Best of the iPad
10 essential launch titles for Apple's slab.
According to Steve Jobs himself, the iPad offers "freedom from porn," which is an interesting remark to make about a device that positively redefines the notion of gadget porn. To own one right now is to abandon yourself to shameless, unfettered lust for something you probably don't need.
Don't get me wrong, I bloody love playing around with the thing, but there's no real logic to forking out more than £400 for something that, right now, from a gaming perspective does little that the iPhone and iPod Touch don't do already. But hell, if you've got the money, surrendering to the wanton desire for something you don't really need is familiar territory for the early adopter.
So, join me for a cash-unconscious whistle-stop tour of the best of the launch line-up, so that you can feel a bit better about re-purchasing upscaled versions of all those games you already own.
(Note: Given that most of these titles have already made their mark on iPhone, I'm going to assume that you're already reasonably well aware of how brilliant they are, and instead will focus on how well they work on the iPad, and whether the extra screen size and visual fidelity makes a quantifiable difference.)
Flight Control HD
- £2.99 (iPhone version £0.59)

Flight Control HD: Scribblenauts.
Guiding little planes and helicopters onto colour-coded landing strips with your own fingers sounds immensely dull - that is, until you get your hands on Firemint's ludicrously addictive touchscreen marvel. What starts out as a pleasantly sedate coffee break diversion soon turns into a feverish exercise in multi-tasking as you frantically try to stop idiotic aircraft from smashing into one another.
Is it better on the iPad? Unquestionably yes. Firstly, it isn't a straight upscaled port like most of the quick-and-dirty efforts out there, but essentially Flight Control on a grander scale, with a much greater playing area available to you. Plus, if you've got stupid sausage fingers, then playing it on the 10" touch screen feels absolutely luxurious, with a little more precision afforded to the paths you trace.
Geometry Wars: Touch
- £5.99 (no iPhone version)
Full disclosure: I absolutely loathe fake twin-stick games on the iPhone with a passion bordering on the psychotic. Imagine my delight when I discovered that DoubleSix Games had elected to faithfully port Bizarre Creations' Xbox Live Arcade sequel using this abhorrent control system. Unleash the hounds!

Geometry Wars Touch: Play with your toes for extra glory.
At first, all my worst fears were realised as the lack of tactile precision resulted in countless unforced errors and pathetically low scores, but a bit of patience and no small amount of talcum powder (you read that right) to reduce the friction turned it into a pleasantly enjoyable affair.
Is it better on the iPad? Well, in this case it's competing with the native 360 version, so obviously not, but as a technical showcase for the brilliance of the iPad's screen, few games come anywhere near this impressive. While you might pull off a few unexpectedly decent scores, the margin for error and general unsuitability for touch screen controls stops it from being a game you'd rather play on the iPad. On top of that, they've annoyingly locked the screen orientation, making it a bugger to play if you're using headphones. Tsk.
Plants vs. Zombies HD
- £5.99 (iPhone version £1.79)
Is there any sane, living being that doesn't love Plants vs. Zombies? Released on innumerable platforms over the past couple of years, it's probably PopCap's finest hour, and definitely one of the best tower defence games you'll ever play. It could well be your favourite iPad game. It will definitely be Ellie's.

Plants vs. Zombies: Not quite what George Romero had in mind.
Presented with an obscenely adorable art style and wry sense of humour, it makes the tired notion of fending off scores of slavering zombies more fun than it reasonably has any right to be. Who needs guns and axes when you've got vengeful plants and lawnmowers on your side? Come to that, who needs other games?
Is it better on the iPad? Honestly, there's not a lot in it. Side by side, the game works just as well on the iPhone, but the iPad just about shades it when the action really heats up and you need that extra bit of precision in object selection and placement that the small-screen version lacks. On the other hand, you really are paying more than three times as much for the luxury. You could, of course, just play your iPhone version on the big screen, but think of all the pixels you'll miss out on, skinflint.
Angry Birds HD
- £2.99 (iPhone version £0.59)
Another game that feels the need to be five times the price on the iPad for the sake of a sharper resolution, but given how cheap it is I'm inclined to let Rovio rake in a bit more cash for making a stupendously addictive bird-flinging tale of revenge. As before, your sole purpose is to catapult a handful of malevolent birds in order to take out the pesky green pigs that have allegedly stolen their eggs, and it's a formula that's as addictive as it is annoying. WHY WON'T THEY JUST DIE?
Is it better on the iPad? Unlike some of the other ports doing the rounds, there isn't any specific advantage to playing Angry Birds on a bigger screen other than the woolly notion of it being 'nicer'. You don't gain greater precision, and the visuals are basically exactly the same. To compound matters, publisher Chillingo hasn't bothered to include the extra levels that were subsequently released on the iPhone version. Swizz.
Real Racing HD
- £5.99 (iPhone version £2.99)
Despite the burly presence of Need For Speed: Shift and Asphalt 5 in the iPad launch line-up, it's actually this plucky outsider that impresses most in the racing stakes - something that won't come as any surprise to those who bought the game on iPhone last year.

Real Racing HD: One of the few games with a playable in-car view.
As with most racing games on the platform, this is another that allows you to focus entirely on just steering the car, rather than worry too much about adjusting your speed. With the dimensions of the iPad absolutely perfect for replicating the action of turning a steering wheel, you simply hold your hands at either ends of the device and tilt left or right into the bends.
While the rather dated-looking visuals aren't exactly stretching the iPad's capabilities, an excellent in-car view and all-round more exciting driving experience puts it some margin ahead of its rather staid competitors.
Is it better on the iPad? Despite its rather jaggy appearance, Real Racing HD still has the capacity to impress by virtue of its grander scale, fooling your brain into feeling like you're playing a game on a massive telly as opposed to a 10" handheld.
Pinball HD
- £1.79 (no iPhone version)

Pinball HD: Insert 'wicky wicky wa wa' joke here.
There are maybe as many as 5000 pinball games on the iPhone (not much of an exaggeration), so it's hardly surprising that the iPad launch line-up already contains five of the bloody things. Top of the heap is easily Gameprom's offering, which pulls together four of its iPhone offerings into one excellent-value compilation that is unexpectedly entertaining.
Is it better on the iPad? As you might imagine, the iPad is near enough the perfect platform for pinball simulators, with its pin-sharp, beautifully detailed backdrops and simple controls making it easy to provide an authentic approximation of the real thing. Needless to say, the dimensions of the device lend themselves extremely well to pinball, though you can actually play the game in any orientation you choose should you wish to forego the more logical vertical option. You'll be playing by sense of smell before you know it.
Vector Runner HD
- £1.79 (iPhone version: £0.59)
My, how it's grown. The famous Flash game from 2007 escaped my attention when it came out for iPhone a couple of months back, but its HD arrival on the iPad is very welcome indeed.

Vector Runner HD: The Impossible Game in a head-on collision with 3D Death Chase.
In true early-eighties tradition, its single-minded premise tasks you with nothing more than left/right avoidance of oncoming obstacles at frenetic speed, and comes across as a blistering retro-futurist fusion of The Impossible Game with 3D Death Chase. If you can stop playing it, you're a better man than I.
Is it better on the iPad? There's not much in it, but its upscaled vector glory is truly beautiful to behold. Sometimes it's the simple pleasures that really click on the iPad, and this is definitely one of them.
Mirror's Edge for iPad
- £7.49 (no iPhone equivalent)
Widely regarded as the pick of the iPad launch line-up, it's easy to see why US critics have been all a-froth about this beautiful free-running platformer. Like a more coherent Canabalt, you must guide Faith safely across endless rooftops and obstacles, leaping, sliding, wall jumping and wall running to the end of each level.
Is it better on the iPad? Like all the best touchscreen games, Mirror's Edge for iPad succeeds by not trying to replicate a joypad. Instead, via a series of taps and context-specific slide motions, you can pull off a breathless array of acrobatic manoeuvres in a way that could be frustratingly out-of-reach on the full-blown version. If anything, EA has done a better job with this version of making a free-running game than DICE managed, and this should be your first port of call when deciding which games to buy.
Tap Tap Radiation
- Free (not available on iPhone)

Tap Tap Radiation: Can you feel the force?
The innumerable Tap Tap games on iPhone always showed a certain degree of promise, but always seemed slightly held back by the limitations of the screen dimensions. With more room to play with, Tap Tap Radiation sees Tapulous shake off some of those shackles with a brilliantly entertaining rhythm action title.
Despite offering up some excellent tracks (including a cracking Datarock track and a great Massive Attack remix), its free nature ensures that it is saddled with a song list that even a hardened music nerd will struggle to be familiar with. No matter, though, because the game itself operates well within its determinedly limited framework.
Is it better on the iPad? There's no denying the gameplay feels a lot more varied, with the pressure pads often shifting place mid-song, while the backdrop feel more psychedelic than ever. Going back to play the old Tap Tap titles is pretty jarring by comparison.
Sam & Max: The Devil's Playhouse Episode 1: The Penal Zone
- £3.99 (not available on iPhone)

Sam & Max: Point and click becomes point and point.
For point-and-click adventure fans, the iPad is positively a dream come true, offering up what amounts to the perfect platform for the genre. The arrival of Telltale's third season of Sam & Max for a bargain price is, obviously, wonderful news, and a sure sign that developers are eyeing the platform with interest. Indeed, the fact that the new season actually premiered on iPad in the US was a real coup for the format.
Is it better on the iPad? In comparison to the PC and PS3 versions we've played, not really. Although the controls and interface are absolutely tailor made for the iPad, it's clear that Telltale struggled to optimise the game's performance adequately. It's not a complete deal-breaker, but the appearance of regular jarring slowdown takes a little away from what would have otherwise been an absolute must-buy.
Bubbling under
With dozens of titles to wade through, forming a definitive top 10 was a real struggle, so here's a list of some of the other games you should keep in mind for your iPad shopping list.
- Scrabble
- Super Monkey Ball 2
- Dungeon Hunter HD
- Worms HD
- Galcon Fusion
- Fieldrunners
- Command & Conquer: Red Alert
You may also like...
-
Why Devs Owe You Nothing
-
Digital Foundry: PS3 Skyrim Lag Fixed?
-
Face-Off: The Darkness 2
-
EA evaluating FIFA Street features for FIFA 13
-
Who Killed Rare?
-
App of the Day: Sir Benfro's Brilliant Balloon
-
Gotham City Impostors Review
-
Sony admits "dropping the ball" with Demon's Souls
-
Kingdoms of Amalur: Reckoning Review
-
Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 Vita Review
-
The Darkness 2 Review
-
CD Projekt: Witcher 2 intro cinematic "the most expensive asset we ever created"
-
Grand Slam Tennis 2 Review
-
Skyrim patch 1.4 now live for Xbox 360
-
One Piece: Unlimited Cruise SP Review
-
Skyrim patch 1.4 performance tip: make a new manual save
-
Metal Gear Solid: The "Lost" HD Remasters
-
Epic's Sweeney on graphics tech: "the limit really is in sight"
-
King Arthur 2 Review
-
Mass Effect 3 FemShep trailer debuts
-
Samsung Galaxy Note Review
-
Next Xbox has tablet-like touch-screen controller - rumour
-
Double Fine Adventure passes Day of the Tentacle budget
-
Valve admits hackers accessed Steam transaction log
-
App of the Day: Superman









Comments (70) Latest comment 2 years ago
Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
That's all I needed to know.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'd really love an ipad but I can't see it happening at that price. Just total luxury.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Thanks.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I wouldn't exactly call myself a pauper, but i'm intelligent enough to not wantto wank £400 up against this pointless device, thanks.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
As I expected they all look like PC games from 15 years ago. Or iPhone games from a year ago.
Also, the problem with Real Racing HD is when steering using the tilt sensor of the iPad you are also moving the screen. Unless the software somehow actively self-rights the screen level this really annoys me, and instantly puts the game into the 'gimmicky' category. But yeah, no need to worry about adjusting your speed; when have braking and accelerating ever been an important part of RACING.
All my bitching aside though, is the iPad really for games? I mean you could spend the same amount of money on a very good PC and play all the latest PC games and have them looking glorious at very high resolutions.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Yeah, but you couldn't fit a high powered PC in your pocket!
Oh, wait.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
But surely "from a gaming perspective" is key here. A consumer who buys an iPad purely for games is perhaps not using their money as efficiently as they might. That doesn't mean the whole device can be painted with the same brush. Oh who am I kidding, carry on people.
Anyway, what I meant to say was Flight Control is bloody brilliant. Along with Angry Birds, it represents the best value game experience I have ever purchased in my life. No kidding. Countless hours of top quality play for 59p cannot be argued with.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
And I think you really have to try one for yourself to appreciate the convenience.
And as for the iPad, as an iPod touch owner I'm both tempted and put off: on the one hand I know the experience would be very similar to the iPod, on the other hand an iPad is fucking expensive.
In any case, it's an irrational purchase anyway. I'd still love to get one nevertheless.
And there's nothing like playing Orbital on the loo, by the way!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Compared to that, the prices for PSP and NDS games are simply absurd.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Exactly. The hostility towards the iPad on a website where people happily import launch consoles and whatnot is hilariously pathetic.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Maybe if people weren't called hilariously pathetic for not liking an expensive tablet they wouldn't be so hostile
Comment below viewing threshold Show
/negged
Comment below viewing threshold Show
If it gets down to 300 EUR I get one.
As already said, whether it appeals to you depends on what sort of person you are. I, for one, don't give a fiddler's fart about mobiles. Or car stereos. Or Facebook. Or Twitter. But I do like gadgets, so...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
1. We are talking about gaming here. Need has absolutely nothing to do with it. Neither does practicality for that matter. It is all about irreverant desire.
2. "Its just for people with more money than sense". That is just something jealous people say, and it always has been.
And I tell you what, I would just LOVE to have more money than sense. I've got more than enough sense already thanks very much, a surplus of money is what I am missing.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Why, of course it is. News flash: so is your 360. And your accessories and games. And your TV.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Allegedly, social (penis?) envy is often about as strong in Apple haters as the Force is in farm boys from Tatooine.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I think you just have to accept that people think Apple products are very expensive, so taht's always gonna be an issue for some people. It's not uninformed idiocy, there's probably a lot of Apple fans in these unnecessarily bad-tempered discussions that would actually agree with that.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The generalization is uninformed idiocy. But that's not even the point - if someone posted in every Porsche-related topic in a car forum how the cars are too expensive, and in every Leica-thread in a photography forum, hell, if someone who only buys used games posted in every review of a new game how it's all overpriced, you'd think he's a retard. Or I really hope you'd do. Same thing here.
"Value for money" isn't an objective term, but narrow-minded people like to extrapolate their own idea to everyone else and constantly point out the result. Clear signs of limited intelligence, in my book.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
This.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I think also, if we are being open about it, "people who dislike Apple products for unrelated reasons think Apple products are very expensive" also accounts for a not insignificant number of negative comments.
Apple is just one of those companies that people like to hate, and it is probably in part due to the desirability of their products coupled with their relative expense.
As UncleLou suggests, Porshe owners probably consider Porshes to be good value, but they are in the fortunate position of being able to make that judgement. The have-nots are not able to make that judgement, as affordability always usurps value (and in most instances where that occurs, sour grapes are quick to follow).
If Apple kit was cheaper, I have no doubt a fair chunk of people (not everyone of course) would suddenly stop having such an issue with other unrelated aspects of their products.
Edit: I'm not saying people who can't justify the spend on an iPad are paupers btw. I can't justify the spend myself, but I like to think I am able to seperate the two issues and not get angry about it (or pretend I don't want an iPad, which I totally do.... for reasons that have bugger all to do with need).
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I'll admit Apple is kind of a special case and there is certainly a lot of irrational hatred for the company (and irrational love!) but price matters for everything, especially when it's high, and you have to admit that Apple stuff is usually highly-priced.
I like to think I am able to seperate the two issues and not get angry about it
I really don't see anyone getting angry about the price here. The only thing I see is people getting angry that some people dared to mention it.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
How about we all just assume someone gave us an iPad for free, and proceed from there? I agree that price is a real factor in everyones' lives, but as a discussion point repeated in every thread about iPads, its get boring really quickly.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
That might make for a more interesting discussion I agree. But you couldn't possible review it like that, or talk about whether you might want one.
edit: How do I get myself into this stuff? iPad - Like the idea of it, lovely form factor, wish it had a few gaming buttons, too restricted in general. Might buy one if it was cheaper as I could forgive the flaws, but at the price there are too many compromises. That's my view, sorry I couldn't get it across without a dig at the price
I'll try and stay out of iPad discussions, like I stay away from AAA game review discussions - for some reason people seem to take these too personally.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Yet, many people think the iPhone is a triumph of excess and style over practical use. I'd argue that the money I've spent on my iPhone has actually saved me a fortune in DS and console games.
Same thing could be applied to the iPad...if I had the initial outlay to buy one I genuinely think it would represent a pretty sensible purchase for me, given that most of my gaming is now done dotted around various comfortable places in my house and garden.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Seriously, is this nothing more than a gadget that apparently straddles the gap between an iPhone and a netbook/laptop? If so, was there any real reason to fill that gap?
IMO, no. It doesn't offer the mobility of an iPhone, nor the power or utility of a similarly priced netbook/laptop. So what does that leave behind? Brand.
It's an Apple geeks gadget, not because it offers any particular hike in power or utility but because it's got the Apple brand on it. I work with a guy who was so enthralled by the iPad that he had his pre-release order in and did nothing but waffle on about it. At no point could he actually tell anyone why he was so taken by it. He already had a good Apple laptop and desktop, along with an iPhone. It's just an 'extra' thing he can use for bragging rights.
Cost isn't a problem for me. I don't look at the price and get put off, in the slightest. I already own an iPhone so my real problem with the iPad is, what does it offer me that I can't do on my laptop? What's more, what can such a closed system like the iPad offer over a Linux or Windows based device?
Nope, it's not a matter of cost. Or value. It simply doesn't offer anything practical, over similar devices already on the market.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Noone is getting angry about people mentioning the iPad being expensive. It's however trolling mentality and stupidity that do indeed annoy me, yes.
FWIW, I am not buying an iPad for myself. I am buying one for my parents, who have absolutely no idea whatsoever how to use a computer, but who immediately knew how to use my iPhone. Maybe I should buy them an Xbox instead because it's better value for money...
Comment below viewing threshold Show
If there was no reason, it will crash and burn. Simple as. The market will decide. Not you, not me. "Brand" alone doesn't make a product successful, ask Sony. That's just a weak excuse. Looking at the sales figures so far, there seems to have been a massive gap for an always-on, small, intuitively to use browsing/multimedia device. A gap netbooks and laptops obviously haven't filled.
Don't make the mistake of projecting your needs and expectations to everyone else.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Funny you should say that, my 4 year old nephew was enthralled by the moving 'unlock' slider on my iPhone...one day whilst sat with him he slid it all the way and unlocked it...a minute later he had flicked through 4 screens to my games screen and picked the logo he liked the look of (Angry Birds!), once in to that he then immediately figured out what he was doing and is now up to Level 7. Watching him using it made it clear to me just how uncluttered and straightforward it all is, I'd never really appreciated that 'it just works' before.
Considering I can't even work out how the hell my other halfs Samsung touch-screen phone works, I'd say that was pretty impressive.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Same way as people tirelessly goes on about the evils of PSPGo, PS3, X360 and so on in every article! There is after all DF anaylsis article on iPad which is a more suitable forum on the merits/demerits of the platform?!
Now article is ABOUT the top iPad apps, and that would he a discussion points as fouls be seen as launch line up, whether that such or such inclusion/exclusion a mistake or a proper recognition?
Some of EG readers may already got iPad or pre ordered it, and would find this interesting?!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Its not relevant to you, but your mistake is to assume that applies equally to everyone else. For some, an iPhone with a big screen for use at home is perfectly relevant enough.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I asume you can back this "fact" up?
I've used that term and, as far as I'm aware, have not been the least bit jealous while doing so. For example; $25 virtual horses, for a game you already pay a subscription fee, are for people with more money than sense. I'm not jealous, I don't play that particular game, I just feel it's grossly over priced and question the sense of people that make such a purchase.
On the subject of the iPad. I'm fortunate enough to be in the position were price alone is rarely a road block. What you get for that price is always going to be a factor however and I feel, like many others, that it is overpriced. From what I've seen it offers nothing you can't already do with other products, including Apples own products.
Of course this is just my opinion. Everyone has their own sense of value and for some the iPad is priced fine, but you guys have more money than sense
Edit: By the way, I have no problem with the article. It's a valid article and I'm sure the people who do own iPads, or are thinking about getting one, find it informative. I did.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
"I asume you can back this "fact" up?"
Of course not. And its not a fact, its just mt opinion (which I clearly value pretty highly)
My point is that its a daft phrase. It implies a lack of sense, when in fact a huge amount of money would also qualify. As I said, I consider myself to be quite sensible, and I would love to have more money than sense.
Edit: and I also take objection when people state their own preferences and requirements, and then go on to suggest that anyone who has different preferences and requirements must be substandard in some way. Someone who buys an iPad might have no sense, or they might just have different preferences from you. Its very narrow minded to assume that your own subjective choice is "correct", and a different choice is "wrong" and must therefore be the result of some flawed thinking.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Your point may have been that you think it's a daft phrase (aren't they all?), but you stated it was used by the jealous alone, which is a load of crap.
Its very narrow minded to assume that your own subjective choice is "correct", and a different choice is "wrong" and must therefore be the result of some flawed thinking.
Agreed, but that goes both ways. People who feel the iPad is priced fine and anyone who thinks different are jealous and/or poor are just as bad as the people who feel it is overpriced and think you're crazy for wasting your money.
By the way, this comment; "but you guys have more money than sense
Comment below viewing threshold Show
You are getting far too hung up on this.
I personally just think that "more money than sense" is a pointless throwaway phrase that de-intellectualises a discussion. It is an insult disguised as a meaningful statement, when it is really nothing of the sort (are we actually suggesting we can measure both money and sense, and than compare them on the same scale?).
It is essentially saying "we disgree on the value of a product, but I shall attempt to say that the source of your disagreement is low intellect", and so I hold the phrase in comtempt. It has no place in sensible discussion.
"Agreed, but that goes both ways"
Of course it does. I have never said I have a problem with the personal reasons someone chooses to not buy an iPad (I am one of those people myself). I have simply addressed that said people have presented own personal reasons as factual reasons why they everyone else on the planet should behave in the same way.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Cheers KR.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
And they'll laugh at you. HD does not cover any one specific resolution. Look it up.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
"But you always get the same bunch of uninformed idiots in Apple threads like kosigan here. Who has the nerve to call Apple products stupidly expensive, while having dozens pf PS3 games in his library. That's the sort of idiocy I mean.
When you can get similarly-capable Netbooks starting at £220 (have a look at http://www.misco.co.uk for examples) - without Apple's refusal to support the most widely-used video format on the internet - how can you defend £400 as not being expensive? Do all Apple products come with rose-tinted spectacles now? Then you have the temerity to present as fact an assumption of how many games I have. You don't know me at all. If you want to choose Apple's products, that's your perogative - but there's no sensible argument against them being expensive unless you happen to ignore a large slice of reality.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
"And they'll laugh at you. HD does not cover any one specific resolution. Look it up."
HD means a vertical resolution of at least 720 lines. Horizontal resolution is not specified. So, technically, we've all had HD for as long as we've had 1024x768 monitors - the resolution that the iPad uses.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
"And they'll laugh at you. HD does not cover any one specific resolution. Look it up."
HD means a vertical resolution of at least 720 lines. Horizontal resolution is not specified. So, technically, we've all had HD for as long as we've had 1024x768 monitors - the resolution that the iPad uses.
Yeah exactly! So the iPad does technically fall in the HD 'zone'. The reason developers are using the term HD for their apps is mostly to distinguish them from their iPhone versions, although personally I think "for iPad" would be a better suffix.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
"But you always get the same bunch of uninformed idiots in Apple threads like kosigan here. Who has the nerve to call Apple products stupidly expensive, while having dozens pf PS3 games in his library. That's the sort of idiocy I mean.
When you can get similarly-capable Netbooks starting at £220 (have a look at http://www.misco.co.uk for examples) - without Apple's refusal to support the most widely-used video format on the internet - how can you defend £400 as not being expensive? Do all Apple products come with rose-tinted spectacles now? Then you have the temerity to present as fact an assumption of how many games I have. You don't know me at all. If you want to choose Apple's products, that's your perogative - but there's no sensible argument against them being expensive unless you happen to ignore a large slice of reality.
I don't think even Apple users would argue their stuff isn't 'expensive' but you called it 'stupidly expensive'. That comes with the unavoidable implication you'd have to be stupid to pay it. You also compared the iPad to a laptop computer.
One last time folks: the iPad is not a laptop and nor is it meant to replace one. For a lot of casual laptop/netbook users, it is replacing them, but Jobs couldn't have made it any more clear in his presentation: the iPad is designed to occupy a new category between smartphones and laptops.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Not once said that. Read the thread. You made a sweeping generalization how all Apple products are "stupidly expensive". Which is nonsense.
Oh, and personally, I think netbooks are useless, impractical crap.
Then you have the temerity to present as fact an assumption of how many games I have. You don't know me at all.
I clicked on your profile. There's a long list of games you allegedly own.
/shrug
Do all Apple products come with rose-tinted spectacles now?
Don't know, my iPhone didn't come with them. I don't own any other Apple products. I am not defending Apple, I am pointing out ignorance.
God, if there's one thing I can't stand when people start whining after you call them out for trolling. Either troll and stand by it, or shut up in the first place.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I sure do enjoy these little chats about whether this resolution or that resolution is proper HD you know, I can't imagine anything more interesting.
If HD was defined as 680 lines instead of 720, or 300 lines, or 12000 lines.... would it really make any difference?
Have scientists discovered some part of the brain that boosts the release of endorphins when it sees a 720p image?
Do people not realise that the distance from the screen, and the size of the screen, are more important factors?
I mean, for all this waffle about whether the screen of the iPad is 720 or 680, has anyone actually stopped to wonder whether the exact number really matters AT ALL.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I am? No more than you are, I'm sure.
I personally just think that "more money than sense" is a pointless throwaway phrase that de-intellectualises a discussion.
Fine, but this; "That is just something jealous people say, and it always has been." wasn't the most intellectual response either and just as insulting.
Most phrases are pointless and throwaway. You know that. So why treat this one so literally? I'm pretty sure the people who use it aren't actually comparing sense and money in a numerical manner.
How you responded also has no place in a sensible discussion.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Ok, my fault, hands up in the air. I said it was always a result of jealously, clearly that was nonsense. Despite how it is frequently said in jealousy, there are some instances of unknown quantity where that is not the case.
"Most phrases are pointless and throwaway"
Quite true. Certainly an awful lot of what I say is exactly that. I don't know what I was thinking with the whole jealousy thing. I must have lost my mind for a moment there, but I feel better now
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Not only underpowered, but "rubbish" as well?
Wow, well I guess with these new scientific findings just in, the iPad's future is looking very fragile. Steve Jobs must be kicking himself.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Real Racing does in fact have a self righting mechanism so when you twist the iPad the view stays level for you (can be switched off if you want tho), at least Real Racing on the iPhone does and I'd assume the iPad features this also. I love how people come up with criticisms when they obviously have never had a go themselves and assume their criticism is true.
I think people suggesting for the same price you can buy a PC and get any games you want in better graphics really are missing the point. Nobody is trying to say this will replace the desktop or console gaming experience, and playing games is one string in the iPad's bow, but it is a unique proposition to developers offering people a new way to play games (well, a bit old now but in a bigger and clearer guise compared with the iPhone). Some developers will try to shoe horn in gaming genres we're all familiar with and trying to play a FPS using virtual analogue sticks isn't really much fun but that doesn't mean it's a failure, it just means they probably shouldn't be trying to make games like that and you lot shouldn't be expecting games like that.
What I've found with my iPhone is a wealth of incredibly different games, and apps which can be productive and incredibly fun (many of the music making apps like Loop-Tastic spring to mind). There's a whole wealth of games and experiences that are only possible on a device like the iPad, games which only work well on a device like this and don't replicate at all well to a desktop or console scenario, where having that tactile immediate response to your fingers on the screen gives you a greater sense of emersion than clutching a controller or a keyboard ever could. For instanse Flight control would be wank if you were drawing the flight paths with a mouse or worse yet an analogue stick. It would work but nowhere near as well as on the iPad/iPhone. I wish people would focus more on these than complaining that it can't do this or that. The creativity apps like Brushes look stunning and there's so much potential here, I wish people would see the bigger picture.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
"I sure do enjoy these little chats about whether this resolution or that resolution is proper HD you know, I can't imagine anything more interesting. "
Hey, I didn't come up with the specifications, I'm just pointing out what they are. Check on Wikipedia if you want verificiation. You'll find that even more interesting.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
If there was no reason, it will crash and burn. Simple as. The market will decide. Not you, not me. "Brand" alone doesn't make a product successful, ask Sony. That's just a weak excuse. Looking at the sales figures so far, there seems to have been a massive gap for an always-on, small, intuitively to use browsing/multimedia device. A gap netbooks and laptops obviously haven't filled.
Don't make the mistake of projecting your needs and expectations to everyone else.
You couldn't be more wrong. Never underestimate the power of brand loyalty. Those million iPad sales could easily be Apple gadget geeks, knee-jerking for their next fix.
What you actually mean is, don't make the mistake of projecting your needs and expectations, against those of ignorant people. No offence but people like your parents, for example who seemingly can't get their head around double-clicking an IE shortcut and figuring out the difference between left click and right click, on a laptop.
/shrug
Ignorance should never be underestimated. Apple target their products against a 'broad' audience, based absolutely on ignorance. If people who aren't Apple geeks actually took the time to investigate, spec for spec what a good laptop offers versus an iPad, the iPad would be severely in the negative. It's so far behind, it's laughable.
Purely on looks, it does look nice. I don't disagree. I think my iPhone is a great piece of kit, in context to where it sits in the hierarchy of gadgets (phones/true mobile devices). Look beyond that on an iPad though, shit resolution, not mobile (won't fit in your pocket), no hardware keyboard, very limited external device connections, piss-poor storage. Do I need to go on?
iPad will sell, no doubt. But it won't sell to informed consumers who are switched on about this kind of thing. It will sell to Apple gadget geeks and the ignorant masses. Does that make it a great piece of kit? Sorry, no it doesn't. It makes it a good looking and cleverly marketed piece of kit. Big difference.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Its not relevant to you, but your mistake is to assume that applies equally to everyone else. For some, an iPhone with a big screen for use at home is perfectly relevant enough.
I don't disagree but those 'some' will either be Apple fanatics or the ignorant masses who Apple reach out to.
Like i've said above, if those ignorant masses took the time to investigate further they could blag a laptop that would offer them so much more than an iPad.
Flip it the other way, what does an iPad offer above and beyond a similarly priced laptop? The only two things I can think of are a touch screen and the 'clipboard' carry but even the latter point is something people are already moaning about, to which the Apple geeks are suggesting they buy effectively a monitor stand for it. So how is it mobile, then?
It doesn't have a place and i'd put money on sales really dropping in the coming months. iFad indeed.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
None of your arguments against the iPad warrant a response - they're all the foaming-mouth rantings of someone staunchly opposed to people making their own mind up about owning a gadget, let alone a gadget by a company you clearly love to hate. Such opinions aren't really worth the pixels they're rendered in.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
How much money would you put on it?
None of your arguments against the iPad warrant a response - they're all the foaming-mouth rantings of someone staunchly opposed to people making their own mind up about owning a gadget, let alone a gadget by a company you clearly love to hate. Such opinions aren't really worth the pixels they're rendered in.
And if I see one more idiot pointing out how a cheaper laptop could do more (like, play flash, have a cover, have a keyboard, do 'real' tasks) I'll fall off my chair laughing. Missing the point so widely it's comical.
I don't particularly see where I was 'foaming'. Of course people can make their own mind up but for you to say that every consumer out there is 'vanilla' and 'informed' is total bullshit. Ignorance plays a massive part of Apple strategy. If they make a product visually appealing, that's half the battle won to bring in the parents, grandparents and non-techies. It's a great strategy but it doesn't make the product good.
I don't hate Apple. If I did, I would't own an iPhone and an iPod Shuffle. If it makes you feel better to label me a ranting Apple-hater then so be it but the fact remains that the iPad simply doesn't offer very much at all that you can't do better, faster, concurrently and with more choice on a laptop.
Please enlighten me on why i'm missing the point, seeing as you're apparently all-knowing.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
I respectfully disagree on pretty much every point, especially that nonsense about Apple's marketing being about ignorance, that's just weird - as if any company except Apple goes out of it's way to detail each and every facet of their product, even the ones that don't necessarily hold up to every spec comparison (which in this case, incidentally, are almost pointless as there's no comparable product).
Finally, what makes a product 'good', ultimately, is in the mind of the person using it. You don't like it, fair play. Did you say you'd used one?
I have no real desire to waste any more of this glorious day writing an opinion that you are free to disagree with and no doubt will do!
Comment below viewing threshold Show
And the fact remains that the DS doesn't offer much at all that I can't do better, faster, blah blah on a Wii or even a Gamecube. A PSP does fuck all better than a PS3. And so on.
The iPad - IS NOT A LAPTOP KILLER. If you want to do stuff that can only be done on a laptop, get a fucking laptop, please. I don't intend to want to edit photos in Photoshop on my iPad.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
For some reason, you see this discussion entirely from one perspective. The iPad. To put it another way, no you won't be using Photoshop on your iPad but you potentially would on your laptop, alongside every other feature that the iPad can offer, and you'd do it....
Faster.
With more concurrency.
At higher resolutions.
On a bigger screen.
With no limitation on external device connections.
With masses more storage.
Having just as much portability.
With better posture.
And an open OS.
Don't retort with abstract responses, be specific on what the iPad actually offers users, above and beyond even the simple list of laptop features above.
I'm not ranting, i'm not flaming and i'm not angry. I'm genuinely interested how any informed individual, who isn't blinded by brand loyalty would willingly buy into hardware that works at a fraction of the power of even a fair laptop.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
If you're one of the rabidly anti-Apple crowd, intent on ignoring the most exciting gaming platform since, well, forever, nothing is going to convince you. However, if you already have and enjoy using an iPod touch for gaming, stay the hell away from the iPad unless you can afford to buy one, because you'll be snared pretty damn quickly.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
The iPad - IS NOT A LAPTOP KILLER. If you want to do stuff that can only be done on a laptop, get a fucking laptop, please. I don't intend to want to edit photos in Photoshop on my iPad.
First off, I don't care whether you believe the iPad is a laptop rival or not. They serve very similar purposes IMO but the big difference is, a laptop can do everything that an iPad can do, minor features such as touch screen aside, but an iPad is massively inferior in any and every other way.
If your argument is that people are happy to get an iPad, because it makes online shopping easier that just means they're ignorant. You would have to be a plum to make a decision on choosing an iPad, for those reasons. The kind of consumer Apple are directly going for. The kind of people who buy Macs over 'beige PCs' because Macs "Look cool!".
You seem fixated on laptops being business machines and that to me speaks volumes about the way in which Apple market their hardware. Just because a laptop runs Windows 7 doesn't mean you can't do online shopping, or play your music, or do anything else that apparently only an iPad can do. In fact, it can do all those things faster and better, whilst simultaneously serving as a media hub, keeping the environment free of malware, running IMs and a multitude of other things, including having a massive selection of Flash games that you'd have to buy on the Apple Store. Casual gamers lose out hugely, in that respect.
I guess the point is, a laptop is scalable. Once you get beyond the requirement of using an iPad for single tasks, it declines in usability. And that's not even talking about the meagre storage capacity on even the top of the range version. Taking the example of easy access for a generation that don't like using computers, what happens when they become more literate? They're stuck using a gimped, closed-system.
Nope, it's a fad. Apple have obviously made their mark in some areas but they've overstretched themselves here. Lets see how the sales pan out over the next 6 months, once the "New gadget!" frenzy has worn off and people start to see the limitations of the hardware.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
An iPad is 'only' a giant iPod touch in the sense a swimming pool is 'only' a giant bath. The extra screen space and the power of the A4 chip provides — in some cases — a superior gaming experience.
If you're one of the rabidly anti-Apple crowd, intent on ignoring the most exciting gaming platform since, well, forever, nothing is going to convince you. However, if you already have and enjoy using an iPod touch for gaming, stay the hell away from the iPad unless you can afford to buy one, because you'll be snared pretty damn quickly.
Can't see it. The iPhone as a gaming platform is actually quite good, for a single reason. It's truly mobile. The iPad is not.
So using the iPad on the train, a laptop will trump it in every possible way.
Using the iPad at home the 360, PS3 and a gaming PC will trump it in every possible way.
Going down the price route, for the same cost as a 64GB iPad, you can have a 360 + 720p TV + good laptop. So even trying to claim that the iPad covers all bases, regardless of location is also a non-starter.
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show
Comment below viewing threshold Show