Jump to navigation

Activision Hits Remixed Comments by Kristan Reed

17 February, 2007

2600 games. Actually, not quite that many.

Read entire article.

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-26 of 26 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
siro
17/02/07 @ 09:07
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I'd consider myself an avid retro gamer, but still I wouldn't dream of paying 10 bucks for a 2600 game collection. ice hockey and river raid are still bliss tho. The third game I'd still go for, Decathlon, just doesn't work on non-joystick controllers. Not if you played it the right (stick trashing) way.
Poorandugly
17/02/07 @ 09:51
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Yesterday I visited a museum conference about how to preserve video games for the future (Howard Besser if you know the bloke). The problem is that, even with excellent convertions and compilations such as this, there is no way to preserve the initial wonder and excitement that (most of) these games were greeted with.
Metalfish
17/02/07 @ 10:43
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
...because these games have had their time?
chupachups
17/02/07 @ 11:41
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"The problem is that, even with excellent convertions and compilations such as this, there is no way to preserve the initial wonder and excitement that (most of) these games were greeted with."

True, but you can preserve people's memories of that excitement through interviews, videos, websites etc.

I think it's very important to preserve games like this because they were how the whole games industry began. If games ever become as mainstream as films or TV, we'll want to know how it started, and how people felt about it.

I'd love to know how the first audiences of the film King Kong reacted to it in the 1930s, and maybe people in the future will want to know how the first players of Donkey Kong reacted in the 1980s.

Almost all of the first ever films and the first ever TV shows, even the ones that were huge hits in their own time, have been lost forever because nobody thought that anyone in the future would be interested. We mustn't repeat that mistake with games.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 17/02/07 @ 11:42
Nookyalar
17/02/07 @ 12:14
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So, what games are on it, then? Looks like Activision Anthology for the GBA to me. Could you buy a GBA and the game for less than the price of the PSP game?
SeesThroughAll
17/02/07 @ 12:19
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So, what games are on it, then? Looks like Activision Anthology for the GBA to me. Could you buy a GBA and the game for less than the price of the PSP game?

The thing is, nobody would buy a GBA for this either.
Inigo
17/02/07 @ 12:47
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The Philips Videopac was far better then the 2600. It had a touch sensitive keyboard and a game of pacman that you could design your own mazes!!!

Daikon
17/02/07 @ 13:35
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I have to disagree with the Beamrider bashing.
Played it on fMSX a couple of weeks ago and it was still a fun game (or was the 2600 version much worse?).
Bitkari
17/02/07 @ 14:15
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
As much fondness as I hold for the 2600, I couldn't bring myself to fork over good money for these games slunk onto a UMD.

For the same money I could get either the Sega or Capcom collections with games that I actually want to play after the first five minutes of teary-eyed nostalgia.

I know how much publishers *love* to churn out re-issues of their existing portfolio of ageing game IP (at least the accountants do), but the line really must be drawn somewhere.

wolfen
17/02/07 @ 15:16
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Actually, Activision was founded after several Atari programmers got fed up with receiving no bonuses for top-sellers and the "no credit for developers" policy and the whole third party issue only appeared after the company established, but that's a completely different story.

The problem with A2600 (and let's be honest, any pre-16 bit system) is that only an handful of games still manage to carry any weight now. From the complete A2600 library, there only about 10 games I still find enjoyable now: River Raid, Keystone Kapers, Crackpots, Fishing Derby, Pitfall, Frostbite, Frogs and Flies, Missile Control, Ram It, Ice Hockey and Seaquest. All rest was outdone by now and it doesn't make much difference to have 10 games you wouldn't care or 100.
IP
17/02/07 @ 15:49
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Pitfall [...] The sequel, though, is blighted by [...] a baffling death mechanic which systematically drags you back to the beginning if you die."

Erm, no it isn't. It takes you back to the most recent cross you stepped on, and as the game essentially gives you infinite lives, you young whippersnappers should be grateful, dammit.
Poorandugly
17/02/07 @ 16:45
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Chupachups wrote: "True, but you can preserve people's memories of that excitement through interviews, videos, websites etc."

Agree, hope someone goes through the trouble of recording those things. There are a lot of decent websites around that tries to do that to an extent. It's easy to forget your own first reactions to certain games as well. I remember having nightmares from playing Syndicate, that version of the future was too frightening for my fragile young mind to handle ;_;
Emilia'sHorse
17/02/07 @ 20:19
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I had an Acorn Atom while my mate had a swanky Atari 2600. I had to type in all the games I wanted to play, which was nice and cheap but resulted in many Syntax errors. He on the other hand had parents rich enough (Or stupid enough) to pay £30 per game.

Playing these old retro collections is a cheap way to relive those early days of video gaming bliss. Love em to bits, even if they are ropey as hell by today's standards.
Scoops
17/02/07 @ 20:52
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I guess if you weren't there the first time round you will never 'get' this kind of collection. If you were it ends up being either an enjoyable nostalgia trip or a harsh realisation of just how far gaming has come. Me? I side with the former!
~magicool~
17/02/07 @ 22:59
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
UNBAN ME PLEASE!!!
~magicool~
17/02/07 @ 22:59
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
UNBAN ME PLEASE!!!
~magicool~
17/02/07 @ 22:59
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
UNBAN ME PLEASE!!!
~magicool~
17/02/07 @ 22:59
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
UNBAN ME PLEASE!!!
~magicool~
17/02/07 @ 23:00
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
UNBAN ME PLEASE!!!
~magicool~
17/02/07 @ 23:00
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
UNBAN ME PLEASE!!!
~magicool~
17/02/07 @ 23:00
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
UNBAN ME PLEASE!!!
GiarcYekrub
18/02/07 @ 01:02
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I remember my Dad buying my brother an Atari 2600 for Christmas one year but he did something quite clever ... he played it 1st and after seeing the wonders of my NES I'd got few months before quite rightly returned it and exchanged it for something called a Sega master System II with sonic and Alex kidd ever since my Dad has never played a game again... bad 2600
zoomah
18/02/07 @ 01:58
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The gaming industry resembles more than ever now that old Smiths gem "Paint a Vulgar Picture". One day even EA haters will count the days for a "EA console Hits Vol 1" with "extra" games and a tacky badge....
vcs+starpath>=:)
18/02/07 @ 23:19
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
HI peeps

Long time reader of this site.
Long time atari fan.
Long time sony fan.
Long time stick with a hoop fan.
Long time spotting, thats a dinosaur fan.
Yes im that old.

while its nice to see the old games making a return into the brave new world of next gen, i cant help thinking, why?.

Do you really need "classics" to sell a nextgen system.

The past is that, the past. read about it in a book, watch it on tv.

Or better still play them on your old console.
VCS still going strong, Sword Of Saros played one week ago in a drunken stupor, ahhhhh happy times, how i wish we could revisit them happy days, oh wait we can.

The end
jonsaan
19/02/07 @ 10:01
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Here's the thing. There were a few good games on the ATARI VCS. However they were licensed and NEVER appear on these stoopid compilations. Step forward, Space Invaders, Phoenix, Asteroids and breakout. Circus was good, Adventure too. Also , games like circus, Kaboom and breakout were completely reliant on the paddle controller and are shit on anything else. WAKE UP you lazy developers.

Until someone can get all the various licenses together and put out an all encompassing collection they will all be like the one reviewd here. Shit.
Ryze
19/02/07 @ 23:55
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
er... nah ta.

Comments: 1-26 of 26 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Advertisement

X View gallery