Jump to navigation
Sponsored by Alienware tracer
Advertisement

Activision chose to censor Russian MW2 News

PC Xbox 360 PlayStation 3 News by Oli Welsh

17 November, 2009

Activision has confirmed the removal of the controversial airport scene from the Russian version of Modern Warfare 2, and said the move was its own decision.

"Other countries have formal ratings boards that we regularly work with. However, Russia does not have a formal ratings entity. As a result, we chose to block the scene after seeking the advice of local counsel," the company told Eurogamer in a statement. Modern Warfare 2 is currently only available on PC in the country.

Activision was moving to clear up reports that the game had been banned or censored by the Russian government. There are claims that the console versions of the game have been recalled from retailers so the airport scene can be removed.

"Reports that Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 has been banned in Russia are erroneous.  Activision only released a PC version of the game in Russia which went on sale on Tuesday, 10th November," the company said.

The scene in question, titled "No Russian", depicts Russian ultranationalist terrorists massacring civilians in an airport with the player's help.

Advertisement

Are you excited about Modern Warfare 2 on PC/PlayStation 3/Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-35 of 35 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
andromeda
17/11/09 @ 11:37
#1
-5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
when will the COD wankathon cease!

overhyped, unwhelming expansion pack.
Crembo
17/11/09 @ 11:40
#2
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
No you didn't, stop lying IW (or Activision, for that matter).
Edited 1 times, most recently on 17/11/09 @ 11:40
Rirekon
17/11/09 @ 11:50
#3
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Really not sure what the fuss is about that scene, it's certainly no more (if not less) disturbing than many other games which allow the killing of innocents. To be honest the Specter Gunship in MW had more impact, that one felt a little too real.
Unclebenny
17/11/09 @ 11:50
#4
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Are we assuming everyones played this level now? It was incredibly hard to keep that level a suprise.

To counter andromeda's well put criticims:

I like COD, it is good.
Zidargh
17/11/09 @ 11:53
#5
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Was I the only one that did not find the Specter Gunship level moving? If anything I was bored by it. Call me desensitized.
kangarootoo
17/11/09 @ 11:53
#6
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"No you didn't, stop lying IW (or Activision, for that matter)."

Think it through for 2 seconds.

1. Why would they lie? To annoy you? Because they are evil (in the AD&D sense, where they just do evil stuff for no real reason)?
2. If they did lie, surely they would know that the truth would out in a matter of hours.

Of course they aren't bloody lying.
skillian
17/11/09 @ 11:58
#7
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Was I the only one that did not find the Specter Gunship level moving?

It was amazingly realistic and that certainly stood out, but I didn't find it moving. Didn't find the airport scene moving either. Maybe I'm just a cold-hearted emotionless cynic.
b00n
17/11/09 @ 12:01
#8
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
If they're lying or not, don't care. I do think it's a bit of a strange and weak decision to censor themselves without any real objective reason to do that. And of course their 'counsel' will have advised that as it only wants to avoid any risk.
skillian
17/11/09 @ 12:03
#9
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
And of course their 'counsel' will have advised that as it only wants to avoid any risk.

That sounds like an objective reason to me.

JahB
17/11/09 @ 12:04
#10
-5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
overhyped, unwhelming expansion pack.

if you really believe that you know 0 about video games.
penhalion
17/11/09 @ 12:08
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The russian government and people will not have taken kindly to being the bad guys in a clearly american game so I'm guessing that Activision were told in no uncertain terms to change it or face the consequences. There is zero other reason why any company incurs additional costs seemingly out of the goodness of their hearts. It's especially unlikely because there simply can't be that many sales of the game in russia.
Xerx3s
17/11/09 @ 12:14
#12
+5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
kangarootoo: Both activision and IW are not above telling porkies if recent weeks are anything to go by.
thedaveeyres
17/11/09 @ 12:20
#13
+16
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
In Soviet Russia, civilians massacre YOU!!
JayScott
17/11/09 @ 12:25
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@ andromeda

Then it's the best damn expansion pack I've ever played. Overhyped, maybe. But expansion pack? You're kidding yourself.
Kazzahdrane
17/11/09 @ 12:27
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@andromeda:

Don't tell me, L4D2 is an expansion pack too. There's nothing long about CoD4 and this one isn't any shorter. Bigger multiplayer and the co-op Spec Ops missions areincredible!
kangarootoo
17/11/09 @ 12:30
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"kangarootoo: Both activision and IW are not above telling porkies if recent weeks are anything to go by."

I deal with these things on a case by case basis, and in this specific case, common sense suggests they aren't lying. There is no motive for doing so, and they would know that the lie would be discovered in moments. It simply makes no sense.
Redeye
17/11/09 @ 12:33
#17
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
kanga: In all honesty, mate, I'd have to counter that; if the Russian authorities (governmental or otherwise) have stepped in and threatened to ban the title because of this particular piece of content, it certainly isn't beyond Activision's PR to throw out some positive spin in an attempt to save both corporate face and regional marketshare.

But if, in fact, Activision pulled it beforehand, before or without any hue and cry from the Russians, ask yourself one question - knowing full well that the title would be sold in that market and the ramifications that would undoubtedly ensue, why even bother incorporating it in the first place?

Not trying to don any tin-foil hats, but it certainly strikes me that Activision have had their wrists slapped here, and are attempting a bit of damage limitation.
Edited 1 times, most recently on 17/11/09 @ 12:33
Bigglesworth
17/11/09 @ 12:47
#18
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Activision fearin' a nukin'. Don't poke the Great Bear.
kangarootoo
17/11/09 @ 12:49
#19
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Redeye

I'm not saying it is beyond the abilities of IW to fib about it, but again I say that a lie like this would be found out easily and IW/Act would know that.

As for incoporating it in the first place, I don't expect anyone to get everything right first time. If the scene is in the game build for most regions, it is quite natural that it would be included in the game build for Russia, if only to start with.

If they then (perhaps in response to the public interest in the issue) sought further advice from a Russian councel (nobody, including Acty, is saying they had no contact with them) that suggested public outcry in Russia might be problematic it is perfectly feasible that they might change their mind about the inclusion to avoid future problems.


What part of that seems so unlikely? I'm not saying its impossible that this story isn't true, but the facts heavily suggest it is true. Certainly we have no grounds for kneejerk "No you didn't, stop lying IW" from someone who doesn't even appear to be able to decide which company that are complaining about.

This whole thing has occam's razor written ALL over it.
makeamazing
17/11/09 @ 13:16
#20
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Taking the airport level out will make for an even shorter SP experience... unlucky gamers in Russia... but to be honest the level is pretty rubbish anyway so they are probably better off without it :)
superted1974
17/11/09 @ 13:16
#21
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
The plot would make even less sense if they just chop this out!
Bremenacht
17/11/09 @ 13:21
#22
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"Other countries have formal ratings boards that we regularly work with. However, Russia does not have a formal ratings entity, but uses threats instead. As a result, we chose to block the scene after being told we'd be tied up and dropped down a mine-shaft during our next visit to Russia," the company didn't tell Eurogamer in a statement.
TafKas
17/11/09 @ 13:49
#23
+4
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Surely without that scene its now going to look like the russians invaded the US because they were bored?
Golgo
17/11/09 @ 14:00
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Quite right to remove the scene. Pure fiction. Russians never massacre other Russians. Never have, never will...
mingster
17/11/09 @ 14:15
#25
-1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Good im glad they cut it out.
Last thing we need is the ruskies taking offence and declaring WWIII over a video game.
UKLL
17/11/09 @ 14:16
#26
+5
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Methinks somebody from Activision is going to get a generous dose of polonium-210 in their tea.
Immaterial
17/11/09 @ 14:46
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
One lump or two?
kangarootoo
17/11/09 @ 15:06
#29
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
What the emote for crying again?
spekkeh
17/11/09 @ 15:46
#30
+1
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So, we've been talking about this scene for the entire week now. Well done IW. /sarcasm
melch
17/11/09 @ 15:49
#31
+3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
im surprised they havent offered players in russia who do want to play this level a chance to download it as DLC for a monthly fee.....

missed opportunity by acti......
Wolverfrog
17/11/09 @ 16:25
#32
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
So now, rather than not having to kill innocent civilians which conveys an important element of the plot, Russian gamers will believe that their country invaded America for no reason?

That really makes no sense.
tomkuryakin
17/11/09 @ 16:34
#33
-3
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"In Soviet Russia, civilians massacre you!"

I didn't realise that MW2 was set in the 1980s.

Or in other words for the hard of thinking, what has Soviet Russia got to do with this?
Salaminizer
17/11/09 @ 23:28
#34
+2
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@tomkuryakin: a TACTICAL FACEPALM for you
menschenfracht
18/11/09 @ 09:17
#35
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
tee-hee - now they're addressing the letter of protest from Ministry of Internal Affairs as 'an advice of local council'...

Comments: 1-35 of 35 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Get Games.  Download Great PC Games!

X View gallery