BioShock Challenge Rooms Review

Room to improve.

Version tested: PlayStation 3

It says something about the impact of a game when downloadable content for it comes prefaced with a plot continuity disclaimer. BioShock's Challenge Rooms, which was released exclusively for the PlayStation 3 last week for GBP 6.29, does just that.

These three self-contained arenas - one focused on combat, the other two on puzzles and exploration - do not, we are explicitly told, form part of the BioShock storyline. They are a "BioShock product", intended to be enjoyed entirely on their own merits. It seems obvious, but it's probably worth saying all the same. The antique beauty, melancholy atmosphere and dark philosophising of 2K Boston's game have so enraptured some players that they could get lost looking for meaning in the simplest non-sequitur.

In fact, they needn't have worried. Despite their odd rules, these three scenarios could quite easily have slotted into the main game's grand narrative as interludes. Atmospherically, they're perfect. A sinister "Chamber of Thrills" theme neatly ties the Challenge Rooms into BioShock's world. A ruined, malfunctioning carnival fairground, where a deranged ringmaster sets twisted and tortuous tests of cunning, makes sense and strikes a chord with Rapture's fallen utopia.

Surprisingly, it's in their mechanics that the Challenge Rooms, some of them at any rate, sound a bum note. They're clever, memorable, carefully designed and visually lavish - but sometimes, they're not very BioShock.

This is most evident in the first room, The 'I' in Team. This tasks you with rescuing a Little Sister from a Big Daddy without using weapons or damage-dealing plasmids. It's set in a malfunctioning shooting gallery, which probably gives you some clue to the answer to the riddle of how to take down a lumbering, moaning, heavily-armoured lunk without any offensive abilities.

'BioShock Challenge Rooms' Screenshot 1

Teddy bears are presents in one room - excellent firelighters in another.

But here's the thing - the room doesn't exactly ask you to solve that riddle yourself. It doesn't allow you to experiment with Plasmids and invented items, even within its tight restrictions, before you arrive at a solution - which would be the BioShock way of doing things. Instead, it gives you only the precise tools you need to solve the puzzle in exactly the way the designers have imagined and leaves a small but intricate trail of causes and effects - partially-disguised locks and keys - for you to follow to the letter. It plays more like the descendant of Metroid and Zelda than System Shock.

It's satisfying in its own way, but once it's done - which won't take long at all - it's done. When it comes to aiming for the Expert Trophy (completing the room in less than three minutes), you'll be looking to shave seconds off the required route rather than extemporise shortcuts or more daredevil solutions. Similarly, earning the Collector Trophy (find a number of hidden red roses) on this and the other two rooms is a matter of dogged, nook-and-cranny legwork - although the roses are hidden with more devious skill than most Easter Eggs.

The next puzzle room, A Shocking Turn of Events, is at least less linear. Here you're required to save a Little Sister from the top of a malfunctioning Ferris wheel by electrifying its controls six times. You're ultimately given more ways of doing this than you need, and after your second success, they're available to you in any order.

Exhausting all of them for the Master Electrician Trophy is the most satisfying pure puzzle in Challenge Rooms, and the choice of tactics and open design make saving time for the Expert Trophy a more cerebral exercise too. It's still a shame that some of the solutions are a simple matter of combing every corner of the level for items, or using the one genetic mutation available to you in a rather obvious manner.

The third Challenge Room, Worlds of Hurt, is a very different proposition, and closer to our expectations. Here the focus turns to combat, and carefully measured doses of the genetic experimentation and player resourcefulness that made BioShock's name.

In Worlds of Hurt, you have to free a Little Sister from a circular prison by besting the enemies in the eight chambers that surround it. You're given a large range of weapons after the first, but aside from that, you're drip-fed Adam (BioShock's genetic currency) and money to buy plasmids, ammunition and supplies, as well as picking up weapon upgrades and invention supplies as you go.

The rooms themselves - teasingly and usefully revealed under glass before you drop into them - have surprising variation and scale, pitting you against enemies of one kind or many, or in automated mazes of turrets and drones. On Easy level the enemies are a pushover, but you'll still have to be frugal with your ammunition and other resources.

On higher difficulty levels both brain and reflexes will be comfortably stretched by this brilliant, bare exposition of BioShock's multiple mechanics. Worlds of Hurt gives you the maximum amount of choice possible and forces you to exercise it with imagination and care. Unlike the puzzle levels, it's highly replayable, as you'll want to try out multiple strategies, possibly aiming for the Tough Guy Trophy which only allows you to use Plasmids, Tonics, the Wrench and the Research Camera - but possibly just for the sake of it.

'BioShock Challenge Rooms' Screenshot 2

On one occasion, the Winter Blast Plasmid is used in a direct homage to Super Metroid.

Challenge Rooms is a short experience, but for the relatively small price-tag, it's intriguing, unusual and handsomely crafted. The signposting in particular is done with humour, flair and great sleight-of-hand, as you'd expect from the creators of the original game. You'd also expect it to be gorgeous, and it is - the new settings have all the wrecked glamour and unsettling Deco doom of the main game, with superb, cinematic use of lighting in particular.

But Challenge Rooms doesn't quite live up to its potential. With the Plasmids and Tonics, 2K Boston created a vast, unique and immensely powerful toolset for this kind of condensed, thinking-man's-shooter - but it hasn't figured out how to fully exploit them yet. The puzzle rooms are a drop in the ocean, featuring only a couple of basic, prescribed examples. On the other hand, Worlds of Hurt doesn't have the focus to force players to think laterally and dig the most out of them.

By contrast, Valve's Portal took one tool and extrapolated its potential with devastating and sustained brilliance - leaving just enough room for players to come up with multiple solutions along the way. In its two puzzles especially, Challenge Rooms feels like no more than the first, hesitant step to evolving something similar for the BioShock universe - something we still believe is entirely possible. We hope this isn't the last we see of the concept.

7 / 10

Read the Eurogamer.net scoring policy

Comments (32) Latest comment 3 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Apologie #1 3 years ago

    lol Eurogamer...and i dont even like the game "its very overrated in my opinion", but i wonder if this DLC were for the Xbox360 what the score would be, damn men, why do gaming press have to be so unprofessional and biased, very disapointing.
    Edited by 3 at 26/11/08 @ 14:35
  • jonsaan #2 3 years ago

    Quick question. Can I read this review without spoiling the main game? I've not yet played it see!
  • DFawkes #3 3 years ago

    It'd have got the same on 360. It's 3 levels. It'd have to have been better than Portal to get a great score. And it was never going to be better than Portal.

    Oh, and it's spoiler free, read away :)
    Edited by 1 at 26/11/08 @ 14:35
  • jonsaan #4 3 years ago

  • bad09 #5 3 years ago

    Not that I will be buying it (played both 360 and PC already), but personally I feel PS owners should of had this DLC free seeing as the wait for Bioshock was so long.
  • JYM60 #6 3 years ago

    Not 10/10?

    Colour me surprised.
  • rudedudejude #7 3 years ago

    Review of 3 levels but still now CoD:WoW Wii review of what could be the best FPs on the Wii yet!
  • jonsaan #8 3 years ago

    It's the same game as the other WAWs. Why bother?
  • SeesThroughAll #9 3 years ago

    Simple fact is, these challenge rooms are overpriced.
  • LeD #10 3 years ago

  • Eraysor #11 3 years ago

    I'm in the overrated camp of Bioshock players; it was fun and had a great art style, but the plot was dire and you could get through the whole game just shocking people and shooting them while they're stunned.
  • muscleblade #12 3 years ago

    "I'm in the overrated camp of Bioshock players"

    Me too. I think Dead Space is better. Atleast gameplay wise.
  • Widge #13 3 years ago

    I've not got through Bioshock yet. Just past Peach Wilkins. Issue mainly being huge massive release schedule and buying loads of games at once!

    Want to get up to Fort Frolick since I've heard many people talk about it recently.

    I really like the look of Dead Space! May be something I save for savouring next year as a cheapie in a dry patch perhaps. I can at least try the demo out now to see if I really like it.
    Edited by 1 at 26/11/08 @ 15:35
  • Law07 #14 3 years ago

  • Apologie #15 3 years ago

    Best Bioshok version...

    1st PC (supreme)
    2nd PS3
    3rd Xfixme360
  • Fixxxer #16 3 years ago

    'xfixme360'

    You do realise that doesn't even work right? You could have at least gone with something like Poxy360. It's as if you fanboys are unintelligent or something.
  • Apologie #17 3 years ago

    Fixxxer

    that's a good one fixer :)
  • schnide #18 3 years ago

    Don't get me wrong, I love Eurogamer and I'm generally able to rise about the fanboy swamp, but I really can't help but feel like everything reviewed on PS3 has a general "hmm well it's okay but.." while 360 product seems to get something more akin to glowing.

    Disclaimer: I own a 360. I don't own a PS3.
  • yupyup #19 3 years ago

    'Xfixme360'

    I suppose we should applaud Apologie for being able to count to 3 at least...
  • Les #20 3 years ago

    So BioShock stripped from its shabby story isn't that great anymore. What a surprise... ;)
  • paralipsis #21 3 years ago

    I'm too much of a story oriented gamer to be even vaguely inclined to get these extra levels. I already thought there was one point in the main gain where the story got derailed just to add some extra gameplay, which did not impress me.

    It's still one of my favourite games of 2007, but it had its flaws, and this kind of product could only serve to exacerbate those deficiencies.
  • bad09 #22 3 years ago

    Les, seriously dude, we all know you only played the demo so how could you possibly know if the story was shabby ;)

    If you played the whole game you'd know the story is actually pretty sweet and compelling.
  • Les #23 3 years ago

    "Les, seriously dude, we all know you only played the demo so how could you possibly know if the story was shabby ;)"

    Through the miracle that is the internet... :p
  • bad09 #24 3 years ago

    @ Les

    Oh man the internet!!!

    No wonder you didn't like it. A tip Les, experience things yourself it's much more fun!
  • Les #25 3 years ago

    "No wonder you didn't like it. A tip Les, experience things yourself it's much more fun!"

    I didn't like what I experienced in the demo (gameplay, presentation, basically everything except for the music). When everyone went on about how great the story was I did some googling to see what it was all about. Turned out it was the usual worse-than-a-B-movie story typical for games (and which I don't mind) that killed itself with pretentiousness. If I want a story to be good, I read a book or watch a movie. Stories are gaming's hygiene factor.
  • man.the.king #26 3 years ago

    @schnide

    Yeah man, I get that feeling everytime I see EG review something that just happens to be only on the PS3. Even the most minor niggles get blown up into a mountain if it's on the PS3 (see the reviewer's complaints about creating levels on LBP), while even big glitches are ignored if it's on the 360 ( see the reviewer's complete lack of mention about graphical polish - or lack of it, such as pop-ins and textures - while discussing Fable 2). Now, I guess I should have to provide the obligatory disclaimer about my console ownership? Yeah, I own the following - PS3 (original 60 GB one), 360 (one of the first batches of machines, and still running fine :), and the Wii.
  • shotgun44 #27 3 years ago

    I would have bought this game if these were free. At 6.29 I'll be borrowing my housemates' xbox copy. Greedy fuckers
  • SPKRFCKR #28 3 years ago

    @shotgun44

    How would you have bought it if it was free? Nonsense statement.
  • 3william56 #29 3 years ago

    "why do gaming press have to be so unprofessional and biased, very disapointing."

    ^^
    Look who they're writing for. "Bioshock was shit". Wow. Insightful, balanced, incisive commenters like this.
  • Les #30 3 years ago

    "Its a totally different medium and I think its a bit daft to directly compare its storytelling merits to books or films, you don't play either of those, there's no sense of interactivity or exploration in either of those and your own personal style cant craft how the story unfolds."

    Don't think it's daft as the people creating the stories for games basically look at the way stories are told in books and movies and shove them in a game to provide the actions you perform with some context. Probably has to do with our constant craving for meaning and reason, even when completely inappropriate.

    The very fact that video games are interactive make them inferior as story telling media IMO. It's not something that will go away as gaming matures, it's there by default. Game worlds and gameplay will very likely never escape the uncanny valley and the amount of unbelievability that I'll accept without it detracting from the play experience is inversely correlated with the seriousness of the story.

    I'd love it if game developers concentrated more on making the actual gameplay enjoyable and accepted that they're not books or movies and that the stories are just there to provide some context and that the only thing it has to accomplish is not bother the player.
  • Farzlepot #31 3 years ago

    Peoples' claims that 'games are physically incapable of telling good stories' remind me of people who only watch French movies. Pretentious, in other words...
    Edited by 1 at 27/11/08 @ 16:18
  • Les #32 3 years ago

    "Peoples' claims that 'games are physically incapable of telling good stories' remind me of people who only watch French movies. Pretentious, in other words..."

    LOL. I do think that there's a bit of truth in there though. I think non-native French speakers tend to overrate French movies because due to the language barrier the ridiculousness isn't as striking as it would have been had the same story been told in their native language.

    And BTW, I'm not claiming games are 'physically' incapable of telling good stories (or at least as well as movies and books do). I think games are metaphysically incapable of doing so... :)

    And if we ever do reach the point in which a gameworld produces a 100% convincing world, we humans have made ourselves redundant... ;)