Total War: Shogun 2

Once more unto the breach.

They say it's called a revolution because over time it always comes full circle. And that saying applies perfectly the Total War series.

In 2000, Shogun: Total War came marching over the hill to change the way we look at real-time strategy gaming forever. Now, a decade on, the masterminds behind the franchise hope Shogun 2 will represent another groundbreaking milestone. Only this time, Creative Assembly is targeting a multiplayer revolution.

"In Napoleon we had a multiplayer campaign and drop-in battles for the first time," explains Ian Roxburgh, multiplayer design lead on Total War: Shogun 2.

"We've kept those and now the multiplayer campaign also includes a fully co-operative mode. You can share field of view and victory conditions with your team mate.

"We've also added a feature called Unit Sharing, so when you're attacked by the AI your ally can enter the battle with you and control some of your troops. It means both players can remain involved at all times."

1

Shogun 2 could take Total War multiplayer to a whole new level.

While this feature is a welcome addition, it's far from being Shogun 2's most standout multiplayer innovation. That accolade goes to the revamped skirmish multiplayer mode which, unlike the modes featured in previous Total War games, attempts to inject context into brutal online bloodbaths.

"What we want to do is make multiplayer feel more like the essence of Total War," Roxburgh reveals. "We want each multiplayer battle to mean something. You still choose an army and then fight someone but now there's a context to it.

"We're calling it the Avatar system. You now get to create and level-up a general unit who will stay with you for the duration of your multiplayer escapades and lead your troops into battle."

Extensive aesthetic customisation options will allow you to create a visually unique commander, and your Avatar's abilities will also be upgradable via a skill tree. Fighting battles will earn you experience that can be channelled into a number of specialist areas, including your general's ability to rally his troops or wield bows with increasing skill.

"We really want to give players a feeling of ownership over a leader character that can be customised and upgraded," says Roxburgh.

While the tried and tested way of playing multiplayer from previous Total War titles will be retained in Shogun 2, this sequel aims to transform our battles against opponents in mysterious faraway lands like Scunthorpe or Stroud into more purposeful encounters.

2

Siege warfare has the potential to be the most tactical ever.

Along with taking advantage of avatar upgrades you'll be able to bolster your troops' abilities, making them faster, stronger, deadlier and able to go longer between toilet breaks in wintry conditions. Clearly, the opportunity to mould your armies to suit your playing style has the potential to exponentially broaden the series' multiplayer appeal and longevity.

These new multiplayer battles will be orchestrated from a traditional turn-based campaign map similar to the ones we've grown to love during the series' single player experiences. It features 65 provinces and 12 naval regions across which players will form clans and fight for ownership of Japan.

Each of the provinces possesses its own tactical, economical and military advantages. Some contain specific dojos that allow you to recruit higher level troops, ensuring your army options will ultimately be decided by your battlefield prowess.

"As a member of a clan, when you capture a region, you earn points for your clan for that particular province," explains Roxburgh. "The clan with the most points owns the region and gains the benefits from it.

"We have a dynamic system that creates new gaming worlds depending on how many clans are entering. About 30 clans will fight in any one gaming world. Each 'season' will last two weeks, after which the top clans will be promoted and the bottom ones relegated."

During your journey of conquest, your general will acquire retainers: objects or individuals linked to your avatar. "As you capture certain regions you'll attain more retainers," reveals Roxburgh.

"You can also take them into a battle with you to gain an extra edge. You have a certain number of retainer slots ranging from one to five - depending on what level your avatar is - that you can take into a battle.

"One option is to send a spy to check on the enemy during the deployment stage to see where they've positioned their troops. Or maybe you use a retainer to increase the strength of your spearmen because you know the opposition will be susceptible to spear attacks. There are around 70 retainers in total."

As well as pushing Shogun's multiplayer nuances, Roxburgh was keen for me to get to grips a single-player campaign siege battle against an AI opponent. This took place on a mountainside sleek with freshly driven snow, and saw me facing off with a superior-sized aggressor attempting to take the multi-layered fortress I was defending. While bazooka-toting samurai (apparently they really did exist) pummelled my fortifications, I picked them off with arrow fire in a desperate bid to prevent them from breaking through.

The sweeping majesty of the setting made for a visually stunning encounter as the two sides exchanged missiles, though unfortunately those now all too familiar AI bugbears that have blighted the Total War series in recent years again reared their heads. The AI often seemed overly static, predictable and unresponsive. Hopefully this will be rectified before release.

The multiplayer battle I tried out was another fittingly titanic encounter as two armies faced off on opposite sides of a valley. Sitting between the two sides were a number of strategic buildings, a new feature that Roxburgh believes will make players more proactive and less defensively minded.

More on Total War: Shogun 2

"Within the multiplayer battles we've introduced the concept of key buildings. There are now key buildings on the map which if captured give you a bonus to some of your units depending on the type of units they are," he says.

"We've added this primarily to stop people from sitting on hills during battles. Now if one player sits on a hill, the other player can capture the buildings in order to counter the terrain advantage enjoyed by the player holding the high ground."

As any Total War buff knows, it's a controversial move to add such a 'gamey' feature to a strategy series that prides itself on authenticity. However, Creative Assembly's reasoning behind this new addition does make some sense.

Anyone who's spent their nights trying to outstare 5000 men on the opposite side of a level to see who'll blink first will understand the frustration that can accompany a Total War multiplayer game. Conversely, though, it's this endless cat-and-mouse-style psychological warfare which often contributes to making these skirmishes so memorable.

The addition of these key buildings certainly seemed to speed up the action as both sides attempted to gain the edge provided by capturing them. But it was impossible to tell from just one battle whether this new approach will ultimately improve the multiplayer experience or dilute it. Perhaps an option to turn bonus buildings off could be one way to safeguard against a purist backlash.

While it's hard to make any definitive judgements on the single-player campaign, or the yet-to-be-seen naval battles, it's clear that Shogun 2's revamped multiplayer features have huge potential to engage players like never before. The need to form clans in order to compete might just put some gamers off, however.

Here's hoping Creative Assembly has more to reveal by the time we've wiped the blood from our katanas, washed the sinews of our hewn enemies from our hair, mediated on our victories and had a nice cup of tea.

Comments (30) Latest comment 1 year ago

Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • CordableTuna #1 1 year ago

    "The AI often seemed overly static, predictable and unresponsive. Hopefully this will be rectified before release. "
    Yup yup. :)
  • SClaw #2 1 year ago

    This reads like the previews for the last two TW games. They always dish out these lies then promise to patch it in later when the game turns up with nothing of the sort. Oh they patched it in alright - it just barely worked though and it took them what, eight months with Empire?

    I'll buy this, no doubt, but I'll wait until a long time after release so I know for sure they aren't all mouth and no trousers.

    TW games are increasingly like Top Gear challenges. Ambitious but frequently somewhat rubbish. And often full of shit.
  • TechnoHippy #3 1 year ago

    Shogun in the Rome engine would have suited me nicely, forget multiplayer.
  • Scopeh #4 1 year ago

    Hopefully this game will actually be released in a playable state unlike the joke release of Empire-Total War. However im very scepticle of this game at the moment. Lots of promises, can they pull them off though?

    I have to admit my faith in CA/Sega took a massive hit when they released ETW in the state it was. Can i trust them..
    Edited by Scopeh at 03/12/10 @ 16:28
  • comben #5 1 year ago

    no you cant im afraid scopeh. lol. sorry but it would be foolish to think this will actually live up to expectations Here's hoping Creative Assembly actually make a game that works on release. or failing that get the AI to work after a year of patches (which they wont seemingly from what ive read), so yeah as another life long fan before empire came out, there going to have to do something absolutley fantastic to this games ai to make me even consider it tbh.

    btw folks empire IS STILL COMPLETLEY FUNKED UP, unless you like AI that fails to reactl AT ALL for 60 minutes despite having the objective of decimating your army in order to win. not to mention all the weird ass bugs that are still rife. poor show old bean.

    on the other hand we can always wait for the darth mod to make it work, a somewhat weird state of play that, but true.
    Edited by comben at 03/12/10 @ 19:34
  • hiddenranbir #6 1 year ago

    "The AI often seemed overly static, predictable and unresponsive. Hopefully this will be rectified before release."

    Maybe if they throw a few extra PhDs and more overly complex intelligences.

    Sigh.

    I'm just hoping they get the "soul", flavour and majesty that made STW the best of the bunch. Simple, robust AI, but it did feel jappywappy which was most important.
  • disusedgenius #7 1 year ago

    Any word on whether proper line of sight visibility is back (i.e. being able to hide an army over a hill, out of sight, for an ambush)?
  • Katana-Bob #8 1 year ago

    Reading this, I can't help but thinking that this is yet another game where multiplayer is given focus at the expense of single player.
  • kingmong #9 1 year ago

    I picked up empire 2 weeks ago for a tenner. great purchase now that they patched all the brokenness.

    probably do the same with this, though the japanese setting doesn't exactly blow my skirt up
  • Smerdyakov #10 1 year ago

    "bazooka-toting samurai"

    Uh-oh.

    "apparently they really did exist"

    In other words, the feudal Japanese experimented with some sort of primitive hand-held gunpowder-based projectile weapon that turned out to be utterly useless and was used only once, but will appear in the game as some ridiculously over-powered weapon that annihilates columns of men and tears fortifications asunder. *sigh*

    I wish they'd keep the fantasy units out of the TW games. It's not like there's a dearth of interesting historical units in any of the time periods they've made games in, yet they insist on adding these ridiculous units. It's gonna be head-hurlers all over again.

  • comben #11 1 year ago

    or flaming pig/ warhound armies :/
  • CouldntResist #12 1 year ago

    I remember making the comment in the Empire TW preview that AI was going to be my big bugbear and that if it wasn't up to scratch, i wasn't going to buy the game. Well the game came along and EG made the following comment:

    'AI hugely improved on both battlefield and strategic levels.'

    I bought the game and quickly realised that very little progress had been made since M2TW and in fact, there had been a regression in some areas.

    Long story short - not going to purchase this time based on reviews and definitely not going to form any opinion based on previews. Will wait a while after release and see what the general consensus from the community is.
  • makememoo #13 1 year ago

    naval battles

    Uh I'm sorry, what? In feudal Japan?
  • Xabarin #14 1 year ago

    The game will be playable at release, but some units will be completely broken and some game mechanics (diplomacy, AI behaviour) will be glitchy or faulty. Casual gamers will hail the game as the triumphant return of the series to glory, and hardcore gamers will say the game is unplayable. A day one patch will be promised, but mayor issues won't be adressed until the second patch 3 months post-release. Major drama and rage will ensue in the official forums. Fans will promise never to buy anything again from Creative Assembly. It will score highly on gaming sites and magazines.

    This is the Total War way.
    Edited by Xabarin at 03/12/10 @ 20:50
  • comben #15 1 year ago

    to be fair though Xabarin when i buy a RTS i would like the game emphasis to be on the strategy and not the real time...
  • SgtPoopy #16 1 year ago

    im feeling pretty jaded with the total war franchise, there's always something that doesnt quite work properly. They should take a leaf out of blizzard's book andrealease their games when they are ready!
  • Trafford #17 1 year ago

    I can forgive a lot of things,especially when the atmosphere is as good as TW gives.
    For once though,I think I'm going to wait for the price slash.
    The last 2 games have made my PC sweat a lot ,this one I'm sure is going to be even more of a system hog.
    Shame as it looks damn pretty.

  • Verwandlung #18 1 year ago

    Fix the laggy world map in Napoleon in the meanwhile?
  • hiddenranbir #19 1 year ago

    @couldn'tresist

    There was progression, they made it less robust by trying to be too clever with it. Apparently complex is better even though you can get the same outcomes with something simpler and more efficient.
  • The_KFD_Case #20 1 year ago

    I could care less about multiplayer. What of the single player campaign?

    P.S. I concur with Scopeh's sentiment towards Creative Assembly (and Sega). I don't trust them like I used to after "Empire: Total War".
    Edited by The_KFD_Case at 04/12/10 @ 01:59
  • Averice #21 1 year ago

    Aww, disappointing. The multi-player here read different from the other preview I read, which didn't mention clans at all. Clans to multi play? Boo. The other preview read it off as more of an achievement system full of near endless perks and simple rewards with a personal campaign map that you could conquer in your own time, the game would just find opponents for you when you selected a territory on your own map. Which sounded much better to me than this clan stuff 2 week only stuff. Oh well, good to know not to buy, thanks.
  • Kerome #22 1 year ago

    Hmm. The setting doesn't do it for me, and the gamey features don't sound like they rationalise properly. Not enough new stuff either. Distinctly underwhelmed.
  • General_Zod #23 1 year ago

    Just a question about TW:Empire, is it any good yet? I bought it in a Steam sale last year knowing that it would be broke. Have they made it playable yet?
  • comben #24 1 year ago

    zod its playable, at least you can technically finish a campaign usually. just expect lots of battles to not really be that awesome as far as the AI or strategy goes. mostly the AI just clumps units together on the strat map in seemingly random places (point in case two full stacks of prussians, chilling out a turns march away from berlin for 50 years....and staying there after i sack there capital city, plus all there territories in fact and then dissapearing due to the faction wipe out, fucking magnets how do they work) and if it doesnt it just sends 3 units to wipe out your farms while you ignore them and sack everything in europe, mostly ignoring your city that has an equal unit number etc :/

    darthmod just hit 6.5 though if you want to actually play it anywhere near where you would expect it to be by now. because vanilla just sucks tbh. im currently trying to get the campaign finished on hard achievement again..... for the 7th time ...due to it not actually triggering on the previous 6 completions. >:(

    and i still cant play as the americans even though i got them unlocked when they actually patched it enough for you to play more than 50 turns. gah!

    and the marathans are still wiping out most of europes finest, chainmail and elephants seems to be the way forward in the age of gunpowder.....wait wut?!

  • mrfrostynova #25 1 year ago

    Glad I'm not the only one who thinks the TW games are plagued with bugs and poor diplomacy.
  • urban #26 1 year ago

  • SixFootHalfling #27 1 year ago

    Last total war game I actually enjoyed was Rome, Empire wasn't doing too badly until I got 50 provinces or whatever the target was, and then had to wait 200 turns to finish the campaign, and then I discovered they hadn't bothered to make half the factions playable anyway.

    Add to that the fact that I cannot win naval battles, and it is impossible to go it alone due to the economic problems (no trade) this creates, and it ended up being my biggest disappointment of the year.

    I could care less about multiplayer.

    Couldn't care less, could implies that you do care, and is a dirty Americanism.
  • Zephro #28 1 year ago

    Only care about the AI. Nothing else.

    They should just turn over the entire team to the AI and nothing else. Though interesting to note they've been advertising the same space on the AI programming team for months now.
  • gmjapan #29 1 year ago

    "all too familiar AI bugbears that have blighted the Total War series in recent years again reared their heads"

    NoooooooO!
    Sieges in RTW were soul destroying. On the surface the game is one of the hottest titles but as you dig deeper its just exploitable rubbish.

    Edit: for SixFootHalfling - it is a dirty Americanism but theres an implied apathy "i could care less but i'm not gonna" so its not entirely as retarded as they make it sound. Shortening it kinda makes their point.

    I dont know why the f*k im explaining a statement i also hate...
    Edited by gmjapan at 06/12/10 @ 22:19
  • B1G_D #30 1 year ago

    Been playing the demo for the last two weeks now non-stop (still crazy addictive gameplay) and the AI on the historical battle is definitely an improvement, especially on the harder difficulties. It's still a little slow to respond to movements and can still be beaten by the old "run around and hit it from behind" attack.