there making games like this then I'm happy for them to stay. If only we could do something about their publishing arm.
Loser
12/05/08 @ 14:57
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@richardiox

All the first party titles are 35 notes. I think it's up to EA/retailers how much they will charge for it.
spidermanalf
12/05/08 @ 15:02
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Wasn't Spielberg involved in the early MOH games as well?
Tiger_Walts
12/05/08 @ 15:11
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Spielberg was also involved in The Dig, insofar that it was going to be a short and then a movie at one point but the budget would have been too big. The writing development was thus transferred to a game production.
charliemouse
12/05/08 @ 15:19
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hooray! I had high hopes for this and will get it on the way home tonight.

Sod the sun! There are way too many good games at the moment...
stampax
12/05/08 @ 15:28
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Another "i'll buy it at 20 quid" comment here
Muddtallica
12/05/08 @ 15:39
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nikanoru: Why did I peg this as shovelware? Now that I think about it, I think it's pretty much entirely because of the name; there's just something very uninspiring about the concept of a modern console game with "blocks" (or, er, "Blox") in the title. I know it's a perfectly fair thing to call the game, but words like "brick" and "block" just make me think of cheap Tiger-handheld-level crap that uses blocks as their interface because the developers were incapable of programming anything more elaborate. Combine that with its status as a game for the Wii, a system often known for attracting just such talentless developers, and I guess I jumped to conclusions.

Basically, I'm an enormous blockist bigot who couldn't look past his deep-rooted preconceptions about blocks. Hopefully quality block-based titles such as this will help me overcome my prejudices and lead my down the path towards spiritual rehabilitation.

Comments: 1-50 of 109 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery