Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

BioShock Review

PlayStation 3 Review by Dan Whitehead

16 October, 2008

Page 2 of 2. <- Page 1

In gameplay terms, you're getting the exact same game - with the promise of downloadable Challenge Rooms in the immediate future (look out for a hands-on with those in the coming weeks). Much has been batted back and forth over BioShock's gameplay. Some see it as a pale console-flavoured rehash of the cult PC fave, System Shock 2. Others see it as a merely average shooter, dressed up in intellectual clothing. Me, I loved it in 2007 - and have had that love reaffirmed by returning to Rapture after a twelve-month detox period.

Most of the criticisms levelled at the game have some merit, but only when taken in isolation. Taken as a whole, it's a phenomenal creation - a game that is rich in gameplay possibilities, giving you a broad and flexible toolbox of conventional weapons and genetically enhanced Plasmids, with the additional tactical layer of tonics and camera research opening up multiple ways to approach any enemy encounter. The realistic environments only add to this, with the old videogame cliché of electrified water cleverly transformed from standalone hazard to just one of many offensive options.

The Vita-Chambers, essentially the game's respawn points, remain and were originally the cause of much grumbling. Allowing you to jump back into the action with no real consequence, beyond whatever ammo and resources you wasted in your previous fruitless efforts, they do remove a lot of the expected consequences from death, and as such can make the game feel skewed towards the easy. Of course, the most pressing reason to avoid death in a game is that you don't want to die and so anyone playing with the sort of immersion that BioShock demands and offers is unlikely to find it any more distracting than the commonly accepted PC habit of quicksave and quickload.

'BioShock' Screenshot 3

The whale-like moan of the Big Daddies: still bowel-quakingly horrible one year on.

For those who still don't approve of respawns, the new Survivor difficulty level makes the Vita-Chambers less of a crutch, reducing your Eve, the genetic resource needed for Plasmid attacks, for each use as well as offering less ammo and tougher enemies, making it much harder to bludgeon your way through the game using the obvious attack options. Forcing you to explore the more passive abilities - such as hacking and making enemies fight each other - it's a mode that makes you see the true scope of the combat, and the game shines brighter as a result.

For those who really, absolutely cannot stand the very concept of the Vita-Chamber, you can disable them completely in the options menu. For those who take such drastic steps, the game's Trophies have numerous awards, clearly inspired by the 360 Achievements but no less fun to earn for their familiar nature.

Is BioShock the greatest game of all time? I honestly don't know, but it's one of the most interesting and immersive experiences to grace our beloved medium. It certainly has flaws, most notably the anti-climactic boss fight which takes place too long after the story has delivered its sucker punch. Yet it's because that sucker punch is so effective that the niggling plot holes have received so much attention. Why, exactly, do the Little Sisters exist? Why would anyone pay money for a product that fills your arm with killer bees? And the very nature of the twist, and your presence in Rapture, really doesn't stand up to too much scrutiny since it hinges on too many variables that couldn't possibly be known by the...

'BioShock' Screenshot 4

When was the last time you saw a console shooter dare to use pink? And make it scary?

But there I go again. It's actually a testament to BioShock's confident and subtle storytelling that such aspects are even worthy of a mention. In an industry where frankly terrible stories are too often praised simply for having a vaguely coherent beginning, middle and end, it would be wrong to dwell too much on the minor inconsistencies of a story with so much pathos and subtext, told in such an inventive manner. That this story comes wrapped in a gripping and satisfying action game which offers an astonishing array of ways to play is more than enough to justify BioShock's status as a standard bearer for next generation gaming.

10/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about BioShock on PlayStation 3?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 247 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Digital~Orgasm
16/10/08 @ 06:01
#1
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Wow 10 wasn't expecting that.

I didn't think Bioshock was that great personally.
Huddy
16/10/08 @ 06:04
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Did not see that coming!

Decent game, but from my experience on the 360 the level design and quality faded toward the end.
smelly
16/10/08 @ 06:05
#3
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh FFS!

There's NO WAY bioshock is worth that!

There's no bloody game! There's no punishment for dying! There's no skill required! Hell you could go thru the game with a pea shooter -> fire couple of bullets at big daddie, die, respawn, repeat until he's dead.

There's bugger all replayability, no multiplayer, the only real reason to replay the game is to see the opposite ending.. I couldnt be bothered after playing it thru once - I just watched youtube.

There's also a gawd awful "protect the ai" level that these games insist upon. Where the ai is f-ing stupid and just is desperate to get hurt. Grrr.

90% of the game is a piece of piss.. then on later levels they take away all your ammo for a Looooooooong section.. Only to give you shit loads again afterwards..

Oh and the end boss was a piece of piss even on the hardest setting.

Only thing that's GOOD about this game is :

A) eye candy (but i've been told that the 360 version apparently looks better)...
B) The story.

But personally, if i want a story - i'd read a book or watch a movie. I play games for the FUN of playing them.. and i'm sorry this game isnt fun...
siro
16/10/08 @ 06:05
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
When was the last time you saw a console shooter dare to use pink? And make it scary?
That was about a year ago, it was... the same game.

So the texture bugs reported on every other site have been fixed?

(Pseudo-)Edit: I'm starting to sound like the MDF.
the_dudefather
16/10/08 @ 06:06
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
as good as halo 3 then?
smelly
16/10/08 @ 06:06
#6
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
OH and the hacking mini game is shit too.

Dagdriver
16/10/08 @ 06:10
#7
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I din't like either - this is one of those all too overrated games - Shure the story telling elements are very good, and the setting is different, but gameplay holds -nothing- new. Those drug improvements are just "rpg-ish" stat/skills in disguise, and for the so-called "moral descisions" - lets just call them marketing hype.
For all of the work they put into this game I would actually have preffered yet another ww2 shooter with the same production values. Yes, really!
Douche
16/10/08 @ 06:26
#8
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Agree with the majority of posters. No way is Bioshock a 10. It wasn't a year a go and it isn't now.
symmetry
16/10/08 @ 06:33
#9
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
You are all fools, this is one of the greatest games ever.
Peew971
16/10/08 @ 06:35
#10
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I don't see why they would give a 10 to the 360 version and not this one. Get over it guys, I played it and gave it 10 myself :)
mattigan
16/10/08 @ 06:36
#11
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Why do these games need such big installs?
bigbadbeasty
16/10/08 @ 06:37
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Let us not get into the bloody 'what is worth a 10' debate (again). Scores are simply opinions.

I really enjoyed Bioshock, but see no reason to buy it again, a year too late... on a console...
tnomad
16/10/08 @ 06:41
#13
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Would you kindly leave the game alone. It's awesome.
Widge
16/10/08 @ 06:50
#14
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Others see it as a merely average shooter, dressed up in intellectual clothing. Me, I loved it in 2007 - and have had that love reaffirmed by returning to Rapture after a twelve-month detox period."

There you go. One line to sum up that some people see a 10, some don't. Individuals.... crazy concept. Take that into account before going on a "this isn't a 10" crusade.

I've only really played the intro on the PC but found it awesome.

This should be sitting in my in tray at work today at some point!
Edited 1 times, most recently on 16/10/08 @ 07:53
spookyzombie
16/10/08 @ 06:52
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ tnomad - I liked what you did there.
morriss
16/10/08 @ 06:52
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
MEGA GAME

Loved it. Love it. Loves it.
TiredRiver
16/10/08 @ 06:54
#17
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This is an 8. Edge was correct. Combat is shallow. It does'nt feel right. It does not feel as good as Halo 3 ! Therefore it is not a 10.
Godhather08
16/10/08 @ 06:57
#18
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@smelly

There's no way I give a shit about what you think.

I'll be getting this game day 1.
morriss
16/10/08 @ 06:58
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Does it support 1080i?
Pirotic
16/10/08 @ 07:00
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's a 10 because it's done more to move the genre forward than anything else in recent years. decent voice acting, interactive storytelling without any cut scenes other than the opening and ending. amazing art direction and level design. What it might lack slightly in game play mechanics it more than makes up for in every other area.

Fort Frolic was the best thing I've played in years!
LeD
16/10/08 @ 07:02
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Why are we getting a review of the PS3 version? It's the same fucking game, of course it's going to score the same fucking score. Most people who wanted to play it have already played it.
Godhather08
16/10/08 @ 07:05
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@LED
You say; "Why are we getting a review of the PS3 version?"

You know the answer to this youself, don't play stupid.
digiwalsh
16/10/08 @ 07:06
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Bioshock has major flaws:

Rubbish character modeling/animation. Evidenced by the fact that everyone you get anywhere near of any importance is seperarted from you by glass/invisible walls except for Sander Cohen and the guy you golf club in the face. An act the game does itself, in some clever "twist" about lack of choice.

The rest of the game is spent communicating with Jpg's through a crackly radio in AWFUL accents that sound like the ones your mates do because they THINK they're funny.


People can gush about the story ALL they want, but when you're too scared/ashamed of your work to let the player interact with other characters on no other level besides kill them, then what's the point.

In the era of Half life 2's Alyx and Bad company's facial animations. Hell, even GTA IV. There's no excuse for this sort of thing, I got sick of speaking to JPG's after DEUS EX.

SleepyMagpie
16/10/08 @ 07:07
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
wired_protocol wrote: "Someone mentioned its worth playing for the story - hardly, it's all very good stuff until the last section, and a good story heavily relies on a good conclusion".

You also go on about this game not being intellectual, and make a point about getting everyone to conform to your idea that it won't make you smarter..?

Since you claim to know something about being intellectual, one would speculate that you have delved into various taxing tomes and are maybe even quite the connoisseur of arthouse films?

If you have even a passing knowledge of more obscure books, and "deep" stuff in general, you would know that many works fail to bring anything to a Hollywood "good" conclusion (even though I don't think you meant this), or even a firm conclusion at all (which I think you meant). In the realm of "high" prose and films, clear-cut conclusions are not as common as you seem to think, wired_protocol.

Maybe you should check out Ayn Rand yourself, it might give you a better appreciation of Bioshock's leitmotif, and the game's atmosphere in general.

The game is probably a 9/10. Very good. It is a game first and foremost to be savoured for it's brilliant atmosphere. Anyone considering it a FPS and judging it accordingly are missing the mark by a mile.

peterfll
16/10/08 @ 07:15
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's a great game IMO.
t8yman
16/10/08 @ 07:17
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Its a very well executed shooter, nice to look at, the big daddies are great, and the level design is very accomplished. I bought it on launch day, played it through once and never went back. Its not a 10/10 game to me - but it might well be for others.
systems
16/10/08 @ 07:17
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm glad it's out at last (and I hope they've patched the bugs http://forums.2kgames.com/forums/showthr... ).

I played the 360 version and didn't think that much of it as I'm one of the "but it's System Shock 2 underwater and less good" brigade. From my experience most 360 owners are current or former PC gamers. However, PS3 owners are a different breed and may have never played System Shock 2 so they'll absolutely love this. I own a PS3 too but I don't think I can face going through it all again.

A bit surprised to see it got the same score even though it is 14 months later. I was under the impression that scores took the year into consideration as a mark of technical achievement. Producing the same game 14 months later doesn't seem that impressive to me.
Daymare
16/10/08 @ 07:19
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If you judge it on pure gameplay terms, it's 8/10 or so. But if you can look past that, the experience, art direction and the story, (which is way smarter then the story of 98% of other games - especially in this genre), then it is what Dan recognizes it to be: a 10/10.

I have a suspicion that "if I want a good story, I'll read a book" argument comes mostly from the people who don't actually read much:)

newt
16/10/08 @ 07:20
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Dear haters, would you kindly.. oh, fuck it. I've got better things to do, right?
squarejawhero
16/10/08 @ 07:20
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
But I suppose the point is it can basically be played as an FPS, and any pretensions towards being anything otherwise seems unimportant when the design only allows you the opportunity to make you think, rather than actually require it.

Most defenders cite this as one of the reasons it makes it great, that the tools afforded to you give you flexibility to approach situations in different ways, but ultimately it's not important when you can merely respawn and try again or rely on one or two weapons or powers through the whole game. Which really defeats the purpose of the plasmid system in the first place.
squarejawhero
16/10/08 @ 07:21
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh and the story's great, if a little obvious, up until the reveal. Then it delves into videogame tropes with aplomb and never recovers.
SleepyMagpie
16/10/08 @ 07:28
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
squarejawhero wrote: "But I suppose the point is it can basically be played as an FPS, and any pretensions towards being anything otherwise seems unimportant when the design only allows you the opportunity to make you think, rather than actually require it."

You are sooo left-hemisphere!
Zomoniac
16/10/08 @ 07:30
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
When was the last time you saw a console shooter dare to use pink? And make it scary?

The last time someone fired a needler at me? They even named an achievement after it.

Still don't get it. Yes, the atmosphere and sound is superb, and it's quite pretty (but only quite pretty, it's far from being a Gears or Uncharted), but the story is about 0.1% that of Halo, its moral decisions are about 0.1% those of GTA4, its AI is about 0.1% of Pong, and has a series of incredibly pointless but cool-looking weapons. Yes the plasmids look nice, but aside from fire and lightening you don't need any of them. Buy as many grenades as possible, walk up to Big Daddy, fire 6 grenades, Big Daddy dead in 2 seconds. Press button to save indentikit alien thing (because you always save, it's not a moral decision when there's a big achievement up for grabs for doing one but not the other). Repeat. Throw in some annoying pipe puzzles and backtracking fetch quests for good measure.

Sometimes I wonder if the game I played was the real Bioshock, and if there's some 1950s-underwater-Halo or something with the same name that has AI and gameplay. Normally when I play a game getting universal 10s that I don't like I can at least see why someone might think that. But with this I simply cannot comprehend why anyone thinks it's worthy of a maximum score because so much of it is just so fucking awful.
shamblemonkee
16/10/08 @ 07:30
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
bioshock is cack
toy_brain
16/10/08 @ 07:31
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I suppose Dan had no option but to give the PS3 version the same score as the 360 one, otherwise you would get cries of "oh, so the PS3 version is worse then!" from mouth-breathing retards with no concept of expectations shifting over time, or the benefit of hindsight.

So for me, this 10/10 means 'just as good as the 360 version'
Not 'genuine 10/10 game'
Which it really should......
maybe it is to Dan
But not to me.
Darren
16/10/08 @ 07:35
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nice review, Dan.

I completely agree with the review and the score... BioShock was last year's finest game and I utterly adored it on the 360. It was an atmospheric and engrossing experience right up until the last section, which alas was a massive disappointment. Still a few minutes of disappointment versus the 35+ hours I got out of it... I can't really grumble. I'm immensely looking forward to the sequel.

I also like the way Dan always mention whether a game has screen tearing or not. Too many reviewers ignore this IMO even if it doesn't annoy everyone (I think it makes my expensive HDTVs look like cheap knock-offs personally).

Keep it up. :)
Lexx87
16/10/08 @ 07:35
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I see this thread is again full of total idiots. Ah well.
Daymare
16/10/08 @ 07:35
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"...but the story is about 0.1% that of Halo, its moral decisions are about 0.1% those of GTA4, its AI is about 0.1% of Pong..."

You lost all credibility right there, mate:)
t8yman
16/10/08 @ 07:39
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Lexx - why? there are people agreeing, and people disagreeing.
Bloodkult
16/10/08 @ 07:40
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh yeah!
Another 10 for the Bioshock.
Get playing it PS3ers, it's lovely.

/robot dances out of thread
berelain
16/10/08 @ 07:41
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Still overrated, then.

Meh. Bioshock was ok. Good story, with some good ideas, but still very average gameplay. The gunplay is weak, the Plasmids are either far too effective or almost useless, and there are about 6 different enemies in the game which repeat indefinately, but get inexplicably tougher as the game goes on. Thats hardly good design.

Its a decent game. But not the all-singing all-dancing saviour of story and shooting that most press articles seem to make it out as.
Demento41
16/10/08 @ 07:42
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
A 9 would have been more appropriate for this game but ne'ermind.
Plughead
16/10/08 @ 07:43
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I like the way defenders of the faith are criticising 'haters' for disliking the game, for wanting everyone to think like them...


...which is exactly what they are doing by ragging on the dissenters.

I thought BioShock was average, spoiled by the Vita-Chambers - but not because they existed, but because the game was designed with them in mind - so just taking them out won't solve the problem, it'll just make everything more frustrating.

People are right - there is no reason to replay this game - the moral decisions are entirely inferior to those present in, say, The Witcher
Bitkari
16/10/08 @ 07:44
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Either this is the best period for video games EVER, or I've accidentally started reading IGN...
bioreit
16/10/08 @ 07:44
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Jesus.

You'd think smelly was sexually abused by a Big Daddy when he was younger or something.

Smelly - a prime example of someone who does not understand that DIFFERENT PEOPLE HAVE DIFFERENT INTERESTS AND OPINIONS.

Me, I think smelly's an absolute knob-jockey, but I'm perfectly willing to accept that other people think of him differently. Like his mum, who thinks he's a rub-tugger.
DFawkes
16/10/08 @ 07:44
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Bioshocks glimmer did dim with me a bit with time, but playing the demo again brought me right into Rapture again. It really is very, very good. All 360 & PC Bioshock owners should have another playthrough, all PS3 owners should have their first, everyone wins!

Except those that don't like it obviously. They'll probably still not like it.
Dizzy
16/10/08 @ 07:46
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It is an awesome game... if you have not played it, you should. A bit of a pity they released it full price IMHO since you can get it super cheap on PC/360 now.
UncleLou
16/10/08 @ 07:46
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Me, I think smelly's an absolute knob-jockey, but I'm perfectly willing to accept that other people think of him differently"

Bad example. I don't think you'll find anyone who disagrees. :)


As for Bioshock - a very good game everyone should play. Whether it's an 8 or 9 (which sounds about right to me) or a 10.
Zomoniac
16/10/08 @ 07:47
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Daymare,

How so? Maybe you liked the story (I didn't), but if you think the 'decision-making' of pressing one of two buttons to do something to one of 50 exactly-the-fucking-same alien things is mental anguish then you're far too sensitive, and if you think the AI was anything less than abysmal then I presume you haven't played another game in the last ten years.
Arwin
16/10/08 @ 07:48
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It was a ten last time, and the PS3 version delivers the same game (a tiny bit more blur, which looks better to some, worse to others) and a few extras ... so it would be inconsistent to rate it lower. It's a great game, but I have to see I keep failing to see how this is a 10 but LBP isn't. There's some serious matter-of-taste issues here. ;) Which should be obvious as I don't like Bioshock at all. I like the art of the environments and the atmosphere of the game, but not nearly enough to want to look at and kill everything that walks inside it ... I had my fill half-way through the demo, and by the time I finished that (on the 360 and then again on the PS3) I was thoroughly convinced that this isn't for me. A big contrast with LBP which I put 10s of hours into the beta and was genuinely depressed for a few hours when it ran out, and then felt genuinely happy about the experience for several days after ...
Edited 2 times, most recently on 16/10/08 @ 08:52

Comments: 1-50 of 247 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery