Assassin's Creed II Preview

Renaissance.

Non-linearity may be everywhere these days (with the option of being everywhere else), but as inFamous suggested and Assassin's Creed II now hopes to prove, a bit of linearity goes a long way too. Sucker Punch's PS3 game had those underground bits where you collected new powers, and they were some of the best and most focused bits of the game. Ubisoft Montreal's second crack at Assassins-versus-Templars pulls the same trick, hiding self-contained, Prince of Persia-style platform levels around the open world, virtually none of which is obligatory, but each of which rewards you with a special metal seal, which together will add up to a great, unidentified reward.

Assassin's Creed II, announced just before E3, is fundamentally similar to its predecessor, but thanks to the Animus concept of replaying a young man's genetic memories, it transplants the action completely from the Middle East to Renaissance Italy, where young nobleman Ezio Auditore da Firenze is out for revenge on the people who killed his father, and falls in with the assassins in the process. He also pairs up with Leonardo da Vinci, who creates various gizmos for him including a flying machine, and who solves previous star Altair's uncomfortable problem of having a finger lopped off to make room for his stealth blade, thus saving Ezio a couple of digits, since he has two of the knives at his wrist-activated disposal.

There are lots of other tweaks and changes, and Ubisoft Montreal is anxious to atone for the first game's repetitive structure, but the linear side-mission levels being shown off at gamescom using the Florence setting are arguably one of the biggest changes. The specific one we're shown is the first, and the only one you have to play. It's accessed through a church. After paying a few NPCs to stir up trouble at the entrance, distracting the armed guards, Ezio ducks inside and sneaks up on two Templars admiring a silver skull-shaped switch, planting his twin blades simultaneously in the backs of their heads.

'Assassin's Creed II' Screenshot 1

The Templars look and sound just as villainous as ever, even though they claim they're not. You're not fooling anyone!

With the skull-shaped switch pressed, Ezio descends into the catacombs for a level called Novella's Secret. Dusty boxes and sarcophagi are scattered all around, and as Ezio moves towards an opening ahead the game switches camera and pans around the room beyond - a huge space with various beams, trapezes, ledges and grab-holds positioned at various points throughout. The process echoes Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time, which producer Patrice Desilets points out to everyone with a smile. We've missed it too! Desilets guides Ezio fluidly across the maze in the sky, navigating to various levers, which open doors and remove ledges so that Ezio can dive safely down into a trademark bale of hay.

Here he can spy on some of those scheming Templars, who bar his way by absently closing a gate behind them. In opening it again, Ezio attracts their attention, but he's better equipped to sort them out this time, as Ubisoft has improved the jumping assassination system so you can mark targets from above and then leap down a great distance to finish them. Ezio can't help alerting a nearby guard in the process, but thanks to a smoke pellet he can lay down some covering fumes and make his way through.

Then he gives chase to a fleeing Templar, who does all sorts to try and throw the young assassin off his tail, creating an impromptu obstacle course in the process. When the Templar pulls down a rope bridge, Ezio has to climb the walls and leap between slim hand-holds; when the Templar slams a gate shut, he has to jump from a nearby window ledge out over a sheer expanse to reach a wooden beam, and then leap onward to another opening to continue the chase. Just a few feet from the Templar's objective, Ezio races up a series of small posts onto a raised platform parallel to the Templar's route, and leaps off the end just in time to land and sink one of his trademark blades into his prey. Phew. Desilets says that if Ezio can't catch up, he gets into a big fight at the end of this sequence, and if the player still fancies one, he can get into it either way. Biff.

Having fought his way through, then, Ezio is able to spy on a Templar meeting deep within the catacombs, where naughty men plan the Pazzi Conspiracy - a real-life attempt to assassinate Lorenzo de' Medici, one of the rulers of Florence. As with the original Assassin's Creed, real historical people and events figure prominently in the game fiction, and Desilets says that the Pazzi Conspiracy is one such event. With the knowledge of their plot in the bag, Ezio exits, but not before stopping off at a special white sarcophagus containing the promised seal.

Between them, the linear side missions should amount to between four and five hours of gameplay, Desilets says, and the fact that this one is over in less than 15 minutes should give you an idea of the volume of extra content Ubisoft Montreal is set to pack into the game. As with the original, there are a variety of collectables and other side missions besides these.

There are other examples of things to do away from the story at gamescom too. Pigeon missions (my suggested name) are assassination commissions with specific rules that Ezio collects from pigeon coops. In this case it's a mission called Caveat Emptor from the aforementioned Medici, who wants Ezio to take out a nearby businessman without giving his presence away.

This gives Ezio an excuse to climb around the rooftops and show off the changes to the free-running system. Although ostensibly the same, Ezio can do a few new things like climbing over ropes tied between buildings, and using hanging baskets to round corners. Because rooftops are higher up in Italy than they were in the Middle East, the developers also sought to create pathways along the middle stories, and designed the city layout with free-running "freeways" in mind as well. Hopefully the team also considered feedback about snagging on objects, although it won't be possible to tell how it feels until Ubisoft allows for hands-on play. It looks fluid enough though.

'Assassin's Creed II' Screenshot 2

Still no sign of da Vinci, although his presence is felt again by people shot with Ezio's musket gun thing.

Back on the rooftops, Ezio uses a musket-style pistol given to him by da Vinci to execute an unwitting enforcer. With his back turned, Ezio has time to train his sights - initially a miasma of Animus-style interference that forms into a straight line to signal dead aim. But then it's back down to the streets, because he needs to tool up. One change to Assassin's Creed II is the money counter in the bottom-left. Players can pickpocket people in the crowd at the touch of a button to top up funds, not to mention loot corpses for weapons and cash, and it's now possible to use traders' services rather than just vaulting over their produce. Today Ezio visits an apothecary, who sells medicine but also, more importantly, poison.

The mini-map shows the pigeon mission target, and upon approach Ezio goes into his Altair-style Eagle Vision, which he can now use while moving. With this he establishes that his target is moving towards a crowd, but worse that he is flanked by a bodyguard. Using the weapon-select wheel though, Ezio can grab his poison, sneak up to the bodyguard in the crowd and inject him, before quickly backing away without attracting any attention. The poison's fast-acting, but it doesn't have the effect you might have anticipated - instead it disorientates the bodyguard, leading him to flail his lance murderously in the direction of Ezio's target. Job done.

Desilets tours through a few other features before we finish. Ezio can toss coins into the street, which prompts people in the crowd to scrabble around on the floor, creating a diversion. Should he find himself in combat, he can also taunt his opponents and move around them more freely, although the emphasis remains on stylish counter kills that make the most of the game's grown-up rating. Pleasingly, Ubisoft retains the tall towers that players had to climb to open up new missions nearby, and you still get to dive off the top of them. We also get to see a bit of Florence at night, and Desilets amuses himself by diving into water to end the demo - something that no longer proves fatal.

There is more yet to see, including updates on what Desmond Miles is up to in the present - although we imagine Ubisoft will leave that to reviewers and players to find out - but while Assassin's Creed flattered to deceive, not quite living up to its hype, the sequel's use of a completely new setting, and design informed by the response to the original, is playing out promisingly. After the last few months' public pronouncements on the game, you almost feel the catacombs level is the development in microcosm: slightly humbler, and more self-conscious, but with no less of the spark and the mystery.

Assassin's Creed II is due out for PC, PS3 and Xbox 360 on 20th November.

Comments (46) Latest comment 2 years ago

Comments threads automatically close after 30 days, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Rodchenko #1 3 years ago

    Still have to complete the first one, but this sounds rather juicy.
    (BTW, I hated the underground sections in inFamous...)
  • bad09 #2 3 years ago

    Gimme gimme gimme!!!!

    All I really care about is will it give me as much fun as AC1 did, from what I've seen the answer to that is a big fat YES!

    Still got 1 to replay after I got a cheap copy for a present a while back. Damn too many games play right now!!!!!!!

    / head explodes
  • EmiliasHorse #3 3 years ago

    Loved the first one for at least the first half. Sure it ran out of steam badly but it was always clear the sequel could and probably would address the problems.

  • JohnnyWashnGo #4 3 years ago

    I haven't even opened the first one yet :(
    Its still in plastic wrapping until I finish other games.

    I think it may the be first game that I have bought and not played right up until the release of the sequel.
  • TheJuriel #5 3 years ago

    Very interested in this. I liked the first one, repetitiveness aside, and if they're seeking to alleviate that problem... awesome.

    I do hope Desmond gets to finally actually DO something in his day, though.
  • SleepyDeathFred #6 3 years ago

    I wonder if Machiavelli will be a central character...
  • avoozl #7 3 years ago

    What I love most about the first one is that it was set in Israel which is totally original, the world was really beautiful and detailed- oozing with atmosphere, and all the mystique the story had. It degenerated in to a mad scramble at the end which a lot of these blockbusters do. It's meant to be an exciting climax but as they wrap up the story with a bang the player tends to lose all control which makes for terrible gameplay. It ended abruptly and left you hanging really badly. I was hoping this second one would continue full on where it left off and be set completely in the present. That would have been a ballsy move though. I just hope they're not going to drag it out.
  • Quint2020 #8 3 years ago

    I really enjoyed the first game even if I was pretty much sick of it by the end of the game.

    It sounds like they've made a real effort to remove a lot of the repetition of the game and with the inclusion of a trading system it could well be one of my favourite games of the year.
  • guernican #9 3 years ago

    "...the Pazzi Conspiracy - a real-life attempt to assassinate Lorenzo de' Medici, one of the rulers of Florence."

    Referenced in that dreadful sequel to Silence of the Lambs, methinks. The Pazzi in question was punished for the conspiracy by being dangled from a building with his guts hanging out. Mmmm. Guts.
    Edited by 1 at 21/08/09 @ 09:19
  • andywilkie35 #10 3 years ago

    I thought the first game was excellent, I can understand the criticism for it being "repetitive" but I loved every second of it. Day 1 purchase for me, can't wait.
  • tesco #11 3 years ago

    The first was the only game I have ever taken back in disgust inside of 48 hours for being so poor.
    Like if GTA only had 4 types of side missions. So dissapointing. Hope this one has a bit more meat on the bones.
    Gameplay really is more important than a pretty setting.
  • kangarootoo #12 3 years ago

    I'm really looking forward to this. There are quite a few nice ideas being discussed in this preview.

    The first one always felt like a bit of a rough diamond to me. Deeply flawed in placed, but undeniably appealing in others. Sort of reminds me on Hitman in that respect, where the the first outing is sort of trying out new ground and making a few mistakes, allowing the sequel to fix what didn't work and bolster what did.

    Plus Venice is an amazingly beautiful place that I have been fortunate enough to visit. And I'm sure hopping around its roofs in the game will be extra nostalgically pleasing for that reason.
  • JensonJet #13 3 years ago

    I can't express how much I hated the first game. For me the real test of how good a game is, is to imagine the game with poor graphics but with the same gameplay, voice-acting, physics, music, etc. If you do with Ass Creed, you're left with an utterly unengaging, absolutely dull game. It's a glorified levels game. One button climb, one button attack, some of the worst voice acting I've heard in a long time, and effectively only about an hour of actual mission, with the rest of the time spent looking for pointless flags! This game is proof that most gamers care for only one thing... how a game looks! I only borrowed this game, but I still feel ripped off for the time I spent playing it! I wanted to give up after 5 minutes, and still wished I'd listened to my initial instincts. What a waste of time. Seriously, one of the worst games I've ever played! I hope the sequel completely fails, Ubisoft Montreal close down, and the people involved in this crap give up working in the industry!!!
  • AliRay #14 3 years ago

    The first game was gorgeous, and the climbing was fun, but ultimately it was very boring to play.

    Once bitten, Ubi, sorry. No purchase here.
  • Hantheman #15 3 years ago

    Hopefully they'll make the combat more interesting...
  • sifujames #16 3 years ago

    Didn't care for the first one, but am interested in this now
  • joe90 #17 3 years ago

    i would say its going to get a 6-7 / 10
  • Domovoi #18 3 years ago

    The first one was definitely flawed gameplay-wise. It consisted of little more than going to every marked point on the map and then going to get the assassination mission from the guild. Stealth consisted of running away and calling base by sitting on a bench. I found the combat reasonably enjoyable, until I figured out the proper special moves, after which it became a question of lather rinse repeat.

    But the world was gorgeous, and I liked all the mystery and manipulation. I think I'm one of only a handful of people who actually enjoyed the ending. It was abrupt and seemingly meaningless, but once you read all the emails and decoded all the messages, you suddenly fell into a rabbit hole that just kept going. Can't wait to see how that story continues.. perhaps even more than the story in Italy.

    If they can make the combat less repetitive and completely replace the whole intel-gathering thing with something that isn't so obviously a list of boxes you need to tick off, this could be great.

    Edited by 1 at 21/08/09 @ 10:25
  • avoozl #19 3 years ago

    The gameplay was good. It wasn't "one button attack", I don't think anything required just one button. Fighting was fun, climbing around buildings was fun. The voice acting was good I thought. No idea what you're talking about.

    If everything apart from the graphics was awful then it would have been as bad as you say. It sounds like the gameplay is just not to your taste. I thought Crysis was rubbish because I don't particularly like shooters and that had good graphics. Honestly I don't think AC is as shallow at all.
  • Spekingur #20 3 years ago

    Assassin's Creed lived up to the hype I had for it :D

    I am excited. Almost starting to sound like Thief-but-not-really.
    I would have a few questions though. Are there day and night cycles this time? And can you kill someone with, for example, a knife whilst you are freerunning - without slowing down and without throwing/shooting something at them?
  • asphaltcowboy #21 3 years ago

    Sounds great! Loved the original, but this sounds a lot more interesting
  • Burkey123 #22 3 years ago

    Absolutely loved the first one. One of my favourite games this gen.
    Admittedly, it did get repetitive but it looks like they have addressed it here! And the ''underground'' missions look intriguing. So really looking forward to this.
  • RedSparrows #23 3 years ago

    He's not called da Vinci, he's called Leonardo!
  • Domovoi #24 3 years ago

    The one thing I really disliked about the voice acting in Assassin's Creed was Altaïr's massive American accent. I realise it's actually Desmond and genetic memory and stuff, but that's a lame cop-out. All the characters you conversed with had great accents, but Altaïr sounded totally out of place.
  • kingmong #25 3 years ago

    @kangarootoo: you know it's in florence not venice right?
  • kangarootoo #26 3 years ago

    "@kangarootoo: you know it's in florence not venice right?"

    Whaaahhh????

    So is Florence full of canals? Man, I'm sure they said Venice in one of the early trailers. There wre canals all over the place.

    /hunts about

    SOME of it is in venice.

    [link url=http://www .youtube.com/watch?v=W8Qz9ah8cKQ
    ]http://www .youtube.com/watch?v=W8Qz9ah8cKQ
    [/link]

    I think they have probably stuck a few well known cities in there, as they did with the first one. Which suits me fine :)
  • M_of_the_sys #27 3 years ago

    Didn't the demo video have the Vatican in it or am I just making things up again?
  • kangarootoo #28 3 years ago

    @M_of_the_sys

    What did we tell you about making stuff up? What did we say!? Go and sit on the naughty step.

    ;)


    I think it was the Piazza San Marco, which has a massive churcy type structure (a few of them actually).

    [link url=http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piazza_San_Marco
    ]http://en .wikipedia.org/wiki/Piazza_San_...[/link]

    I've been up that tower :) They used to run horses up inside it apparently (not sure why, transporting stuff I guess, or maybe just so the horses could enjoy the view).
  • Metalfish #29 3 years ago

    The first was deeply repetitive and focused far too much on sword-play rather than assassin like behaviour and often resorted to extremely "gamey" abstraction instead of progression. Also, unless "blank slate" Desmond can actually do something this time, could we maybe see less of him?

    Great atmosphere though.
  • muscleblade #30 3 years ago

    If this is more like the fantastic Batman AA than the first repetitive game with the boring combat gameplay it could be amazing. Im currently playing Batman not the demo btw. Batman AA might become GOTY. Its that good. 10/10 imo.
  • Dr.Mott #31 3 years ago

    "I realise it's actually Desmond and genetic memory and stuff, but that's a lame cop-out"

    That would almost be excusable, but the problem with that is that Desmond and Altair had different voice actors, which is just ridiculous. I still loved the game though, can't wait for the second one.
  • bunglebonce #32 3 years ago

    The more I come across this series, the more I just want a next-gen Sly 2.
  • telboy007 #33 3 years ago

    First game = most fun i've ever had holding down a button.
  • curtlikesmeat #34 3 years ago

    Like others I enjoyed the modern day setting as much as the historical one and I look forward to that story - it's obviously leading up to a game set in current times which I think has potential to be excellent.
  • Caspar_Esq. #35 3 years ago

    Still think the Levantine setting was a lot more interesting because it had never really been done much before.
  • M_of_the_sys #36 3 years ago

    @Kangarootoo

    Ah yes. It was the Basilica! Cheers for that. Am I allowed off the naughty step now?

    It's the historical references that I loved about the first game. It was pretty cool to play in that era. That's not all I loved about it though. Shanking people is always a larf. Guffaw guffaw!
  • thedaveeyres #37 3 years ago

  • ardamillo #38 3 years ago

    Looking forward to this. Played the first without high expectations and was pleasantly surprised.
  • Wolverfrog #39 3 years ago

    I. Need. This. Game.
  • spekkeh #40 3 years ago

    So, still no bikini shot of Jade Raymond in the press release folder?
  • symmetry #41 3 years ago

    Really liked Ass Creed, so can't wait for this one.
  • oktava #42 3 years ago

    the first was a great tech demo and a piss poor game.
    now rate me down please.
  • Iain815 #43 3 years ago

    I liked the first one. While the gameplay was repetitive and eventually boring, the story was great and very immersive.

    I was gawking at the markings at then end of the 1st game, then searching online trying to understand their meanings as if it was the latest episode of Lost.
  • Firewarrior706 #44 3 years ago

    Actually, the gun thing isn't a musket. It fires one of Ezio's blades. If you watch the trailer, he retracts the blades and pushes it to the side into the 'gun'. So I assume you must be able to pick up more blades at Assassin's Bureaus and/or buy more.
  • Bleemo #45 2 years ago

    This thing ran like a mare on my PC even though I can get Crysis to run fine on it. I hope the PC version is better optimised this time around.
  • skoypidia #46 2 years ago

    The first one wasn't bad actually. I liked the fighting system; it was one of the very few non-button mashing one. It could be improved to become excellent. Let me explain though that when I first played this I was direly disappointed. Game play seemed straight stupid. Playing on, I discovered a simple joy in it, the kind of joy you find in games like Minesweeper or Diablo. Looking back, this game was too beautiful for its own good. In fact it was the first game ever too simple for its looks. I really think its game play would be better appreciated in a simpler (and shorter) game. Let’s see where they take the second one.