Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

Battlefield 1943 Hands On

PC Xbox 360 PlayStation 3
Hands On by Tom Bramwell

27 March, 2009

Page 1 of 2. Page 2 ->

Never mind Bad Company - welcome to Dimwit Company. Nobody's talking to one another - hardly surprising, since the guys to either side of me are Italian, French and Spanish - and once the landing craft hit the beach, we've all regressed by about seven years. Italy's landed a biplane upside down on an anti-aircraft gun, and I'm stuck fast in a trench. In a tank.

Battlefield 1943 may be simplified - three maps, three classes, one objective - but the key word is accessibility, not casual. There's a tutorial this time - the first in the series, rather unbelievably - that introduces you to the concepts offline and then lets you practice in planes and tanks unmolested by hostiles. There are facilities for private matches, clans and squads, and there are levelling and reward systems (Achievements/Trophies and a broader range of honours beyond that, although no unlocks), but for the majority of people approaching the game from scratch, it's a one-click process to start playing, and it's not difficult to understand what's going on. You pick an infantryman, rifleman or scout class and then choose where to spawn. But it's still Battlefield, and it still punishes you for pratting around.

There are five control points on each map, like the one we're seeing today - Iwo Jima, after last month's reintroduction to Wake Island - and the European press gathered at DICE's wind-battered Stockholm headquarters have more difficulty negotiating the keycard door to the balcony than they do contesting the territory on the second map's thin, turbulent sliver of Ogasawara. Fighting seesaws between an airstrip at one end through trenches and over grassy hills past a lighthouse to higher ground at the other, and while all the vehicles are present and correct, it's an infantry war; automatic weapons, bazookas, sniper rifles, pistols and - gloriously - katanas doing the best of the killing.

'Battlefield 1943' Screenshot 1

"We have designed the levels now with 24 in mind, but that's not hard-coded. You can always squeeze in more players," Liu says when we ask about the PC version.

Yet there really is a lot to it, just as there should be, and it's been tweaked smartly. Snipers blink - a well-judged stab of disorientation - into their telescopic sights and trace anyone daft enough to wander around out of cover; bazookas eviscerate the arrogant tanks; and the new bomber wings are repelled by anti-aircraft fire (another clever bit of balancing - rather than an unavoidable artillery strike, when a bombing run is called in from a special shack the team in the crosshairs now has a slim chance of repelling the onslaught).

DICE has played around with these maps, despite their heritage, and the results appeal to old and new. Senior producer Patrick Liu tells me that the small team deliberately reorganised them symmetrically. "Wake Island used to be one team defending the island and the other team attacking it. Now we've made it so there are two carriers and both teams are attacking the island, just to make things fair. Otherwise, for a total newb, it's extremely hard to get into asymmetric gameplay."

There's also a squad command system, similar to Battlefield: Bad Company. Commands are context-sensitive, so if you're staring at an enemy flag and issue an instruction, your comrades are told to attack; if you're staring at your own flag, they're told to defend. You can also spawn next to anyone else in the squad, rather than just the squad leader, so if he's a sniper hiding out in the distance, you can pick someone closer to the action and materialise there.

To Page 2 ->

Advertisement

Are you excited about Battlefield 1943 on PC/PlayStation 3/Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-42 of 42 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Bagpuss
27/03/09 @ 13:14
#1
-2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
BATTLEFIELD 3 .......

Not this time wasting crap.....i played Battlefield 1942 , 7 years ago ffs, i have no desire to play a version for 'console kiddies'.

BATTLEFIELD 3 IS WHAT WE WANT DICE.
mcbi4kh2
27/03/09 @ 13:19
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
interested, hope its as good as Warhawk.

Has bad company been in the EG face-off series?
dsmx
27/03/09 @ 13:20
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
3 maps? even the bf hero's beta has 3 maps and when that launches it will be free. I'm struggling to see what the point in bf1943 is.
kestral
27/03/09 @ 13:21
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
looks good 1942 was the one that was played most here in the office so looking forward to that.
mcbi4kh2
27/03/09 @ 13:23
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
1942 was the one that was played most here in the office

awesome, any jobs going?
mashk
27/03/09 @ 13:25
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Three maps doesn't sound alot, but, I remember only ever playing Strke at Karkland on BF2. As long, as it's three astonishingly good maps, I'll be happy.

Looking forward to it.
glaeken
27/03/09 @ 13:32
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This will be a buy for me :) I do wish they had picked some other 1942 maps beyond the pacific ones though as I have played them a bit too much. Still they do say they have made changes so lets hope these freshen things up some what.
AphoticCosmos
27/03/09 @ 13:37
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Will get it simply for some BF love, but I really want BF3 kthx >:|
jaluuk
27/03/09 @ 13:41
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Killing someone with a katana is a mark of honour - so much so that it's recognised by a specific mark of honour."

VOCABULARY FAIL :)
Raajaa
27/03/09 @ 13:41
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
buying this on release. Not just because I'm a Battlefield whore, but because I love the intense fights that it brings.
4thVariety
27/03/09 @ 13:43
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Cheap throwaway multiplayer game, why not. Pay $15, play it for a few week, forget it ever happened. Six months later, same game new textures. It sure beats a $60 game nobody is going to play a single day longer than the cheap counterpart.
Widge
27/03/09 @ 13:44
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Will it be anything like Day Of Defeat:Source?
rupert
27/03/09 @ 13:44
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
helicopters1?!?! 1943?!?!! wtf
sneetch
27/03/09 @ 14:10
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@rupert
helicopters1?!?! 1943?!?!! wtf

Hello and welcome to "History Today".

They had "viable" helicopters in the '20s and '30s. They were used in small numbers during WW II.
sneetch
27/03/09 @ 14:18
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@dsmx
3 maps? even the bf hero's beta has 3 maps and when that launches it will be free. I'm struggling to see what the point in bf1943 is.

I dare say it's an experiment: will we make enough money on smaller projects like this for them to be viable/more lucrative than spending loads more cash and time on bigger projects? Probably followed by: how much will people pay for extra maps?
symmetry
27/03/09 @ 14:18
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
You can also spawn next to anyone else in the squad, rather than just the squad leader, so if he's a sniper hiding out in the distance, you can pick someone closer to the action and materialise there.

YEAH BABY!!!
glaeken
27/03/09 @ 14:21
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@sneetch

Yeah but aside from history helicopters were only in one of the expansions to 1942 that no-one ever played and did not feature on the Pacific maps nor have they featured in any of the media so far release for 1943.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 27/03/09 @ 14:21
shamblemonkee
27/03/09 @ 14:25
#18
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
bagpuss, do you really need to spout off that shit in every thread about this game, including the video comments?

if you're not interested.. jog on.

looks good to me i enjoyed the original and will take a peek at this.
WiseNail
27/03/09 @ 14:34
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Tom

Are you able to clarify if it supports split screen and / or bots to fill out private rosters?
ronuds
27/03/09 @ 15:01
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
24 players isn't enough to really capture the feeling of an epic battle.

Fail! :P
AphoticCosmos
27/03/09 @ 15:10
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
24 players isn't enough to really capture the feeling of an epic battle.

Fail! :P


Y'know they said within the same paragraph that it's not a hard-coded limit ;)
glaeken
27/03/09 @ 15:28
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The 24 player count worked great for BF:BC in gold rush mode but 1943 does not have gold rush so the 24 count might work out a little low. I guess we will have to see.
Adam_T
27/03/09 @ 15:38
#23
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I hope this one has a server browser that does'nt crash like a bitch and a overactive punkbuster that goes mental.

Oh, and if they didn't release it in pre-alpha form like most other BF games, that would be good too.
rashes
27/03/09 @ 17:40
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This is a really great idea and I'd expect a minimum price of 1200 MS points. I think it would be justified. I play rarely plat COD and Battlefield single played but end up spending 55 Euro on those mainly to get my hands on the multi-player.

Look sweet too.

Spekingur
27/03/09 @ 17:44
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I loved BF1942. I have to this day wanted a new one with a new graphics engine. So yes, finally some loving! And proper viewing distances without stupid fog.
Jonny5Alive7
27/03/09 @ 19:49
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I agree with Bagpuss at the top of the comments. I'm a huge Battlefield fan but going back to WW2 just feels like a step backwards. Battlefield 2 was awesome, I want a sequel to that which is even better. Plus I used to love 64 player servers, where sometimes it just went crazy because there was so much going on. I'd prefer this to 24 players only.

Also the maps they're doing are classics, but is it not a bit lazy just rehashing the same old maps and just changing the scenario slightly?
Edited 1 times, most recently on 27/03/09 @ 19:50
sneetch
27/03/09 @ 20:42
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@glaeken
@sneetch

Yeah but aside from history helicopters were only in one of the expansions to 1942 that no-one ever played and did not feature on the Pacific maps nor have they featured in any of the media so far release for 1943.


Ah. Fair enough so. I'm not sure whether they'll be all that good anyway, are they even armed, I wonder?
Anthony_UK
27/03/09 @ 22:15
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Didn't the console version of battlefield 2 also have a 12 player limit per team? That was perfectly fine.... I was worried about this, but after just watching an in game vid on gametrailers (sorry on my iPhone so can't link) I really can't wait! It'll keep me going till the main event of bad company 2! And modern warfare 2 and flashpoint 2......I just won't be leaving the house the later half of this year! :-)
hollowroom
27/03/09 @ 22:34
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Bagpuss

BATTLEFIELD 3 .......

Not this time wasting crap.....i played Battlefield 1942 , 7 years ago ffs, i have no desire to play a version for 'console kiddies'.

BATTLEFIELD 3 IS WHAT WE WANT DICE.


This this and this again.
RedSparrows
27/03/09 @ 23:08
#30
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Naysayers, shut up. This is an interesting idea for XBLA/PSN, hopefully it will end up being yumz. I doubt you hardcore leet types are going to be ignored for ever.
metalangel
28/03/09 @ 08:57
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Katanas!? Fuck off, seriously. Every map you'll be dealing with twats just charging at you and one hit killing you. They had them on ONE map in Forgotten Hope and it ruined it. Also, no explanation of how we will repair vehicles/heal teammates in the absence of the medic and engineer classes.
Tetsuo_Shima
28/03/09 @ 10:09
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Three maps shouldnt be too big a problem since players of bf2:mc insisted on the 3-map b2f/backstab/hidden pass cycle anyway. This is a purchase for me, so long as it is 1200 points (or less).
Errol
28/03/09 @ 13:28
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Massively simplified version of 1942/BF2 gameplay. Don't see the point really.

And how on earth can they change Wake? One side HAS to be defending the island ffs.
PearOfAnguish
28/03/09 @ 13:58
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Real Battlefield fans want a remake or follow-up to 1942, not more modern warfare gubbins.
BiffTanner
28/03/09 @ 14:47
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Real Battlefield fans want a remake or follow-up to 1942, not more modern warfare gubbins."

Couldnt agree more, which is why im psyched for 1943, just hope more maps are to follow.
Its all well and good for another modern day BF at some point but since we have had modern day and future setting most recently a ww2 setting should be done first imo.
Jonny5Alive7
28/03/09 @ 21:58
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Why? Theres gazillions of WW2 shooters already, plus not that much changed between 1942 and 1943 :-)
Mr-Bozzey
29/03/09 @ 12:07
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
should be good it will ease the wait of BF-BC2 but i have to agree i would love a BF-3 still 1943 and bf-bc 2 is a welcomed pair for me.

i find the BF games probably the best online FPS ever i love KZ2 and COD but BF just makes you feel in a epic battle on epic sized maps you really feel part of the frontline just love the series !
metalangel
29/03/09 @ 12:11
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
mrbozzey you might enjoy Frontlines, same guys who made the Desert Combat mod.
aphexstwin
30/03/09 @ 09:29
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
am i the only one who doesnt want destructable environments? some of the best fights in bf2mc are over well defended buildings and the barrels of doom thread on the forum was awesome. bfbc just doesnt have that same feeling of pure humour to it, nor a sense of easy gameplay. i love the look of the fb engine, just dont like its physics. and no ww2 backstab? no sale!
Tlaloc
29/06/09 @ 03:02
#40
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I played the snow village demo of Battlefield 1942 against bots for about 3 years. Hours a day, day in day out. At the time I had a crap internet link and I never tired of that demo. After some months, I bought the game but it had higher system requirements than the demo and my PC was incapable of running it properly. I went back to the demo. Now I have a fat internet pipe and DICE are promising me a version that is sure to work on my 360. Will I be buying it? Oh my most indeedily doodily! In fact, I am expecting a life altering experience. In fact, I am getting quite pathological about the idea of land mines and C4. I am oiling up my looney laugh, I am. See you all in a couple of weeks. Bring your own matches.
jambo74
08/07/09 @ 20:22
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Can't get on the severs. Once again DICE let us down at a launch. No buy.
m0thr4
09/07/09 @ 22:10
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Launched on PSN today and no problems with the servers. I guess they were prepared this time.

Comments: 1-42 of 42 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Get Games.  Download Great PC Games!

X View gallery