Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood

Auditore tract.

Rome wasn't built in a day. It was built in 365. While the multiplayer component to Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood has been in development for years now, the single-player game has been pieced together in just 12 months by much the same team as built the second game. And how they've used that time. When you first step into the Roman colosseum, it's another Damascene moment. The sense of awesome scale and craftsmanship that's gone into recreating this ancient monument is comparable to the first time you rode over the crest of the hill and saw Jerusalem laid out on the horizon of the first game.

It's in ruins, of course. By Renaissance Rome the colosseum was a tourist attraction, much as it is today, the sand once stained by the blood of so many martyred Christians now overgrown with tall grass, the tiered seating worn and crumbled by time and the footfall of a hundred thousand sightseers. The result is a strange feeling of virtual tourism within tourism, as you marvel at the hustle and bustle of 16th Century Italy and marvel again at the remains of a Rome 1200 years older still visible through the cracks of the Catholic architecture now built upon it.

The year's work hasn't all been architectural, though. Brotherhood opens moments after the second game closed, implying that, for its writers, the story of Ezio Auditore da Firenze was planned in full long before Ubisoft Montreal split it into two separate games. But the game systems that the story and setting dress have been tweaked and added to in exciting, meaningful ways that run deeper than the tweaks to the combat system.

The Brotherhood of the title is more than a narrative congregation, though it is that too. At the start of the game Ezio arrives at the Villa Auditore from Florence still a young man. He has a boastful swagger, the sort of braggadocio any twenty-something who had single-handedly thwarted a circle of Templars and confronted the Pope within the Vatican itself would exhibit. Moments later, his lovemaking interrupted, his villa decimated by cannon fire, his friends and family dead and his torso sporting a deep wound, he escapes a grown man, finally understanding that a war that cannot be won singlehandedly.

In mechanical terms, this realisation translates to a kind of management metagame overlay to the now well-established Assassin's Creed template. In between chasing the story missions, clambering over architecture and killing in silence, Ezio can find and recruit assassins, men and women sympathetic to freedom's cause, who join his ranks on principle. You have up to eight slots in your assassin's guild, and can dress and equip each as you see fit. These fighters can then be called upon during the normal flow of play to, for example, stealthily take down a target you mark, or create a distraction allowing you to move through the world undetected.

You can also send your guild members off on missions around Europe, choosing tasks of suitable difficulty in order to earn experience points that, in time, level their abilities. In much the same way as, say, Final Fantasy Tactics, these guild missions have a time cost, removing your assassins from play till their mission is completed, either through victory or defeat. This management RPG component reinforces Ezio's newfound stature as a leader by giving you, the player, a sense of responsibility for your charges, inspiring pride at their victories and keen regret at their death.

For the first time, Brotherhood introduces gunpowder to the treason, plot and parkour that has defined the series so far. Ezio's villa is now kitted out with cannons, used to defend it against Borgia retribution in the game's opening moments. More than that, Ezio also carries a firearm, a pistol concealed in his sleeve that can be used to shoot soldiers from their horses, or quietly headshot targets from behind. For a game based upon the art of the blade, ballistic weaponry (later in the game there are supposedly tanks and machine guns) feels incongruous.

While the first game in the series was criticised for being environmentally rich but mechanically repetitive, Assassin's Creed II introduced a host of objectives to add variety and interest to the game's exquisite cities. Brotherhood piles on yet more interest to keep you busy. The map screams with blinking icons, each one representing a different interactive opportunity, encouraging you to recruit new assassins, capture towers to increase your influence, take on side missions and aid those in need around you.

The compelling villa management aspect to the second game has been upgraded again for Brotherhood. Now, as Borgia power weakens in Rome, you will be able to rebuild, renovate and upgrade many assets of the city. Shops, faction headquarters and the fast travel system are all subject to upgrades while rebuilding and renovating buildings within a district increases its value, bringing prosperity and wealth to the people who live there. Before you can renovate a particular part of the city, you'll need to locate the Borgia tower in the district, defeat the captain who lives there, and burn the construction down, lending the game a redemptive overlay as you combat control with freedom and work to change the lives of Rome's citizens.

Similar to the first two games, there are many modern-day interludes in which you play as Ezio's descendent Desmond who, alongside his love interest and Da Vinci Code-style team of archaeologists, traces his ancestors through modern-day Italy. By setting these sections in the same locations as those being explored by Ezio, they are more successful than they have been in the past, adding diversity and a different perspective on the closely familiar historical free-running elsewhere in the game.

That said, all of the additions are just that: add-ons that do little to alter the nature of play in the Assassin's Creed universe. Even guns haven't upset the fine, if curious, balance of the previous game. The question then is whether the fresh seasoning does enough maintain interest across a 15-hour campaign that, storyline aside, remains relatively unchanged. If not, Rome may once again fall.

Comments (25) Latest comment 2 years ago

Comments for this article are now closed, but please feel free to continue chatting on the forum!

  • udat #1 2 years ago

    It could use the same engine and same mechanics and simply offer more storyline and I would still want this. I really enjoyed ACII. The new mechanics sound very interesting, though I can imagine reloading in a huff if one of my minions that I have levelled up gets themselves killed.

    Hell, I can *still* remember being pissed off beyond belief when my top soldier in XCom was nailed by his own buddy under psionic control. Ragequit!
  • Stratix #2 2 years ago

    I thoroughly enjoyed the second one, and I'm sure I'll have a blast one this too! Hopefully the PC version's copy protection wont be quite so extreme however...

    The only people it really hindered were people like me who bought the game legitimately.
    Edited by Stratix at 19/10/10 @ 11:50
  • richarddavies #3 2 years ago

    Im getting a little overwhelmed by how many good games are coming out lately. Dead rising 2, Castlevania, Enslaved, Fallout:new vegas, Vanquish, This...... My game to bank balance ratio is well off at the minute :( Lookin forward to this though. Couldn't believe how much of an improvement 2 was to the first.
  • Skorms-Boss #4 2 years ago

    "At the start of the game Ezio arrives at the Villa Auditore from Florence still a young man. He has a boastful swagger, the sort of braggadocio any twenty-something who had single-handedly thwarted a circle of Templars and confronted the Pope within the Vatican itself would exhibit."

    Just to let you know Ezio is 40 when he defeats the pope.

    All ready preordered and I'm looking forward to this one!
    Edited by Skorms-Boss at 19/10/10 @ 12:00
  • kangarootoo #5 2 years ago

    Loved AC2. It took all the scenic greatness of AC1, and sorted out the gameplay problems. Getting this one is almost a given for me.
  • brseg #6 2 years ago

    Dont you think the reviewer sounds a touch disappointed in this preview? (esp the final paragraph).
  • Razorus #7 2 years ago

    Skorms is right, I was going to mention that.
  • tossetaz #8 2 years ago

    Sounds very promissing and the second game was fantastic!

    I'm pretty sure i'm not gonna care much for the multiplayer so I just don't hope they make any cutbacks on the single-player due to time spent on MP, this preview makes it sound like they havn't!

    Next game they need to include some kind of co-op, freeroaming parkur co-op would be wonderfully awesome!
    Edited by tossetaz at 19/10/10 @ 12:23
  • FreakyZoid #9 2 years ago

    > For the first time, Brotherhood introduces gunpowder

    You got a pistol in AC2.
  • Jonny5Alive7 #10 2 years ago

    I'm looking forwards to climbing around Rome, that part will be great I think. Have to admit I'm not too fussed about building up my guild, calling in your AI teammates always seems like a hassle in most games.
  • SteveHolt #11 2 years ago

    Opinions are fun, I'd really like to know what people find in the AC franchise - cleared both games, did everything but the collectibles, and they're the shallowest, more repetitive games I've played this gen. And the storyline is embarrassing - I mean, AC1's ending was kinda cheesy, but AC2's is completely nuts. IMO, it's really a game for tourists - seeing the nice vistas is the only highlight.

    And I'm still curious to see how a franchise that doesn't feature one single above-average gameplay mechanic could provide a good multiplayer experience.
  • kangarootoo #12 2 years ago

    @brseg

    Its pretty typical to end a preview with a tone of "all looks well, but the proof is in the pudding". It would be jumping the gun to say "all looks well".

    And also, no game is perfect - I don't expect AC:B to be any exception. There are clearly still questions hanging over it, but there are also reasons to be optimistic.
  • kangarootoo #13 2 years ago

    @SteveHolt!!!

    The tourism thing is valid, but its still a positive for me. With rubbish gfx, AC wouldn't have been the same experience, but then neither would ICO of SotC for that matter.

    Personally, I had been to Venice for the first time a few months before AC2 came out, so I was very much enjoying the tourism aspect of it. Now of course that won't work for everyone, but I'm not asking everyone to have my experience of the game, I am just asking that I enjoy my experience of any game.

    I don't hold lofty principles against these things, and I think when people start a sentence "the only reason people enjoyed it..." they seem to forget that they are saying people enjoyed it - many games can't claim that much.


    I would also dispute that the tourism was the only highlight in AC2. It had lots of other highlights besides. You seem to be saying that the story for you was a lowlight, and that is as maybe. But story isn't everything.
  • SteveHolt #14 2 years ago

    @kangarootoo: I actually enjoyed the tourism aspect (especially in AC2, they really made the most out of the Renaissance setting), except that archers are a major annoyance when you just want to enjoy the view.
  • BOBBYLUPO #15 2 years ago

    Unfortunately my enjoyment of this hinges on whether they've brought back professional man boy, Danny Wallace, with his unique brand of humour-free comedy.

    Everything else about part 2 was perfect.
  • kangarootoo #16 2 years ago

    @BOBBYLUPO

    Thgis is true. I'm sure he is a nice chap, but he can't bloody act. Someone should at least tell him that the microphone picks up that sharp intake of breath he does before EVERY SENTENCE (once you notice it, you can't undo the noticing).
  • kangarootoo #17 2 years ago

    @MattDamon

    Well fair enough. Maybe it was a little negative. I'm not sure whether it means anything. The implication seems to be that "more of the same" is a bad thing, but whether that is the case or not depends on the player I think.
  • dacicus #18 2 years ago

    Hated the first AC because of the game being repetitive. Loved the story, though. AC2 was bloody well made, offering diversity and a lot of new gameplay concepts to the series. Played and explored a lot. I was enchanted by its depiction of the italian cities (though not fully accurate, it was a Rennaissance feel in it).

    And from what I read, it looks like I'll get Brotherhood, provided that the game won't ask me to stay online, while playing the SP campaign. A Steam release, with its Steamworks protection I can swallow (barely, but I can). But UPlay from Ubi, it will add the game on the no buy list - at least on PC ( and i love PC gaming, as much as i love console gaming). If the PC version will have the same dumb Ubi protection, I'll buy it on XBox 360. And if the Ubi Protection it will be integrated on XBox 360 as well, I'll give up on the game completely (which really would be sad, as from what I gather, Brotherhood looks epic).
  • Zebula77 #19 2 years ago

    I'll be getting this. Loved both ACs and will most likely love this as well.

    But, too many great games at the moment. I'm playing PES 2011, getting Fallout New Vegas on Friday and have plans on getting both Force Unleashed 2 and Dead Rising 2.

    Not sure where I'm gonna find the money, let alone the time required to play everything.
  • coomber #20 2 years ago

    Who did Danny Wallace play?!
  • Syrette #21 2 years ago

    Game of the year tbh.
  • Thunderbolt #22 2 years ago

    Loved both games, particularly AC2's sim-lite aspect in fact I spent most of the time trying to find ways to make more money. By the end of the game I had everything and more money than I knew what to do with. I imagine in the new game they will tighten down on this aspect.

    I'm not going to pre-order this as I'm still not sold on its being a rush-job and the multiplayer doesnt interest me.
  • Rack #23 2 years ago

    "You have up to eight slots in your assassin's guild, and can dress and equip each as you see fit."

    So, Ezio and his team of 8 scantily clad hookers then?
  • Skorms-Boss #24 2 years ago


    coomber

    Danny played Shaun Hastings, a fellow assassin and hacker
  • lcrochke #25 2 years ago

    [PC] It seems a nice game, i would have bought it if it wasnt for the copy protection and the lousy (understand unexisting) Ubisoft support.
    I'll promote piracy and terrorism before giving Ubisoft another cent.