Call of Duty: Elite Preview

Shot-in-the-facebook.

Do you need a new social network in your life? Activision thinks you do. It's betting so hard on it, in fact, that it's set up an entire developer, Beachhead Studios, just to create and maintain one – or something that certainly looks like one, anyway. It's aimed at the millions of people out there who play Call of Duty multiplayer.

And, yes, that's millions. 20 million people play Call of Duty online every week, and seven million – eek! – fire a game up every day, apparently. It's almost as big as Farmville. There have been rumours floating around for years that these figures are just so temptingly gigantic that Activision will simply have to dive in at some point and start charging a monthly fee for anyone wanting to get in on the action. That hasn't happened, though, and at a recent Call of Duty press event, the publisher actually reiterated its commitment to offering free multiplayer. Then, it announced Call of Duty Elite, and that's where the whole social network thing comes in.

Call of Duty Elite has been created to organise and enhance your multiplayer COD fun. It offers players a single profile that will store all of their Call of Duty stats, and that profile will evolve with each new game Activision releases. Part of Elite will be premium content and will presumably require a subscription, but everybody will get access to at least some of the platform for free. If you really like online warfare, it's an interesting prospect.

Activision's approached the service with a multi-screen strategy, offering iterations of Elite across the internet, mobile apps, and within the COD games themselves. Each access point will serve up the content most suited to it – the iPhone app, for example, looks likely to foreground friends lists, comments and programme guides – but the PC seems to be where the most complete version of the service hangs out. Elite will launch with support for Black Ops and Modern Warfare 3, and it's the Black Ops content, running on a laptop, that the publisher's currently showing off.

Who wouldn’t want to get closer to the COD community? They seem to be friendly.

Elite on PC has a stylish, Steam-influenced kind of visual design to it. Log in and you'll find yourself looking at a plain black backdrop with most of your available content broken down into four tabs running down the side of each page: Career, Connect, Compete, and Improve.

Career is where most of the really interesting stuff is, offering something called an Elite Summary - which kicks off with a Twitter-type status box and a feed from acquaintances, before leading you through updates on friends, tracked players, and playlist schedules - and your Player Card. Your Player Card seems to be the heart of Elite. It's a career summary that's tailored for each game, and the Black Ops Player Card we're shown starts by displaying overall stats, then drops down into an overview of recent matches, your custom classes and personal bests, and finally provides a space to collate things like screenshots. You can compare your own data with friends and rivals at any stage, and the stat-love goes dizzyingly deep, offering stuff you'd expect – such as winning percentages, XP earnings and kill/death ratios - and stuff you might not, like nifty little heat maps for each match, complete with a timeline that allows you to see where you were and who you were killing at every moment in any of your last ten online games. You can even see recent performances rendered as graphs. Graphs! I'd like a copy on my desk by Monday, please. And a mocha. Make that a white mocha.

Connect is a lot more straightforward, but also hints at something of a departure for the series. With Elite you'll be able to form groups: not necessarily of players you want to get matched with or against, but of players you have common real-world interests with. In-game photographers can have a group. Head shot specialists can have a group. Fans of Moonlighting, the pioneering mid '80s dramedy that introduced Bruce Willis to the world, can have a group, and one that I'll certainly be joining. It's a bit like the groups you get on websites like Flickr, basically, although hopefully with fewer pictures of sleeping kittens. Beyond that, Connect is also home to a Theatre feature. It curates the best user-generated content, such as pictures and YouTube videos, and also allows you to skim through the most-viewed, and most-liked uploads, as well as anything you're tagged in. Again, sleeping kittens will probably not be present.

Compete, meanwhile, offers a programme guide. It's in the form of a calendar, running along the top of the page, and it's filled with events you can sign up to, from death match tournaments to screenshot contests. Events will be updated regularly, and Activision's promising real world prizes on occasion, citing the real world prize du jour, the iPad.

After that, you're left with the Improve tab, which is basically an interactive encyclopaedia of all things COD: expect top-down views of all the maps, with objective locations and other game-specific info marked, alongside tips and summaries for each weapon in the game, each attachment, each perk, each kill-streak, and each game mode. Every item you look at allows you to call up your own personal statistics relating to it, and it's surprisingly addictive stuff.

That's Elite as it will support Black Ops, then. For Modern Warfare 3, Activision's planning on rolling out a lot more features: clan support to sit alongside groups, for example – it's weird they'd hold that particular element back - and a program guide that goes beyond individual players and caters for groups, clans, and leagues. The Improve section, meanwhile, will apparently allow you to connect to the "collective intelligence of the community" – you're going to learn a lot about what Your Mom's been up to, I'll be bound – in as yet unspecified ways. Will you be able to ask the best players questions? Will there be Parky style interviews? Will somebody get called a "n00b"? Nobody's letting on at the moment.

How much will you pay for this? For quite a bit of the content, you'll pay nothing, by the looks of it: a lot of the career information and the whole membership of groups business were both cited as things that will be free to all, while a Premium membership will not only get you an advanced range of Elite features, but will also allow you to access all DLC – and all future DLC - at no extra cost (it's still being offered for purchase a la carte, of course). I asked Jamie Berger, Call of Duty's vice president of digital, what will happen to that free DLC you've been using if you decide to cancel your premium membership, and he said, "We'll tell you more about that later, but I think we'll have a lot of good news for people." That sounds positive, but good news always does.

Pricing has yet to be announced, but Activision has stated that, "when it launches, Elite will be less than any comparable in-game service out there right now." It's also been stressed that Premium memberships will feed back into the running of the live Elite operation, funding the development of new features and the 24/7 service team. Beyond that, they will probably purchase a few new crystal skulls for Bobby Kotick to drink Vimto from, so we'll all be winners.

That's Elite, then: stats, tips, groups, and community stuff. It will be interesting to see where Activision places its pay wall, and whether it ends up dividing a community into haves and have-nots, but for the time being, it's looking like a thoughtful - and fairly restrained – approach to the inevitable business of further online monetisation.

Comments (54) Latest comment 12 months ago

Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • richarddavies #1 12 months ago

    Thanks but no thanks.
  • Architect_z #2 12 months ago

    Sounds interesting, but I don't think it'll be worth paying for.
  • kwarive #3 12 months ago

    Lots of marketing buzzwords and nothing of real substance.
  • ipressbuttons #4 12 months ago

    So basically what the Gears of War 3 Beta offered? Don't get me wrong I like to play Call of Duty but a montly payment for some extra features? No chance!
  • whizzedout #5 12 months ago

    That video was actually awesome, best bit "Dinners ready" LOL
  • spiritsnake #6 12 months ago

    sounds ok, maybe something to mess around with when theres nothing else to do.
  • Razzajazz #7 12 months ago

    Haven't DICE had this for years with the Battlefield website, and the Veterans' program? Can't see exactly what the difference is at the mo.... And the BF website is free, so I can't possibly see what they're going to charge for....
  • username84 #8 12 months ago

    So what is it? Just stat screens and ego films of kills?
    I take it the online gaming is still free? Facebook COD style?
    If this is the case, and I haven't got it all wrong it looks utterly utterly pointless.
  • Olemak #9 12 months ago

    Sounds like the result of a game of bullshit bingo played by clueless execs.

    Social media! Connectability! Revenuification! Data mining! In-depth analysis! UGC! Monthly exploitation! Ahhh.... execgasm....
  • nuanimal #10 12 months ago


    This sounds very similar to Bungie.net - and honestly sounds ok features wise, but seriously charging for this? Also, I do wonder who the target audience is for this - as good as having 20m players are, how many of them will be willing to sign on, let alone pay? Seriously I can't many snot-nosed sunlight adverse 14yo twats buying in. Maybes only a small number need to be in to make it profitable?

    Comparative question: How many Halo players have a bungie.net account setup?

    The free DLC could be a good call as long as the subscription makes back a years worth of DLC (say £450 a year for 2 sets of maps). And that was a very good qestion about what happens to DLC when sub ends, Chris. And if the sub allows you to get all future DLC for say MW4... well then that seems like a intersting way to entice loyalty for your next product.

    All in all, CoDE looks alright. Will just have to wait and see what the pricing and uptake is like.

    Oh yeah, and fuck Bobby Kotick and Activision, etc, etc,

  • P1GEONPOO #11 12 months ago

    Liking the way it doesnt take itself serious
  • coolbritannia #12 12 months ago

    Looks good, I'll prob buy MW3 now.
  • el_pollo_diablo #13 12 months ago

    Seems backwards to me. If they built an iterative engine, a la Source, and then released cheaper, smaller MP map packs and cheaper, smaller single player campaigns I might be willing to give it a go. But if the games are still going to be boxed £40 affars, all on different engines and so on, then forget it.
  • darkmorgado #14 12 months ago

    That's 6 articles about COD now on the front page.

    Fucking hell, EG. Calm down.
  • effinwooly #15 12 months ago

  • paketep #16 12 months ago

    Pass too. And fuck Kotick.
  • hulahoops #17 12 months ago

    Hmm. I'd have created a Facebook app which collates personal data and disperses it in the social network.

    Then from there I'd start wondering how to monetise it. But create value for the user first, then create value for yourself, that's the only order to do things in these days.
  • Cronan #18 12 months ago

    How is this different to what Bungie have provided for years, for free?
  • randyronald #19 12 months ago

    Just Activision repackaging what others offer for free and charging a premium price for an already lucrative franchise. That better be one pretty ribbon on top.
  • Bartacus #20 12 months ago

    There is no need for a charge for this, they are being greedy cnuts.
  • fletch7100 #21 12 months ago

  • Benno #22 12 months ago

    I imagine they'll make a killing from this. I, however, will not be subscribing.
  • P3ndula #23 12 months ago

    The franchise took a big hit with Block Ops. They just don't know it yet.
  • Arsecake_Baker #24 12 months ago

    Come on Dice this would be a perfect time to put the boot into Activision, announce all the same but for free!
  • sabbede #25 12 months ago

    Sure its an interesting idea, but: It should be free, and itshould be for a game that isn't crap.
  • Arsecake_Baker #26 12 months ago

    Plus! All that money and the console version still doesn't run on a dedicated server!
  • joelstinton #27 12 months ago

    If people read the article, instead of instantly assuming...

    "How much will you pay for this? For quite a bit of the content, you'll pay nothing, by the looks of it: a lot of the career information and the whole membership of groups business were both cited as things that will be free to all, while a Premium membership will not only get you an advanced range of Elite features, but will also allow you to access all DLC – and all future DLC - at no extra cost (it's still being offered for purchase a la carte, of course

    I think the things that bungie.net offers will be free. Acti are more than aware about the people who jump on the hate bandwagon and will bring issues like these up. I would imagine a paid service would be dedicated servers, DLC, and access to older maps from previous titles.
    Edited by joelstinton at 31/05/11 @ 15:38
  • Tyronne #28 12 months ago

    What`s that old saying...a fool and his money is soon parted?...kinda sums this all up.
  • Timotei #29 12 months ago

    "That's 6 articles about COD now on the front page.

    Fucking hell, EG. Calm down"

    Seven, actually.*


    *Count correct at time of posting, refunds unacceptable.
  • fletch273 #30 12 months ago

    Sigh... It looks like this franchise isn't leaving any time soon.
  • BeersOfWar #31 12 months ago

    I would much rather drag my cock through a mile of broken glass.

    Thanks.
  • Ptarmigandalf #32 12 months ago

    Will it have hats?
  • beastmaster #33 12 months ago

    Can I still shoot people in the head?

    /loads shotgun
    /points at myself
    KABOOM!
  • chrisola #34 12 months ago

    if it costs less than any current comparable gaming service, and the only one's which are comparable are Bungie.Net and Bad Company 2 Veteran which are both free, does that mean we get paid to use it???

  • layleeloo #35 12 months ago

    Borrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrre. So are we to prepare for another 6 months of daily COD bollocks then? Its all that rubbish which turned me off the whole franchise in the first place
  • DazzeL190 #36 12 months ago

    Some of you guys need to think this through.

    If you don't like CoD this won't sell it to you but no one suggested it would.

    If you buy CoD anyway but don't want to pay any more then you get loads if additional free stuff - awesome.

    If you do think the extras are worth it then you get even more extra features - awesome.

    So far, where is any of this bad?

  • TheRealBadabing #37 12 months ago

    We all know Activision are greedy shits so I doubt anyone is particularly surprised by this. The problem will come in a year or two when other publishers think they have to do something similar or their e-peen will shrivel.

    Look at what happened with Project $10; suddenly every exec with a 2nd rate IP decided that they wanted some of that action. It's a very short-sighted strategy and one that is not sustainable for anyone but the really big names.
  • CaptainQuint #38 12 months ago

    "Improve"

    Improve what? CoD is the EASIEST online shooter out there - even your dad and uncle can get top kills!

    That's the CoD secret - it even makes rubbish gamers feel like 'pros'.
  • Kilters #39 12 months ago

    Way to split the fanbase. The ratio of fucktards in this should be prodigious
  • ichobi #40 12 months ago

    I will take haddock and chips please.
  • fafaf #41 12 months ago

    "at a recent Call of Duty press event, the publisher actually reiterated its commitment to offering free multiplayer."

    Do people not hand money over for the game anymore?
  • Code_R #42 12 months ago

    It sounded pointless up to the bit where it said "Pricing" where it became absurd.
    Edited by Code_R at 31/05/11 @ 21:15
  • Code_R #43 12 months ago

    It sounded pointless up to the part where it said "Pricing" where it became absurd.
  • makeamazing #44 12 months ago

    After listening to that, i am obviously way to old to be a COD player...... it was like an episode of the sims or something.... very strange... makes it clear they are aiming it at younger people.
  • jtodroc #45 12 months ago

    Killzone.com also includes most of this stuff for free as well, including the tournament/clan part of it.
  • slow2run #46 12 months ago

    I love playing COD online and have been doing so for many years back to COD2 through to BLOPS> I also love Halo and Battlefield which I have played for the same length of time. I find stat tracking k/d etc one of the things that takes the fun out of online shooters and makes people take the game far too seriously. It also effects gameplay with players pursuing their own stats rather than join in on team objective games for example, this can lead to a particular game mode to become pointless. Skill in FPS is measured in more than just stats. This is aimed at youger players vanity and seems to be all about me me me, look at me. I think its a cheap money spinner for them. Its a video game not a lets compare how big our cocks are game. The teen massive will love it. As for me just give me a balanced MP with great map design.
  • glowingworm #47 12 months ago

    GFX looks awful compared with BF3. social / subscription stuff looks pointless, Karl was funny in a - i'm getting paid too be funny way - I really hope this fails for all FPS players around the world sake. such a shame COD.
  • Averice #48 12 months ago

    Pretty tired of attempts at forced social networking, at least they aren't trying to force us to spam facebook anymore afaik.

    IDK though, if they do it right could be okay. Activision's WoW requiring you to pay for cross realm LFD really sucks. I didn't know so many people played CoD though, that's pretty cool actually. I usually don't buy fps's, but I'm thinking I'll grab the next installment in the series.
  • Alf-Life #49 12 months ago

    I think the most interesting thing is getting the pay-for-DLC for free... it's very PSN+ like...

    Then again... will someone who only has a 360 (I'm lucky enough to have 360 and PS3) has to pay for the game, XBL *and* a subscription? :s I wouldn't.
  • flaming.carrot #50 12 months ago

    I'm ashamed to admit I actually like COD multiplayer. That being said, there are a *lot* of wankers online that play this game and I have not intention of getting more 'social' with any of them.
    Edited by flaming.carrot at 01/06/11 @ 09:38
  • carlitoswagon #51 12 months ago

    Actually thought hat vid was hilarious and very well done. It's made me realise that cod isn't the devils spawn but something which is there to enjoy and run with, instead of pointing a finger at and laughing. Cod can now coinicide within my Battlefield universe as an alternative which gets some hugs now and again.

    Although, I won't be buying that.
  • IronGiant #52 12 months ago

    Is this supposed to be a preview or a sales pitch? Reads as if activision have sent some bundles of cash to EG..

    Yes most will start off free but won't be long before the good stuff is all subscription based, waste of time.
  • SandyMcD #53 12 months ago

    Since this is very similar to the bungie.net stat tracking for Halo, I just had a look at my old Halo 3 stats.

    In over 1200 games, I only got 4 'linktacular' medals - for playing in a match comprised entirely of bungie.net users.

    That's a really low ratio, considering the bungie.net service is completely free. Activision will have a tough time selling this.
  • Meh #54 12 months ago

    but i have so many questions...

    i have but one statement to make... meh!!