Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

Biology Battle Review

Xbox 360 Review by Kieron Gillen

26 January, 2009

Page 1 of 2. Page 2 ->

Oh my God! It's totally incredible. It's the best shooter I've played in ages. Dangerously compelling, beautifully executed, sonically vicious, mechanistically inspired, scarily polished. I can't get enough of it. It's not only one of the best games on the Xbox 360, but one of the best games of the decade.

Geometry Wars 2 is just as good as everyone said!

I only got around to playing Bizarre Creations' shooter opus whilst reviewing Biology Battle, another one of Microsoft's "community games", for Xbox 360. Since they're both Robotron-derived arena shooters, I wanted to be familiar with the apparent state of the art before offering my opinion on the new pretender. On some level, this is unfair - walking into the room with the hottest person on Earth makes anyone look dowdy. On another level, it's revealing a fundamental truth. They're the same price - 800 Microsoft Points, which is just under seven quid. Which one would you want to play? Well, it's Geometry Wars 2, comrades. Unless there's something about Biology Battle's specific take which means that it's worth owning them both. Is there?

It contextualises its arena shooting more than most of its type. Rather than just dropping you in an enclosed space, allowing you to zoom around firing in a separate direction to the way you're facing and having masses of enemies spawn before trying to hurt you via the medium of high-speed collision, it actually tells a little story. With a Portal/World of Goo-esque ironic sheen, you're positioned as a medical corporation's nanobot going inside creatures to zap stuff. So presumably the arena is a cell, and all the enemies appearing are antibodies. I wish real biology was more like this when you looked down a microscope, as I might not have been bored for all four years of my degree. A term paper on "Lightning Smart Bombs Effect On Intercellular Cytostasis" would have been a definite first anyway.

'Biology Battle' Screenshot 1

Small is beautiful. Keep telling yourself that.

Its main mechanistic flourish is its life-mode and death-mode dichotomy. In a standard game, you start in life mode, and find your points multiplier increasing by your mere existence. Eventually you'll come across a big baddy who you destroy, gaining access to the Armageddon power-up. From that point onwards, you can activate it at any moment and switch to death mode. If you do so, you gain a one-time 10x multiplier, which doesn't increase again as you go on to face a whole new mob of baddies (with a few different power-ups). Point being, there's a neat tactical pay-off. If you want to maximise your score you'll want to stay in life mode as much as long as possible before switching to death mode to get that 10x bonus and earn some serious points. If you swap too early, you'll have a load of lives to play in death mode, but you'll basically be earning nothing for shooting the pesky antibodies. If you swap too late, you might not have enough lives to maximise points.

That play is most important in the global challenge mode, where you compete on a leaderboard, which is pretty nifty programming given that community games can't access the official servers (apparently it's all peer-to-peer - magical peer-to-peer). While you can't track friends, you're constantly aware of where in the whole world rankings you are and how many points you need to reach the next level. While the lack of friends is a loss, the sense of this simple arcade game being plugged into something far larger adds a lot to the experience.

There's also local play, allowing you to play either by yourself at various difficulty levels or co-operatively with friends, which is ideal if you've got three comrades who fancy experiencing what it's like to be part of the immune response inside the human body. There are also party versus modes, which are for when being part of the immune response isn't enough. Some are takes of arcade classics - for example, versions of lightbikes with a trail bobbling along behind your tiny biology-thing and you trying to force your opposition into colliding with them, or an arena-based shooter enlivened with an ability to drop antonymous turrets. Some riff a little wilder, like the Froghop game, which is basically a Frogger-esque race to a safe point across a screen of enemies.

To Page 2 ->

Advertisement

Are you excited about Biology Battle on Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-21 of 21 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
HuggyAtHome
26/01/09 @ 08:18
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Please no more 2 stick shooters.

Please.
daz_john_smith
26/01/09 @ 08:19
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Do they actually get to choose the price point of their game or do Microsoft choose it for them? I really enjoyed the Biology Battle demo and thought it was one of the best community games, however pricing it on a par with Geometry Wars 2 is suicide. Geometry War 1 is only half the price as well.
Goatboy
26/01/09 @ 08:36
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
They choose their price.
cymro
26/01/09 @ 08:41
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
2 pages to slag off a community game?
not much news about then?
Edited 1 times, most recently on 26/01/09 @ 08:42
menage
26/01/09 @ 08:50
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I always want to like these games. But seeing as I suck at them I always end up hating them, Even GW, too freaking chaotic for me. Only one I liked was Mutant Storm Empire.
Tzetrik
26/01/09 @ 09:02
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
microsoft or the game publisher chooses the price, not the developer.
penhalion
26/01/09 @ 09:20
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Tzetrik

With community games the developer chooses the price. You are thinking of live arcade games, which are a different category.
sneetch
26/01/09 @ 10:32
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Xerx3s
If you don't know what you're talking about, don't post.

Xerx3s, this place would be a ghost town if we followed that rule! ;)
Vistrix
26/01/09 @ 11:15
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Correct me if im wrong, but Microsoft still have a large influence over the price point because they get a fair share of the price. Developers have to increase the price point for some profit.

Right?
Edited 1 times, most recently on 26/01/09 @ 11:15
Monkey_Puncher
26/01/09 @ 11:15
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Johnny Platform's BIscuit Romp > Killzone 2
Monkey_Puncher
26/01/09 @ 11:16
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Vistrix, you're wrong. Microsoft have no say on the price or the content of XNA games, it's all up to the developers.
Ranger101
26/01/09 @ 11:32
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If your game is above 50megs, then you can't set it at the lowest pricepoint of 200 points, otherwise its completely up to you - hence the ludicrous prices that some of these devs with no pride have put up for their pieces of shit that they call a game.

Some of these XBLA Community developers are an embarassment to the trade. I just hope that they don't ruin the reputation (and jeopordise the existence) of XBLC games before we ship our first professional effort out on there.
SpaceMidget75
26/01/09 @ 12:14
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I agree. My first XNA will be priced at the lowest price possible. 200 pts so far.

The way I see it, any money I get for this is a bonus considering I get paid for developing elsewhere as my day job.

This just allows me to be more creative and bring in a little extra to help feed the kids. =]

Besides, at 200pts I feel more people will be willing to splash out.

Ergates_Antius
26/01/09 @ 12:57
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
A term paper on "Lightning Smart Bombs Effect On Intercellular Cytostasis" would have been a definite first anyway.
Actually, I think I read a similar paper in Trends in Biochemical Sciences a couple of years ago.
miiiguel
26/01/09 @ 14:03
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Please no more 2 stick shooters. "

I was thinking about that too, couple of weeks ago..., then I played Groov.

Too bad the guy who did it didn't put an email address in the credits section. I'd like to sugest him the use of custom soundtracks, that would be something! Also the slow-motion during the down tempo is kinda useless, it should be some sort of blast or something.
Ooops, this is not about Groov...

btw, I bought Biology Batles, I think it deserves the money.
Edited 2 times, most recently on 26/01/09 @ 14:07
Ranger101
26/01/09 @ 15:16
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
We're probably going to hit the 150mb limit, so the 200pts option won't be available to us, but needless to say, I won't have the audacity to charge the same price as what the fantastically awesome Bionic Commando Rearmed team did.

We just want to make available, at a reasonable exchange of value, what we think would be an awesome game to share with other Xboxians. (And maybe Steam too if it doesn't cost an arm and a leg to get published there).
L_Ron_Cupboard
26/01/09 @ 15:47
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
i switched off when he mentioned world of goo. again. shut up about it already.
Lawlost
26/01/09 @ 21:32
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Kieron can you persuade the guys at pom pom to do this http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/astro-... or the original space tripper for the xbox 360.

/thanks in advance
Notez
27/01/09 @ 07:12
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Geometry Wars 2 is just as dreadfully boring as everyone said!

Fixed. Taking that into consideration 800p does seem a bit high for this as well.
muscleblade
27/01/09 @ 12:50
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@miiiguel

You bought this, but havent played GeoWars 2, Pac Man CE or Omega Five. Too me thats strange.

Comments: 1-21 of 21 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery