Jump to navigation
Advertisement

1942: Joint Strike Review

Xbox 360 PlayStation 3 Review by Dan Whitehead

25 July, 2008

When dealing with the legacy of the classic arcade shoot-em-ups, the terms "remake" and "sequel" are pretty much interchangeable. Sequels were really just revisions of the previous version, introducing new ideas which could then be woven into the DNA of future instalments. That's certainly the approach Capcom seems to be taking with its latest forays into the back catalogue. Technically, it's a remake but since it changes most of the elements from the original 1942, it works just as well as a modern sequel.

This, then, is most definitely a 1942 game. There's no jarring switch to full 3D (although the backgrounds now boast a lovely illusion of depth) and no attempt to over-complicate a simple recipe. In some vaguely established alternate Second World War you have a fighter plane and a sky full of bad guys to destroy. Tapping the fire button fires as normal, while holding it down charges up a more powerful shot. Your weapons can be improved by scooping up the power-up icons left behind by squadrons of red planes, offering the usual array of quad-shot, three-way or focused laser upgrades. More powerful missile attacks can be earned and stockpiled depending on how many foes you blast apart. Very rare power-ups grant you extremely destructive attacks for a few precious seconds. The signature move of the series, the loop-the-loop dodge, also doubles as a limited smart-bomb special attack, momentarily clearing the screen of enemies and bullets.

The game has been completely redesigned to take advantage of modern widescreen displays, rather than trying to cram a vertical screen template into the available space. At a time when lots of old games are getting fairly slapdash graphical makeovers in the hope of scraping some cyber-coins from Xbox Live Arcade and PlayStation Store customers, it's commendable that Capcom has actually gone to the effort of creating a new game from the old cloth, rather than following the far easier "clean 'em up and shovel 'em out" routine. That said, Xbox owners should probably be aware that their version of the game suffers from some noticeable slowdown during the more hectic moments, while the PS3 version runs at a silky smooth 60fps at all times.

'1942: Joint Strike' Screenshot 1

Boss battles involve hitting numerous target points on gigantic planes, tanks and warships. Surprise.

From Norihiko "Metal Gear" Hibino's urgent music to the bombastic wartime presentation, Joint Strike looks modern but feels classic in its construction. Level transitions send you swooping through war-torn cities in crackly sepia before bleeding back into HD colour for the action, and famous landmarks such as Big Ben explode spectacularly as you battle past them, but the game really doesn't deviate much from the timeworn vertical shoot-'em-up formula. There are lots of baddies, shooting lots of bullets, and it's up to you to find the tiny spaces in between to stay alive.

Of course, it's this point that will either guarantee your interest or send you foraging off for something else. It's a Marmite kind of genre, you love it or hate it, and Joint Strike isn't in the mood to try and win over anyone still sitting on the fence. You get a health bar, but refills are few and far between. There are no Continues so even on the easiest setting, which starts you off with a generously feline nine lives, this is a tough nut to crack. At the hardest setting, with just two lives to see you through to the end, it's strictly for the hardcore.

There's co-op play for two players, both local and online, which throws even more enemies at the screen for a truly frantic experience. Instead of the missile attacks from solo play, you can now use special Joint Strike attacks in conjunction with your companion. Each player gets to choose their own plane (from the standard selection of three) along with their preferred attack. Shot Link allows you to ricochet a powerful attack off your partner, and requires careful team timing for its effect. Clash Blast pulls up a crosshair between the two planes and destroys anything in that area. Chain Lightning is perhaps the most familiar from the gameplay videos, creating an arc of electricity between you that, with some nifty flying, can then be used to trap and kill enemies.

'1942: Joint Strike' Screenshot 2

That Chain Lightning team-up attack in full lethal effect.

That's about it for new (or new-ish) features, and the game's appeal ultimately rests on the residual affection for the original 1984 arcade machine. While the name has undoubtedly endured, it doesn't seem to be a cabinet held in terribly high esteem by aficionados. It hits all the right spots for a vertical blast, but doesn't throw in backrubs along the way.

There are certainly shoot-'em-ups out there, both classic and modern, that do more interesting things with the framework. I won't pretend that Joint Strike is the most thrilling shoot-'em-up to be revived and relaunched as a digital download, but it's a damn solid effort and if all classic arcade titles received this sort of careful updating before being shunted into our cyber-pipes the world would be a better place.

7/10

Read our Scoring Policy

Advertisement

Are you excited about 1942: Joint Strike on PlayStation 3/Xbox 360?
View Eurogamer readers most anticipated games

Thanks!

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

Comments: 1-34 of 34 in total

Poster
Comment Low-scoring comments hidden. Log in to see them!
Beano
25/07/08 @ 07:19
#1
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Bought the PSN version last night from the US Store. Plays ok but nothing spetacular. 7/10 seems a bit overrated to me.
bdaggers
25/07/08 @ 07:45
#2
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
360 version has noticeable slowdown.

+

"careful overhaul"

= WTF ?

Aretak
25/07/08 @ 07:45
#3
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"That said, Xbox owners should probably be aware that their version of the game suffers from some noticeable slowdown during the more hectic moments, while the PS3 version runs at a silky smooth 60fps at all times."

Xbox360lol?
michaelius
25/07/08 @ 07:48
#4
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Now if only they moved their lazy bottoms and add trophy support into this game.
kj66246
25/07/08 @ 07:50
#5
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Old skool... Check out that trailer :-) That takes be back a while that does.

SOLD (PSN).

Oh and nearly forgot... xbox360lol.

/that felt nice ;-)

Widge
25/07/08 @ 07:59
#6
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
OMG! THATS CELL POWER!
spammage
25/07/08 @ 08:06
#7
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
OMG PS3 rules alert. Quick, get the xbox fanbois in here........
miiiguel
25/07/08 @ 08:08
#8
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
1942 with no slowdown.... that's it, I'm getting da powa of da c3ll!

edit: on the other hand, I have to clear this EG being biased thing...
Edited 1 times, most recently on 25/07/08 @ 09:10
mcmonkeyplc
25/07/08 @ 08:13
#9
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
PS3 RULEZ!!! 360 SUCKS! ALL HAIL KAZ!
kj66246
25/07/08 @ 08:17
#10
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Nice retort lads...

Would not have expected anything less... :-)
Floppy
25/07/08 @ 08:24
#11
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
This game (and any other schmup) needs the modern equivalent of the weighty Mega-Drive Arcade Power Stick. The standard 360 controller just doesn't cut it.
degville
25/07/08 @ 08:49
#12
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Hmmm I read somewhere elese that its a bit easy and you'll fly through it in 30 mins or so? is this true?
This sort of game in the arcades of old was really tricky to finish and cost you a fortune in 10ps
DuTraveller
25/07/08 @ 08:51
#13
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Can anyone tell me any shoot-'em-ups that are better than this one??
Edited 2 times, most recently on 25/07/08 @ 09:51
Ranger101
25/07/08 @ 08:56
#14
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Technically there were like millions of sequels/reversions to 1941 - Any of you lot in London, pop down to Casino on Tottenham Crt. Rd. and they've got a few there - 20p a go!
bdaggers
25/07/08 @ 09:01
#15
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Finally !

A reason to buy a PS3.

oh, wait.

gallow
25/07/08 @ 09:05
#16
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Its a purchase for me when it gets released on PSN.
Darren
25/07/08 @ 09:07
#17
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"That said, Xbox owners should probably be aware that their version of the game suffers from some noticeable slowdown during the more hectic moments, while the PS3 version runs at a silky smooth 60fps at all times."

Wooooh... definitely waiting for the PS3 version then which I noticed was available to buy on the US PS Store but predictably NOT the European one!

*sigh*
Colin8703
25/07/08 @ 09:20
#18
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
EG, I cannot believe that this dull piece of shit scored one point less than Ikaruga which is also on XBLA.

You can't even configure the buttons on it for an arcade stick for fuck's sake.

This game is sooooooo boring.

By the way, i love these types of games.



miiiguel
25/07/08 @ 09:24
#19
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"That said, Xbox owners should probably be aware that their version of the game suffers from some noticeable slowdown during the more hectic moments, while the PS3 version runs at a silky smooth 60fps at all times."


ok... that was for the ones who didn't get the first *3* times.
It's a party, all is forgiven EG. 1942 FTW!
GamesConnoisseur
25/07/08 @ 09:51
#20
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Ah one of the rare occasion where PS3 is superior to X360, in a scrolling shooter, yup something to be proud of!!

Kidding aside, if the game has trophy as well, then that would slow down my (virtually) 100 percent habit of getting the multi platform titles on X360.

Game itself plays reasonably well and though did expect a bit more oomph for the loaded 1942 heritage.
CrunchinJelly
25/07/08 @ 11:31
#21
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Capcom in average XBLA/PSN game shocker!
BBIAJ
25/07/08 @ 11:53
#22
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Have any of you commenting on the 360 version actually played it?

I have, a lot, both in single player and online MP, and not had one instance of slowdown yet.

So Darren, I'd at least try the 360 demo and consider it first, just a thought.
Retroid [mod]
25/07/08 @ 12:05
#23
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
It's a slightly above-average shooter, nothing more. The 1942 legacy is misspent on this, just disappointing, really!

7/10.....? No way. Of all the 1942 sequels / spin-offs, this is probably the worst.
sneetch
25/07/08 @ 13:20
#24
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
@Darren
"Wooooh... definitely waiting for the PS3 version then which I noticed was available to buy on the US PS Store but predictably NOT the European one!"

Is there normally much of a delay, Darren? Dunno what PS Store is usually like.
Rev. Stuart Campbell
25/07/08 @ 13:20
#25
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"At the hardest setting, with just two lives to see you through to the end"

Which is how far away, exactly? Come on, dude, it's not asking too much of a review to tell us how many levels there are. And does every level come with one of those weird sub-games after it like in the demo, or what?
septimus
25/07/08 @ 14:01
#26
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Downloaded it last night for 360, seems okay, reminds me more of the Amiga clone Banshee than the original 1942 now. Will wait for the PS3 version I think. Rather not have slow down.
Vermillion3000
25/07/08 @ 14:18
#27
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Okay, here's the thing..

Yes the game employs the whole of your widescreen telly - which is commendable and wondrous indeed..

APART FROM THE FACT THAT IT RUINS THE WHOLE GAME!!!

These shooters live and die on time it takes to respond to incoming enemies. In a vertical scroller, the wider the screen the longer the response time. Get the screen wide enough and you can no longer actually get anywhere near a large proportion of the enemies.
1942JS does this and it spoils the game because you are constantly missing half the enemies, and in a shooter like this keeping a 100% kill rate is one of the big draws.
Check out 1941:Counter Attack on MAME - that game is set on the narrowest strip of fun you'll ever see outside the pages of Playboy and it works brilliantly because it's all about reflexes and coping with the numbers of enemies rather than spending several seconds crawling across the screen before you're even allowed to shoot something.

Have another go on Ikaruga and see how much more fun it is when you have got more or less permanent access to the enemies.

EffEmmGee
25/07/08 @ 15:12
#28
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I played this in Co-op last night on the Xbox 360 with no slowdown then later on I completed it on my own and still no evidence of slowdown.
All it takes is 1 negative comment from 1 person and everyone else takes this as truth and out comes the fanboyisms!
Why cant people find out for themselves and make their own judgment? There is a demo for this you know!
Trafford
25/07/08 @ 21:34
#29
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Online it is bugged.
+Slowdown.Still like it though.
jonarob
26/07/08 @ 11:34
#30
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I've found online to be excellent fun and lag-free. Played three good run throughs now. If you like shooters, this is definitely worth a purchase. I haven't noticed any slowdown, either (360 version).
Edited 1 times, most recently on 26/07/08 @ 12:35
ViolentReprisal
26/07/08 @ 19:20
#31
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
"the PS3 version runs at a silky smooth 60fps at all times."

I'm guessing you didn't play it at 1080p then?
jonarob
26/07/08 @ 19:41
#32
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
Oh, and it has six stages in total.
Solaris_Wave
03/08/08 @ 00:38
#33
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
I was very surprised to see the comment about frame rate slowdown. I haven't seen a drop in the frame rate once, either in single player or co-op mode. Maybe it is to do with my choice of resolution. I am running my XBox 360 at 1360x768 resolution and at 60Hz via a VGA cable. That is pretty much the ideal ratio for my LCD TV. Maybe slowdown is occurring with component or HDMI connections, seeing as resolutions available are different (to a degree)?
j,taurus
12/09/08 @ 17:07
#34
0
You buried this comment
Comment below viewing threshold
Show
if there was trophys 4 this id probably buy it. but there isnt so im not lol

Comments: 1-34 of 34 in total

Want to comment on this article? Log in, or register!

X View gallery