Homefront

Multiplayer hands-on with Battle Commander.

"He will win whose army is animated by the same spirit throughout all its ranks." Those are the words of Sun Tzu, a man who would have had a lot of time for Homefront, where everyone is spiritually drawn toward camping behind rocks and using remote-control helicopter drones to spam one another with rockets.

Helicopter drones are a lot of fun. Knuckle down somewhere private to spawn a buzzing little friend and you can zoom through the sky from his perspective, raining down hellfire on unsuspecting KPA or US troops depending on your allegiance.

The kills you make with a drone - and there will be plenty - are not so valuable to your team's score as ground kills, but they are far more disruptive to an enemy's movements over open ground. They can make the difference between securing an objective and simply being mown down.

And helicopter drones, while immediately gratifying, are just one of many delights available as part of Homefront's impressive Battle Points system. BPs are awarded for kills, assists and other things Sun Tzu would probably respect. Prior to each match you can customise your loadouts across six battle classes so that you can spend BPs on buffs, weapons and gizmos in the heat of the action.

(Helicopter drones are not as game-breaking as they sound - if the enemy shows signs of over-reliance on drones, you can always go hunting for the operators in the backyards and houses of the neighbourhoods you're fighting through.)

Other BP purchases include flak jackets, RPGs, and different drones - there's a little WALL-E style tank with a machinegun who proves very popular - and each class loadout gets two "purchase slots" to stock with them. In battle, providing you have sufficient BP, you just hit up or down on the d-pad to buy and make immediate use of your desired toy.

BP can also be spent on vehicles at the point of spawn - tanks, Humvees, even proper helicopters. As you would imagine, the range of available purchases grows considerably as you accumulate experience and graduate up the ranks of officerhood within Homefront's progression system.

You can also customise your primary weapon, its attachment, special explosives and abilities (perks) depending on your rank. While all the classes can be modified to some degree the basic setups are assault, SMG, heavy (my favourite), sniper, tactical and stealth.

Kaos is also making noises about how accessible its vehicles are ("This is not the sort of game where you spend two hours learning how to fly a helicopter," says multiplayer man Erin Daly, truthfully).

But the big change we've been invited to New York and THQ's Gamer's Week to experience is something else. It's called Battle Commander, and it's described to us as an artificial intelligence (we're going to go ahead and guess it's actually a bunch of algorithms) that watches over matches for which it is deployed and tasks individual players with specific missions that make sense to the context of the ongoing conflict.

There are shades of Splash Damage's Brink to this, and welcome ones - if a player or a group of players is doing particularly well, the Battle Commander may assign them missions based on their particular proficiency. A sniper may be told to secure another three successive kills, for example. The rewards for doing so are additional buffs and more dramatic Battle Commander objectives.

Missions are rated out of five stars. As individuals (or groups, or even specific drones) advance up the star scale the opposing team's Battle Commander takes notice and designates those individuals for specific fire missions, providing heads-up display directions to opposing players so they can try to shut down their killing sprees.

Kaos describes it as "making large-scale warfare personal" and "supporting basic revenge instincts with escalating rewards", but a simpler way to put it is that it organises combat so that nobody gets too big for their boots. Moreover, taking out people on Battle Commander missions confers a lot more Battle Points.

At first we play regular rounds of Team Deathmatch and Ground Control (a capture-and-hold mode where the frontline of combat is pushed across the map by shifting objectives based on each team's score) without the Battle Commander, and they are interesting enough.

The Cul-de-Sac map's abandoned houses, backyard swing-sets and piles of overturned family saloons make for intricate, claustrophobic killzones, while Farm's steep hills, barns and open spaces are a drone-lover's paradise.

But the introduction of Battle Commander on Suburb - an Xbox 360-exclusive map full of neat wooden houses and interesting sight-lines for snipers - alters the flow. The best intentions of team-mates at multiplayer FPS press events rarely coagulate into actual co-operation for longer than a couple of minutes, but the Battle Commander's tasking eases players naturally together as they converge on high-value targets.

Kaos' goal may simply have been to burnish instinctive FPS behaviour with structure and reward, but it also seems to encourage lone wolves to work together - not unlike Valve's celebrated AI Director in the Left 4 Dead series.

"If you're not going to bring something new to the table then why even bother?" senior level designer Rex Dickson says to us prior to our first experience with Battle Commander. His comments aren't aiming for any other FPS specifically, but in a genre where everyone politely uses slightly different names for the same systems and annual changes to rulesets are met with great fanfare, it's a nice attitude to encounter.

Battle Commander isn't as mighty an advance as THQ's grandiose introduction of it might suggest, but it, along with experience clearly drawn from Kaos' endeavours with the useful if not spectacular Frontlines: Fuel of War, suggest that Homefront multiplayer will be competitive when it hits in March.

Allied to a bold singe-player campaign heavily influenced by Half-Life 2, it could make for a game that injects much-needed new energy into a polished but increasingly homogenised modern combat genre. Sun Tzu would probably like that.

For all the latest on Homefront, check out our dedicated microsite.

Comments (23) Latest comment 1 year ago

Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • tjcrooke #1 1 year ago

    My goodness, this looks rather intriguing now doesn't it?
  • cynical #2 1 year ago

    It certainly does look interesting. I've had absolutely zero interest in this title until now... now I'll definitely give it a look.
    Edited by cynical at 21/01/11 @ 16:25
  • Dizzy #3 1 year ago

    I liked their previous game, so I will be keeping an eye on this.
  • cianchristopher #4 1 year ago

    Seems to me like THQ are a little late to the party for semi-realistic FPS games. Sure, they're super-popular at the moment, but trends change quickly, and in a year or two we could be looking at another genre dominating the marketplace.

    Call of Duty owns this part of the market, and Battlefield: Bad Company is the alternative to that. I don't see much room for a third competitor. I imagine THQ are planning the first in a series here, and that they would like to have their own "Call of Duty" in two-or-three games' time.

    Best of luck to them, but I'm not expecting too much.
  • Vortex808 #5 1 year ago

    Hmmm, this is starting to sound worthwhile. My interest is unexpectedly mounting about this game.
  • jstar #6 1 year ago

    and... how does it actually play? How does it feel? How does it control? Isn't that the point of a hands on? No, as usual on Eurogamer it is yet another opportunity to flex those literary muscles and name drop a few notable historical figures.
  • Lotos8ter #7 1 year ago

    @cianchristopher - I think THQ/KAOS have made no secret that they want some of COD's pie and Frontlines was a decent enough game. This looks very good indeed though.

    As someone who moans about Call of Duty games, then buys the yearly update only to spend months feeling very dirty, I'm extremely eager to see what the finished game will be like. Fingers crossed for an accessible yet deep FPS that actually brings something new to the table.
  • TruWari3r #8 1 year ago

    I'd just like to know if this will have any destruction like DICE's bfbc2 or none like cod.
  • Ranger101 #9 1 year ago

    Kaos describes it as "making large-scale warfare personal" and "supporting basic revenge instincts with escalating rewards"

    AWESOME. Wasn't hype about this game until I read that. This sounds amazing.

    @Truwarrior, I too would like to know this, but from the videos I've seen, it looks COD-like rather than BC2. If it did have destructible environments, it would be a Battlefield killer possibly.
    Edited by Ranger101 at 21/01/11 @ 17:07
  • Anciegher #10 1 year ago

    Yeah that was a whole lot of nothing.

    How is the gameplay?
    How are the wanky animations seen in the trailers? Have they polished it enough?
    Do objects bounce around like they are in some weird alien gravity?
    How's the controls?
    Is it actually a fun game?

    Give us some opinions or don't bother doing a hands-on!
  • byakuya83 #11 1 year ago

    Post deleted at 10:03:41 30-03-2012
  • Death-Jester #12 1 year ago

    This is another one of those games that I have managed to completely miss, only to see a review (or in this case a hands-on) and think "wow, not only does this sound right up my alley, but it's not too far from release!". Definitely add this one to my 'must watch' list.
  • Madder-Max #13 1 year ago

    sounds excellent. The very nature of Fuel of War MP is lone wolves eventually working together and this sounds like they have brought the very essence over into this game. Not so sure about the cod style points thing but will wait and see. just hope it is nothing like COD whatsoever. Really like the sound of battle commander.

    Proper battles on Fuel of War are thrilling enough (yes the hosted servers are still running) and this sounds like the thrill levels will be upped.
  • metalangel #14 1 year ago

    Frontlines: FOW had a great idea: Only make objectives along the 'frontline' capturable, to focus the fighting around several key points and minimize the tedium of some jerk who just goes driving around alone, away from the action, ganking everyone they see.

    But the world ignored it, because Call of fucking Duty was soooo much better, obviously. Then, some time later, Bad Company 2 came out, which offered much of what Frontlines did, only not as good, and people were fighting to be the first to wank across its tits, it was SO FUCKING GOOD WHY HASN'T ANYONE MADE A GAME LIKE THIS BEFORE OMG ETC

    Now we have Homefront. Will it get the love its older sibling deserved?
  • X3Entente #15 1 year ago

    reminds me of mercenaries playground of destruction
  • OrangesJoel #16 1 year ago

    The poster in which th--WAR substituted a word in a well known sa--WAR with the word WAR left me feeling pretty cynical about this title, not to mention the neo-con international warfare fantasy it embodies. Multiplayer sounds genuinely interesting from this feature though - I shall keep my eye on this.

    My only concern is that so many reward mechanics could have it turn out like Burnout: Revenge, where every three seconds it goes "HEY! Look how good you are at me! Have some stars! PLEEEASE LIKE MEEE," like a desperate hanger-on trying too hard to be accepted by some trendy indie band or other after a show. If you normalise reward too much it ceases to feel rewarding and just ends up patronising.

    Even then, though, I'm still rather more interested in what Brink has to offer for this kind of thing.
  • TheLittlestHobo #17 1 year ago

    Glad to see another dev throwing their hat in the large scale ring. Ground control sounds interesting mode. But for me, after a wall goes slack I can never go back; there needs to be destructible terrain. Imo that's the standard going forward for me in large scale FPSs. Doesn't seem like it from the vid.

    Speaking of which there should be some BF3 (Frostbite 2) news in March so let the competition commence.
  • mooseman721 #18 1 year ago

  • Badassbab #19 1 year ago

    They really wanted to make an Afghan/Iraqi resistence to US occupation game but due to political considerations couldn't so made up an unbelievable story where the US is under occupation by scary commie Koreans and you as an American 'freedom fighter' get to resist the occupation and expel the invaders. Gotta laugh.
  • SFG_Clan #20 1 year ago

    I think the ideas behind the multiplayer are interesting, but I will not be getting on the grounds that it's single-player campaign is a bunch of right-wing American fantastical bull!
    Korea would implode on itself and would be shattered from another civil war, it is completley unfeasable even on the thinnest ficitional premise that Korea would be able to invade and occupy America effectively.

    Alot of games do this now, even my beloved Battlefield Bad Company 2, but at least Russia has the theoretical manpower to invade America.
  • jtodroc #21 1 year ago

    From the videos of the single player campaign it looks very CoD, in that you sit behind some cover and wait for the enemy AI to pop its head up.

    Multiplayer, on the other hand, sounds a lot more interesting after reading this. I just hope you don't end up with with too many drones flying around spamming rockets at you non-stop.
  • carlitoswagon #22 1 year ago

    Interesting. Really hoping this lives up to the hype.
    Would have liked to hear more about the game mechanics, how movement & control feels etc etc.
    Sound good?
    Any environmental destruction?



  • maxb #23 1 year ago

    been looking forward to this for a while as i really liked fuel of war and so far it seems to be quite promising but will wait and see.