Brink

A closer look at the sprinting man's shooter.

"Alright!" cries supernaturally chipper Splash Damage CEO Paul Wedgwood towards the assembled journalists. "If you go into customisation, you'll be able to change anything about your character that you like. We've unlocked everything and bumped you up to level six, so you'll be able to select all of the content."

Loading my character, I find myself face-to-face with a cross between a Somalian pirate and Stig of the Dump. The journos who used this terminal before me have buried my blank canvas under dreadlocks, a plaid shirt, cargo pants, £3000' worth of tattoos and about 80 kilos of military accessories.

Sighing inwardly, I first go to pry off the man's gas mask, which ends up revealing a terrifying mask of clown face paint, smeared over craggy, elderly features. I slip the gas mask back in place. The next minute before the match begins I spend simply tinkering with the various textures for my shirt and shoes. Much safer that way.

Brink is nothing if not colourful. Both literally - in the stark blacks and blues of its Security side, the kaleidoscopic hues of the rag-tag opposing Resistance, and the heavy-handed palette of the maps where they fight - and metaphorically.

1

Sliding into somebody's legs knocks them down briefly. Very briefly. Probably leave the heroics to somebody else, eh?

Fittingly for a game about civil war on a day-after-tomorrow floating city (turned day-after-tomorrow floating refugee camp as the rest of the world floods), Brink's voice acting provides a chocolate box of accents to choose from for your character, with similarly multi-cultural cutscenes. It's oddly heartwarming to hear an American, African and an Irishman arguing over the finer points of their mission. Speaking of cutscenes, it's during this playthrough that I see one of Brink's opening cinematics for the first time, which tells the story of the game's city, The Ark, through a beautiful scale model which warps and grows as a narrator walks you through the place's troubled history.

That Brink should boast all of this incidental charisma feels like a very smart move indeed, because while the campaign of the game itself can be played in single-player, there's no getting away from the relentlessness and panic of Brink's multiplayer-style missions. Rather than the Battlefield-inspired landscapes of Splash Damage's last project, Enemy Territory: Quake Wars, Brink's maps more often resemble the close-quarters claustrophobia of their first game, the critically-acclaimed Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory. With Brink, Splash Damage is taking the intensity and variety that made them famous, and doing its best to repackage it with more than a little charm.

The new mission we play is noteworthy for a couple of reasons. As opposed to the tight angles and cramped streets of Container City, the map Splash Damage had previously trotted out most often, we play a Resistance mission to recover a prisoner from a gleaming, Security-controlled section of the Ark full of wide-open courtyards and foyers.

2

The guns! The faces! The clothes! It's the most seductive ugly world ever!

Sound pleasant? It was brutal. Think the Normandy Landings. Corners and tight passages are what you want as an underdog. Wide-open spaces are just meet-and-greet zones for defenders and attackers, with the difference that attackers have to actually cross those spaces and the defenders let their bullets do the talking.

The other exciting difference was that Brink's different body types were available for us to play with. While everybody has to choose to play either a Soldier, Medic, Engineer or sneaky Operative, this is a dynamic choice and can be switched at various command terminals during a match. Your body type is a little different, and like the range of perks you unlock, can only be changed between matches.

Medium body type is what you'll be familiar with. This is the default choice, leaving you as a stocky guy who can run, slide, vault and climb using Brink's SMART system (Smooth Movement Across Random Terrain) competently, but there are two other options that get unlocked at slightly higher levels. Heavy body type turns you into a boulder of a man with a little more health than usual and who can carry Brink's array of heavy weapons, ranging from grenade launchers to miniguns and machine guns to gigantonormous automatic shotguns. The trade-off is that Heavy body types climb about as well as oiled elephants, leaving certain shortcuts and even whole pieces of the level inaccessible to them. They also don't slide so much as they fall over with style.

But the Agile body type was what I was interested in. Selecting this body type gives your character all the muscle and poise build of a man raised on milk and biscuits. You take a penalty to health and can't even carry the Medium build's array of assault rifles and shotguns, instead being restricted to sniper rifles, pistols and SMGs. The trade-off for all of this is that not only do you run and climb faster than anybody else, you slide farther and can perform wall-jumps.

It's not even a choice. I pick Agile like a drowning man grabbing at a rope, the match begins, and I'm off! Off, into a world of much bigger men with much bigger guns.

The first task for the Resistance team is to gain entrance to this faceless facility, meaning we have to first hack the cover off a door control panel at the far end of a courtyard, plant explosives on it, then protect those explosives while their inexplicably long timer ticks down, with Security forces assaulting our position and raining fire down the entire time.

In short, it's no place for an Agile to be. Spotting a convenient array of pipes and machinery on one side of the yard, I send my fragile avatar catapulting up them with a hop, skip, a prayer and a jump, leaving him high above the combat zone and out of the fire zone. I have no idea where I am, but that's not too much of a problem. With a touch of the d-pad I bring up Brink's objective wheel and the game immediately prompts me with a handful of objectives. Selecting a command post that needs hacking (which would give my entire team a boost to their health) I go sprinting off, stopping occasionally to fire a rifle round into the furious Security below.

3

Blank train timetables are the new lens flares. You heard it here first.

Playing as an Agile is a great way to amplify what makes Brink different. It boosts the game's simple Assassin's Creed / Mirror's Edge parkour mechanics, yes, but since you'll keel over in a firefight like a stalk of corn in a breeze it also encourages you to go off and do your own thing, something Brink excels at. The levels might be cramped in places, but they also sprawl deceptively, with lots of small sub-objectives hidden down shortcuts and up on walkways.

Attacking engineers may find the objective wheel hinting that they repair a staircase, while defending engineers can assemble fixed gun emplacements. Operatives can sabotage enemy equipment. Everybody can capture command posts, or creep their way around to behind enemy lines and open fire at men on the wrong side of cover. It's a lovely sense of freedom, and eases the cruelty of what is otherwise quite a hardcore FPS. If the fighting in one part of the level kills you off twice in a row, there's no need to go back there. You can leave that deathtrap to your team and go hunting a different prize - or you can simply approach the same kill zone from a different angle, or as a different class, or with different weapons.

Back as an Agile, I encounter difficulties as my team starts escorting our important AI prisoner from his cell back to the start of the level. Excellently, in order to sidestep the higher age rating given to games featuring the shooting of unarmed men, a pistol hangs limply from our VIP's arm as he shuffles limply forward.

4

If God is a DJ, and life is a dance floor, and we are the music, the heavy would still be a fat man camping in the corner with an enormous gun. He's that kind of guy.

Filled with urgency, I go running out to join the pack, sliding around and firing my pathetic Agile pop guns at the Security team with commendable enthusiasm, if not effectiveness. It's a slaughter. For minute after minute our medics go rushing out under storms of enemy fire to get the man back on his feet, only for him to topple over just a few feet closer to our exit elevator. I try clambering across the top of the level, but can't find an angle for sniping. I change to an engineer and try dropping gun emplacements, but they're shattered by enemy fire in seconds. I just don't know what to do. I don't know the level, the tricks relating to all the class-specific powers, or quite who to help.

By the time we get the prisoner to the elevator, I'm supping a strange cocktail of exhaustion, elation and disheartenment. I sucked. I didn't even use my wall-jump, except when showing off with a group of other reinforcements on our way back to the action. I want to change that. I want to be among the smartest, fastest and most dangerous gunmen the Ark has ever seen. Just how much depth Brink will offer remains to be seen, but that's still a very, very good sign.

Comments (43) Latest comment 1 year ago

Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • Vortex808 #1 1 year ago

    \o/ Still can't wait for this!
  • cw- #2 1 year ago

    I see 'SMART' in Brink articles and automatically think about this : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhrfhjLd9e4
  • butler` #3 1 year ago

    sounds awesome, i see it as borderlands 2 in a lot of ways (though that might be misplaced?)
  • carlitoswagon #4 1 year ago

    Looks like a nice mix of teamwork, objectives and customisation. Plenty of competition in March with Bulletstorm and Homefront, so hope it doesn't fall off the radar. Seems like some games would benefit from a delayed release. Let people see whats good and whats not.

    Edit: so the release isn't march. Good. It'lll benefit from a slight delay.
    Edited by carlitoswagon at 28/02/11 @ 16:20
  • Ultrasoundwave #5 1 year ago

    This game looks innovative, original and interesting............which means it will sell fuck all unfortunately.

    / curses the modern gamer
  • HisDudness #6 1 year ago

    Carlito: Is it actually out in March? I don't think so...

    I don't think there is a solid date, but I'd bet more like May or June.

    Edit: Eurogamer claims "Brink is due to be released 20/05/2011 on PlayStation 3, PC, and Xbox 360."
    Edited by HisDudness at 28/02/11 @ 15:28
  • DrStrangelove #7 1 year ago

    If God is a DJ, and life is a dance floor, and we are the music, the heavy would still be a fat man camping in the corner with an enormous gun.

    More of those brilliant EG philosophy excursions please!
  • DrStrangelove #8 1 year ago

    @butler`

    "sounds awesome, i see it as borderlands 2 in a lot of ways (though that might be misplaced?)"

    I think it's much more Team Fortress than Borderlands.
  • magicpocket #9 1 year ago

    Did anyone catch the Parkour Tour Brink sponsored? http://www.youtube.com/user/ParkourTour?...
  • Dave52 #10 1 year ago

    I have to say - this is very, very interesting... I just hope that enough people buy into it to give the multiplayer some longevity.
  • Puriel #11 1 year ago

    reminds me a bit of shadowrun which was a great game if played in a good team
  • FTM #12 1 year ago

    I wonder if you can play with a few friends against AI, rather than player v player

  • Murton #13 1 year ago

    @carlitoswagon: it was pushed back from Autumn 2010 to March 2011 and now May 20th 2011. Hopefully it won't slip again as I've been looking forward to this for a very long time already.

    Good preview/hands on, wonder if EG will review it in all modes, single player, co-operative and full multiplayer. Personally I'm mostly interested in the co-op, the full on multiplayer will be interesting at first but I reckon it'll become an annoying sniper-fest within a minute of each game starting resulting in the attacking teams simply not having the manpower to complete their objectives, much like the Enemy Territory games or MAG.

    Roll on May 20th
  • butler` #14 1 year ago

    I think it's much more Team Fortress than Borderlands.

    Is it really that multiplayer focused? I haven't read much on it but I thought it was a co-op / campaign jobbo?
  • TheEarlOfZinger #15 1 year ago

    I want this. The game looks great - the only thing I'm not sure about is the lack of deathmatch/team deathmatch in the multiplayer.

    For context - Sometimes you need a break from the objective based stuff, I played quake wars a lot - and it got stale really.
  • Murton #16 1 year ago

    @butler

    According to the dev diary vids there are three modes of play. Single player which is your standard campaign. Co-op which is the standard campaign for up to 8 guys and full multiplayer where everyone is a player, like the Enemy Territory games or Team Fortress. XP is earned and retained in all modes for the purposes of character advancement and customisation, which is good news because I doubt I have the patience for versus MP.

    @ EarlofZinger - not heard anything about a standard or team deathmatch mode. Hopefully it will have one so that the people who want to play deathmatch can go and play and not spoil the objective based game for everyone else. Nothing worse than playing an objective based multiplayer where only three men on the team are interested in the objective while the other 5 sit on a ridge with sniper rifles popping headshots.
  • TheRealBadabing #17 1 year ago

    Torn between PC and 360 for this one.

    M&K control would be nice but it comes at the price of a fractured community and elitist wankers on every server.

    Getting the EG Shadowrun chaps back together on Xbox live would be nice but it comes at the price of everyone else being pre-pubescent wankers and racists.
  • TheEarlOfZinger #18 1 year ago

  • lordofthedunce #19 1 year ago

    Sounds like a game for me. I have a regular bunch who love co-op gaming but aren't really into versus 'cos we're old and crap at games.
  • atrimus #20 1 year ago

    @ultrasoundwave

    i agree to an extent. i'm all for innovation and originality, but i tend to approach new IP with some trepidation, especially if i'm not that familiar with the developer. if they can get a demo out there for me to try, then it'll be all the merrier. otherwise, it'll take some serious word-of-mouth praise for me to plunk down the cash. $60 goes a long way nowadays, and if i have to choose between something promising yet untested, or something old and yet proven good, then i'm going for the latter.
  • ssmulders #21 1 year ago

    Hands-on like a hands-on should be.
  • asphaltcowboy #22 1 year ago

    Cannot wait for this. Possibly my most anticipated this year!
  • schmung #23 1 year ago

    Please let it be like The Specialists
    Please let it be like The Specialists
    Please let it be like The Specialists


    Half decent movement is a mp shooter is something I've had to do without for far too long. I have my appendages crossed for this.
  • smithdown #24 1 year ago

    I kinda forgot this was incoming.It still looks in great shape to me, I hope it gets loads of support from gamers on all platforms.
    Loads of games to finish between now and then, including Deus Ex 3 and Portal 2! It's a bitter-sweet age to be a gamer - so much awesomeness to play, so little time...
  • djed #25 1 year ago

    hehe, what is an 'african' accent exactly?

    edit: spelling
    Edited by djed at 28/02/11 @ 19:23
  • Geminosity #26 1 year ago

    I really want to like this because the mechanics interest me but I find the art style repulsive and sticking in super-customisable characters but not having a female option really puts me off.

    It's odd... if you just play set characters ala what they're doing with Anarchy Reigns then I don't care about gender diversity so much, but the minute you make the avatar you play customisable I get irked when there's no female selection. I think it's because when you can mould the character it feels more like how you're seen suddenly becomes a lot more relevant.
    Edited by Geminosity at 28/02/11 @ 19:28
  • Vortex808 #27 1 year ago

    I really like the art style, but it's certainly odd there's no female character options.
  • Tryhard #28 1 year ago

    I'll believe it all when i see it with my own eyes.This game has been pushed back so many times,and has been moving along under silent running.I hope it does all that we have heard.Only a few months away and this is the only stirring of information.Strange.
  • Flying_Pig #29 1 year ago

    Looks interesting :)
  • philreeduk #30 1 year ago

    As cool as this sounds ive got a feeling its going to get trounced by L.A. Noire, just like Alan Wake did with Red Dead.
  • TheGuvernor #31 1 year ago


    This title is looking more & more intriguing - could be shaping up into something pretty special.
    Maybe they should do some bloody marketing!!
  • SniperZoz #32 1 year ago

    all they need to add is a jetpack ;)
    Edited by SniperZoz at 28/02/11 @ 23:02
  • jumpdeveraux #33 1 year ago

    I'd like to hear how robust the netcode is given Agile enables you to run faster than anyone else - hopefully we won't see teams of all Agiles sprinting everywhere and hard to actually hit (a la COD)

    Interested but definitely waiting for the reviews and hopefully a demo to try it out before parting with cash.
  • Hypocee #34 1 year ago

    Sorry to possibly contradict you, Murton, but I think the phrase 'standard campaign' could mislead. Story progression is entirely confined to loading-screen cutscenes; there are no levels designed for a corridor experience, no nonhuman enemies, no bosses, no non-bark NPC dialogue and no scripted events in a level triggered by time or stepping on a certain polygon. Brink is always, and only, progressive objective-oriented 8-v-8 battle. (Well, you can turn down the numbers if you want in quick match/dedicated server.) The only difference in the 'modes' is how many of the characters are controlled by bots, from 15 to zero, and whether the human players choose to be on the same side. That blurring between SP and MP is the goal that makes Splash Damage foam the most at the mouth in interviews.

    It's a damned shame there are no female characters, but it's not odd when you hear Splash Damage talk about their financial, disc and memory budgets for localised speech and models/animation. It's entirely valid to be pissed off about it or choose not to buy the game because of the lack of female avatars, but multiple SDites have said throughout development that they badly wanted to have women in the game and simply could not accomplish it without another disc medium, another console generation and lots more budget.

    Edit: Welll...Agiles are supposed to be hard to hit, so you may be out of luck. All characters can slide to dodge bullets/crosshairs, and Agiles are superslidey.
    Edited by Hypocee at 28/02/11 @ 23:59
  • jumpdeveraux #35 1 year ago

    @Hypocee

    I've no issues with agiles being hard to hit. I just want to understand hit detection/netcode is sufficiently robust that fast moving targets don't suffer from the same "phantom" effect as in e.g. Black Ops where I've emptied an entire clip into someone running straight at me at full sprint only to "miss" and get knifed in the face.
  • AgentBalti #36 1 year ago

    This is looking very promising...I'm glad it's getting a bit of a following. But more importantly...htf can you sigh inwardly?!
  • figgis #37 1 year ago

    If it's anything like Wolfenstien ET the multi-player will be great.
  • LittleRiver #38 1 year ago

    no.1 game on my watch list this year.
  • CaptainKid #39 1 year ago

    Wait. what?
    Objectives you say?
    In an online shooter none the less?
    What will they think of next.

    This game sounds a lot like Wolfenstein ET and that was a GOOD game.
  • Hypocee #40 1 year ago

    I know I could be missing a joke, CaptainKid, but I choose to let you know just in case: Brink is from the same folks who did the Enemy Territories.
  • CaptainKid #41 1 year ago

    I know..
    Guess my joke didn't translate well to English and to text..

    Anyway Wolf:ET was great and I hope this will be to.
  • Geminosity #42 1 year ago

    @hypocee

    Actually, splash damage said at one point they had a choice... they could have male and female chars with less customisation options or they could do one gender and have more. Obviously the correct choice was to pick adding some more t-shirts and haircuts at the cost of alienating a chunk of their potential customer base... right? :p
  • Hypocee #43 1 year ago

    @Geminosity:

    Actually, in this case, 'less' is a euphemism for 'no', and they're not talking about drawing T-shirts and hairdos. When you listen to SD talk about not just the financial but the production time, localisation, disc space (ridiculously enough), and most importantly console memory limitations on the number of voices they could do (e.g. http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2010/10/... ), and then think about what it would have taken to get another gender looking semihuman in the generator and do twice the animation work, it becomes clear that in any world adjacent to reality the choice was between customisable dudes representing a broad cross-section of humanity, or Two North American Men With Choice of Haircut and Two North American Women With Choice Of Haircut.

    Please note that I'm only arguing against an unfair portrayal of SD's motives. As I've said on a previous EG hands-on and elsewhere, I can absolutely understand resenting the customiser or refusing to buy the game due to its lack of female characters. I view myself as letting SD slide on that area because I need to reward their (hopefully) dazzling innovation in movement, art and multiplayer structure; if there's a Brink II I intend to make female characters a buy/no buy criterion. I'm aware that I get to make that decision from a privileged position, though.