Jump to navigation

Table of contents

Page Previous 1 2 Next

Advertisement

Army of Two Review

Xbox 360 PlayStation 3 Review by Oli Welsh

5 March, 2008

Page 1 of 2. Page 2 ->

A few campaigns into Army of Two, and mercenaries Tyson Rios and Elliot Salem are lugging their risible body armour, pimped hand-cannons and mismatched names towards their next encounter with a bunch of insurgents who look like a street gang, in an army base that looks like a skate park, in an Iraq that looks like the outskirts of Denver. Rios (bald, scarred, The Serious One) is being Basil Exposition, wondering aloud to Salem (tousled, tattooed, The Impetuous One) whether a mole might be betraying them to the enemy.

"Don't know don't care," barks Salem, and the mindless killing begins once more.

In case you hadn't guessed from the getup that makes its supposedly macho heroes look like camp, sado-masochistic, medieval ice hockey goalies, Army of Two doesn't take itself all that seriously. This co-op-focused, third-person shooter is no Tom Clancy's Advanced Military Anorak Fantasy. Why are we killing these men? What's the plot again? Which third-world country are we blowing up next? Don't know, don't care. In the middle of one firefight, Salem starts banging on about who the best rapper in the Wu-Tang Clan is. It's practically self-parody.

'Army of Two' Screenshot 1

Yes - that is a codpiece with 'Merc' written on it.

It's a good thing, too. The light tone helps you get past the drab locations, dodgy politics, dumb machismo, clumsy dialogue and production-line plot of this superficially standard action game, and focus on what it does well: tactical AI, weapon customisation and superb two-player co-op dynamics.

For all that it revels in shooter cliché, the fact that Army of Two was designed from first principles for two players makes it quite an unusual beast. The core of this is the "aggro" system that splices the cover-and-flank tactics of a squad shooter with the threat management mechanics of an MMORPG, and then telegraphs it to the player with all the subtlety of a sucker punch. When one of the pair of "private military contractors" is shooting at the enemy, he draws their fire and glows red. His partner fades to transparency and can move to a flanking position unmolested, the better to take out the enemies behind cover, in body armour, or at machinegun posts. Or to not die, if he's the one under fire already (a "feign death" move also allows you to instantly drop aggro when your health is low).

'Army of Two' Screenshot 2

Versus mode lets you play as any enemy character.

As if the visual cues weren't easy enough to understand, there's an aggro meter at the top of the screen, showing you where things stand. It might seem like overkill, but the absolute clarity of the aggro system is Army of Two's greatest strength. It makes it supernaturally easy to fall into the game's steady, swinging rhythm, and means that EA Montreal has been able to notch enemy behaviour a few levels above blind and brain-damaged without making the game frustrating to play. Your opponents frequently attack from two sides and use cover properly, blind-firing and falling back when threatened - but since they can always be outsmarted and outflanked by using the aggro system, you've always got options.

The game is best enjoyed by far with another player, and supports split-screen play as well as a robust drop-in drop-out mode over Xbox Live or PSN. But the AI that takes control of your partner when you play alone is surprisingly capable, too. It's not that it's outstandingly clever, believable or error-free - rather that the command system is elegant and effective, with directions on the d-pad allowing you to toggle between passive and aggressive versions of advance, regroup, and hold-position. Between this and the aggro system, it's simplicity itself to manipulate the AI to get you out of thorny situations.

To Page 2 ->

Advertisement

Are you excited about Army of Two on PlayStation 3/Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-50 of 101 in total | next 50 »

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Carlo
05/03/08 @ 11:26
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
LOL
mkreku
05/03/08 @ 11:29
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I want a codpiece with MERC on it :(
Paukl
05/03/08 @ 11:30
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Insightful, Carlo.

This game hasn't interested me from day one, I figure if you're going to do a milatary shooteer, it either needs to be serious a la Clancy, or a 100% piss take; a combination of the two leaves me cold.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 05/03/08 @ 11:30
systems
05/03/08 @ 11:32
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's a rental then, or wait for the Classics range. Good, as I want Vegas 2 any way and that's only 3 weeks away.
thewolfiv
05/03/08 @ 11:43
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
7? wow i'm impressed i though it would suck, i guess the tampon thing will be for Ver 2...

"one player to use a shield or car door as portable cover while the other cuddles up close behind and dispenses "lead" from his "iron". that made me laugh.
Quint2020
05/03/08 @ 11:44
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"In the middle of one firefight, Salem starts banging on about who the best rapper in the Wu-Tang Clan is."

SOLD
deepmenace
05/03/08 @ 11:51
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
how long to complete? sounds like perfect rental material.
gman7714
05/03/08 @ 11:52
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Surely it can only be Method Man!!

Though ODB's Shimmy rocks socks
SeesThroughAll
05/03/08 @ 11:53
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"It takes two to tango, whiskey, alfa, tango."

Brilliant!
figgis
05/03/08 @ 11:54
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Tsk, GZA!
Madafunkola
05/03/08 @ 11:57
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
RIP ODB. NWA FTW!
DDevil
05/03/08 @ 12:05
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I've been flip-flopping on whether or not to get this since I first heard of it. At the moment it's a no and the review is just re-enforcing that viewpoint.
Carlo
05/03/08 @ 12:06
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
paulk: Insightful, Carlo.

You didn't find T.W.A.T funny?
Johnson
05/03/08 @ 12:08
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's another just above average EA game! Wow.
evilbert
05/03/08 @ 12:10
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
lol @ "There's nothing like the love of one Mexican wrestler for another" caption!
MBar
05/03/08 @ 12:14
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
paulk: Insightful, Carlo.

You didn't find T.W.A.T funny?


Perhaps if you'd replied: Lima Oscar Lima.
muscleblade
05/03/08 @ 12:14
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Its about 4-5 hours on the normal difficulty.
the_dudefather
05/03/08 @ 12:20
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Its about 4-5 hours on the normal difficulty."

lol wut? really?

heard 10 from somewhere else, but I normally play on the harder difficulties anyway
Setaro
05/03/08 @ 12:22
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So, more gay than Gears of War?
gaselite
05/03/08 @ 12:31
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"In the middle of one firefight, Salem starts banging on about who the best rapper in the Wu-Tang Clan is."

Genius
bdc
05/03/08 @ 12:35
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Takes two to twat ?
HarryB
05/03/08 @ 12:35
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
its a bit repetitive, run n gun... crap cover system. bad framerate. but still fun usually. not AAA
Paukl
05/03/08 @ 12:45
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ Carlo

Sorry, I thought that was just your version of F1RST LOLZOOOOROFLCOPTOR!!!1!!!
Meho
05/03/08 @ 12:45
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Had a go on the first mission last night and.............. I guess the Brothers in Arms games have spoiled me a lot because Army of Two didn't manage to keep my interest... Sure, I only played the first mission but the map is severely linear (more Gears of War than BiA, definitely), the friendly AI could be a little better (my buddy died because he ran directly towards enemy even though he had plenty of cover to choose from. It is true that my command was 'advance' but I did expect him to do this within reason and use available cover) and the GPS system is not exactly to my liking. I mean, it's kinda sexy to have it overlayed across the whole screen, but doing so pauses the game. Meaning, I'd prefer having a minimap with waypoints than having to jump out of the game to look for clues where to go. Even with the game appearing to be very linear as I already said. Back to back is, as stated in the review, pretty pointless beyond that first time you see it in the tutorial. Riot shield is a... riot, I guess because it looks like a gimmick and I've yet to see if it has meaningful tactical value later in the game...

But, none of this is a dealbreaker if you play in co-op I imagine. Since I have no friends, and no desire to play with strangers, I'll never know. On the other hand, it's the production values that might be this game's downfall, not the gameplay. It's not that it's HORRIBLE but after the gargantuan success of Call of Duty 4 I'm afraid that average military look just doesn't cut it any more for many casual players (presumably the ones supposed to get this one rather than UBI's Tom Clancy shooters). Also, sounds... Guns sound too much like peashooters which, again, is not something I'd normally complain about but this is a game that probably needs all the style it can get (and tries hard with those buddy moves mentioned) because I suspect that its tactical component is simply not a deciding selling point.

Edit: Grammar
Edited 1 times, most recently on 05/03/08 @ 12:47
muscleblade
05/03/08 @ 12:45
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@the_dudefather

Its not 10 hours by a mile 5 is absolutely max. And you have to complete it on normal to play it on proffesional.

Personally i liked the length of the game and the multiplayer is very fun so completing it 2 times and playing multiplayer give the game a good 20+ hours.
MuppetThumper
05/03/08 @ 12:49
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
enough with the machismo bullshit. i hope this crashes and burns.
Darren
05/03/08 @ 12:57
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The single player game doesn't sound too enthralling from the review and I'm not interested in playing it online so I won't be buying it. Just as well it didn't score 9 or 10/10 really as I might have missed out on a great game. The truth is I'm more than a bit bored of shooters at the moment, they offer little that's genuinely new or exciting that we haven't seen elsewhere (and often better) . I'm now getting to the point where I can't tell one from the other to be honest, they're so samey! :(
GordonCaladan
05/03/08 @ 12:58
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Army of Two. NO HOMO.
ScarOnTheSky
05/03/08 @ 13:02
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Phew - I'm glad the game is okay, wasn't expecting a stellar score anyway.
dadrester
05/03/08 @ 13:04
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
haha.. tango, whiskey, alpha, tango.
CrispyXUK
05/03/08 @ 13:15
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Looks awful
Moz
05/03/08 @ 13:24
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Do they seriously think Halo 3 co-op is that good!!! The Halo 3 campign is average at best! Which make me think that either I should ignore the last comment or not bother with Army of Two if it is in fact worse then the Halo 3 campign
Stifler
05/03/08 @ 13:32
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ Moz

Shhhh....you don't know what you are talking about, you have embarrassed yourself and your family.

:)
syphaa
05/03/08 @ 13:43
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Such a shame.
Was holding out for this title.

What a anti-climax to what looked like a real solid good fun MP game.
Will still give it a blast I reckon...
Apologie
05/03/08 @ 13:43
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I don't trust that much in Eurogamer review's (especially after that reference to a game, in my opinion, pretty average (Halo 3)... i think the game looks and play's awesome, a must buy for me... the co.op is well balanced and the whole presentation is top notch.
Don't miss these game just because of a review... at least give it a try.
Edited 2 times, most recently on 05/03/08 @ 13:50
Quint2020
05/03/08 @ 14:00
#36
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Don't know what all you guys are on about 7 is a good score from EG, they seem to like being at least 1 under the average review score except for the really big releases.
ccfb
05/03/08 @ 14:02
#37
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"the most overtly homoerotic touch in a game that's not exactly short of them - is the riot shield system, which allows one player to use a shield or car door as portable cover while the other cuddles up close behind and dispenses "lead" from his "iron"."

You are reading WAY too much into that.
koji_m
05/03/08 @ 14:09
#38
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
ffcourse a Halo 3 reference had to be made...
gman7714
05/03/08 @ 14:09
#39
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Game just dispatched my pre-order.

Metacritic avg is 80 so far and according to most reviews the game (having been on my watch list for ages) seems to do what it says on the tin so I'm happy
mr_ruberfon
05/03/08 @ 14:15
#40
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"In the middle of one firefight, Salem starts banging on about who the best rapper in the Wu-Tang Clan is."

introducing the ghostface killaaah!
WiseNail
05/03/08 @ 14:29
#41
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
When are we going to get a few Lesbo-erotic games, that's what I want to know...
the_dudefather
05/03/08 @ 14:30
#42
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
try Fear Effect II
T4RG4
05/03/08 @ 14:41
#43
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Do they seriously think Halo 3 co-op is that good!!! The Halo 3 campign is average at best!"

Phew, agreed :) Brother and I found it SO bland, I dont know why people cant take their rose tinted glasses off when it comes to Halo3. Anyway, thought this game would be average at best, whilst 7 out of 10 isnt an average point, it certainly is an average game score. Although from the review and peoples comments here, it really sounds like a 6.

Me avoiding.
monkie_king
05/03/08 @ 15:03
#44
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"the most overtly homoerotic touch in a game that's not exactly short of them - is the riot shield system, which allows one player to use a shield or car door as portable cover while the other cuddles up close behind and dispenses "lead" from his "iron"."

queers of war?
asphaltcowboy
05/03/08 @ 15:18
#45
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hey monkie_king, I've 2006 on the phone, they want their joke back! :P
DrDamn
05/03/08 @ 15:25
#46
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Pleased and unhappy it didn't quite cut the mustard. Pleased as I really do have too much to play in the shooter section of my games collection. I have a terrible lack of control when it comes to not buying good games regardless of how much I will play them. Unhappy as this was EA with some new IP - which we really need to encourage.
Les
05/03/08 @ 15:45
#47
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
“The single player game doesn't sound too enthralling from the review and I'm not interested in playing it online so I won't be buying it. Just as well it didn't score 9 or 10/10 really as I might have missed out on a great game.”

You mean you feel you have to get every 9/10 and 10/10 game so you don’t miss out on a great game?! I know countless of games with that score that I’d gladly would have missed out on (Oblivion being the most obvious example). Scores shouldn’t matter. Read the text. If it doesn’t sound appealing to you you’re better off not playing it, even if the score is very high.
Darren
05/03/08 @ 16:08
#48
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Les - What I meant to say is that I'd have hated Army of Two to have been a truly great game because I've gone off shooters at the moment so I had no intention of buying it anyway, I want to play something different (it's why I've ordered a baseball game of all things!). I don't like missing out on must-have games and it's not that I don't like shooters, it's just that I feel like I've O/Ded on them! I'm saving my enthusiasm for the genre for Gears of War 2 and Resistance 2 later on this year, by then I'm hoping shooters will feel exciting again! :)
samaran
05/03/08 @ 16:12
#49
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
if the answer isn't ghostface or raekwon i will not buy this game
Waldo
05/03/08 @ 16:19
#50
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'm so sick of these American gung-ho games.

I'm sorry you have to play it. :(

Comments: 1-50 of 101 in total | next 50 »

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery